Vermont becomes ninth U.S. state to legalize marijuana


Recommended Posts

techbeck

Vermont became the ninth U.S. state and third in the Northeast to legalize recreational marijuana use on Monday when Republican Governor Phil Scott signed a bill passed by the legislature earlier this month.

 

The law legalizes possession of up to 1 ounce of the drug, two mature plants and up to four immature plants by people 21 and older beginning on July 1. It does not legalize trade in the drug.

 

“Today, with mixed emotions, I have signed H. 511,” Scott said in a statement, referring to the measure by its legislative number.

 

He noted that he had vetoed an earlier version of the bill that would have opened up sales of the drug, saying that a state commission would have time for further study before allowing a retail trade in recreational pot.

 

Neighboring Massachusetts, nearby Maine and six other states have legalized marijuana use as a result of voter initiatives.

 

More....

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-vermont-marijuana/vermont-becomes-ninth-u-s-state-to-legalize-marijuana-idUSKBN1FB2VU

 

 

Won't be long before every state has it legalized.  I know it is a topic for a lot of states. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
DocM

Until DoJ reverses the Obama-era Federal prosecution suspension.  Marijuana is still illegal under Federal controlled substances law, which has primacy over state law. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
+Zagadka
Just now, DocM said:

Until DoJ reverses the Obama-era Federal prosecution suspension.  Marijuana is still illegal under Federal controlled substances law, which has primacy over state law. 

And I've rarely been more into states' rights. And I am generally very into states' rights.

Link to post
Share on other sites
DocM

Why do I get the feeling we may see many more nominal liberals re-discovering the 10th Amendment? 

Link to post
Share on other sites
+Zagadka

Liberals can be federalists. They should be. Most of the policies that actually impact people are local, anyway.

Link to post
Share on other sites
DocM
4 minutes ago, Zagadka said:

Liberals can be federalists. They should be. Most of the policies that actually impact people are local, anyway.

Can be, but the post-1970's versions have been increasingly not.  Often militantly not, which is why they're often vilified in flyover country.

Link to post
Share on other sites
+Zagadka

Yea, I'm not even a socialist.

 

The feds should protect rights and safety, the policies should be local.

 

But the same problem is in reverse; conservatives who want larger central government control... everything from immigration, drug policies, abortion, religious issues, pretty much anything. The fact that they support the feds with things like the Patriot Act or even accept Gitmo is disturbing.

 

If people in Iowa don't want pot, fine. We do. It is pretty simple to accommodate both.

Link to post
Share on other sites
DocM
10 hours ago, Zagadka said:

Yea, I'm not even a socialist.

 

The feds should protect rights and safety, the policies should be local.

 

But the same problem is in reverse; conservatives who want larger central government control... everything from immigration, drug policies,

Immigration is a Federal responsibility via the Constitution, and a Supreme Court decision going back to 1875.

 

Article I, Section 8, Clause 4

 

“… To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization, …”

 

14th Amendment, Section 1

 

“All persons born or naturalized in the United States,…” 

 

The first Federal immigration law was enacted in 1875, and in 1876 the U.S. Supreme Court ruled immigration regulation was an exclusive Federal responsibility. 

 

Drugs, even if grown/made in the state, still involve interstate commerce at some point and that's Federal. Already been through SCOTUS.

 

Quote

abortion, religious issues, pretty much anything. The fact that they support the feds with things like the Patriot Act or even accept Gitmo is disturbing.

Freedom of Religion, and the practice of same, is guaranteed under the 1st and 14 Amendments.

 

Abortion in the form of Roe v Wade has no legal foundation, even many liberal analysts say it was a bad decision which created law from thin air. Before Roe it was up to the states, and it should have stayed there via the 10th Amendment.

 

Quote

 

If people in Iowa don't want pot, fine. We do. It is pretty simple to accommodate both.

Then repeal the Interstate Commerce  clause  along with most Federal taxation (income taxes are a minority). Then  enforce the 10th Amendment rather than have activists pull those new "law" out of their asses.

Edited by DocM
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
mudslag
On 1/24/2018 at 2:56 AM, DocM said:

Until DoJ reverses the Obama-era Federal prosecution suspension.  Marijuana is still illegal under Federal controlled substances law, which has primacy over state law. 

