Recommended Posts

If it occurred at SF-8 min it can't have been fully fueled and pressurized. 

 

The discussion is moving to a problem in the strongback RP-1 line, umbilical, the connector or a strongback hydraulic line. A leak in any can result in a hydrocarbon  aerosol. Added to the GOX boiloff and you have a fuel-air explosive looking for an excuse to go boom.

 

Also,

 

China lost a rocket this week so they'll be investigating.

Proton is standing down to investigate an S2 anomaly

Arians 5 is booked through 2017

Also, ex-NASA and now SpaceX uber-engineer John Muratore is lead for prepping 39A. No doubt he'll be up to his elbows on LC-40 rehab.

 

SpaceX investigation updates....

 

Quote

>
Overview of the incident:

- Yesterday, at SpaceX's Launch Complex 40 at Cape Canaveral Air Force Station, an anomaly took place about eight minutes in advance of a scheduled test firing of a Falcon 9 rocket.

- The anomaly on the pad resulted in the loss of the vehicle.

- This was part of a standard pre-launch static fire to demonstrate the health of the vehicle prior to an eventual launch. 

- At the time of the loss, the launch vehicle was vertical and in the process of being fueled for the test.  At this time, the data indicates the anomaly originated around the upper stage liquid oxygen tank.  Per standard operating procedure, all personnel were clear of the pad.  There were no injuries.

To identify the root cause of the anomaly, SpaceX began its investigation immediately after the loss, consistent with accident investigation plans prepared for such a contingency.  These plans include the preservation of all possible evidence and the assembly of an Accident Investigation Team, with oversight by the Federal Aviation Administration and participation by NASA, the United States Air Force and other industry experts.  We are currently in the early process of reviewing approximately 3000 channels of telemetry and video data covering a time period of just 35-55 milliseconds. 

As for the Launch Pad itself, our teams are now investigating the status of SLC-40.  The pad clearly incurred damage, but the scope has yet to be fully determined.  We will share more data as it becomes available.
>

 

Moving to LC-39A

 

Link....

 

Quote

>
With its launch pad likely facing major repairs, SpaceX said it would use a second Florida site, called 39A, which is located a few miles north at NASAs Kennedy Space Center and was used for space shuttle missions.

The pad is on schedule to be operational in November, SpaceX said. The company had planned to use the pad for the first time later this year for a test flight of its new Falcon Heavy rocket.
>

  • Like 2

Any word on why the payload was attached?  Is that (or was that) normal SOP?  I understand test firings ... though I'm curious why test firings occur with the payload in case something like this happens.

 

Also...is it normal SOP for the upper stage to be loaded with fuel for the first stage test?  Just seems like a lot of loading/unloading of propellent (regarding the upper stage).  But...what do I know...I'm medical. :) 

  • Like 1

~12 days from WTF? to scheduling RTF...that was quick.

 

@pbdes (Space News)
SpaceX President Shotwell: We anticipate return to flight in November, meaning down for three months. Next flight from CCAFS, then to VAFB.

 

@pbdes (Space News)
SpaceX's Shotwell: We have been told that the Sept. 1 anomaly will not affect Falcon 9's insurance rates. So we expect no impact.

 

@pbdes (Space News)
SpaceX's Shotwell: Falcon Heavy wont launch this year, likely Q1 next year. Could be from Pad 39A or from VAFB, not sure.

 

Edited by DocM
  • Like 1
2 hours ago, DocM said:

~12 days from WTF? to scheduling RTF...that was quick.

 

@pbdes (Space News)
SpaceX President Shotwell: We anticipate return to flight in November, meaning down for three months. Next flight from CCAFS, then to VAFB.

 

@pbdes (Space News)
SpaceX's Shotwell: We have been told that the Sept. 1 anomaly will not affect Falcon 9's insurance rates. So we expect no impact.

 

@pbdes (Space News)
SpaceX's Shotwell: Falcon Heavy wont launch this year, likely Q1 next year. Could be from Pad 39A or from VAFB, not sure.

 

Where was this information coming from, do you know? They've very sporadic, not sure if this is an interview or what?

With some SpaceX input...check out the design influence...

 

MARS: Trailer #2

video is 1:43 min.

 

 

 

and

 

MARS: Trailer #1

video is 0:30 min.

