White lines and low quality printing with a new Brother HL-3170CDW laser printer


Recommended Posts

Printer model: Brother HL-3170CDW (Laser printer)

Firmware version: 1.01

Connection: WiFi

Current OS: Win 10, OS X Sierra

 

I just hooked it up and all the prints I've tried have vertical & horizontal grayish \ white lines.

I've attached an album: Imgur

The first image is the actual sky image, the second is a print of those sky. The other two are demo prints, you can clearly see vertical lines on all of them. On an actual image print it looks a lot worse than on a print of a solid color like in the demos.

So far I tried installing new drivers, different OS's, calibrating color from the printer and driver, changing print quality from the driver.

 

Can anyone tell me where's the problem?

The best help you can get about that is from Brother's support...

 

I'm not a printer guru, but your header might be bad. just my 2 cents.

On 10/13/2016 at 10:50 PM, Mindovermaster said:

The best help you can get about that is from Brother's support...

 

I'm not a printer guru, but your header might be bad. just my 2 cents.

Thanks, I'll contact them on Monday. What do you mean by "header" ?

But you didn't update the firmware?  I have that same printer, and the current firmware is

 

Maintenance Information

Node Information

Model Name Brother HL-3170CDW series

Serial no. U63478(snipped)

Main Firmware Version 1.27

Sub1 Firmware Version 1.05

Memory Size 128MB

 

There is not really a print head in laser printer..  So its not that.. My guess would be toner cart is low or empty or just bad.  Did you try taking the towner out and rocking it back and forth?  Your pickup roller could be dirty as well or just some dirt in your paper path?  I agree though your best best is to connect their support.  I have had mine for a few years now and have no such issue.

Thanks @BudMan

 

I'll try playing with the toner now.

I thought about returning it thinking that that model is faulty in general. Glad that's not the case.

Is there a chance you have a photo of a color printed page you can upload so I can also print it and compare? It would be a lot easier if I could present a print with "this is how it suppose to look" to the store I bought it from.

 

Edit: My firmware is 1.27 & 1.05, In the first post I took the numbers from the driver, I now checked the actual printer.

 

Edited by Shasoosh

you just want a pic of the test page?

 

Well took a pic with my phone of the demo and test print pages.. Clearly there is no streaks.

 

 

IMG_2880.JPG

 

I have been really happy with it.. This dec will be 3 years and still on original carts.  Black is getting low at 10% but colors are still at 40%.  I don't do all that much printing.  But when I do its fast, and the printer really uses like no power sitting there idle in sleep mode.  But when you print it wakes up really fast and you have your page(s) in a few sec.  Other than the size it makes for a great home printer if you ask me.  It is a bit larger than your typical inkjet, etc.  When its time for more ink I might give it to my son and let him buy the ink ;)  And just git myself something new.. Using new tech, etc.  I wouldn't mind getting rid of my old flatbed scanner and making some room on my desk and getting new color laser with scanner built in, etc.

Thanks @BudMan

Actually I was hoping for a picture pic if you have one laying around (for example: http://wallpapersdsc.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Blue-Flower-HD.jpg ) as it's really hard for me to see those lines from the demo print

I totally understand if you're low on ink and prefer not to. 

 

Btw, from what I've read on that printer, sometimes the ink indicator says low on ink but actually there's a lot more in there so reseting the toner get a lot more prints out of a "need to replace" one. Worth a shot.

Ok printing that image.. You do understand its not a photo printer right..  It's a laser printer - not going to give you photo quality prints..

IMG_2882.JPG

 

How long you think that print would of taken with a "photo" printer??  With the laser it was printed in just a couple of seconds.  I what your after is photo quality printing then a laser is not what your after.

 

printissues.jpg

 

From your examples of your demo print I can clearly see lines in your color boxes.  I do not see any of those in my demo print..

3 hours ago, BudMan said:

But you didn't update the firmware?  I have that same printer, and the current firmware is

 

Maintenance Information

Node Information

Model Name Brother HL-3170CDW series

Serial no. U63478(snipped)

Main Firmware Version 1.27

Sub1 Firmware Version 1.05

Memory Size 128MB

 

There is not really a print head in laser printer..  So its not that.. My guess would be toner cart is low or empty or just bad.  Did you try taking the towner out and rocking it back and forth?  Your pickup roller could be dirty as well or just some dirt in your paper path?  I agree though your best best is to connect their support.  I have had mine for a few years now and have no such issue.

I was just about to mention, shake the toner cartridge! Some particles may have settled during warehouse storage. (DON'T TURN IT UPSIDE DOWN! JUST TAKE IT OUT, SHAKE IT, AND ROLL THE ROLLER A FEW TIMES. DON'T RUIN YOUR CLOTHES, lol!) Remember: hands are washable, and you can get the toner off relatively easy. It's not so easy on clothes, so if you do shake it, do it cautiously)

  • Like 1

Laser printer is great for printing everyday stuff, stuff for your kids school, work reports with graphs, etc., flyers and such.  Recipes, etc. etc.  Great for doing paper crafts with my granddaughter and heavy paper (card stock) But if what you want is to print out some photos to hang on the wall etc..  Then no the quality going to suck for that..  Either just order them at your local drug store walgreens, cvs, target, walmart and have them mailed to you or pick them up.  If we need a photo we just upload it to the corner walgreens and can pick it up in less than an hour for like 10 cents a print.

 

Makes no sense to me to have a photo printer when I can have great prints for a few pennies in less than hour.  Any size - and I didn't have to buy ink, paper or printer..
 

