Recommended Posts

This explains a few things. They subbed for Vencore on SpaceX, ULA and a lot of other projects. Presumably other subs will need to be found.

 

The OIG noted safety issues, missed completion dates, cost overruns etc.

 

http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/space/os-nasa-oig-agents-raid-sbd-construction-contractor-20160707-story.html

 

Quote

Federal agents raid NASA construction contractor

 


Federal agents raided the Titusville office of a NASA construction contractor on Thursday, according to Orlando Sentinel news partner Fox35.

Investigators with NASA's Office of Inspector General, the agency in charge of probing crimes against NASA, removed boxes of documents and computer towers from SDB Engineering and Constructors Inc., according to Fox35.

The company located on East Parrish Road has worked on several big projects at NASA's Kennedy Space Center including upgrades to the Vehicle Assembly Building and corrosion control work at Launch Complex 41 and Launch Complex 37, used for United Launch Alliance launches.

SDB Engineering and Constructors Inc. has contracts with the U.S. Air Force, SpaceX, ULA, and previously United Space Alliance, before the Space Coast company closed in 2014, according to the SDB Inc. website.

SDB Inc. is a subcontractor for multiple companies including engineering company Vencore, audited by NASA OIG in 2016.

Vencore has a $1.9 billion overall contract with NASA's Kennedy Space Center.

The audit of Vencore was initiated because of concerns over NASA's ability to "to motivate contractor performance and improve acquisition outcomes," according to the 2016 report.

The Orlando Sentinel was unable to reach NASA OIG for comment on the ongoing investigation and calls to SDB Engineering and Constructors Inc. went unanswered.

 

  • Like 1
23 minutes ago, DocM said:

This explains a few things. They subbed for Vencore on SpaceX, ULA and a lot of other projects. Presumably other subs will need to be found.

 

The OIG noted safety issues, missed completion dates, cost overruns etc.

 

http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/space/os-nasa-oig-agents-raid-sbd-construction-contractor-20160707-story.html

 

"to motivate contractor performance and improve acquisition outcomes"

 

That seems to be very common with regards to contractor work for our government.  It sucks.  I saw it throughout my career.  It'll cost x amount of dollars for the equipment, y amount for the installation ... and then the contractors drag their feet....come up with some excuse or find a loophole in the contract...and add additional cost/time on top of the agreement.  You're left with having to pay the additional cost/delaying operations because of them and/or the contract.

Why are cost overruns permitted?  In the real world, once you have a written quote on something, that's the price you pay, end of story.  If their costs have gone up since quoting, that's THEIR problem, not yours!

 

  • Like 3

Because that's how many govt procurements work; they get to cover increased post-contract "costs" - aka Cost Plus. How else do you explain $500 hammers and $1200 toilet seats? $36B rockets? $12B spacecraft w/only 4 seats?

 

 

3 minutes ago, DocM said:

Because that's how many govt procurements work; they get to cover increased post-contract "costs" - aka Cost Plus. How else do you explain $500 hammers and $1200 toilet seats? $36B rockets? $12B spacecraft w/only 4 seats?

 

 

Our government does not work the way it should. FFman is absolutely correct.

  • Like 2
1 hour ago, DocM said:

Because that's how many govt procurements work; they get to cover increased post-contract "costs" - aka Cost Plus. How else do you explain $500 hammers and $1200 toilet seats? $36B rockets? $12B spacecraft w/only 4 seats?

The whole corrupt lot of 'em need shoving out of the nearest airlock.  I swear, if it were left to the US gov, we'll never get to Mars...

 

4 minutes ago, FloatingFatMan said:

The whole corrupt lot of 'em need shoving out of the nearest airlock.  I swear, if it were left to the US gov, we'll never get to Mars...