 

 

 

‘Mars’: Behind the Scenes of National Geographic Channel’s Global Event Series

https://www.yahoo.com/tv/mars-national-geographic-channel-premiere-date-144321018.html

 

Quote

Still, Wilkes’s favorite location was the Hawthorne, Calif., offices of SpaceX. “Just because what they’re doing is so exciting, and there’s aspects of SpaceX that they’ve historically never allowed an outside crew in to document that we were granted access to,” he says. “Just seeing the energy and enthusiasm on their factory floor is something that I think very few people have seen unless you have the pleasure of actually getting to go there. It harkens back to, I don’t want to say the ‘glory days of space,’ because I’m hoping that we’re back in the glory days, but even going back to the ’60s, where there was just this excitement around the Apollo program, and all the best and the brightest were coming out of universities to work at NASA. That sort of fell off a bit, as we just got stuck, as Elon likes to say, in low Earth orbit. And when you go to SpaceX, you see an age range from 20-year-olds up to 60-year-olds, and people who are clearly the best and brightest out of MIT, and Caltech, and all the great science schools. You also see the slightly more seasoned, probably former NASA or government contractor types walking around. They’re all just intermingling on the factory floor, and they’re building rockets, and Elon’s desk is in the middle of all of it, so it has this mix of being a sort of tech Silicon Valley startup, and, at the same time, they’re building rockets on the same factory floor. I think that’s going to be an exciting thing for people to see.”

:D

  • Like 2

MARS-Daedelus-3.jpgThe design of the Daedalus spacecraft in MARS is similar to a biconic side-entry BFS concept outside engineers have discussed in general layout, but not the details or scale.  Lots of artistic license there.

The biconic has the heat shield along its side to minimize heat loading per m^3 and enters like the Shuttle, but it rotates to vertical for the landing. The rear flipperon would be used to protect the engines during re-entry and as an elevator. Sometimes these are split into 2 flipperons which are independently moveable for additional directional control. Flipperons have been used on ESA's IXV vehicle, Blue Origin's SV orbital capsule and the Russian Kliper concept. Multiple engines for engine out capability. 

 

ESA's IXV shows both the biconic concept and shows split flipperons.

 

IXV_large.jpg

 

We'll see how close it is.

National Geographic graphics
MARS-Daedelus-1.jpg

 

MARS-Daedelus-4.jpg

 

MARS-Daedelus-2.jpg

 

MARS-Daedelus-3.jpg

Edited by DocM
  • Like 2

Actually, I'm curious to know if the flame trench at SLC-40 can handle Falcon Heavy. If so, this is an opportunity. A new strong back such as the one at 39A could be used and the hanger can already fit 3 cores. This would be great for the 5+ tonne lifts.

 

Have to find the silver lining from tragedy.

 

:)

  • Like 1
57 minutes ago, Draggendrop said:

Actually, I'm curious to know if the flame trench at SLC-40 can handle Falcon Heavy. If so, this is an opportunity. A new strong back such as the one at 39A could be used and the hanger can already fit 3 cores. This would be great for the 5+ tonne lifts.

 

Have to find the silver lining from tragedy.

 

:)

No. Part of the Titan triple flame duct is concreted and it would cost too much to clear it out.

 

There is a plan to add a new second pad on LC-40, giving them LC-40A and LC-40B (for FH), but that's down the road.  Fixing LC-40(A), getting LC-39A ready, and Boca Chica have priority.

  • Like 1

I doubt it, even with upgrades. It'll take a 39-A type of Pad, and the clearance of all of the "stuff" and the reinforced superstructure to deal with the "oomph". So, no. Probably not.

  • Like 1

There's room. The new hangar has to be 90° or 180° to the existing hangar and a new flame trench, mount, ramp and access roads built (+infrastructure taps.)  Pure guess, but I'd be looking for a draft EIS sometime after Boca Chica opens.

  • Like 2

Most recent SpaceX financial info I can find.

 

The Information...

 

>


SpaceX shares recently sold at a price 24% higher than the last fundraising round, a securities filing by Fidelity Investments indicates, a price that would value the firm at close to $15 billion. It suggests that SpaceX shares have continued to rise in the secondary market and likely explains why Fidelity marked up its stake in the company to that level in February.

