White lines and low quality printing with a new Brother HL-3170CDW laser printer


Recommended Posts

Printer model: Brother HL-3170CDW (Laser printer)

Firmware version: 1.01

Connection: WiFi

Current OS: Win 10, OS X Sierra

 

I just hooked it up and all the prints I've tried have vertical & horizontal grayish \ white lines.

I've attached an album: Imgur

The first image is the actual sky image, the second is a print of those sky. The other two are demo prints, you can clearly see vertical lines on all of them. On an actual image print it looks a lot worse than on a print of a solid color like in the demos.

So far I tried installing new drivers, different OS's, calibrating color from the printer and driver, changing print quality from the driver.

 

Can anyone tell me where's the problem?

The best help you can get about that is from Brother's support...

 

I'm not a printer guru, but your header might be bad. just my 2 cents.

On 10/13/2016 at 10:50 PM, Mindovermaster said:

The best help you can get about that is from Brother's support...

 

I'm not a printer guru, but your header might be bad. just my 2 cents.

Thanks, I'll contact them on Monday. What do you mean by "header" ?

But you didn't update the firmware?  I have that same printer, and the current firmware is

 

Maintenance Information

Node Information

Model Name Brother HL-3170CDW series

Serial no. U63478(snipped)

Main Firmware Version 1.27

Sub1 Firmware Version 1.05

Memory Size 128MB

 

There is not really a print head in laser printer..  So its not that.. My guess would be toner cart is low or empty or just bad.  Did you try taking the towner out and rocking it back and forth?  Your pickup roller could be dirty as well or just some dirt in your paper path?  I agree though your best best is to connect their support.  I have had mine for a few years now and have no such issue.

Thanks @BudMan

 

I'll try playing with the toner now.

I thought about returning it thinking that that model is faulty in general. Glad that's not the case.

Is there a chance you have a photo of a color printed page you can upload so I can also print it and compare? It would be a lot easier if I could present a print with "this is how it suppose to look" to the store I bought it from.

 

Edit: My firmware is 1.27 & 1.05, In the first post I took the numbers from the driver, I now checked the actual printer.

 

Edited by Shasoosh

you just want a pic of the test page?

 

Well took a pic with my phone of the demo and test print pages.. Clearly there is no streaks.

 

 

IMG_2880.JPG

 

I have been really happy with it.. This dec will be 3 years and still on original carts.  Black is getting low at 10% but colors are still at 40%.  I don't do all that much printing.  But when I do its fast, and the printer really uses like no power sitting there idle in sleep mode.  But when you print it wakes up really fast and you have your page(s) in a few sec.  Other than the size it makes for a great home printer if you ask me.  It is a bit larger than your typical inkjet, etc.  When its time for more ink I might give it to my son and let him buy the ink ;)  And just git myself something new.. Using new tech, etc.  I wouldn't mind getting rid of my old flatbed scanner and making some room on my desk and getting new color laser with scanner built in, etc.

Thanks @BudMan

Actually I was hoping for a picture pic if you have one laying around (for example: http://wallpapersdsc.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Blue-Flower-HD.jpg ) as it's really hard for me to see those lines from the demo print

I totally understand if you're low on ink and prefer not to. 

 

Btw, from what I've read on that printer, sometimes the ink indicator says low on ink but actually there's a lot more in there so reseting the toner get a lot more prints out of a "need to replace" one. Worth a shot.

Ok printing that image.. You do understand its not a photo printer right..  It's a laser printer - not going to give you photo quality prints..

IMG_2882.JPG

 

How long you think that print would of taken with a "photo" printer??  With the laser it was printed in just a couple of seconds.  I what your after is photo quality printing then a laser is not what your after.

 

printissues.jpg

 

From your examples of your demo print I can clearly see lines in your color boxes.  I do not see any of those in my demo print..

3 hours ago, BudMan said:

But you didn't update the firmware?  I have that same printer, and the current firmware is

 

Maintenance Information

Node Information

Model Name Brother HL-3170CDW series

Serial no. U63478(snipped)

Main Firmware Version 1.27

Sub1 Firmware Version 1.05

Memory Size 128MB

 

There is not really a print head in laser printer..  So its not that.. My guess would be toner cart is low or empty or just bad.  Did you try taking the towner out and rocking it back and forth?  Your pickup roller could be dirty as well or just some dirt in your paper path?  I agree though your best best is to connect their support.  I have had mine for a few years now and have no such issue.

I was just about to mention, shake the toner cartridge! Some particles may have settled during warehouse storage. (DON'T TURN IT UPSIDE DOWN! JUST TAKE IT OUT, SHAKE IT, AND ROLL THE ROLLER A FEW TIMES. DON'T RUIN YOUR CLOTHES, lol!) Remember: hands are washable, and you can get the toner off relatively easy. It's not so easy on clothes, so if you do shake it, do it cautiously)

  • Like 1

Laser printer is great for printing everyday stuff, stuff for your kids school, work reports with graphs, etc., flyers and such.  Recipes, etc. etc.  Great for doing paper crafts with my granddaughter and heavy paper (card stock) But if what you want is to print out some photos to hang on the wall etc..  Then no the quality going to suck for that..  Either just order them at your local drug store walgreens, cvs, target, walmart and have them mailed to you or pick them up.  If we need a photo we just upload it to the corner walgreens and can pick it up in less than an hour for like 10 cents a print.

