Mel Gibson Thinks Batman V Superman Is a ‘Piece of ****’


Recommended Posts

Didnt really like Batman V Superman to much.  And still not sold on Ben Affleck as Batman.  Batman has always not killed anyone and this pretty much screws that all up.  I am all for a dark interpretation...like Christian Bale movies.   But this was pushing it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, techbeck said:

Batman has always not killed anyone and this pretty much screws that all up.  I am all for a dark interpretation...like Christian Bale movies.   But this was pushing it.

well, that depend on which era of batman you looking at.

Very early of Batman Comic did shows he uses guns and kills villains.

http://www.newyorker.com/news/daily-comment/batmans-gun

 

and theres more:

http://gizmodo.com/7-times-batman-has-bent-his-no-guns-rule-1634040693

Edited by Torolol
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Batman V Superman Is a ‘Piece of ****! Three hours of nothing, while some bad movies have redeeming qualities this had none.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't think BvS was that bad, having said that, I'm unlikely to ever watch it again and literately none of it stayed in my head. 

I actually like Gibson's stuff and think he's a quite talented human. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, MikeChipshop said:

I didn't think BvS was that bad, having said that, I'm unlikely to ever watch it again and literately none of it stayed in my head. 

I actually like Gibson's stuff and think he's a quite talented human. 

what was the actual plot again? superman was a god amongst men and they voted he come into court and then this judge drinks ######? - that's what I remember about it..

 

oh and batman didn't give a ###### about anyone and killed people because ###### the police.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.