Xbox One X


Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, dwLostCat said:

(because I don't know why we're still using the reveal thread after it's been revealed)

product page: http://www.xbox.com/en-US/xbox-one-x?xr=shellnav

 

This'll be the first console I've ever preordered, I'm pretty excited about it. :)  I hope MS can win back some PS4 focused devs with this.

What exactly are you excited about? I don't mean that to sound as negative as it does but I'm curious. For me, I'm still mixed on whether I'll get it or not.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1334576-xbox-one-x/#findComment-597939284
Share on other sites

I'm still undecided about it, but looking forward to hearing more about it over the course of the year. 

 

Are you actually able to pre-order it yet? I haven't seen anything on the MS website or the usual outlets. 

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1334576-xbox-one-x/#findComment-597939292
Share on other sites

Just now, Skiver said:

Whilst that sounds obvious, is it honestly something to get excited for? I know it's not a bad thing but I honestly am not actually that excited by it.

I think it's exciting if it's your first foray into console (or Xbox) gaming. If you already own a One, unless you need the latest and greatest, I feel there's very little reason to upgrade.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1334576-xbox-one-x/#findComment-597939296
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Skiver said:

What exactly are you excited about? I don't mean that to sound as negative as it does but I'm curious. For me, I'm still mixed on whether I'll get it or not.

Obviously, the performance is a big thing.  It outperforms my PC on a lot of stuff.  I don't know if all big name devs will update their code to support it but I would expect most of them to.  Right now, I'm mostly doing console gaming on the PS4 Pro and it's a damn nice machine.

 

The Xbox Ones perf, well.  Disappointing is the best word, because it was usually fine but you could tell it wasn't amazing. (Depending on the game the foliage popping in, low game resolutions, noticable skipping in some racing games with the better cars, a terrible hard drive which fortunately you could bypass with an external...)  Just that the original versions of these consoles couldn't even do 1080p smoothly was disappointing, nevermind antialiasing and all that.  It wasn't a big problem for me when playing the games, but I definitely preferred playing on my PC.

 

That I don't need to replace my game library or controllers or anything with it is awesome.  I already have a nice collection of X1 games (including anything I've bought with Play Anywhere so the saves will transfer right over from my PC.)

 

And usually, one thing I like about playing on consoles is just how dang quiet they are when gaming compared to a normal machine.  I have no idea if that will apply to this box as well or not.

 

I don't know how much I care about 4K yet, though I'm sure I'll find out pretty soon.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1334576-xbox-one-x/#findComment-597939404
Share on other sites

When we first learned about these mid-cycle updates I was pretty annoyed that it could split the developers on which console to develop for. But now that both console play the same games, and 4K/HDR is enabled with patches, I am almost wishing they did have exclusive content. Otherwise, there's really no reason for me to want or buy one. I'd rather they'd both move on to the 9th generation with completely new hardware and cut the bagged of the under powered mobile CPU 2013 consoles, which we're still stuck with in 2017. Finally, the prospect of downloading 100 GB 4K assets is not something I want to deal with for a device which is supposed to be "pick up and play".

 

I'll be putting my money into more PC hardware instead (Y)

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1334576-xbox-one-x/#findComment-597942470
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Andrew said:

Finally, the prospect of downloading 100 GB 4K assets is not something I want to deal with for a device which is supposed to be "pick up and play".

Gears of War 4 is already 100GB on PC and I think pretty big on the console too.  Quantum Break, I think, was >70GB on the console.  Not really sure anymore.

 

This is not the first time large games will be out in recent memory, and it won't be the last on consoles or PC.

 

That said, assuming all games will be that large is silly.  I still remember people arguing at me that every game would be 60GB when the X1 released.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1334576-xbox-one-x/#findComment-597942492
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, dwLostCat said:

Gears of War 4 is already 100GB on PC and I think pretty big on the console too.  Quantum Break, I think, was >70GB on the console.  Not really sure anymore.

 

This is not the first time large games will be out in recent memory, and it won't be the last on consoles or PC.

 

That said, assuming all games will be that large is silly.  I still remember people arguing at me that every game would be 60GB when the X1 released.

I don't think it's silly, console game patches have exploded in size and both MS and Sony do not seem to want to use discs with more layers. Hence we are met with 10's of GB day one patches with discs only containing a fraction of the game.