 

 

 

And when Sessions does, this will turn into a State issue and end up in courts. Sessions doesn't have the money or resources to go terminator on marijuana. Over half the country now has legal marijuana in some form and majority of the country is in favor of legalization. This is a lose lose battle for Sessions which is largely why he keeps talking about it but hasn't done anything yet. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
+Mirumir

On one hand, this provides for an increased revenue from taxation (gotta pay for all that debt somehow!) and a temporary job spike => a short-term economic growth; on the other hand, you get a lazier and less productive population => a long-term risk.

Link to post
Share on other sites
techbeck
5 hours ago, Mirumir said:

On one hand, this provides for an increased revenue from taxation (gotta pay for all that debt somehow!) and a temporary job spike => a short-term economic growth; on the other hand, you get a lazier and less productive population => a long-term risk.

Depends on the person really.  I know a lot of people who smoke pot and are very productive.   Senior network admin at my last job did it every day and during work.  He hiked, rode his bike, did a lot of out door activities, and never had an issue with the network going down or things breaking. 

 

Like alcohol, some will abuse it and be lazy asses and not do anything.  Others will be fine.

Edited by techbeck
Link to post
Share on other sites
mudslag
12 hours ago, Mirumir said:

On one hand, this provides for an increased revenue from taxation (gotta pay for all that debt somehow!) and a temporary job spike => a short-term economic growth; on the other hand, you get a lazier and less productive population => a long-term risk.

 

 

How do you get temporary job spike and short-term economic growth out of this? As long as it remains legal, either medicinal or recreational, there will be businesses serving it. There will also be the growers and all the other types of businesses that revolve around that industry. 

 

As for laziness, that's going to be subjective to the user. There are plenty of people that can smoke and live productive lives. 

Edited by mudslag
Link to post
Share on other sites
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By +MJK
      Apps can no longer offer marijuana delivery services on the Google Play Store
      by Muhammad Jarir Kanji

      You will no longer be able to schedule your next delivery of marijuana using your Android smartphone. Google has added marijuana to its list of restricted content on the Play Store, meaning apps that offer delivery services for the psychoactive drug will soon be banned from its platform.

      The ban applies to all jurisdictions, regardless of the legality of marijuana in a particular state. The company's updated policies state the following on the matter:

      The two most prominent apps in the space are Weedmaps and Eaze, and both risk facing a ban if their apps are not updated within 30 days to remove any aspects enabling the sale of marijuana. Google has also released a statement regarding compliance with its policies, and how apps like Weedmaps can remain on the Play Store in light of the changes:

      This could mean that the apps would still be able to promote marijuana and possible even allow you to book deliveries, as long as the developers ensure that the actual sale process is redirected to the browser, for example. What the specifics of the solution are will probably become clearer in the next few weeks as the developers of affected apps update their wares.

      The move coincides with updates to the company's Play Store policies to make it safer for children.

      Source: Google via Android Police

    • By techbeck
      A US Food and Drug Administration advisory committee on Thursday unanimously recommended approval of an epilepsy drug that would be the first plant-derived cannabidiol medicine for prescription use in the United States.
       
      The FDA will vote in June whether to approve the drug, Epidiolex, an oral solution, for the treatment of severe forms of epilepsy in a small group of patients. The FDA has approved synthetic versions of some cannabinoid chemicals found in the marijuana plant for other purposes, including cancer pain relief.
       
      Cannabidiol, also called CBD, is one of more than 80 active cannabinoid chemicals, yet unlike tetrahydrocannabinol, or THC, it does not produce a high.
       
      The committee's recommendation was delivered after reviewing data from the drug's maker, GW Pharmaceuticals PLC, a UK-based biopharmaceutical company.
       
      "We're obviously very pleased by the unanimous recommendation in support of the approval of Epidiolex," GW CEO Justin Gover said. "It's a very important milestone in the approval process."
       
