Xbox One X


Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, dwLostCat said:

(because I don't know why we're still using the reveal thread after it's been revealed)

product page: http://www.xbox.com/en-US/xbox-one-x?xr=shellnav

 

This'll be the first console I've ever preordered, I'm pretty excited about it. :)  I hope MS can win back some PS4 focused devs with this.

What exactly are you excited about? I don't mean that to sound as negative as it does but I'm curious. For me, I'm still mixed on whether I'll get it or not.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1334576-xbox-one-x/#findComment-597939284
Share on other sites

I'm still undecided about it, but looking forward to hearing more about it over the course of the year. 

 

Are you actually able to pre-order it yet? I haven't seen anything on the MS website or the usual outlets. 

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1334576-xbox-one-x/#findComment-597939292
Share on other sites

Just now, Skiver said:

Whilst that sounds obvious, is it honestly something to get excited for? I know it's not a bad thing but I honestly am not actually that excited by it.

I think it's exciting if it's your first foray into console (or Xbox) gaming. If you already own a One, unless you need the latest and greatest, I feel there's very little reason to upgrade.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1334576-xbox-one-x/#findComment-597939296
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Skiver said:

What exactly are you excited about? I don't mean that to sound as negative as it does but I'm curious. For me, I'm still mixed on whether I'll get it or not.

Obviously, the performance is a big thing.  It outperforms my PC on a lot of stuff.  I don't know if all big name devs will update their code to support it but I would expect most of them to.  Right now, I'm mostly doing console gaming on the PS4 Pro and it's a damn nice machine.

 

The Xbox Ones perf, well.  Disappointing is the best word, because it was usually fine but you could tell it wasn't amazing. (Depending on the game the foliage popping in, low game resolutions, noticable skipping in some racing games with the better cars, a terrible hard drive which fortunately you could bypass with an external...)  Just that the original versions of these consoles couldn't even do 1080p smoothly was disappointing, nevermind antialiasing and all that.  It wasn't a big problem for me when playing the games, but I definitely preferred playing on my PC.

 

That I don't need to replace my game library or controllers or anything with it is awesome.  I already have a nice collection of X1 games (including anything I've bought with Play Anywhere so the saves will transfer right over from my PC.)

 

And usually, one thing I like about playing on consoles is just how dang quiet they are when gaming compared to a normal machine.  I have no idea if that will apply to this box as well or not.

 

I don't know how much I care about 4K yet, though I'm sure I'll find out pretty soon.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1334576-xbox-one-x/#findComment-597939404
Share on other sites

When we first learned about these mid-cycle updates I was pretty annoyed that it could split the developers on which console to develop for. But now that both console play the same games, and 4K/HDR is enabled with patches, I am almost wishing they did have exclusive content. Otherwise, there's really no reason for me to want or buy one. I'd rather they'd both move on to the 9th generation with completely new hardware and cut the bagged of the under powered mobile CPU 2013 consoles, which we're still stuck with in 2017. Finally, the prospect of downloading 100 GB 4K assets is not something I want to deal with for a device which is supposed to be "pick up and play".

 

I'll be putting my money into more PC hardware instead (Y)

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1334576-xbox-one-x/#findComment-597942470
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Andrew said:

Finally, the prospect of downloading 100 GB 4K assets is not something I want to deal with for a device which is supposed to be "pick up and play".

Gears of War 4 is already 100GB on PC and I think pretty big on the console too.  Quantum Break, I think, was >70GB on the console.  Not really sure anymore.

 

This is not the first time large games will be out in recent memory, and it won't be the last on consoles or PC.

 

That said, assuming all games will be that large is silly.  I still remember people arguing at me that every game would be 60GB when the X1 released.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1334576-xbox-one-x/#findComment-597942492
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, dwLostCat said:

Gears of War 4 is already 100GB on PC and I think pretty big on the console too.  Quantum Break, I think, was >70GB on the console.  Not really sure anymore.

 

This is not the first time large games will be out in recent memory, and it won't be the last on consoles or PC.