 

We reported in April that Fidelity had marked up its stake in SpaceX to $96.42 a share in February, which is the equivalent of about $15 billion for the whole company...
>

  • Like 1
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • The quantum search for Time's origin had an equally mind-boggling conclusion by Sayan Sen Image by Steve Johnson via Pexels A theoretical study from researchers at the University of Surrey suggested that the direction of time may not be fundamentally fixed in certain quantum systems. The work, published in Scientific Reports, examined how the “arrow of time” could emerge from microscopic physics and found that time-reversal symmetry can remain intact even in models used to describe processes such as energy loss and thermalisation. The arrow of time refers to the observed one-way direction from past to future in everyday life. In macroscopic processes, this is easy to see. Spilled milk spreads across a table and does not gather back into a glass, and heat flows from hotter objects to colder ones. These processes shape the common sense idea that time moves in a single direction. However, at the level of fundamental physics, many equations do not prefer a direction of time. Time-reversal symmetry means that the same physical laws can describe a system whether time moves forward or backward. This has made it difficult to explain why irreversible behaviour appears in the large-scale world even when the underlying rules do not require it. Dr Andrea Rocco, Associate Professor in Physics and Mathematical Biology at the University of Surrey, described this contrast: "One way to explain this is when you look at a process like spilt milk spreading across a table, it's clear that time is moving forward. But if you were to play that in reverse, like a movie, you'd immediately know something was wrong – it would be hard to believe milk could just gather back into a glass. However, there are processes, such as the motion of a pendulum, that look just as believable in reverse. The puzzle is that, at the most fundamental level, the laws of physics resemble the pendulum; they do not account for irreversible processes. Our findings suggest that while our common experience tells us that time only moves one way, we are just unaware that the opposite direction would have been equally possible." The study focused on open quantum systems, which are quantum systems that interact with a surrounding environment. This environment, often described as a heat bath, can exchange energy and information with the system. The researchers used this framework to study how a direction of time might appear even when the underlying physics does not enforce one. A key part of the analysis involved the Markov approximation. This is a simplification used in many models where the system is assumed not to retain memory of its past states. The idea is that changes depend only on the current state, not on earlier history. This is commonly used when studying thermalisation, which is the process where a system settles into equilibrium with its environment. The study also used concepts such as master equations, including the Lindblad and Pauli equations, which describe how probabilities of different quantum states change over time. Another related model discussed was quantum Brownian motion, which describes the random-like movement of a quantum particle interacting continuously with its environment. In these descriptions, a “memory kernel” can appear, which is a mathematical term that accounts for how past states influence current behaviour. The researchers found that applying the Markov approximation did not break time-reversal symmetry. Even when the system interacted with an effectively infinite heat bath, the resulting equations of motion remained symmetric in time. This meant that the same mathematical description could, in principle, run forward or backward in time without contradiction. The study further showed that standard frameworks used in open quantum systems, including quantum Brownian motion and master equations like the Lindblad and Pauli forms, could be written in a time-symmetric way. These equations are typically used to describe processes that look irreversible, such as dissipation and thermalisation, but the results suggested they can also be interpreted as allowing evolution in both time directions. Thomas Guff, Research Fellow in Quantum Thermodynamics, said: "The surprising part of this project was that even after making the standard simplifying assumption to our equations describing open quantum systems, the equations still behaved the same way whether the system was moving forwards or backwards in time. When we carefully worked through the maths, we found that this behaviour had to be the case because a key part of the equation, the "memory kernel," is symmetrical in time. We also found a small but important detail which is usually overlooked – a time discontinuous factor emerged that kept the time-symmetry property intact. It’s unusual to see such a mathematical mechanism in a physics equation because it's not continuous, and it was very surprising to see it appear so naturally." The researchers also noted that deriving a one-way arrow of time from time-reversal symmetric microscopic dynamics remains an open problem across fields such as thermodynamics, statistical mechanics, particle physics, and cosmology. Their results suggested that some standard descriptions of irreversible behaviour in open quantum systems may be better understood using a time-symmetric formulation of Markovianity. According to the study, processes such as thermalisation, which are usually treated as irreversible, could in theory be described in a way that allows evolution in either time direction under the same rules. This does not imply that time reversal occurs in everyday life, but rather that the underlying equations do not strictly enforce a single direction. Overall, the findings suggested that the perceived direction of time may emerge from how physical systems are modelled and approximated, rather than from a fundamental asymmetry in the laws themselves. The researchers noted that this perspective could have implications for ongoing work in quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, and cosmology on the origin of time’s arrow. Source: University of Surrey, Nature This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
    • A bit premature... 100% Marketing. Bizarre.
    • A $300 price hike is insane! No one is going to want to pay that much!
    • Since the 1st one flopped, there is really no reason to make another one. It's just losing money left and right.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      579
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      74
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      71
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!