Recommended Posts

Here's a pic of the LC-39A rainbirds. The (huge) tent was up for a few months while they were working on the launch mount. Transporter-Erector is to the right.

 

LC-39A rainbirds.jpg

 

Another flight on the manifest,

 

Peter B. de Selding ‏@pbdes  5m5 minutes ago
Thales: Bangladesh Bangabandhu Ku-/C-band sat CDR OK, payload/platform mating in March. Thales-ordered SpaceX launch Dec 2017 [tight sched].

 

And Gwynne Shotwell confirmed on CBS that they're trying for 20-24 launches in 2017.

  • Like 2

Iridium NEXT #2 looks like April-ish, and...

 

Peter B. de Selding ‏@pbdes  53m53 minutes ago
CEO Desch @IridiumComm: TBD but we may be able to cut @SpaceX launch interval to < 60 days as from our 3D launch. https://www.spaceintelreport.com/iridium-next-launch

  • Like 1

That's just a placeholder date. Things get really-real once they put a (used?) booster on the T-E, roll it out to the pad, stand it up and do fit, connection and GSE tests. What with the recent launch and today's holiday it wasn't happening this weekend. Both the Vandy and 39A pads are recently rebuilt for F9 Block 5 and need their A-team.

 

Block 5 is the last major iteration of Falcon 9, with a max thrust after liftoff of 1.9 million lbf and several other upgrades including to the landing legs. Supposedly due by summer, after that about $300+ million/yr of R&D money goes to ITS. 

Edited by DocM
  • Like 1

The last place holder for a launch, that I've seen, was for Echostar 23 late January, then I've seen January 26th. All NET, since their is a lot of activity at 39A. Something will have to be fitted for "bug checks" soon, or CRS-10 may also get bumped.

 

Seems this first launch from 39A, and it's starting "headaches", will open the door to a busy season. 

 

:D

 

 

I still have issues putting the 1st stage into perspective, makes any landing a hell of a lot more incredible when you put it into perspective:

 

comment_4WehOMrLe79UTxLYPQVm4ixdOJLHFdfH

 

 

  • Like 3
59 minutes ago, DocM said:

Yup, it's big - and ITS will make it look like a sounding rocket..

I really don't get just where they're going to launch that monster from.  Surely it can't be anywhere within like, 50 miles of a population centre?  The noise it'll make will just be... catastrophic!

 

  • Like 1

So far it looks like KSC is first up to bat, and in the mid-2020's (due to orbital factors) Brownsville, Texas (Boca Chica).

 

There's an outside possibility of the upcoming Camden County Spaceport in Georgia, but that's still in the EIS stage and a bit higher in latitude. Also possible would be an eastern locale in Puerto Rico, which lost out to Boca Chica.

Oh yeah. ITS is gonna be a true beast. It'll make all other rockets, including Saturn V, look like test articles. Seriously, it's like nothing that will have ever been seen before and it'll be a game-changer. :) 

Reminderthe core number and mission number are offset by 1 because of a core swap last year, therefore Iridium NEXT-1 was Core #29 but Mission #30.

 

Launch is typically ~30 days after shipping. SES-10 shipped last week, so H2 February. This means 2 launches between now and then, if all goes well. Helluva cadence.

 

Mission #31: Echostar 23 (NET January 26, estimated: 0000-0230 EST, 0500-0730 GMT)

 

Mission #32: ISS CRS-10 (NET February 8, estimated: 1355 EST, 1855 GMT).

 

Mission #33: SES-10 (H2 February.) SES says a previously flown core is likely.

 

The FCC application for Mission #33 has gone in

https://apps.fcc.gov/oetcf/els/reports/STA_Print.cfm?mode=current&application_seq=75607&RequestTimeout=1000

  • Like 3

Stephen C. Smith at SpaceKSC has a bunch of new images for 39A.....

 

http://spaceksc.blogspot.ca/2017/01/going-up-part-12.html

 

sample...

 

170115_spacex17_sm_zps2txif16w.jpg

SpaceKSC.com.

 

:)

  • Like 1

It could be said that it's a shell of it's former self. :shifty::shiftyninja: Aahh? Aaaahhhh? Thank you, I'll be here all week! Tip your waitstaff! (Hey, ow! You don't have to be so rough, I know where the door is ...)

  • Like 1
12 minutes ago, Unobscured Vision said:

It could be said that it's a shell of it's former self. :shifty::shiftyninja: Aahh? Aaaahhhh? Thank you, I'll be here all week! Tip your waitstaff! (Hey, ow! You don't have to be so rough, I know where the door is ...)