 

Whole video game collections are going to be wiped out if the "patches" / servers are ever removed / turned off. At least last generation you could pop a disc in and ignore TUs/patches and still play a game.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1334576-xbox-one-x/#findComment-597942514
Share on other sites

Short of compressing things to hell and back, not much we can do about game sizes, as we move to 4k and textures get more real and so on, game size will only grow with time, not go down.  Unless there's some super fancy way to compress things, but then we're talking added install time to uncompress files and so on.  At least they're smart about only giving you the 4k stuff if you're on the X, so installs and updates for non-X owners will be on the smaller side.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1334576-xbox-one-x/#findComment-597942634
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Andrew said:

I don't think it's silly, console game patches have exploded in size

You should see how many games on my Xbox One are less than 5GB!  It would blow your mind!  (Apparently.)

 

Yes, it's bloody silly.  First party titles might continue to be large but the majority of them aren't going to be.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1334576-xbox-one-x/#findComment-597942660
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, dwLostCat said:

You should see how many games on my Xbox One are less than 5GB!  It would blow your mind!  (Apparently.)

 

Yes, it's bloody silly.  First party titles might continue to be large but the majority of them aren't going to be.

Retail games or downloadable games? Name some retail games (typical AAA ) less than 5 GB for me please, I'm interested to know.

 

Even the typical rehashed sports title from EA each year is 20+.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1334576-xbox-one-x/#findComment-597942670
Share on other sites

Just now, Andrew said:

Retail games or downloadable games? Name some retail games (typical AAA ) less than 5 GB for me please, I'm interested to know.

I don't keep a lot of games installed if I'm not playing them, so I rather can't.  But if we're talking retail games the number of them that are over 40GB is very low from what I've seen so far.  (I copy to and from external hard drives every so often.)

 

Hell, the only thing I've seen huge on my system is the Halo MCC with ODST added on (@70GB)

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1334576-xbox-one-x/#findComment-597942680
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, dwLostCat said:

I don't keep a lot of games installed if I'm not playing them, so I rather can't.  But if we're talking retail games the number of them that are over 40GB is very low from what I've seen so far.  (I copy to and from external hard drives every so often.)

 

Hell, the only thing I've seen huge on my system is the Halo MCC with ODST added on (@70GB)

Well it may comes as a surprise if you actually look into the install sizes for games, and factor in not everyone wants to swap HDDs or have multiple hooked up, to have a quick MP game of XYZ when they're friend's ask. When games like Halo 5 already weigh in at 100 GB and 4K assets weighing in at 100 GB (for a title like Forza 7 - Halo 6 could easily eclipse this), it's ballooning out of control and faster than hard drives keep up.

 

Either way, this is my personal experience I'm talking about - we obviously use our consoles differently and have different game libraries. It is turning me away from console gaming and back to PC. Not a single game I have installed on Steam is near 100 GB.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1334576-xbox-one-x/#findComment-597942684
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Andrew said:

Either way, this is my personal experience I'm talking about - we obviously use our consoles differently and have different game libraries. It is turning me away from console gaming and back to PC. Not a single game I have installed on Steam is near 100 GB.

Which is fair enough, I still buy everything disc only and will never go straight download until the day they stop pressing discs and would of been exploding as well with missing assets from disc if I was still on ADSL, recently with the fibre 100Mbp roll out in Australia I'll manage fine, when the backbone can handle 1Gbps being unlocked for everyone I'll be even happier.

 

How many games on steam do you run in 4K and what size are those but? We'll see soon game sizes the same roughly across the board for those chasing 4K.

 

I can understand why they won't expand disc content this mid release, only the S and X have the ability to read the larger disc sizes so what happens to those who can't on the original xbox? And on the original and S not needing that content at all?

 

Some other questions I've thought about recently but,

 

The next question is what size HDDS do we want minimum off next gen? 4TB minimum? HDDS this gen where way to small, The portable USB with several TB on my xbox has saved me from release from ever really needing to delete a title. Sony fell behind in this regard for years and it blew my mind we only just got what was massively needed. Just look at the sizes of a couple of CoDs and the Remastered.

 

Will Sony and Microsoft even provide the content on the disc or get away with minimum pressing and still demand the large downloads on every title? We're pretty much slowly transitioned to always connected now which was a massive blow up at the start of the generation. Have people become more accepting? Or has internet just progressed that much? It has in Australia and don't find myself no where near as outraged as I was when Microsoft first tried announcing it.

 

What happens to these massive game sizes and downloads for those still without a 4K next gen will people deal with the downloads for down sampling?

 

Anyway will have preorder day one, ability to play 3 generations of great games on one console, 4K gaming, that's all I need. 

