Recommended Posts

b0se DMX 2.1

I never liked visual styles, thought they were resource hogs and unusable because they decrease productivity due to the many annoying render glitches and bugs, espically in windows blind.

Until I tried b0se DMX 2.1. In my opinion, this is his best work period. It's beautiful. There are other themes from b0se that are pretty good, but there's always something I don't like about them. DMX2.1 is flawless. It's fast and easy on the eyes. I liked it so much that it became my perminent VS. I even made a wallpaper template to match the theme. I also found a Y'Z toolbar icon set to go with it. And made skins for other apps to match the DMX2.1 look, including a modified samurize script from stevofc. Take a look:

post-34-1073898623.jpg

Edited by mayamaniac

In the month I've been looking into this VS world, I think there's no VS Maker that can reach the creativity of some WindowBlinds skinmakers. There are just so many WindowBlinds skins that should be ported into VS! I'm not using WB just to not get my system screwed up (which would be very unprobable though).

I would love that you VS themers could listen to the crowd and port a lot fo WB skins ^_^

My first WinXP Change Look was: Nightshades by Lightstar (ThemeXP.org)

Here is my list of the Style I use... (more than others)

1. Nightshades by Lightstar - No Desktop Picture

8652.jpg

2. Good Day XP by MetalMax

s12536.jpg

Picture of mydesktop with this style: Wincustomize.com - Good Day XP - Angelina Jolie

3. LaST (Cobalt) by Paul Boyer / Mormegil

Check it at Wincustomize.com - LaST (Cobalt)

4. Christhmas Time by Paul Boyer / Mormegil

Check it at Wincustomize.com - Christmas Time

5. ChaNinja by ??? - No Desktop Picture

Check it at Wincustomize.com - ChaNinja

6. iGlass 2 by 00Zero Cool (I use this now) - No Desktop Picture Yet

Check it at Wincustomize.com - iGlass 2

Thats it...I have tried many more, but I love this!

  • 2 years later...
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I've been using MWB Premium for a number of years so that along with Windows updates and updated browser should be fine. Thanks for that.
    • For some reason I suddenly have the urge to go shopping at Sears.
    • So I did a quick test based on 3+ different public instances from the litany at searx.space ... and it spins everything rather differently. It seems that SearXNG is a meta-search engine (queries multiple search indexes rather than only Google's or Bing's or Wikipedia's or Reddit's) that operates in two modes: > public instances ... each instance opens itself to outside users who piggyback on its cached search history; this instance's own identity becomes known/tracked but end-users are hidden similar to an anonymization proxy; this instance's querying of major search indexes may be API based [rated limited, blocked, etc.]). > private instances ... your private install/instance that itself queries multiple (configurable) search indexes of crawled web content; every major Search Engine associates all traffic to your private instance (so your traffic is tracked via network usages) but client-side tracking (your own browser/computer specs) is flushed because it's a "server" doing the querying rather than your browser. My test asked the same 1 question to the 3+ engines and they all returned vastly different results: some had CAPTCHA failures against Google, some had failures against Wikipedia, and the actual results were also different -- some had auto-complete enabled, others returned a wikipedia highlighted excerpt despite the Wikipedia failure (hinting at results being cached from previous keyword matching), and others just gave an Are-You-Human non-CAPTCHA loop before returning random results. So this begs the caveat: Search query results will vary based on which instance is used because every instance queries the other search indexes separate (and thus its results are influenced on that instance's aggregate search history and index-access limitations). The major distinctions for SearXNG versus DDG or Brave: > The search UI is 'untracked' since no UI trackers are baked-in which would phone home or lay cookies into your browser (for DDG/Brave usage stats), > There is no 'crawler' that canvasses the Internet to discover fresh content (it leaves that to the major search indexes), > Queries multiple search indexes ("meta-search engine") based on the configurations and usage history of the server instance, > Privacy-friendly due to its ability to shield user tracking via standing up a non-local server instance connectable to major VPN providers: queries would all appear to come from general VPN/Proxy providers rather than your private instance (whether installed locally or on your own VPS in the cloud). PS: I've previously come across specialized search engines of this nature that indexes searches across media assets like YT, OF, etc. SearXNG seems to be a good backbone...if the rate-limiting/captcha/etc. issues were resolved.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      490
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      225
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!