 

giphy.gif

  • Like 2

So given the latest slight slip, the next three launches are now: 

 

NET Jan 30 - B1030 launching Echostar 23

NET Feb 8 - B1031 launching CRS-10

NET Feb 22 - B1021 launching SES 10

  • Like 2
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • The quantum search for Time's origin had an equally mind-boggling conclusion by Sayan Sen Image by Steve Johnson via Pexels A theoretical study from researchers at the University of Surrey suggested that the direction of time may not be fundamentally fixed in certain quantum systems. The work, published in Scientific Reports, examined how the “arrow of time” could emerge from microscopic physics and found that time-reversal symmetry can remain intact even in models used to describe processes such as energy loss and thermalisation. The arrow of time refers to the observed one-way direction from past to future in everyday life. In macroscopic processes, this is easy to see. Spilled milk spreads across a table and does not gather back into a glass, and heat flows from hotter objects to colder ones. These processes shape the common sense idea that time moves in a single direction. However, at the level of fundamental physics, many equations do not prefer a direction of time. Time-reversal symmetry means that the same physical laws can describe a system whether time moves forward or backward. This has made it difficult to explain why irreversible behaviour appears in the large-scale world even when the underlying rules do not require it. Dr Andrea Rocco, Associate Professor in Physics and Mathematical Biology at the University of Surrey, described this contrast: "One way to explain this is when you look at a process like spilt milk spreading across a table, it's clear that time is moving forward. But if you were to play that in reverse, like a movie, you'd immediately know something was wrong – it would be hard to believe milk could just gather back into a glass. However, there are processes, such as the motion of a pendulum, that look just as believable in reverse. The puzzle is that, at the most fundamental level, the laws of physics resemble the pendulum; they do not account for irreversible processes. Our findings suggest that while our common experience tells us that time only moves one way, we are just unaware that the opposite direction would have been equally possible." The study focused on open quantum systems, which are quantum systems that interact with a surrounding environment. This environment, often described as a heat bath, can exchange energy and information with the system. The researchers used this framework to study how a direction of time might appear even when the underlying physics does not enforce one. A key part of the analysis involved the Markov approximation. This is a simplification used in many models where the system is assumed not to retain memory of its past states. The idea is that changes depend only on the current state, not on earlier history. This is commonly used when studying thermalisation, which is the process where a system settles into equilibrium with its environment. The study also used concepts such as master equations, including the Lindblad and Pauli equations, which describe how probabilities of different quantum states change over time. Another related model discussed was quantum Brownian motion, which describes the random-like movement of a quantum particle interacting continuously with its environment. In these descriptions, a “memory kernel” can appear, which is a mathematical term that accounts for how past states influence current behaviour. The researchers found that applying the Markov approximation did not break time-reversal symmetry. Even when the system interacted with an effectively infinite heat bath, the resulting equations of motion remained symmetric in time. This meant that the same mathematical description could, in principle, run forward or backward in time without contradiction. The study further showed that standard frameworks used in open quantum systems, including quantum Brownian motion and master equations like the Lindblad and Pauli forms, could be written in a time-symmetric way. These equations are typically used to describe processes that look irreversible, such as dissipation and thermalisation, but the results suggested they can also be interpreted as allowing evolution in both time directions. Thomas Guff, Research Fellow in Quantum Thermodynamics, said: "The surprising part of this project was that even after making the standard simplifying assumption to our equations describing open quantum systems, the equations still behaved the same way whether the system was moving forwards or backwards in time. When we carefully worked through the maths, we found that this behaviour had to be the case because a key part of the equation, the "memory kernel," is symmetrical in time. We also found a small but important detail which is usually overlooked – a time discontinuous factor emerged that kept the time-symmetry property intact. It’s unusual to see such a mathematical mechanism in a physics equation because it's not continuous, and it was very surprising to see it appear so naturally." The researchers also noted that deriving a one-way arrow of time from time-reversal symmetric microscopic dynamics remains an open problem across fields such as thermodynamics, statistical mechanics, particle physics, and cosmology. Their results suggested that some standard descriptions of irreversible behaviour in open quantum systems may be better understood using a time-symmetric formulation of Markovianity. According to the study, processes such as thermalisation, which are usually treated as irreversible, could in theory be described in a way that allows evolution in either time direction under the same rules. This does not imply that time reversal occurs in everyday life, but rather that the underlying equations do not strictly enforce a single direction. Overall, the findings suggested that the perceived direction of time may emerge from how physical systems are modelled and approximated, rather than from a fundamental asymmetry in the laws themselves. The researchers noted that this perspective could have implications for ongoing work in quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, and cosmology on the origin of time’s arrow. Source: University of Surrey, Nature This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
    • A bit premature... 100% Marketing. Bizarre.
    • A $300 price hike is insane! No one is going to want to pay that much!
    • Since the 1st one flopped, there is really no reason to make another one. It's just losing money left and right.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      579
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      74
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      71
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!