Aaron Hernandez, former NFL player, found dead in prison cell, officials say


Recommended Posts

Aaron Hernandez, the former New England Patriots star who was convicted of murder in 2015, killed himself in his prison cell Wednesday morning, officials said.

 

Hernandez, 27, was found hanging in his cell by corrections officers around 3:05 a.m. at the Souza Baranowski Correctional Center, Massachusetts Department of Correction officials said in a statement.

He was pronounced dead an hour later.

 

Hernandez was in a single cell in a general population housing unit and hanged himself with a bed sheet attached to his cell window. He also tried blocking his door from the inside with various items, officials said.

 

An investigation was ongoing.

 

More....

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/04/19/aaron-hernandez-former-nfl-player-found-dead-in-prison-cell-officials-say.html

Boo hoo, cry me a river.

 

Can't do the time, don't do the crime. What a loser with no regard for human life.

1 hour ago, wakjak said:

good riddance.

 

Although now he's basically an innocent man.

Only acquitted of one of the murders. He still had a life sentence for the other one.

Quote

The death of the once-promising NFL tight end came almost two years to the day when he was convicted of first-degree murder in the death of semi-pro football player Odin Lloyd. The 15th selection in the 2010 NFL draft, Hernandez was arrested in August 2013 in connection with Lloyd's June 2013 death.

On April 14, Hernandez was found not guilty in a double homicide separate from the Lloyd case; however, he was already serving a life sentence without the possibility of parole in connection with Lloyd's murder.

 

2 minutes ago, SpeedyTheSnail said:

Boo hoo, cry me a river.

 

Can't do the time, don't do the crime. What a loser with no regard for human life.

Only acquitted of one of the murders. He still had a life sentence for the other one.

 

I know, but now that he's dead, in Massachusetts, if an inmate dies before appeals go through, it's as if he's never been arrested, or convicted of any crimes. He's an innocent man in the eyes of the law in Massachusetts.

 

The family of the deceased will have to refile a lawsuit and do it all over, just without the murderer in the room.

And now listen to yourselves - basically *street justice* trumps the legal system - and you couldn't be happier - what hypocrisy!

2 minutes ago, PGHammer said:

And now listen to yourselves - basically *street justice* trumps the legal system - and you couldn't be happier - what hypocrisy!

better dead than wasting tax payer dollars to hole him up for however long his life would have been.

4 minutes ago, wakjak said:

better dead than wasting tax payer dollars to hole him up for however long his life would have been.

And you are among those that supposedly hate the death penalty?  THAT is why I call BS on it - in what way is "street justice" any fairer?

"Street justice" does not - by design - have ANY of the protections against incorrect verdicts that our judicial system - complete with capital punishment - has; why is it preferable to the latter?

I'm in FAVOR of capital punishment; that should not be news to anyone.  Still, I'm not in favor of "street justice" which is nothing less than vigilantism.  If you would PREFER vigilantism, put it into the legal and judicial system - don't go mealy-mouthed and excuse what you dare not say in the open - of such is claims of hypocrisy founded in the first place.

1 hour ago, wakjak said:

I know, but now that he's dead, in Massachusetts, if an inmate dies before appeals go through, it's as if he's never been arrested, or convicted of any crimes. He's an innocent man in the eyes of the law in Massachusetts.

Which is proof Mass. laws & politics are half crazy and the rest just plain nuts.

Edited by DocM
On 4/19/2017 at 8:40 PM, wakjak said:

I know, but now that he's dead, in Massachusetts, if an inmate dies before appeals go through, it's as if he's never been arrested, or convicted of any crimes. He's an innocent man in the eyes of the law in Massachusetts.

 

The family of the deceased will have to refile a lawsuit and do it all over, just without the murderer in the room.

What's the point if there is technically no justice? Despite my belief that the death penalty should be used, if you didn't commit the crime and you got aqquited of one, why commit suicide? 

 

The answer: You are either a coward or guilty. Seeing as football players can take a lot of physical pain, he probably was guilty.

 

If he somehow was innocent (as I was not there and cannot say he was or wasn't), then this was still justice unserved. Had he been innocent, then he is out of a life and a murderer is walking free. If he is guilty, a murderer is technically unpunished.

 

The only reason to refile a lawsuit is to make money off of a presumably rich football player's relatives.

Maybe the suicide is linked to CTE, which a deeper look at his brain will certainly tell if he had or not. Seems like a lot of athletes who commit suicide recently in high impact sports are affected by this, which could be an explanation of the suicide of Mr Hernandez. 

