Recommended Posts

December 7, 10:30am EDT

 

We are finalizing the investigation into our September 1 anomaly and are working to complete the final steps necessary to safely and reliably return to flight, now in early January with the launch of Iridium-1. This allows for additional time to close-out vehicle preparations and complete extended testing to help ensure the highest possible level of mission assurance prior to launch.

  • Like 1

SpaceX job posting

 

We are looking for talented, inspired, and creative software engineers to build, deploy, and own our satellite fleet management and Internet gateway data centers all around the world. These systems are massively distributed, highly available, secure, high performance, and fault tolerant

  • Like 2

Yup, and orbital/deep space nodes using Delay Tolerant Networking (DTN.)

 

BTW: the Seattle facilities are adding people fast, and they're expanding the Palo Alto facility where those former Broadcom engineers are working.

  • Like 1

:yes: Yessir. The IT Majors at school are being asked to double up their class loads and graduate early -- and are being paid to do so by an unnamed party. Anyone who does "will be compensated, but must sign a Recruitment NDA". I assume this is that "unnamed party".

IM'd one of the IT Majors I know if they know what the scoop is, and he said that they're being very particular about who is actually being offered the Recruitments. It's only the top 10%, and he's not part of that group. Sounds like SpaceX's M.O. :yes: 

 

[EDIT] Chatting with him some more, it's Seniors only that are being pushed to finish up their Degrees starting next Term, Juniors in the same bracket are being offered a slot in the Internship Program but it'll still count as Credits toward their Degree. The screening process will forward the top 3% of that 10% that they're looking at. Wow ... stiff. They aren't messing around. The other 7% will have a chance later on once they complete their Degrees and get some experience elsewhere OR if the Recruiter needs the extra help with the Project.

Edited by Unobscured Vision

Oh yeah! I forgot about that one. This is gonna be bigger than that, I think. Much larger Project, this one. SpaceX needs Datacenters (and IT Staff doing things the SpaceX way) all over Earth ... so I think it's gonna be a big hiring spree. :yes: 

I figure they'll need at least 2 kilosouls in Seattle alone, not to mention opening Boca Chica and an outside shot at another launch site at Spaceport Camden in Georgia,

 

http://spaceportcamden.us

 

BTW: SpaceX made GlassDoors 50 best places to work in 2017 list.

Edited by DocM
  • Like 1
19 minutes ago, FloatingFatMan said:

Seems a little short sighted of them to limit themselves to US recruiting though. The UK also has quite a few extremely talented programmers, you know... ;)

 

Unless they want to come here as resident tech workers, which needs a special visa, or to become citizens it presents an ITAR issue.

 

ITAR: International Traffic in Arms Regulations. Many space techs are dual-use and could be diverted for military purposes.

So with the Falcon 9 being grounded all of this time and the expansion in all of their workforce. How are they currently making money, are they just burning through their cash reserves until they can start launching again?

During May's fundraising round it was said their private share price was up 24% to $96.42/share, they have have $billions in cash reserves and their valuation was $15 billion. 

 

Just my opinion, but I've long suspected they're doing black projects for DoD.  Stories of flag officers visiting McGregor well before F9 v1.1 and the EELV battle, other bits, then topping it off last year Musk had a private meeting with SecDef Ashton Carter at the Pentagon. Musk blew it off as discussions about a flying armor suit ( :) ), which with the PR blurbs sounded like a deflection. 

Edited by DocM
  • Like 1

In all fairness, if a company wants to make it -- really make it -- then Mil/Gov work is the place to do it. Honorable intentions are all well and good, but business is business and money is money. Musk and Co. are smart to do things this way, if in fact that's what they're doing. All of the ventures with Tesla, SolarCity, and SpaceX (and the other companies that are not as well-known under the umbrella of Musk) that want that deep-rooted business in the U.S. Infrastructure? This is the way to do it. 

 

I've got no problem with this. Let them get some of the pie that LH/M, Boeing and Honeywell and others have been eating for the better part of 75 years (or more). Business changes, so does Technology; and the needs of the U.S. Government change with it. It must change. So long as it doesn't become stagnant. That's the true lesson to be learned. :yes: 

On 12/2/2016 at 1:03 AM, John. said:

Well, in other slightly better Space news today ...

 

 

©Low№$ never been good for Rocketry ∯CiEnce == he's been steadily gambling w/ so-called innovations & comedy has arrived to its pity end.

 

Quote

Due to scheduling delays, one of SpaceX’s customers has decided to go with a different rocket. British satellite operator Inmarsat announced today that it will launch one of its satellites on a European Ariane 5 rocket, instead of on one of SpaceX’s vehicles like it had originally planned. On short notice, Inmarsat was able to secure a mid-2017 launch for the spacecraft — a communication satellite for the European Aviation Network (EAN).

http://www.theverge.com/2016/12/8/13883640/spacex-satellite-launch-inmarsat-arianespace-schedule-delay

 

17 hours ago, SarK0Y said:

©Low№$ never been good for Rocketry ∯CiEnce == he's been steadily gambling w/ so-called innovations & comedy has arrived to its pity end.