 

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1334576-xbox-one-x/#findComment-597943172
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Vandalsquad said:

The next question is what size HDDS do we want minimum off next gen? 4TB minimum? HDDS this gen where way to small, The portable USB with several TB on my xbox has saved me from release from ever really needing to delete a title. Sony fell behind in this regard for years and it blew my mind we only just got what was massively needed. Just look at the sizes of a couple of CoDs and the Remastered.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1334576-xbox-one-x/#findComment-597943218
Share on other sites

I can't seem to edit in this forum anymore.  Sigh.  It's a good forum when it works...which is not often enough.

 

I was going to say I'll continue being happy with a 1TB included as long as I can use an external.  I don't know about what they plan past X1X/PS4P, but I don't expect them to go past 1TB for the default.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1334576-xbox-one-x/#findComment-597943222
Share on other sites

I think by the simple nature of the hardware, PC games still also being sold on DVDs and never making the move to BDs, games on steam, install sizes, are smaller because they're probably using more compression compared to the consoles which would rather just not compress, to speed up loading and so on, and take up more of your disk space.

 

But still, I mean look here, I just grabbed Dishonored 2 from the Steam summer sale and it says it needs 60GB, I'd say that's around the new average for AAA games.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1334576-xbox-one-x/#findComment-597943402
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, George P said:

I think by the simple nature of the hardware, PC games still also being sold on DVDs and never making the move to BDs, games on steam, install sizes, are smaller because they're probably using more compression compared to the consoles which would rather just not compress, to speed up loading and so on, and take up more of your disk space.

 

But still, I mean look here, I just grabbed Dishonored 2 from the Steam summer sale and it says it needs 60GB, I'd say that's around the new average for AAA games.

Hey it may be an outlier but FF13 needed 60GB on PC.  Titanfall did.  It's not 'normal'  on either system but it does happen.

 

Recore is around 6-7GB on the console and 9 on PC or something, and that has a retail release.

 

Looks like install sizes should be getting a lot more dynamic than usual.

http://wccftech.com/xbox-one-x-will-always-download-4k-assets-regardless-connected-tv/

Quote

As part our developer readiness for Xbox One X, we have made available a feature which will give them significant flexibility when it comes to what gets installed on a user’s console. In addition to 4K specific assets, developers have options when it comes to language specific assets as well, which depending on the title, can drastically reduce the install footprint. This ability to intelligently install the best assets for each console and language are available on all Xbox One devices, and it will be up to the developer of the game to determine the specific implementation.

 

Edited by dwLostCat
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1334576-xbox-one-x/#findComment-597943468
Share on other sites

Some footage from Assassin's Creed Origins on the One X. Definitely a good looking game. The more I see the more I think that November is going to be an expensive month :p

 

 

So I haven't watched all of it yet, but the first few minutes and I see skin/kill animals and think Far Cry. I see using an eagle to spot faraway targets/explore the area and I think Watch Dogs :p

