Recommended Posts

HARTFORD, Conn. (AP) — A Connecticut state worker fired after he was caught smoking marijuana on the job was punished too harshly and should get his job back, the state Supreme Court ruled Friday.

 

Gregory Linhoff was fired from his maintenance job at the University of Connecticut Health Center in Farmington in 2012 after a police officer caught him smoking pot in a state-owned vehicle. He had no previous disciplinary problems since being hired in 1998 and had received favorable job evaluations, according to his union. He was arrested, but the charges were later dismissed.

 

th?id=OIP.Ma23baf0c73d0ce5db6cbcecd70a10

 

State officials said firing the New Hartford resident was the only appropriate penalty for his conduct and not doing so would send a bad message to other employees. An arbitrator disagreed and overturned the firing, saying Linhoff instead should be suspended without pay for six months and be subject to random drug testing for a year after he returned to work.

 

The state appealed and a Superior Court judge overturned the arbitrator's decision on the grounds that it violated Connecticut's public policy against marijuana use. Linhoff's union, the Connecticut Employees Union Independent SEIU, appealed the judge's ruling to the Supreme Court.

 

All seven justices agreed that the lower court judge was wrong to overturn the arbitrator's ruling, saying that while state policy on drug use in the work place allows for firing workers it does not require it. Justices also said that judicial second-guessing of arbitration awards is uncommon and should be reserved only for extraordinary circumstances.

 

more

Now this is a question that I have been wondering, say I move to a state where it's legal to use marijuana, I'm sure that I couldn't smoke while at work, but what happens in a situation where on my day off I enjoy a joint or so and the next day I go to work and get injured, I'm sure the employer is going to want to ###### test, and when it shows THC in the blood, can they fire me? I have mixed feelings about this guy, yes he was doing something that in that state is considered illegal, and he was in a state owned vehicle (dumb ass move there) but I agree with the higher courts ruling in that termination was too extreme for a first time offense.

5 hours ago, jnelsoninjax said:

Now this is a question that I have been wondering, say I move to a state where it's legal to use marijuana, I'm sure that I couldn't smoke while at work, but what happens in a situation where on my day off I enjoy a joint or so and the next day I go to work and get injured, I'm sure the employer is going to want to ###### test, and when it shows THC in the blood, can they fire me? I have mixed feelings about this guy, yes he was doing something that in that state is considered illegal, and he was in a state owned vehicle (dumb ass move there) but I agree with the higher courts ruling in that termination was too extreme for a first time offense.

This is about precedent, what if it was drinking alcohol? I doubt people would be so forgiving then. If it's illegal, don't do it on or in state property. They are obligated to obey the laws as they are representatives of the law. Zero tolerance in this profession makes sense. Public servants should always be under more scrutiny since they are paid by those they serve.

So, as a critical care nurse, if I chose to smoke pot on the job in that state while taking care for one of those judge's family members, I wonder if they would have a different take. Juggling multiple life saving IV medicines, breathing machine settings, interpreting lab values, and other tasks is very difficult when you are sober, much less when you are impaired.

  • Like 3
2 minutes ago, Gary7 said:

It is not legal to smoke pot in Conn. He broke the law and should have been fired. This is plain nuts.

I don't know employment law (UK or US) so I'm asking this out of curiosity but in the UK if you do something "wrong" then you go through a process of warning. I think the more serious the offence it can call for an instant dismissal but could the better process here not to have warned him first?

 

I got the impression a few years ago when I spent 5 weeks in the US that you could pretty much be fired at any point for any reason rather than going through what seemed like a fair warning/dismissal process?

^ Yes. Every job that I am aware of would fire you in the US for being impaired. Employers are at risk of paying for injuries related to this activity if their employee gets hurt.

1 minute ago, Skiver said:

I don't know employment law (UK or US) so I'm asking this out of curiosity but in the UK if you do something "wrong" then you go through a process of warning. I think the more serious the offence it can call for an instant dismissal but could the better process here not to have warned him first?

 

I got the impression a few years ago when I spent 5 weeks in the US that you could pretty much be fired at any point for any reason rather than going through what seemed like a fair warning/dismissal process?

If this guy was drinking Jack Daniels, a legal beverage what would they have done. This is what happens in a Country run amuck with Politically Correct BS.

1 minute ago, Gary7 said:

If this guy was drinking Jack Daniels, a legal beverage what would they have done. This is what happens in a Country run amuck with Politically Correct BS.

If he were over the "impairment" limit, they would have bounced him - even if it were JD (which is legal, though regulated).  This is not a new issue - including in the US; consider HGV drivers (over-the-road tractor-trailer drivers - I used the EU-specific term on purpose, since a lot of Neowinians live in Europe); in the US, they are regulated by state DMVs, the Interstate Commerce Commission and (in the case of specialty transport, such as HAZMATs) the Departments of Energy and/or Defense.  (HAZMATs?  No - I'm not talking explosives - though they are ALSO transported by truck; I'm talking - surprisingly - common automotive parts such as air bags; the actuator of an airbag (or Supplemental Restraint System) - regardless of manufacturer - is typically a cartridge-actuated device (CAD for short) and is based on military technology of Korean War vintage.  The issue is, in fact, safety - nothing more OR less.

1 minute ago, PGHammer said:

If he were over the "impairment" limit, they would have bounced him - even if it were JD (which is legal, though regulated).  This is not a new issue - including in the US; consider HGV drivers (over-the-road tractor-trailer drivers - I used the EU-specific term on purpose, since a lot of Neowinians live in Europe); in the US, they are regulated by state DMVs, the Interstate Commerce Commission and (in the case of specialty transport, such as HAZMATs) the Departments of Energy and/or Defense.  (HAZMATs?  No - I'm not talking explosives - though they are ALSO transported by truck; I'm talking - surprisingly - common automotive parts such as air bags; the actuator of an airbag (or Supplemental Restraint System) - regardless of manufacturer - is typically a cartridge-actuated device (CAD for short) and is based on military technology of Korean War vintage.  The issue is, in fact, safety - nothing more OR less.