13 minutes ago, wakjak said:

Maybe the suicide is linked to CTE, which a deeper look at his brain will certainly tell if he had or not. Seems like a lot of athletes who commit suicide recently in high impact sports are affected by this, which could be an explanation of the suicide of Mr Hernandez. 

Do you think it could be linked to CTE or do you think he could be guilty and murdered at least 1 person due to steroid induced mood and personality changes?

 

Non-the-less, you and I could certainly agree that the only reason this is getting any sort of coverage is because he was an athlete. This stuff happens all the time, but we never hear about it because nobody really cares, unless somebody is famous.

1 hour ago, SpeedyTheSnail said:

Do you think it could be linked to CTE or do you think he could be guilty and murdered at least 1 person due to steroid induced mood and personality changes?

 

Non-the-less, you and I could certainly agree that the only reason this is getting any sort of coverage is because he was an athlete. This stuff happens all the time, but we never hear about it because nobody really cares, unless somebody is famous.

I'm unsure either way, he could very well be guilty of at least one, the timing of it does make it seem that way for sure. 

 

 

I saw some scuttlebutt going around that, like wakjak said, "He's an innocent man in the eyes of the law in Massachusetts." So, that would also mean that he doesn't forfeit his contract money and it would go to his wife and daughter. The speculation is that he saw it as the only way to still provide for his family.

 

Not saying I agree, or that I think that makes him some upstanding family man now, or anything like that. Just saying it makes ya think.

 

Ohh...on a side note...WHOO-HOO...my 100th post!

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • I've been on Deezer for over a decade, but glad that Tidal joined them in fighting AI slop. Can't stand such takes as Spotify's: "Spotify's CEO recently pushed back against listeners who call AI music "slop," urging people to stop using the term and instead embrace the creative potential of AI music."
    • “Could” … in the IS the healthcare is run by insurance companies that make indecent profits denying basic treatments to people that are paying money for nothing. Besides, where are all the Trump epigones who were stating that the tariffs were going to paid by foreign companies and not the US citizens? …
    • Microsoft Teams gets smarter at spotting sneaky meeting bots by Usama Jawad Microsoft Teams is set to receive a couple of new features soon, including a dedicated Recap app and a rather controversial location tracking functionality. The Redmond tech giant has also explained how it has made online communication and collaboration a lot more performant this year. Now, the company has detailed more secure bot admission mechanisms, as first reported by us in March 2026, and now available in Teams. As the use of AI has expanded across enterprise environments, Microsoft has begun allowing users to integrate bots into their meetings for various tasks, such as note-taking. While this has a tangible productivity benefit for users, Microsoft has highlighted how misconfiguration has allowed bots to join meetings that they shouldn't. This has created security and privacy risks, which Microsoft is now combating using a new Teams admin policy that allows organizers to control how external bots access meetings. Admins can leverage a policy called Manage external bots and their access to meetings. The default configuration is "When detected, require approval before joining", which places detected bots in a lobby before they are explicitly admitted into the meeting. The other option disables the experience. Microsoft has also requested admins to only allow organizers and co-organizers to manage access to a meeting, so that other people don't randomly allow bots into meetings. Teams will now be able to leverage infrastructure signals to intelligently detect and distinguish between bots and humans. Microsoft will soon also trial a registration experience for independent software vendors (ISVs) to build a system that registers a bot with Microsoft, so it is marked as a "known" bot. Teams will also categorize bots as trusted and suspected threats so that organizers can quickly identify which bots they want to allow into a meeting. Additional safeguards to block accidental admission of a bot into a meeting include: No one-click Admit option for identified bots Confirmation prompts when admitting participants that include bots Warnings when organizers choose Admit all, and bots are included Microsoft has begun rolling out this experience, and it will be retiring the current CAPTCHA verification implementation. In the future, the company plans to roll out new capabilities like allow-lists, organization-wide policies, admin reports, audit logs, and more granular controls.
    • With the current hardware prices Microsoft should lift the restriction. Then if you have the correct TPM then allow you to use X feature, if you don't have the correct TPM then don't but still actually let you run windows. 11. With a disclaimer during install that X features would be unavailable.
    • It's good for recycling of course. But commence inflation of a second hand RAM bubble and price gouging on DDR 4 inventory in 3... 2... 1...
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      538
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      266
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!