 

 

I have no idea what this says. Can we please have this in English or French, I can do French. 

I got about half of it, past the truly terrible translation. A slam on SpaceX, I'm assuming. We're leaving it alone, given the poster and the history of stirring pots. Moving along is best.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • The quantum search for Time's origin had an equally mind-boggling conclusion by Sayan Sen Image by Steve Johnson via Pexels A theoretical study from researchers at the University of Surrey suggested that the direction of time may not be fundamentally fixed in certain quantum systems. The work, published in Scientific Reports, examined how the “arrow of time” could emerge from microscopic physics and found that time-reversal symmetry can remain intact even in models used to describe processes such as energy loss and thermalisation. The arrow of time refers to the observed one-way direction from past to future in everyday life. In macroscopic processes, this is easy to see. Spilled milk spreads across a table and does not gather back into a glass, and heat flows from hotter objects to colder ones. These processes shape the common sense idea that time moves in a single direction. However, at the level of fundamental physics, many equations do not prefer a direction of time. Time-reversal symmetry means that the same physical laws can describe a system whether time moves forward or backward. This has made it difficult to explain why irreversible behaviour appears in the large-scale world even when the underlying rules do not require it. Dr Andrea Rocco, Associate Professor in Physics and Mathematical Biology at the University of Surrey, described this contrast: "One way to explain this is when you look at a process like spilt milk spreading across a table, it's clear that time is moving forward. But if you were to play that in reverse, like a movie, you'd immediately know something was wrong – it would be hard to believe milk could just gather back into a glass. However, there are processes, such as the motion of a pendulum, that look just as believable in reverse. The puzzle is that, at the most fundamental level, the laws of physics resemble the pendulum; they do not account for irreversible processes. Our findings suggest that while our common experience tells us that time only moves one way, we are just unaware that the opposite direction would have been equally possible." The study focused on open quantum systems, which are quantum systems that interact with a surrounding environment. This environment, often described as a heat bath, can exchange energy and information with the system. The researchers used this framework to study how a direction of time might appear even when the underlying physics does not enforce one. A key part of the analysis involved the Markov approximation. This is a simplification used in many models where the system is assumed not to retain memory of its past states. The idea is that changes depend only on the current state, not on earlier history. This is commonly used when studying thermalisation, which is the process where a system settles into equilibrium with its environment. The study also used concepts such as master equations, including the Lindblad and Pauli equations, which describe how probabilities of different quantum states change over time. Another related model discussed was quantum Brownian motion, which describes the random-like movement of a quantum particle interacting continuously with its environment. In these descriptions, a “memory kernel” can appear, which is a mathematical term that accounts for how past states influence current behaviour. The researchers found that applying the Markov approximation did not break time-reversal symmetry. Even when the system interacted with an effectively infinite heat bath, the resulting equations of motion remained symmetric in time. This meant that the same mathematical description could, in principle, run forward or backward in time without contradiction. The study further showed that standard frameworks used in open quantum systems, including quantum Brownian motion and master equations like the Lindblad and Pauli forms, could be written in a time-symmetric way. These equations are typically used to describe processes that look irreversible, such as dissipation and thermalisation, but the results suggested they can also be interpreted as allowing evolution in both time directions. Thomas Guff, Research Fellow in Quantum Thermodynamics, said: "The surprising part of this project was that even after making the standard simplifying assumption to our equations describing open quantum systems, the equations still behaved the same way whether the system was moving forwards or backwards in time. When we carefully worked through the maths, we found that this behaviour had to be the case because a key part of the equation, the "memory kernel," is symmetrical in time. We also found a small but important detail which is usually overlooked – a time discontinuous factor emerged that kept the time-symmetry property intact. It’s unusual to see such a mathematical mechanism in a physics equation because it's not continuous, and it was very surprising to see it appear so naturally." The researchers also noted that deriving a one-way arrow of time from time-reversal symmetric microscopic dynamics remains an open problem across fields such as thermodynamics, statistical mechanics, particle physics, and cosmology. Their results suggested that some standard descriptions of irreversible behaviour in open quantum systems may be better understood using a time-symmetric formulation of Markovianity. According to the study, processes such as thermalisation, which are usually treated as irreversible, could in theory be described in a way that allows evolution in either time direction under the same rules. This does not imply that time reversal occurs in everyday life, but rather that the underlying equations do not strictly enforce a single direction. Overall, the findings suggested that the perceived direction of time may emerge from how physical systems are modelled and approximated, rather than from a fundamental asymmetry in the laws themselves. The researchers noted that this perspective could have implications for ongoing work in quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, and cosmology on the origin of time’s arrow. Source: University of Surrey, Nature This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
    • A bit premature... 100% Marketing. Bizarre.
    • A $300 price hike is insane! No one is going to want to pay that much!
    • Since the 1st one flopped, there is really no reason to make another one. It's just losing money left and right.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      581
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      73
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!