 

Makes no sense to me to have a photo printer when I can have great prints for a few pennies in less than hour.  Any size - and I didn't have to buy ink, paper or printer..
 

Thanks guys and thanks a lot for that print @BudMan, That was really cool of you.

 

I do understand that that's not a photo printer but printing a photo helped me distinguish between the quality of the printer or a problem with the printer. I do suspect that my blue and black toners are faulty. 

 

I did a few more tests and found another problem, not sure it's the printer fault this time. As one that owns that same printer, I'd love to hear your take on this one too.

 

 

5 hours ago, Obi-Wan Kenobi said:

I was just about to mention, shake the toner cartridge! Some particles may have settled during warehouse storage. (DON'T TURN IT UPSIDE DOWN! JUST TAKE IT OUT, SHAKE IT, AND ROLL THE ROLLER A FEW TIMES. DON'T RUIN YOUR CLOTHES, lol!) Remember: hands are washable, and you can get the toner off relatively easy. It's not so easy on clothes, so if you do shake it, do it cautiously)

Yeah, I did that before... :/

 

12 minutes ago, Mindovermaster said:

Yeah, I did that before... :/

 

Man, me too! Ruined my whole uniform! Hard lesson learned!

looks like a dirty image transfer drum/fuser unit to me (may look like a big metallic roller) they can get charged up and toner/paper dust particles can stick to it, esp if transported recently.

  • 6 months later...
3 hours ago, Hhhhhhugo said:

Hi all, I have exactly the same problem than  Shasoosh user. Did you solved the problem? Thank you!

Hello and welcome to Neowin.

 

I would recommend creating a new topic with a description of your problem, including as much detail as possible to aid in helping you with a solution.