 

NASA never should have been outsourced. We did get to the moon..:)

On 7/24/2016 at 11:16 AM, jjkusaf said:

"to motivate contractor performance and improve acquisition outcomes"

 

That seems to be very common with regards to contractor work for our government.  It sucks.  I saw it throughout my career.  It'll cost x amount of dollars for the equipment, y amount for the installation ... and then the contractors drag their feet....come up with some excuse or find a loophole in the contract...and add additional cost/time on top of the agreement.  You're left with having to pay the additional cost/delaying operations because of them and/or the contract.

WFA in procurement (all procurement - it's not unique to military, space, or even national-government procurement) is an ongoing problem - it gets even worse when it links to elections - and it often does, even at the subcontractor level.  (How much are contributions in LOCAL elections connected to subcontractors - even in Florida?  It has indeed become an issue in local elections merely in the DC area - consider that both corruption cases involving different former Virginia governors involve contractors or subconctractors.)

Not space related, but even after half of Detroit's major officers were sent to federal prison (the mayor got 27 years) the new mayors office is already in trouble over blight demolition contracts - kickbacks etc. and costs rising 25% a year or more. FBI investigation, probably a Grand Jury investigation etc.

 

They never learn, and at the federal level it's baked in.

  • Like 1
4 minutes ago, DocM said:

Not space related, but even after half of Detroit's major officers were sent to federal prison (the mayor got 27 years) the new mayors office is already in trouble over blight demolition contracts - kickbacks etc. and costs rising 25% a year or more. FBI investigation, probably a Grand Jury investigation etc.

 

They never learn, and at the federal level it's baked in.

Not news, DocM - it predates Watergate at the very least.  (The FBI gets involved because the national government is one of the sources for the funds via various trusts - especially the Transportation and Transit Trust Fund - which is covered by fuels taxes.)

  • Like 2

Oh yeah ... and because of DOD Regulations for procurement, development, and manufacturing for Mil, Gov, Uni and Sci Projects (and anything important marked for Civ use) all designs, components and personnel must be sourced from within the U.S. and employ U.S. Companies -- and generally if that work has anything to do with Mil, Gov, or Sci Classification then it'll charge extra "Premiums" on top of costing more since we probably don't make some of those components here anymore; so they'll need to build the facilities necessary to build the subcomponents to build the components ... (thanks to President Bush in '89 & Clinton in '93).

 

Systemic, convoluted cycles of greed and mismanagement on top of more greed and mismanagement run by barely competent people whose only goal is to occupy their time with spending money that they really aren't accountable for ... yeah, it's a [poop]show. Welcome to the great monolithic industrial machine that builds nothing on-time or on-budget anymore, because it can't. Pretty much like Microsoft, now -- a big, convoluted mess that doesn't know what it's supposed to be doing; and even when it tries it still isn't doing a very good job of it nor in a timely fashion.

26 minutes ago, Unobscured Vision said:

Oh yeah ... and because of DOD Regulations for procurement, development, and manufacturing for Mil, Gov, Uni and Sci Projects (and anything important marked for Civ use) all designs, components and personnel must be sourced from within the U.S. and employ U.S. Companies -- and generally if that work has anything to do with Mil, Gov, or Sci Classification then it'll charge extra "Premiums" on top of costing more since we probably don't make some of those components here anymore; so they'll need to build the facilities necessary to build the subcomponents to build the components ... (thanks to President Bush in '89 & Clinton in '93).

 

Systemic, convoluted cycles of greed and mismanagement on top of more greed and mismanagement run by barely competent people whose only goal is to occupy their time with spending money that they really aren't accountable for ... yeah, it's a [poop]show. Welcome to the great monolithic industrial machine that builds nothing on-time or on-budget anymore, because it can't. Pretty much like Microsoft, now -- a big, convoluted mess that doesn't know what it's supposed to be doing; and even when it tries it still isn't doing a very good job of it nor in a timely fashion.

hmmm....really?  Not doubting you ... but all of the systems we used were foreign.  For example we used a Belgium company (AGFA) for the Picture Archiving and Communications System (actually that is Air Force wide) ... and two of the radiology rooms were also AGFA with a Switzerland company being the third radiology room (SwissRay). :)  We had Toshiba for CT and Ultrasound.  In fact we couldn't upgrade to GE equipment because they hadn't been vetted through the appropriate IT security (the DIACAP monster if you're familiar) so they weren't authorized for purchase.

