Aaron Hernandez, former NFL player, found dead in prison cell, officials say


Recommended Posts

Aaron Hernandez, the former New England Patriots star who was convicted of murder in 2015, killed himself in his prison cell Wednesday morning, officials said.

 

Hernandez, 27, was found hanging in his cell by corrections officers around 3:05 a.m. at the Souza Baranowski Correctional Center, Massachusetts Department of Correction officials said in a statement.

He was pronounced dead an hour later.

 

Hernandez was in a single cell in a general population housing unit and hanged himself with a bed sheet attached to his cell window. He also tried blocking his door from the inside with various items, officials said.

 

An investigation was ongoing.

 

More....

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/04/19/aaron-hernandez-former-nfl-player-found-dead-in-prison-cell-officials-say.html

Boo hoo, cry me a river.

 

Can't do the time, don't do the crime. What a loser with no regard for human life.

1 hour ago, wakjak said:

good riddance.

 

Although now he's basically an innocent man.

Only acquitted of one of the murders. He still had a life sentence for the other one.

Quote

The death of the once-promising NFL tight end came almost two years to the day when he was convicted of first-degree murder in the death of semi-pro football player Odin Lloyd. The 15th selection in the 2010 NFL draft, Hernandez was arrested in August 2013 in connection with Lloyd's June 2013 death.

On April 14, Hernandez was found not guilty in a double homicide separate from the Lloyd case; however, he was already serving a life sentence without the possibility of parole in connection with Lloyd's murder.

 

2 minutes ago, SpeedyTheSnail said:

Boo hoo, cry me a river.

 

Can't do the time, don't do the crime. What a loser with no regard for human life.

Only acquitted of one of the murders. He still had a life sentence for the other one.

 

I know, but now that he's dead, in Massachusetts, if an inmate dies before appeals go through, it's as if he's never been arrested, or convicted of any crimes. He's an innocent man in the eyes of the law in Massachusetts.

 

The family of the deceased will have to refile a lawsuit and do it all over, just without the murderer in the room.

And now listen to yourselves - basically *street justice* trumps the legal system - and you couldn't be happier - what hypocrisy!

2 minutes ago, PGHammer said:

And now listen to yourselves - basically *street justice* trumps the legal system - and you couldn't be happier - what hypocrisy!

better dead than wasting tax payer dollars to hole him up for however long his life would have been.

4 minutes ago, wakjak said:

better dead than wasting tax payer dollars to hole him up for however long his life would have been.

And you are among those that supposedly hate the death penalty?  THAT is why I call BS on it - in what way is "street justice" any fairer?

"Street justice" does not - by design - have ANY of the protections against incorrect verdicts that our judicial system - complete with capital punishment - has; why is it preferable to the latter?

I'm in FAVOR of capital punishment; that should not be news to anyone.  Still, I'm not in favor of "street justice" which is nothing less than vigilantism.  If you would PREFER vigilantism, put it into the legal and judicial system - don't go mealy-mouthed and excuse what you dare not say in the open - of such is claims of hypocrisy founded in the first place.

1 hour ago, wakjak said:

I know, but now that he's dead, in Massachusetts, if an inmate dies before appeals go through, it's as if he's never been arrested, or convicted of any crimes. He's an innocent man in the eyes of the law in Massachusetts.

Which is proof Mass. laws & politics are half crazy and the rest just plain nuts.

Edited by DocM
On 4/19/2017 at 8:40 PM, wakjak said:

I know, but now that he's dead, in Massachusetts, if an inmate dies before appeals go through, it's as if he's never been arrested, or convicted of any crimes. He's an innocent man in the eyes of the law in Massachusetts.

 

The family of the deceased will have to refile a lawsuit and do it all over, just without the murderer in the room.

What's the point if there is technically no justice? Despite my belief that the death penalty should be used, if you didn't commit the crime and you got aqquited of one, why commit suicide? 

 

The answer: You are either a coward or guilty. Seeing as football players can take a lot of physical pain, he probably was guilty.

 

If he somehow was innocent (as I was not there and cannot say he was or wasn't), then this was still justice unserved. Had he been innocent, then he is out of a life and a murderer is walking free. If he is guilty, a murderer is technically unpunished.