I cannot speak for the law in Conn. But where I live it is not legal to have an open container of any Alcoholic beverage in a car. In the 60's I went to Myrtle Beach with a bunch of friends from DC. When the bars closed they gave you what they called "Go Cups" so that you can finish what you were drinking . I found that to be strange--they do not do that there anymore.:)

Just now, Gary7 said:

I cannot speak for the law in Conn. But where I live it is not legal to have an open container of any Alcoholic beverage in a car. In the 60's I went to Myrtle Beach with a bunch of friends from DC. When the bars closed they gave you what they called "Go Cups" so that you can finish what you were drinking . I found that to be strange--they do not do that there anymore.:)

Practically NO state permits public consumption of any alcoholic beverage in its original container (this includes beer) over a certain BAL amount (where drive-up bars are permitted - which is only in certain Southern states - such as Louisiana and Texas - the served drinks themselves are monitored so as not to go above that limit - which differs from locality to locality).  Further, no casino in the US serves alcoholic beverages for off-site/off-sale consumption - this does include casinos owned OR operated by Native American tribes (such as the Hard Rock Casinos in both Florida and Nevada - which are owned AND operated by the Seminole tribe).  Safety again.

3 minutes ago, PGHammer said:

Practically NO state permits public consumption of any alcoholic beverage in its original container (this includes beer) over a certain BAL amount (where drive-up bars are permitted - which is only in certain Southern states - such as Louisiana and Texas - the served drinks themselves are monitored so as not to go above that limit - which differs from locality to locality).  Further, no casino in the US serves alcoholic beverages for off-site/off-sale consumption - this does include casinos owned OR operated by Native American tribes (such as the Hard Rock Casinos in both Florida and Nevada - which are owned AND operated by the Seminole tribe).  Safety again.

Apparently in Coon, they don't give a damn about safety.:(

31 minutes ago, Gary7 said:

If this guy was drinking Jack Daniels, a legal beverage what would they have done. This is what happens in a Country run amuck with Politically Correct BS.

i know 3 people who were caught drinking while working, and they were not fired, but sent to an alcoholic type rehab to get counseling. 

they were only warned that if it happened again, then they would be fired.

Just now, Buttus said:

i know 3 people who were caught drinking while working, and they were not fired, but sent to an alcoholic type rehab to get counseling. 

they were only warned that if it happened again, then they would be fired.

But they were not in a vehicle..

4 minutes ago, Gary7 said:

But they were not in a vehicle..

in fact, just a little background on it, he was a hard core alcoholic, he used to get up in the morning, drink a 6 pack, then get one during the day as he did his service calls and finish that during the day as he drove around, then have another 6 pack or two at night.

he made some boneheaded move while driving and got pulled over, got a DUI (again, while working) and didn't get fired.  got sent to rehab, cleaned up, and AT&T even promoted him from working with copper up to sending him to school to learn fiber optics and doing that.  (he's retired now)

 

so people don't always get fired for doing dumb things like that

4 hours ago, Barney T. said:

So, as a critical care nurse, if I chose to smoke pot on the job in that state while taking care for one of those judge's family members, I wonder if they would have a different take. Juggling multiple life saving IV medicines, breathing machine settings, interpreting lab values, and other tasks is very difficult when you are sober, much less when you are impaired.

Agreed, several countries who don't generally require drug testing still require it for professions such as nursing. Not only that, but he was on the job, it's ludicrous not to throw the book at him. I am all for allowing people on there own time to do as they please, but never on the job.

"...while state policy on drug use in the work place allows for firing workers it does not require it...."

 

Nor does it prohibit it. And Connecticut is not a "right to work" state.

 

State court is out of bounds on this one.

On 8/22/2016 at 3:34 PM, Hum said:

An arbitrator disagreed and overturned the firing, saying Linhoff instead should be suspended without pay for six months and be subject to random drug testing for a year after he returned to work.

Justice has been served.

Well, here is the real bottom line "received favorable job evaluations, according to his union". The outright firing of a union employee in a non right to work state is just not going to happen.  That guy could have gotten stoned, driven into a group of school children at a bus stop in his work truck and his union would have prevented him from being fired. I'm surprised his supervisors even got the termination paperwork started to be honest.

On 8/23/2016 at 8:11 AM, Gary7 said:

It is not legal to smoke pot in Conn. He broke the law and should have been fired. This is plain nuts.

Agreed.For me, it doesn't matter whether it's illegal but whether the company allows it. Like Barney said below, I don't know of any job in the US except maybe at a pot dispensary, that you can be impaired on anything and keep your job. For the

 

record, I am not against pot as medicine or even own time recreational use but rules are rules. Like drinking is legal but there are a subset of rules that go with it. Drink, obtain a BAC above .08 (in Florida) and it becomes illegal to drive, etc, etc. Also for

 

me it's about common sense. All the pro pot folks think that if they legalize pot, it just opens the floodgates and you can smoke anytime, anywhere is naive at best. 

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
    • Cheers everyone for the replies. It's been very useful. 👍
    • Compared to the 7735HS it is around 25-30% slower in multi-threaded tasks (according to Google search) I did a review of the 7735HS Beelink SER6 Max in 2023, but thinking about it, it's not comparable to the 7730U. For the example you gave about how it will be used, the 7730U is actually an excellent choice for its power and battery efficiency.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      194
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      71
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!