       
      More....
      https://www.cnn.com/2018/04/19/health/fda-committee-marijuana-drug-epilepsy-bn/index.html
    • By Hum
      HARTFORD, Conn. (AP) — A Connecticut state worker fired after he was caught smoking marijuana on the job was punished too harshly and should get his job back, the state Supreme Court ruled Friday.
       
      Gregory Linhoff was fired from his maintenance job at the University of Connecticut Health Center in Farmington in 2012 after a police officer caught him smoking pot in a state-owned vehicle. He had no previous disciplinary problems since being hired in 1998 and had received favorable job evaluations, according to his union. He was arrested, but the charges were later dismissed.
       

       
      State officials said firing the New Hartford resident was the only appropriate penalty for his conduct and not doing so would send a bad message to other employees. An arbitrator disagreed and overturned the firing, saying Linhoff instead should be suspended without pay for six months and be subject to random drug testing for a year after he returned to work.
       
      The state appealed and a Superior Court judge overturned the arbitrator's decision on the grounds that it violated Connecticut's public policy against marijuana use. Linhoff's union, the Connecticut Employees Union Independent SEIU, appealed the judge's ruling to the Supreme Court.
       
      All seven justices agreed that the lower court judge was wrong to overturn the arbitrator's ruling, saying that while state policy on drug use in the work place allows for firing workers it does not require it. Justices also said that judicial second-guessing of arbitration awards is uncommon and should be reserved only for extraordinary circumstances.
       
      more
    • By Matt B
      Microsoft partners with marijuana trade start-up
      by Matt Blowes



      Microsoft is breaking a long-held corporate taboo by teaming up with Californian-based start-up KIND Financial to help the legal marijuana trade stay legit. KIND Government Solutions will take advantage of Microsoft's Azure Government cloud platform to enable authorities to monitor the marijuana trade from "seed to sale".

      While Microsoft's venture will not directly involve the sale of marijuana, it is the company's first foray in the industry. KIND is promoting the software as a useful regulatory tool which helps to, "close the loop between marijuana-related businesses, regulatory agencies, and financial institutions."

      The announcement does set Microsoft apart from many large US corporations, who have so far avoided investing in legal marijuana. With the drug being legalized in Microsoft's home state of Washington in 2014, and other states including California voting on legalization this year, the barriers to investment are starting to fall.

      Microsoft's Kimberly Nelson said the timing was right for the Redmond-based company to get involved.

      It may be a relatively small investment for Microsoft, particularly after announcing it was purchasing LinkedIn earlier this week. But it is a significant step for a newly legalized industry struggling to shake a negative reputation.

      Source: KIND Financial via NY Times

    • By Chris Schroeder
      EazeMD's mobile app offers medical marijuana consultation without leaving your home
      by Chris Schroeder

      Image: The Travel Joint Weed on the web isn't unheard of. The issue may still be touchy for some, but the ways in which you can get legal marijuana are emerging faster than ever before. Even big wigs from major tech companies are looking at ways to capitalize on the growing popularity of the feel-good substance, and at least one group within the 420-friendly business is making its approval and distribution process both simpler and cheaper for applicants.

      EazeMD is an app that is available on Android and iOS for free and is intended to cater to residents of the state of California (for now). The app offers cheap consultations for those seeking approval for a medical marijuana card that can only be ascertained by seeing a licensed physician. The consultation part of the process is made simple by simply creating an account on the EazeMD app and making an appointment for a video conference with a EazeMD physician. The price of admission is $40, with $30 going toward the medical consultation and $10 covering the signed and embossed recommendation letter that will grant you a medical marijuana card. This is considerably cheaper than what you'd pay for a standard visit to a doctor, where you could easily pay $100-$200 just for a medical marijuanaconsultation before application fees are taken into account.

      The cheaper path to getting your medical marijuana card and the ability to remotely consult carries a high ceiling of opportunity for this end of the marijuana business. Applicants that are approved for medical marijuana through EazeMD have the benefit of immediately being able to order medication through the company's website. Recreational marijuana is still very hard to come by, but the growing accessibility to legal medical marijuana is good news for those wishing to cut costs and get their treatments through legal channels. Assuming governing forces don't make it impossible to modernize the industry in other parts of the world, this service could be coming to you before long.

      Source: EazeMD, via Edgadget