freak180 Posted November 23, 2016 Author Share Posted November 23, 2016 How the hell did this topic go downhill? Anyway, They banned the account that leaked it which is kind of odd but from I heard they are taking down those profiles.. Which I'm surprise they took them this long. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rippleman Posted November 23, 2016 Share Posted November 23, 2016 I am shocked to how many are on the side of "child pornography cause no harm". I for one am blocking all the people that have this view point. Viewing child prograpy DOES HURT children no matter what you sick bastards say. End of story. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dick Montage Posted November 23, 2016 Share Posted November 23, 2016 If you can't discriminate between arguing without emotion and supporting child porn, then you are sort of out of your depth. Let me spell it out for you - nobody here says it doesn't hurt children INDIRECTLY. A point was put forth as an argument to dissect. But seeing as you chose to block people who you feel challenge your very much fixed and narrow view of the issue, you'll never get that. +Anarkii, theyarecomingforyou and MikeChipshop 3 Share Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rippleman Posted November 23, 2016 Share Posted November 23, 2016 (edited) 17 minutes ago, Nefarious Trigger said: If you can't discriminate between arguing without emotion and supporting child porn, then you are sort of out of your depth. Let me spell it out for you - nobody here says it doesn't hurt children INDIRECTLY. A point was put forth as an argument to dissect. But seeing as you chose to block people who you feel challenge your very much fixed and narrow view of the issue, you'll never get that. i know exactly what you mean, however, due to the extreme severity of the issue, indirectly or not (and it IS directly - consumption creates the market), its a vile and disgusting position to hold. Sickos. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
troysavary Posted November 23, 2016 Share Posted November 23, 2016 19 minutes ago, Rippleman said: I am shocked to how many are on the side of "child pornography cause no harm". I for one am blocking all the people that have this view point. Viewing child prograpy DOES HURT children no matter what you sick bastards say. End of story. I didn't argue that child porn causes no harm. I just don't feel that teens voluntarily posting naked pics counts as child porn. theyarecomingforyou 1 Share Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rippleman Posted November 23, 2016 Share Posted November 23, 2016 12 minutes ago, troysavary said: I didn't argue that child porn causes no harm. I just don't feel that teens voluntarily posting naked pics counts as child porn. I wasn't seeing your post, I was mostly just talking to the guys that are defending this atrocious position of "it does not harm." One wonders if their family and loved ones know their position and if they are around children. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dick Montage Posted November 23, 2016 Share Posted November 23, 2016 4 minutes ago, Rippleman said: I wasn't seeing your post, I was mostly just talking to the guys that are defending this atrocious position of "it does not harm." One wonders if their family and loved ones know their position and if they are around children. See, that whole argument about "what if it's your daughter" crops up, as predictable as the sunrise and sunset. You are still deliberately not reading the whole post and just arguing emotively. But hey, you have blocked me so you must be arguing with yourself? theyarecomingforyou 1 Share Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rippleman Posted November 23, 2016 Share Posted November 23, 2016 (edited) 1 minute ago, Nefarious Trigger said: See, that whole argument about "what if it's your daughter" crops up, as predictable as the sunrise and sunset. You are still deliberately not reading the whole post and just arguing emotively. I reject your position and don't care on your reasoning. Child pornography is wrong and nothing you can say to defend your position will change my mind on that. Nothing you can say will will change that VEIWING and CONSUMING IT DOES HARM CHILDREN no matter how much you are trying to say that it doesn't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dick Montage Posted November 23, 2016 Share Posted November 23, 2016 1 minute ago, Rippleman said: I reject your position and don't care on your reasoning. Child pornography is wrong and nothing you can say to defend your position will change my mind on that. Nothing you can say will will change that IT DOES HARM CHILDREN no matter how much you are trying to say that it doesn't. You repeatedly failed to understand my position, so whether your reject or care is moot. You can't even grasp what is being said. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dick Montage Posted November 23, 2016 Share Posted November 23, 2016 (edited) 25 minutes ago, Rippleman said: snip So you are swearing and using capitals and attempting to patronise rather than anything else? Unfortunately, you invalidate everything you try to say with such tactics, and could have simply read and understood the thread better. Telling me to (whatever) off, lol - really? Or what will you do about it? You have literally zero control over that. How about I make it really easy for you: Nobody has at any point said that viewing child porn doesn't harm children. It was put forth as a valid discussion point, and then dissected and defactored. There is a valid argument that simply viewing doesn't directly harm children. You have argued this, but that simply suggests that you can't comprehend the difference between directly and indirectly. Get it? Nobody is agreeing with you as you have picked a moot argument that nobody has any real time for. However, you have blocked me and so can't read this. Edited November 23, 2016 by Andrew Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Open Minded Posted November 23, 2016 Share Posted November 23, 2016 10 hours ago, astropheed said: But you aren't only harming your body when you choose to buy drugs I grow my own. Clones from the BPG. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rippleman Posted November 23, 2016 Share Posted November 23, 2016 (edited) 10 minutes ago, Nefarious Trigger said: How about I make it really easy for you: Nobody has at any point said that viewing child porn doesn't harm children. You are incorrect, others HAVE said that it doesn't. Aside from that. thank you for finally agreeing with me that the consumption of child prography HARMS CHILDREN. Why that was so hard for you to accept is beyond my understanding. So now that you accept that we agree, what are you thinking you were disagreeing with me about? This has been my one and only claim - viewing and consuming child probgraphy HARMS CHILDREN. End of story. Open Minded 1 Share Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dick Montage Posted November 23, 2016 Share Posted November 23, 2016 3 minutes ago, Rippleman said: You are incorrect, others HAVE said that it doesn't. Aside from that. thank you for finally agreeing with me that the consumption of child prography HARMS CHILDREN. Why that was so hard for you to accept is beyond my understanding. So know that you accept that we agree, what are you disagreeing with me about? No, they haven't. They have put forth arguments not opinions. Nobody is agreeing or disagreeing with you, because you've failed to grasp simple parts of the thread so much that they just aren't engaging. Wow, you really exist in your own little bubble. But hey, you can't read this, as you blocked everyone who you felt challenged your view of the world. theyarecomingforyou 1 Share Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rippleman Posted November 23, 2016 Share Posted November 23, 2016 (edited) 3 minutes ago, Nefarious Trigger said: No, they haven't. They have put forth arguments not opinions. Wow, you really exist in your own little bubble. But hey, you can't read this, as you blocked everyone who you felt challenged your view of the world. Unless the people went back and edited their comments, 2 people have said that it doesn't. However, since you now agree with me on MY single and ONLY claim "VIEWING and CONSUMING child poragraphy harms children" then there is no issue so not sure what you want. Added.... I will reject all world view challenges that try to say "the viewing and consumption of child pronagraphy doen't harm children". I suggest all people should reject this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrunknMunky Veteran Posted November 23, 2016 Veteran Share Posted November 23, 2016 Topic Closed I see no good leaving the discussion open when some cannot discuss it without resorting to attacks. Dick Montage 1 Share Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts