Thoughts on Forum navigation change I want to implement (remove Activity)


Recommended Posts

Before you all get your panties in a twist :p  I am thinking of moving all the current 'Activity' items to the 'Forum' tab position, so they are always in view.

 

Guidelines, Staff, Online Users and Subscribe can be moved to the More menu (also on the main news website).

 

This reduces the number of tabs to 5 and hopefully syncs up the main news navigation too at some point.

 

I think that having the 'activity' items always in view would be preferable than having it across as a different tab. It also gives us a better means of syncing it with the forum tab on the news site.

 

I had to mouse hover over Activity to figure out what it did, never used it.

 

I'm more likely to be going to the guidelines then anything else so if that one could stay in clearer view I'd appreciate it from my side.

  • Like 3

I only use News and Forums, so I'm not bothered with the proposed changes. I would say keep the Guidelines somewhere prominent though. That way there are no excuses from members on how "difficult" they are to find, and the result of their behaviour.

You might not like what I'm about to say, but I think you should keep the Activity tab the way it is for the sake of people who automatically move their cursor over to the Activity tab when they want to see the latest posts. Changing it would mean that the user would need to readjust to the layout, which in all honesty seems pointless for such a small change.

 

Plus, it would make the forum navigation bar look more empty, and I don't think it needs more white space. 

  On 26/05/2016 at 10:56, Danielx64 said:

Honestly when I'm here I only use one link up there, the unread content link. Also there nothing under the more tab or am I missing something?

Expand  

Honestly, I just use a book mark to bring me to the main page. Lol.

  On 26/05/2016 at 18:19, Steven P. said:

Give_That_Man_A_Cookie_meme.jpg

Expand  

Do I get one?

 

My view on the navigation:

 

  • Make Guidelines the last item under Forums (still visible, but not prominent for those who frequent the forums)
  • Move All Activity and Unread Content under Forums, but keep everything else under Activity
  • Remove Search under activity, it is redundant, we have a search bar
  On 31/05/2016 at 13:09, Gary7 said:

Nice, a tab for every section would be nice. Like Tab Mix Plus does with firefox. Have a tabbed forum......:)

Expand  

Well Software was added. Donations as well as less important items are now on the More (click menu dropdown) the idea is to make it less confusing, not cluttered. The break point to mobile/tablet appears to work still even with more items under Forum.

  On 31/05/2016 at 13:14, Steven P. said:

Well Software was added. Donations as well as less important items are now on the More (click menu dropdown) the idea is to make it less confusing, not cluttered. The break point to mobile/tablet appears to work still even with more items under Forum.

Expand  

I was not serious about a tabbed forum, but one could due that using TMP in a browser with pinned tabs. Fast Page would also work.

  On 28/05/2016 at 06:01, BinaryData said:

Dude, you wear panties? What's wrong with you. Men where undies. Sheesh!

Expand  

no no REAL men wear diddly squat ;) (under yer kilt)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I use Outlook Classic but after decades it still doesn’t support Google Calendar and Contacts properly (not a big issue for me but is for some of my clients) and doesn’t have unified mailboxes to aggrigate multiple mail accounts.
    • Lol, replacing a wav file is that difficult for a software giant? Must be one of their devs that set some permissions/restrictions on it...
    • Sure, let them keep building for "most", I'm in no rush to buy such unreliable disposable vehicles...
    • Chrome extension blocks social media until you scream "I'm a loser" by David Uzondu Social media addiction is a problem that affects millions, with studies suggesting roughly 10% of Americans are hooked and hundreds of millions more are dealing with it around the world. We have seen some creative ways to reduce their reliance on social media, like the one we reported on recently about using an $8 smart plug to physically block websites. Now, a new Chrome extension takes the concept of adding friction to a completely new level of personal humiliation. The extension, called Scream to Unlock, was created by developer Pankaj Tanwar. He made a Show HN post on Hacker News today explaining that regular site blockers were just not annoying enough to work for him. His solution forces you to enable your microphone and screech "I'm a loser" to get access to sites like X, Facebook, and Instagram. The louder you yell, the more time the extension grants you. Once you install it, trying to visit a blocked site brings up a stark "Access Restricted" message. You are then prompted to perform your self-deprecating chant. After you give in and yell the phrase, the extension grants you access for a set amount of time. The concept is built on you being too embarrassed to yell. And boy, you have to be loud to please it. If your scream's volume is under 30, the extension mocks you with, "You sound like a mouse!". Getting above that might earn you a "Not bad, but you can do better!", while a truly powerful yell (100% volume and above) gets you an "AMAZING! That was an epic scream!". During my own test, I yelled the phrase at what felt like a respectable volume, only to get the mouse treatment. It granted me a measly 23 seconds on X. So if you are interested in this extension, for God's sake, do not try it in an office. Your coworkers will probably think you have finally lost it and are performing some bizarre humiliation ritual at your desk. The Chrome extension's description on the Chrome Web Store claims that all audio processing happens locally and no data is collected. That is not entirely true. Digging into the code, Neowin noticed that it uses window.SpeechRecognition to handle speech recognition. In Chrome, this API sends your voice data to Google's servers for processing. So while Tanwar himself might not be collecting your data, you should be aware of Google's involvement.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      solidox earned a badge
      First Post
    • First Post
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Year In
      blissa jayden earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      blissa jayden earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      blissa jayden earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      575
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      216
    3. 3
      +FloatingFatMan
      170
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      152
    5. 5
      Som
      151
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!