Recommended Posts

The news has hit that RDR is finally being added to the Xbox One backward compatibility list, something fans have been asking for quite some time now.   The news that it's going to happen this Friday has sparked a buying boost on Amazon it seems, it's sales have jumped almost 6,000%.   This just shows that hit games from the 360 being added to the BC list can bring new life to them and sell more copies.

 

Currently, Red Dead Redemption's Game of the Year Edition (which includes all of the downloadable content) is the No. 26 seller in Amazon's video games category. So what? Well, its old position was 1,544.

 

http://www.polygon.com/2016/7/6/12106074/red-dead-redemptions-backward-compatibility-news-jolts-sales-almost

  • Like 3
14 minutes ago, Andrew said:

6000% is related to the rank, not the sales just FYI.

I went with what the source was called it in their headline.   You're such a nitpicker. :p

  • Like 1

This thread would be a lot busier if the people always hating on the 360 arcade releases showed some love for the AAA releases. Still been getting some Black Ops 2 time in lately myself :laugh:

 

Ranking in at the 2nd highest video game on Amazon right now up to 11, only under Monster Hunters for the DS that releases in a week.

 

Glad I've never gotten rid of a physical game in my life, so no need to repurchase here.

top.jpg

Anyone else have this loaded yet?

 

Seems to be playing better than it ever did on the 360 which is amazing, Hopefully Scorpio and Microsoft push ahead with emulation wizardry for OG xbox compatibility with the Scorpio and One, replaying my entire game collection any time I want on the one console is what I want more of in the future (Y)

 

Don't know how much time I'll get to invest in this with the backlog I have at the moment but multiplayer is crawling with people for those who want to jump on.

Digital Foundry's video suggests a more stable 30fps (low 20s in some places on 360) play and some reduced screen tearing.

 

What magic to bring a six year old game up to barely playable standards on "modern" hardware.

  • Like 1
2 hours ago, compl3x said:

Digital Foundry's video suggests a more stable 30fps (low 20s in some places on 360) play and some reduced screen tearing.

 

What magic to bring a six year old game up to barely playable standards on "modern" hardware.

If only emulation was equivalent to the power of the machine, I agree and found it totally outrageous that I had to redownload the entire game why wouldn't it just work off the disc with all that dam power?!

5 hours ago, Vandalsquad said:

If only emulation was equivalent to the power of the machine, I agree and found it totally outrageous that I had to redownload the entire game why wouldn't it just work off the disc with all that dam power?!

It makes me wonder if all this BC stuff is even worth it. It's not a bad thing to have but I am pretty "meh"about it.

  • Like 1
10 hours ago, Vandalsquad said:

If only emulation was equivalent to the power of the machine, I agree and found it totally outrageous that I had to redownload the entire game why wouldn't it just work off the disc with all that dam power?!

Because of the nature of the BC system they're using, all the BC games added are self contained packages with the game code and custom app-v bits needed to run the game.   There isn't some single emulator installed on the XB1 that just loads up some rom/disc and plays, it's not doing it in the traditional way people think.

 

The only possible way to "just work off the disc" is if they actually put 360 hardware inside the XB1, which makes no financial sense, Sony tried it and ditched the idea quick with the PS3 having PS2 hardware inside.

  • Like 1
12 hours ago, compl3x said:

Digital Foundry's video suggests a more stable 30fps (low 20s in some places on 360) play and some reduced screen tearing.

 

What magic to bring a six year old game up to barely playable standards on "modern" hardware.

No different from playing a 6 year old game on your modern hardware PC and having it run just the same as it did 6 years ago but with a smoother frame rate.

3 minutes ago, George P said:

Because of the nature of the BC system they're using, all the BC games added are self contained packages with the game code and custom app-v bits needed to run the game.   There isn't some single emulator installed on the XB1 that just loads up some rom/disc and plays, it's not doing it in the traditional way people think.

 

The only possible way to "just work off the disc" is if they actually put 360 hardware inside the XB1, which makes no financial sense, Sony tried it and ditched the idea quick with the PS3 having PS2 hardware inside.

It didn't bring any real cost saving of bringing down the PS3 cost by removing the hardware, PS2 games we're competing too well, and Sony wanted to push PS3 games. 

Just now, Eternal Tempest said:

It didn't bring any real cost saving of bringing down the PS3 cost, PS2 games we're competing too well, and Sony wanted to push PS3 games. 

It didn't bring cost savings right away because Sony was still making and still had PS2 emotion engines to use, but the longer it went on and the harder it gets to make older hardware the costs become an issue, that's why we get hardware revisions in the first place.  At some point making those emotion engines for the PS3 would become a cost issue, and not to mention get in the way of their plans to slim down the thing, let's not forget how huge the original PS3 was.