 

The only reason to refile a lawsuit is to make money off of a presumably rich football player's relatives.

Maybe the suicide is linked to CTE, which a deeper look at his brain will certainly tell if he had or not. Seems like a lot of athletes who commit suicide recently in high impact sports are affected by this, which could be an explanation of the suicide of Mr Hernandez. 

13 minutes ago, wakjak said:

Maybe the suicide is linked to CTE, which a deeper look at his brain will certainly tell if he had or not. Seems like a lot of athletes who commit suicide recently in high impact sports are affected by this, which could be an explanation of the suicide of Mr Hernandez. 

Do you think it could be linked to CTE or do you think he could be guilty and murdered at least 1 person due to steroid induced mood and personality changes?

 

Non-the-less, you and I could certainly agree that the only reason this is getting any sort of coverage is because he was an athlete. This stuff happens all the time, but we never hear about it because nobody really cares, unless somebody is famous.

1 hour ago, SpeedyTheSnail said:

Do you think it could be linked to CTE or do you think he could be guilty and murdered at least 1 person due to steroid induced mood and personality changes?

 

Non-the-less, you and I could certainly agree that the only reason this is getting any sort of coverage is because he was an athlete. This stuff happens all the time, but we never hear about it because nobody really cares, unless somebody is famous.

I'm unsure either way, he could very well be guilty of at least one, the timing of it does make it seem that way for sure. 

 

 

I saw some scuttlebutt going around that, like wakjak said, "He's an innocent man in the eyes of the law in Massachusetts." So, that would also mean that he doesn't forfeit his contract money and it would go to his wife and daughter. The speculation is that he saw it as the only way to still provide for his family.

 

Not saying I agree, or that I think that makes him some upstanding family man now, or anything like that. Just saying it makes ya think.

 

Ohh...on a side note...WHOO-HOO...my 100th post!

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • I'm not unblocking my camera for this crapola. Sorry, Google.
    • Ummmm that is what is it supposed to do. Just turn if off in settings if you do not want it analyzing your open tabs. Chrome does the same thing with Gemini. Sarfari will do the samething after Apple's AI and even more so with the release of their 27 versions that is now powered by Googles LLM/ML models. Understanding why it is doing it and how it can help you vs jumping to some conspiracy theroy is a much better approach. As long as it can be turned off, all is good. Yes the default should be off but the a lot of people would never discover these features.
    • Just another reason (aside from many others) not to use Edge. Firefox 153.0b5 DEx64 has a similar feature added recently in prior builds that I will turn off at some point when I get around to it. It's the new "Something looks suspicious" page that pops up here and there. It cleverly hides itself between web pages that I've actually visited; as a result, you know, of selecting a web page and telling the browser where to go. The interesting thing is that it does not produce these warnings from pages that I, as the only intelligent user of the browser in my system, have ever directed the browser to open! What seems to be happening is that the browser looks at all the goofy ad links on a web page I do actually open and selects one that "looks suspicious" and then creates the "something looks suspicious" web page, which is neatly inserted, as mentioned, between web pages my RB ("real brain") has directed the browser to load in a session. The thing is, I usually look at links I am considering to follow before I ask the browser to load them, and in cases I have noticed where the link does indeed look suspicious, most of the time I will choose to not follow the link at all. Doesn't everyone do this or something similar? I am picky about what I voluntarily load... (I don't like links that start off fine, with a site designaiton that seems normal enough but then is followed by indecipherable alphanumeric strings many, many lines long, etc. I tend to reject those because they look suspicious. They may not be, but I don't care... I'll stay with Firefox, of course, if for no other reason than they usually let you turn off the junk you don't like. And because it isn't Edge... But at some point Microsoft will come to realize that putting your bookmarks on the left side is a Good Thing for a lot of people, just as Microsoft discovered when it had the bright idea of nailing the Windows taskbar to the bottom of the screen, when for decades Microsoft browsers had left that placement up to the user. They have finally reversed the obscenity of that decision. Finally.
    • Google was using the old CATPCHAs data to train their LLMs. What is the say they won't use this camera data of users to train their LLM? these companies need some strict regulations!
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
    • First Post
      carols23 earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      Tom Willson earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      513
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      259
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      94
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!