  • DrunknMunky locked this topic
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Dude, im talking about simply disable it from settings app. Because of the eu regulation, you could disable it here for years.
    • One big question about Mars was answered thanks to Einstein's 100 year old theory by Sayan Sen Image via DepositPhotos Scientists at the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have calculated how time passes on Mars compared with Earth, adding detail to how timekeeping would need to work beyond Earth’s orbit. The study, published in The Astronomical Journal, found that clocks on Mars run an average of 477 microseconds, or millionths of a second, faster per day than clocks on Earth. A microsecond is one millionth of a second, a very small unit used in precise scientific timing systems such as atomic clocks, which measure time using consistent atomic behavior. This difference is not constant. Because Mars moves around the Sun in a non-circular path (an eccentric orbit, meaning its distance from the Sun changes over time instead of staying fixed) and is affected by gravity from other bodies, the daily difference can vary by as much as 226 microseconds over a Martian year. The study also identifies smaller repeating changes of about 40 microseconds per day linked to synodic cycles (repeating periods that describe how planets line up with each other as they orbit the Sun from different positions). These longer patterns affect how time differences slowly rise and fall. To make these estimates, researchers compared Mars with Earth and the Moon. The work looks at relativistic proper time (the time actually measured by a clock depending on its speed and the strength of gravity where it is located, as described in Einstein’s relativity). This shows that each world has its own slightly different “rate” of time. This becomes more important as space missions expand into cislunar space (the region between Earth and the Moon) and toward Mars. On Earth, time systems rely on atomic clocks and satellites, which stay closely synchronized for navigation and communication. The study is based on Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity, which shows that time is affected by gravity and motion. Stronger gravity makes clocks run slower, while weaker gravity makes them run faster. “The time is just right for the Moon and Mars,” said NIST physicist Bijunath Patla. “This is the closest we have been to realizing the science fiction vision of expanding across the solar system.” A day on Mars is about 40 minutes longer than on Earth, and a Martian year lasts 687 Earth days. But the main question is not just about days and years, but how fast time itself passes. An atomic clock placed on Mars would function normally, but compared with one on Earth, the two would slowly drift apart due to differences in gravity and motion. This requires careful calculation of what is similar to a time-zone difference across planets. Researchers modeled Mars using a reference surface and included gravitational effects from the Sun, Earth, the Moon, and other planets. This includes a multi-body gravitational system (often described as a three-body or four-body problem, where predicting motion becomes difficult because multiple large objects all pull on each other at the same time through gravity). Mars also follows a Keplerian orbit (an idealized elliptical orbit based on simple gravitational laws that assume smooth motion, before adding real-world disturbances from other bodies). In addition, the researchers accounted for solar tides (small changes in gravitational force caused by the Sun that slightly distort planetary motion and timing, especially in systems involving Earth and the Moon). These combined effects are described as relativistic proper-time offsets (small but measurable differences in elapsed time between locations caused by gravity and motion), which must be included when comparing clocks across planets. “But for Mars, that’s not the case. Its distance from the Sun and its eccentric orbit make the variations in time larger. A three-body problem is extremely complicated. Now we’re dealing with four: the Sun, Earth, the Moon and Mars,” Patla explained. “The heavy lifting was more challenging than I initially thought.” Although the differences are extremely small, they matter for navigation and communication systems that depend on precise timing. Even modern networks on Earth, such as mobile systems, rely on timing accuracy at very small fractions of a second. Communication between Earth and Mars currently takes about four to 24 minutes or more depending on planetary positions, meaning signals are not real-time. A shared and accurate time system could help future missions reduce confusion in navigation and data exchange. “If you get synchronization, it will be almost like real-time communication without any loss of information. You don’t have to wait to see what happens,” Patla said. Researchers note that fully developed interplanetary communication networks are still far in the future. However, understanding how time behaves across planets helps prepare for those systems. “It may be decades before the surface of Mars is covered by the tracks of wandering rovers, but it is useful now to study the issues involved in establishing navigation systems on other planets and moons,” said Neil Ashby. “Like current global navigation systems like GPS, these systems will depend on accurate clocks, and the effects on clock rates can be analyzed with the help of Einstein’s general theory of relativity.” Patla added that the results also help improve understanding of time itself under relativity. “It's good to know for the first time what is happening on Mars timewise. Nobody knew that before. It improves our knowledge of the theory itself, the theory of how clocks tick and relativity,” he said. Source: NIST, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 by Razvan Serea TeraCopy is a compact program designed to copy and move files at the maximum possible speed, also providing you with a lot of features. Copy files faster. TeraCopy uses dynamically adjusted buffers to reduce seek times. Asynchronous copy speeds up file transfer between two physical hard drives. Pause and resume transfers. Pause copy process at any time to free up system resources and continue with a single click. Error recovery. In case of copy error, TeraCopy will try several times and in the worse case just skips the file, not terminating the entire transfer. Interactive file list. TeraCopy shows failed file transfers and lets you fix the problem and recopy only problem files. Shell integration. TeraCopy can completely replace Explorer copy and move functions, allowing you work with files as usual. TeraCopy is free for non-commercial use only. For commercial use you need to buy a license. The paid version of the program includes the following features: Copy/move to your favorite folders. Save reports as HTML and CSV files. Select files with the same extension/folder. Remove the selected files from the copy queue. TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 changelog: Added support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. Improved exception handling and automated bug report upload. Fixed several minor bugs and small memory leaks. Build 26 (June 24) Fixed a rare exception when a transfer completed. Features added since version 3.17: Enhanced speed graph. New multi-threaded copy engine. Support for copying to multiple targets. Queue system for managing multiple copy operations. Support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. TeraCopy entry in the modern Windows Explorer context menu. Integrated toolbar in the title bar. Why receive LocalSend transfers with TeraCopy? Handle file conflicts: Skip, overwrite, or rename files when a file with the same name already exists. LocalSend always creates another copy, which can waste time and disk space, especially when resuming an interrupted transfer. Filter unwanted files: Apply ignore lists or remove files manually before accepting a transfer, so unnecessary files are not downloaded. Better performance on fast networks: In tests over a 10 Gbps connection, TeraCopy received files several times faster than the standard LocalSend app on Windows. Download: TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 | 14.5 MB (Freeware, paid upgrade available) View: TeraCopy Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Briefly used Turbo Pascal (and Turbo C++) in 97 and soon after that I bought PC magazine that included a full version of Delphi 2. I still use Delphi today, some 29 years later.
    • Age of Empires Mobile comes to PC, here's how to carry over progress from your phone by Ivan Jenic Image: YouTube/Microsoft Microsoft just released Age of Empires Mobile for PC. The game, officially called Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, is available for free on Steam and Microsoft Store, almost two years after its initial release for handheld devices. Age of Empires is one of those franchises that entire generations grew up with. The original came out in 1997, and immediately got people hooked to building civilizations and crushing their enemies on the battlefield. However, the franchise today is a far cry from its roots, as Age of Empires Mobile is, well, a game optimized for handheld devices, and not a classic RTS title we’ve all loved for years. And, of course, it includes in-game purchases. The PC version is still a mobile game at its core, but it’s been optimized for desktop play. There’s mouse control, full keyboard compatibility, and a refined UI. Microsoft also refreshed the visuals with some 4k textures, so the game should look better on larger screens. The game supports Crossplay, so you can switch between your phone, tablet, and PC without losing anything. But linked progress doesn’t come out of the box, as you have to enable it first. Here’s how to link your progress: On your mobile device, open Age of Empires Mobile. Go to Settings (Gear icon) > Account. Select Bind Account and choose a sign-in option. Once you enable account binding, sign in on PC using the same method, and your progress will be accessible across all your devices. Xbox Game Pass subscribers also get a bonus reward pack on PC, which includes: 1 Monthly Pass Token 1 Custom Resource Chest 10 Universal 60-Minute Speed-Ups 1,000 Empire Coins Exclusive Player Portrait Frame You can find more info about Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, as well as download links, on the Age of Empires official website.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      458
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!