Thanks guys and thanks a lot for that print @BudMan, That was really cool of you.

 

I do understand that that's not a photo printer but printing a photo helped me distinguish between the quality of the printer or a problem with the printer. I do suspect that my blue and black toners are faulty. 

 

I did a few more tests and found another problem, not sure it's the printer fault this time. As one that owns that same printer, I'd love to hear your take on this one too.

 

 

5 hours ago, Obi-Wan Kenobi said:

I was just about to mention, shake the toner cartridge! Some particles may have settled during warehouse storage. (DON'T TURN IT UPSIDE DOWN! JUST TAKE IT OUT, SHAKE IT, AND ROLL THE ROLLER A FEW TIMES. DON'T RUIN YOUR CLOTHES, lol!) Remember: hands are washable, and you can get the toner off relatively easy. It's not so easy on clothes, so if you do shake it, do it cautiously)

Yeah, I did that before... :/

 

12 minutes ago, Mindovermaster said:

Yeah, I did that before... :/

 

Man, me too! Ruined my whole uniform! Hard lesson learned!

looks like a dirty image transfer drum/fuser unit to me (may look like a big metallic roller) they can get charged up and toner/paper dust particles can stick to it, esp if transported recently.

  • 6 months later...
3 hours ago, Hhhhhhugo said:

Hi all, I have exactly the same problem than  Shasoosh user. Did you solved the problem? Thank you!

Hello and welcome to Neowin.

 

I would recommend creating a new topic with a description of your problem, including as much detail as possible to aid in helping you with a solution.

  • DrunknMunky locked this topic
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • With the current hardware prices Microsoft should lift the restriction. Then if you have the correct TPM then allow you to use X feature, if you don't have the correct TPM then don't but still actually let you run windows. 11. With a disclaimer during install that X features would be unavailable.
    • It's good for recycling of course. But commence inflation of a second hand RAM bubble and price gouging on DDR 4 inventory in 3... 2... 1...
    • Bypassed Windows 11 shows surprising stability on ancient, completely unsupported hardware by Sayan Sen When Windows 11 was first released, one of the most complained-about issues with the new desktop Microsoft OS was its higher system requirements, which pushed many relatively modern and powerful processors and devices onto the officially unsupported list. Thankfully, they have not been updated again for the base OS, though systems require four times the memory and storage if they want to run AI-powered apps and features. As such, Windows 11 technically runs on 4GB of memory, and there is no imposed restriction on the generation of memory it supports. Speaking of memory, prices are extremely high nowadays for hardware, especially DDR5 and DDR4 kits due to the current silicon shortage, and there are also reports of it affecting DDR2 as well, and it might only be a matter of time before even DDR1 gets affected. Before that could happen, an enthusiast took an ancient DDR1-based system and decided to try out Windows 11 on it to see how well the modern OS would fare on such hardware. The system runs an outdated graphics card interface standard based on AGP, or Advanced Graphics Port, called AGP 3.0 or AGP8x. AGP was essentially succeeded by the modern PCI Express (PCIe) bus standard. The user behind the experiment is retro hardware enthusiast Omores, who built the system around an ASRock ConRoe865PE motherboard based on Intel's i865PE chipset from way back in 2003, around the time when AGP was still in fashion. What made this board special back in the day was its unusual support for newer Core 2 Duo and even Core 2 Quad processors while still retaining older DDR1 memory support and an AGP8X graphics slot, making it an ideal bridge or link between two vastly different generations. Powering the machine was Intel's Core 2 Quad Q6600 alongside 3GB of DDR1 RAM and an ATI Radeon HD 4650 AGP graphics card, one of the final and most capable GPUs released for the aging AGP interface. While installing Windows 11 itself was relatively easy by bypassing Microsoft's hardware checks, getting the graphics card fully functional proved to be some challenge. Microsoft had quietly dropped native AGP support after the earliest releases of Windows 10, meaning newer versions of Windows no longer include the necessary Graphics Address Remapping Table (GART) drivers required for proper AGP acceleration. Without them, AGP graphics cards typically boot up, though with limited functionality, and can often throw a Code 43 error in Device Manager. To work around the limitation, Omores extracted Intel's legacy AGP440 SYS driver from an early Windows 10 release and paired it with a modified INF file so Windows 11 would correctly recognize the chipset. Following this and combined with AMD's final 64-bit Catalyst AGP drivers from 2012, the Radeon HD 4650 was able to operate with full AGP 8X acceleration intact. The result was said to be surprisingly usable for hardware that is over two decades old. Hardware-accelerated H.264 video playback worked correctly and benefited apps like Firefox, while legacy applications and games ran without major graphical issues. The system also successfully completed the 3DMark 2001 benchmark, although performance naturally lagged behind what the same hardware achieves under Windows 7, which is significantly lighter than Windows 11. There was, however, one unavoidable limitation as Microsoft's Windows 11 version 24H2 introduces a mandatory SSE4.2 CPU instruction requirement that cannot be bypassed through installer modifications or registry tweaks. Since no AGP-era processor supports SSE4.2, Windows 11 version 23H2 effectively becomes the final release capable of running on such systems. Regardless, it is still a very cool feat and quite fascinating to see just how stable Windows 11 turned out to be on such unfamiliar hardware. Source: Omores (Patreon) via O_MORES (Reddit)
    • That will only really help other players that are also responsible for creating the problem.
    • Well, it's good to know that they have found a workaround to a problem that they helped create, I guess...
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      539
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      266
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!