Recommended Posts

I enabled it, but it isn't as fun as it sounds, you need to enable it in your account settings > security settings and then install the google authenticator app. 

 

The other option was to require a questions and answer challenge, which only Neowin can set, errrr (left that disabled).

 

Two-factor isn't required by default, and isn't for new registrations. Standard 2FA is available if you login with Facebook, Google or Microsoft account.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1324984-two-factor-turned-on/
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Steven P. said:

I enabled it, but it isn't as fun as it sounds, you need to enable it in your account settings > security settings and then install the google authenticator app. 

 

The other option was to require a questions and answer challenge, which only Neowin can set, errrr (left that disabled).

 

Two-factor isn't required by default, and isn't for new registrations. Standard 2FA is available if you login with Facebook, Google or Microsoft account.

I used the Microsoft app kVmWm6g.gif

 

Well I never messed with my settings, apparently it was maybe just coincidence on the timing.

I had to dump cookies, and do a reboot before I could get back on the site with this computer.

(also changed back to google's DNS from NTT Data's - but that probably had nothing to do with it as it seems to have been a weird cookie thing)

One thing people have to be careful about when it comes to using the Google Authenticator app or other authentication apps is that if you factory reset your phone, break your phone or for whatever reason have to reinstall the authentication app all your codes are GONE! I would highly recommend that anyone who uses Google Authenticator install it on more than 1 device. If you only have 1 device I would recommend going to walmart and buy a $40 Moto E and install it on there too.

 

I'm aware you can use services like Authy but having all my two-factor codes in an online account kind of makes me feel uneasy.

  • Like 2
7 minutes ago, Circaflex said:

Why would they be out of luck? Microsoft Authenticator works fine on Windows Mobile.

The page claims "You will need to install the Google Authenticator app onto your smart phone. When we need you to verify your identify, you will enter the code shown in the app.".  So I assumed that was the only authenticator that worked on the forum. It's good to hear that is not the case.

9 minutes ago, Circaflex said:

Two users already have pointed out that you dont need Google Authenticator, probably the only reason it was mentioned is because it is the most commonly used one. An authenticator is an authenticator. 

I feel the page should be updated to inform users that other authenticators can be used. It may be obvious to users such as yourself, but I don't think it's very clear at the moment.  Especially to those who are new to two-factor authentication.

39 minutes ago, LimeMaster said:

I feel the page should be updated to inform users that other authenticators can be used. It may be obvious to users such as yourself, but I don't think it's very clear at the moment.  Especially to those who are new to two-factor authentication.

Very good point, LimeMaster, not all of us are that familiar with 2FA and any information provided/shared is helpful.

  • Like 5

I vote that @warwagon helps me with any update to that page (if I can even edit it) :p Maybe I can link to the authenticator download pages too :)

 

And in case you don't even care, here's a kitten:

cutest-cat-gifs-kitten-meow.gif

5 minutes ago, Steven P. said:

I vote that @warwagon helps me with any update to that page (if I can even edit it) :p Maybe I can link to the authenticator download pages too :)

 

And in case you don't even care, here's a kitten:

cutest-cat-gifs-kitten-meow.gif

Good choice, Neobond!  He's a knowledgable man. :)

6 minutes ago, Steven P. said:

I vote that @warwagon helps me with any update to that page (if I can even edit it) :p Maybe I can link to the authenticator download pages too :)

 

And in case you don't even care, here's a kitten:

cutest-cat-gifs-kitten-meow.gif

Steven, you better hide your kitten or @The Evil Overlord will cook it in the microwave then eat it. 

 

 

:p 

2 hours ago, Steven P. said:

I vote that @warwagon helps me with any update to that page (if I can even edit it) :p Maybe I can link to the authenticator download pages too :)

 

And in case you don't even care, here's a kitten:

cutest-cat-gifs-kitten-meow.gif

 
 

Sweet, sounds like fun!

 

cat_almost.gif

  • Like 2
8 hours ago, Joe User said:

I recommend using WinAuth as a backup to your phone's authentication software. It's full featured and open source.  https://winauth.com/

 

 

 

Thank you for posting about that app :) That would handy for those who don't even use a smart phone (or want one).

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • In the boot options in the UEFI is set to legacy or CMS? It needs to be set to UEFI if it's not already.
    • Researchers claim Microsoft's quantum breakthrough is flawed by basic Python errors by Karthik Mudaliar Microsoft's aggressive roadmap to deliver a commercial quantum supercomputer by 2029 has now hit a bit of a snag, and it's not because of a complex sub-zero dilution refrigerator, but rather because of a few lines of basic Python code. A new critique published in the scientific journal Nature argues that simple software errors effectively manufactured the breakthrough that Microsoft's foundational research claimed back in 2025 into Majorana-based topological qubits. Topological quantum computing, the path that Microsoft chose for its research, relies on creating and controlling "Majorana zero modes." These are exotic quasiparticles that theoretically offer vastly superior error resistance compared to the highly sensitive superconducting qubits currently being championed by rivals like Google and IBM. However, physically proving you have created these particles requires sifting through massive amounts of complex electrical conductance data to isolate a specific "topological gap." Because of the sheer volume of data, physicists rely heavily on custom software pipelines to process the results. This is where the Python scripts come in. Now, according to the critique, Microsoft’s data processing software contained fundamental programming errors that ultimately skewed the published results. By mishandling data arrays or deploying incorrect logic within the Python script, the software supposedly discarded "noisy" or contradictory data. Which is why it only highlighted the specific electrical measurements that supported the topological-gap claim. The researchers behind the critique argued that this makes the findings invalid, suggesting the heralded "quantum leap" was actually a false positive generated by bad code and not a product of groundbreaking physics. However, Microsoft is pushing back hard against these allegations. The Redmond giant has formally rejected the criticism, saying that it's just a minor anomaly rather than a fatal flaw. According to the company, while there may have been a minor oversight in the data parsing scripts, it does not alter the fundamental reality of their physical experiment. Just weeks ago, Microsoft unveiled the Majorana 2 quantum processor, a milestone so significant that the company boldly accelerated its timeline for a commercial quantum supercomputer from 2035 down to 2029. But the new software allegations reopen an old wound. Microsoft's quantum division faced a remarkably similar crisis when a landmark 2018 paper on Majorana particles was famously retracted in 2021 after independent physicists discovered the data had been inappropriately cropped. That historical baggage makes the current Python-related allegations particularly sensitive. If the foundational math and data processing for the 2025 breakthrough are genuinely flawed, the highly anticipated 2029 commercial timeline could easily be delayed or, worse, cancelled.
    • Because of what they have done to VMware I will never buy anything Broadcom again.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      467
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      123
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      82
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!