 

Of course...this was medical ... so it may be different than the "real" DoD and probably had some sort of waiver or whatever for the DoD regulation you mentioned. :)

 

  • Like 1
13 hours ago, jjkusaf said:

hmmm....really?  Not doubting you ... but all of the systems we used were foreign.  For example we used a Belgium company (AGFA) for the Picture Archiving and Communications System (actually that is Air Force wide) ... and two of the radiology rooms were also AGFA with a Switzerland company being the third radiology room (SwissRay). :)  We had Toshiba for CT and Ultrasound.  In fact we couldn't upgrade to GE equipment because they hadn't been vetted through the appropriate IT security (the DIACAP monster if you're familiar) so they weren't authorized for purchase.

 

Of course...this was medical ... so it may be different than the "real" DoD and probably had some sort of waiver or whatever for the DoD regulation you mentioned. :)

 

Right. That equipment fell under a certain GL Code, so it was fine.

13 hours ago, jjkusaf said:

hmmm....really?  Not doubting you ... but all of the systems we used were foreign.  For example we used a Belgium company (AGFA) for the Picture Archiving and Communications System (actually that is Air Force wide) ... and two of the radiology rooms were also AGFA with a Switzerland company being the third radiology room (SwissRay). :)  We had Toshiba for CT and Ultrasound.  In fact we couldn't upgrade to GE equipment because they hadn't been vetted through the appropriate IT security (the DIACAP monster if you're familiar) so they weren't authorized for purchase.

 

Of course...this was medical ... so it may be different than the "real" DoD and probably had some sort of waiver or whatever for the DoD regulation you mentioned. :)

 

jkusaf - there are also cases of Congressional "meddling" involving contracts for a specific agency (due to the contracting agency in question being in the district of a powerful Member of Congress - consider my own Fifth Congressional District (Maryland) and the military agencies in it (from Joint Forces Base Andrews to ONI (which is subject to DIACAP - which you just mentioned); not even DIACAP has roadblocked procurement WFA all that well)).  In short, I'm not saying that such WFA happens despite the waivers - instead, I am saying that the WFA happens due to the waivers.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Waymo recalls self-driving software after cars enter closed freeway work zones by Paul Hill Waymo, the self-driving car maker owned by Alphabet – the parent company of Google –, has recalled some of its fifth-generation Automated Driving Systems (ADS). It did so after some of its cars drove through closed construction zones. According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), the affected vehicles were capable of driving through a closed freeway construction zone and continuing to drive at speed. The listing on the NHTSA website says that Waymo is currently developing a solution to fix this issue, but in the meantime, freeway driving is being restricted. Waymo will update its ADS software so that vehicles can detect when they can avoid entering construction zones. According to the Safety Recall Report, on April 20, 2026, Waymo’s Field Safety Committee began meetings reviewing an event from April 11, 2026, and five events from April 19, 2026, where Waymo’s autonomous vehicles didn’t recognize and drove past ramp closure signs into the pre-planned freeway construction zones. This took place in Phoenix, Arizona. Separately, on May 18, 2026, seven Waymo vehicles entered freeway lanes with active construction in the San Francisco Bay Area by driving between cones that were placed to show the lane was closed. On the back of both of these events, Waymo restricted freeway driving until it could address the issue. In June, Waymo’s Safety Board reviewed the issue and additional information related to ADS performances around construction zones; then, as a result, it decided to conduct a recall. This development is not good for Waymo as it adds to a growing list of technical hiccups its cars have experienced. Ultimately, it will lead to more scrutiny from lawmakers around the world who will be more cautious about letting autonomous vehicles on their roads without tighter regulation. For readers in areas where Waymo operates, does this news make you more wary about stepping into one of these vehicles?
    • I'm still on Windows 10 22H2 because I didn't want to deal with all the issues in Windows 11, so I waited almost a week before installing the latest Patch Tuesday update (KB5094127), I went ahead and did it, and it was a huge mistake—ever since then, my File Explorer has seen a performance drop of about 30% when transferring large files... Once again, Microsoft has outdone itself! This update cannot be uninstalled, either through the Control Panel (via Settings) or by accessing Advanced Startup Options. The only possible alternative would be to use system restore points, but I’d have to reinstall all app and driver updates (and there’s no guarantee it would work). Or there’s the “nuclear option” of a in-place repair without losing files or apps, but even then, all my customizations would be lost! Microsoft just can’t help but mess everything up! Way to go, Microsoft! But I still don’t want your c****y Windows 11!
    • Microsoft: Windows 11 could finally solve a major issue across AMD, Nvidia, and Intel GPUs by Sayan Sen While Microsoft has been trying to improve it, Windows 11 is definitely not flawless, as even today some issues are taking a year to publicly acknowledge. However, one area of trouble that may finally see much better results soon is graphics driver crashes. Work on graphics driver timeouts, also called Timeout and Detection Recovery (TDR), is not new as the latest WDDM 3.2 also has specific improvements regarding it. Windows Display Driver Model (WDDM) version 3.2 is supported on Windows 11 24H2 and 25H2. However, with the upcoming version 26H2, TDR crash diagnosis could go to the next level as Microsoft is introducing a new DirectX 12 API feature called "DirectX Dump Files". Similar to how system memory dump files work when a system crashes or freezes or encounters any such major issue, DirectX Dump Files (DDF) will essentially record a snapshot of the GPU execution right at the moment a graphics-related crash or hang or freeze occurs, so that developers can better understand and diagnoze these TDR and timeout detection errors. The dump will be available as a .dxdmp file for analysis and it will be a comprehensive dump file generated with detailed insights about the hardware, drivers, Windows, as well as the affected application. This should be another welcome change in this department. Earlier at GDC 2026, when the technology was first debuted, Microsoft had shared more details regarding it. The company had explained how DDF is designed to gather data from every layer of the graphics stack into a single file, eliminating the need for developers to manually correlate logs from multiple tools. As mentioned above, the dump can contain a lot of useful details like GPU hardware state information such as register values, shader program counters, page fault virtual addresses, shader memory data, and command buffers. Alongside that, it also captures DirectX runtime and kernel information, including D3D objects, pipeline state objects, device error data, adapter details, and CPU call stacks. Microsoft says the feature has been built around two primary use cases: retail device removals and local device removals. The former allows developers to collect crash information from end users' systems in the field, while the latter helps QA teams and developers investigate issues on test machines. Developers will also be able to include up to 2 MB of custom application data through new D3D12 APIs, providing additional context for troubleshooting. In addition, Microsoft is introducing three dump collection modes ranging from zero-overhead capture, which has no runtime performance impact on supported hardware, to higher-detail modes that collect more vendor-specific debugging data. On compatible Tier 2 hardware, zero-overhead dumps will be enabled by default, meaning developers may begin receiving useful crash diagnostics without making any code changes. The table below explains the three tiers: Tier Description NO_OVERHEAD Enables crash capture with no runtime cost and is suitable for broad deployment MEDIUM_OVERHEAD Provides a balance, capturing additional diagnostic data with moderate impact HIGH_OVERHEAD Collects the most detailed GPU and driver state available, enabling deeper investigation at the cost of higher runtime overhead In terms of availability, the company expects broader release to be around the fall of 2026, which should be right around the time when Windows 11 version 26H2 lands. Right now, DirectX Dump Files are available as a preview and currently, only AMD has the compatible AgilitySDK Developer Preview driver version 26.10.07.02. You can find the official announcement post here on Microsoft's website.
    • And with SO much better perf than the laggy mess that is Files.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      BizSAR earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Jordan Smith earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      598
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      190
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      80
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      76
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!