 

11 hours ago, compl3x said:

It makes me wonder if all this BC stuff is even worth it. It's not a bad thing to have but I am pretty "meh"about it.

 

6 hours ago, George P said:

Because of the nature of the BC system they're using, all the BC games added are self contained packages with the game code and custom app-v bits needed to run the game.   There isn't some single emulator installed on the XB1 that just loads up some rom/disc and plays, it's not doing it in the traditional way people think.

 

The only possible way to "just work off the disc" is if they actually put 360 hardware inside the XB1, which makes no financial sense, Sony tried it and ditched the idea quick with the PS3 having PS2 hardware inside.

Really should of put /sarcasm at the end of that sorry guys thought that tounge in cheek was obvious maybe only to me :p

14 hours ago, George P said:

No different from playing a 6 year old game on your modern hardware PC and having it run just the same as it did 6 years ago but with a smoother frame rate.

Drastically different considering you can usually mod those games and they have more inbuilt options to mess with.

 

I used to be a strong supporter of BC, but now I wonder if it is worth the effort. Especially if any resources are being siphoned off to make it possible.

 

 

52 minutes ago, compl3x said:

Drastically different considering you can usually mod those games and they have more inbuilt options to mess with.

 

I used to be a strong supporter of BC, but now I wonder if it is worth the effort. Especially if any resources are being siphoned off to make it possible.

 

 

Not every game has a moding system built in, and even fewer people mess with mods, besides, that's like moving the goal posts now.  In most cases you'll run that older game smoother, it won't look vastly different and if you are waiting for mods to make it look better then that's a whole different subject outside of BC.    BC just means the old stuff runs, like it did, without needing to change any code, moding is changing code, apples to oranges. 

2 hours ago, George P said:

Not every game has a moding system built in, and even fewer people mess with mods, besides, that's like moving the goal posts now.  In most cases you'll run that older game smoother, it won't look vastly different and if you are waiting for mods to make it look better then that's a whole different subject outside of BC.    BC just means the old stuff runs, like it did, without needing to change any code, moding is changing code, apples to oranges. 

 

Fair enough. I guess I cannot get as excited about a game I finished 6 years ago being made 're-available' on modern consoles. A HD upgrade would have been nicer but I guess that isn't really R* thing.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Bluesky COO warns social media regulations could destroy competition from small startups by Paul Hill Fears that increasing government control of social media risks regulatory capture by the biggest social media firms were raised again recently. Bluesky’s chief operating officer said in an interview that social media bans for children and tighter regulations for social media firms risk creating a world where there are only a few social media platforms run by companies with the deepest pockets. Regulations on social media firms have been very lax since they appeared for mainstream users in the 2000’s. This gave Meta, Snapchat, and Google time to build up their user bases and get entrenched, with Meta being the most successful. Now that Meta has succeeded, it has been attempting regulatory capture. By pushing for more regulations of social media, Meta hopes to make it more difficult for rivals to challenge it. For its part, it doesn’t need to worry about the cost of regulation because it has a lot of money to spend, whereas startups do not. Speaking to CNBC, Rose Wang, Bluesky’s chief operating officer, said: “I support the protection and the safety of youth, the question that we have then is at what cost, because essentially what I’m scared of is in the long term, we’re headed to a world where there’s about three to five platforms, and extreme heavy regulation of those platforms, and basically the whole compliance teams of these platforms are 10 times the size of our entire team. So, basically, we’re living in a world where it’s almost impossible for smaller entrants to come in and build healthier spaces. These platforms have led to a place where the bottom line is the thing that drives what they do... so I understand why governments have to step in and regulate, because the platforms have done nothing right.” She said that while she is not against regulation, there needs to be more channels between the small to mid-sized players and regulators to help protect them. She says that big tech players, on the other hand, “who we know are circumventing regulation,” need to be regulated. Essentially, the Bluesky position is one of nuance, rather than absolutes. While Bluesky’s proposal may preserve competition in the social media space, it still doesn’t address the massive privacy implications these age verification measures introduce, such as handing over sensitive identity documents to access age-gated content. Source: CNBC
    • it dosnt support onprem exchange. it dosnt support mapi-calls. the views are all worse/limited. its slower. it cant see public folder calendars. we already have webmail. the list of other missing features is pretty huge but i only see it when customers call to say their email isnt working, and 9/10 times its cause they accidentality changed to outlooknew(new). Hold the line everyone!
    • yeah, this looks beautiful. Damn this winter's going to be great.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      249
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      71
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      70
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!