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1334576-xbox-one-x/#findComment-597952844
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Pretty nice tool, thanks
    • Indeed. But note that this has Wifi7, HDMI 2.1, BlueTooth 5.4, and 5G Ethernet, so even in the additional features list this bundle blows the Steam Machine away. And, with the money saved, one could improve this dramatically.
    • One of the strangest galaxies in our Universe could help answer some long overdue questions by Sayan Sen Image by Pixabay via Pexels | Not representative An international team of astronomers led by the Department of Astronomy at Tsinghua University has discovered an unusually metal-poor galaxy that may contain signs of first-generation star formation. The galaxy, named Metal-Pristine Galaxy COSMOS Redshift 3 (MPG-CR3), or CR3, was identified using observations from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), the Very Large Telescope (VLT), and the Subaru Telescope. The findings, published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, describe CR3 as the most metal-poor galaxy known from the period known as "cosmic noon," around 11.5 billion years ago. Cosmic noon refers to a period when the universe was producing stars at its highest rate and galaxies were growing rapidly. In astronomy, "metals" refers to all elements heavier than helium, including oxygen, carbon, and iron. Because CR3 contains so few of these heavier elements, researchers say it closely resembles what scientists expect the earliest galaxies in the universe may have looked like. The discovery is significant because it could offer clues about Population III (Pop III) stars, the first generation of stars thought to have formed after the Big Bang. These stars are believed to have formed from gas made almost entirely of hydrogen and helium, before heavier elements were created inside stars and spread across the universe through supernova explosions. Hence this is why CR3 has been referred to as a "living fossil." Scientists have long believed that Population III stars existed only in the very early universe. As more generations of stars formed and died, they enriched surrounding gas with heavier elements, making the conditions needed for metal-free star formation increasingly rare. Because of this, researchers expected the formation of such stars to have largely ended after the epoch of reionization, a period when radiation from the first stars and galaxies transformed the neutral hydrogen filling the universe and made it largely transparent to ultraviolet light. CR3 appears to challenge that idea. The galaxy was observed at a redshift of z = 3.193 ± 0.016. Redshift measures how much light from a distant object has been stretched as the universe expands and helps astronomers determine how far back in time they are looking. In this case, the redshift corresponds to roughly 11.5 billion years ago during cosmic noon. Although the universe was already several billion years old by that point, CR3 shows characteristics more commonly associated with much earlier galaxies. Observations revealed exceptionally strong emissions from hydrogen and helium, including Lyα, Hα, and He I λ10830. Lyα, or Lyman-alpha emission, is a specific wavelength of light produced by hydrogen and is widely used to study distant galaxies. Hα emission is another hydrogen signature commonly used to trace active star formation, while He I λ10830 is produced by helium and can indicate the presence of very hot, young stars. The measured equivalent widths of EW₀(Lyα) = 822 ± 101 Å and EW₀(Hα) = 2814 ± 327 Å are among the highest ever observed in star-forming galaxies. Equivalent width is a measure of the strength of an emission line relative to the surrounding light, and such large values are typically associated with intense and very recent star formation. At the same time, researchers found no statistically significant detections of metal emission lines, including [O III] λλ4959, 5007 and C IV λλ1548, 1550. Emission lines act as chemical fingerprints that reveal which elements are present in a galaxy. Oxygen and carbon lines are commonly seen in galaxies that have already undergone significant chemical enrichment. Their absence in CR3 suggests an unusually pristine environment. Using abundance calibration methods developed with JWST observations, the team placed a 2σ upper limit on the galaxy's gas-phase metallicity of 12+log(O/H)<6.52, corresponding to less than 0.7% of the Sun's metallicity (Z < 7 × 10⁻³ Z⊙). Gas-phase metallicity measures the abundance of heavy elements in a galaxy's gas. A 2σ upper limit indicates that the true value is very unlikely to be higher than the quoted threshold. Even when accounting for uncertainties in the calibration methods, the most conservative limit remains 12+log(O/H)<6.95, making CR3 the most metal-poor galaxy identified at cosmic noon. The galaxy also appears to contain very little dust. Researchers measured a Lyα/Hα flux ratio of 13.9 ± 2.5, a result that suggests negligible dust attenuation, meaning very little of the galaxy's light is being absorbed or scattered by cosmic dust. Because dust is usually produced by earlier generations of stars, this finding further supports the idea that CR3 has experienced very little chemical enrichment. Further analysis using spectral energy distribution modelling, a technique that compares observed light with theoretical models, suggests that CR3 contains an extremely young stellar population only around 2 million years old. The modelling, which used Population III stellar templates, also indicates the galaxy has a stellar mass of approximately 6.1 × 10⁵ M⊙. The symbol M⊙ represents one solar mass, or the mass of the Sun. One of the key questions raised by the discovery is how such a chemically primitive galaxy could exist in a universe that had already spent billions of years producing heavier elements. To investigate this, the researchers examined CR3's surroundings. Their analysis suggests the galaxy may lie in a slightly underdense environment, with a density contrast of roughly δ ≈ −0.12. An underdense region contains less matter and fewer galaxies than average. The team suggests that this relative isolation may have helped preserve pockets of pristine gas. Metal-rich material expelled from nearby galaxies may never have reached CR3, while the lower rate of galaxy mergers and interactions could have slowed the mixing of enriched gas into the system. If future observations confirm these findings, CR3 could provide some of the strongest evidence yet that first-generation star formation continued well after the epoch of reionization. Such a result would challenge the conventional view that pristine star formation ended by z ≳ 6 and suggest that small pockets of metal-free gas survived much longer than previously thought. Researchers stress that more observations will be needed to determine the galaxy's true nature. Future spectroscopic studies with higher resolution and better signal quality could help confirm whether CR3 is genuinely hosting Population III star formation. The discovery is also expected to encourage searches for other similar galaxies, which could help astronomers better understand how the first stars formed and how galaxies evolved in the early universe. Source: Tsinghua University, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "I think in the immediate absence of a partner to apply relief" In the words of Sterling Archer... "Phrasing!"
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      454
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      161
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      107
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      83
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!