 

That said, assuming all games will be that large is silly.  I still remember people arguing at me that every game would be 60GB when the X1 released.

I don't think it's silly, console game patches have exploded in size and both MS and Sony do not seem to want to use discs with more layers. Hence we are met with 10's of GB day one patches with discs only containing a fraction of the game.

 

Whole video game collections are going to be wiped out if the "patches" / servers are ever removed / turned off. At least last generation you could pop a disc in and ignore TUs/patches and still play a game.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1334576-xbox-one-x/#findComment-597942514
Share on other sites

Short of compressing things to hell and back, not much we can do about game sizes, as we move to 4k and textures get more real and so on, game size will only grow with time, not go down.  Unless there's some super fancy way to compress things, but then we're talking added install time to uncompress files and so on.  At least they're smart about only giving you the 4k stuff if you're on the X, so installs and updates for non-X owners will be on the smaller side.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1334576-xbox-one-x/#findComment-597942634
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Andrew said:

I don't think it's silly, console game patches have exploded in size

You should see how many games on my Xbox One are less than 5GB!  It would blow your mind!  (Apparently.)

 

Yes, it's bloody silly.  First party titles might continue to be large but the majority of them aren't going to be.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1334576-xbox-one-x/#findComment-597942660
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, dwLostCat said:

You should see how many games on my Xbox One are less than 5GB!  It would blow your mind!  (Apparently.)

 

Yes, it's bloody silly.  First party titles might continue to be large but the majority of them aren't going to be.

Retail games or downloadable games? Name some retail games (typical AAA ) less than 5 GB for me please, I'm interested to know.

 

Even the typical rehashed sports title from EA each year is 20+.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1334576-xbox-one-x/#findComment-597942670
Share on other sites

Just now, Andrew said:

Retail games or downloadable games? Name some retail games (typical AAA ) less than 5 GB for me please, I'm interested to know.

I don't keep a lot of games installed if I'm not playing them, so I rather can't.  But if we're talking retail games the number of them that are over 40GB is very low from what I've seen so far.  (I copy to and from external hard drives every so often.)

 

Hell, the only thing I've seen huge on my system is the Halo MCC with ODST added on (@70GB)

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1334576-xbox-one-x/#findComment-597942680
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, dwLostCat said:

I don't keep a lot of games installed if I'm not playing them, so I rather can't.  But if we're talking retail games the number of them that are over 40GB is very low from what I've seen so far.  (I copy to and from external hard drives every so often.)

 

Hell, the only thing I've seen huge on my system is the Halo MCC with ODST added on (@70GB)

Well it may comes as a surprise if you actually look into the install sizes for games, and factor in not everyone wants to swap HDDs or have multiple hooked up, to have a quick MP game of XYZ when they're friend's ask. When games like Halo 5 already weigh in at 100 GB and 4K assets weighing in at 100 GB (for a title like Forza 7 - Halo 6 could easily eclipse this), it's ballooning out of control and faster than hard drives keep up.

 

Either way, this is my personal experience I'm talking about - we obviously use our consoles differently and have different game libraries. It is turning me away from console gaming and back to PC. Not a single game I have installed on Steam is near 100 GB.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1334576-xbox-one-x/#findComment-597942684
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Andrew said:

Either way, this is my personal experience I'm talking about - we obviously use our consoles differently and have different game libraries. It is turning me away from console gaming and back to PC. Not a single game I have installed on Steam is near 100 GB.

Which is fair enough, I still buy everything disc only and will never go straight download until the day they stop pressing discs and would of been exploding as well with missing assets from disc if I was still on ADSL, recently with the fibre 100Mbp roll out in Australia I'll manage fine, when the backbone can handle 1Gbps being unlocked for everyone I'll be even happier.

 

How many games on steam do you run in 4K and what size are those but? We'll see soon game sizes the same roughly across the board for those chasing 4K.

 

I can understand why they won't expand disc content this mid release, only the S and X have the ability to read the larger disc sizes so what happens to those who can't on the original xbox? And on the original and S not needing that content at all?

 

Some other questions I've thought about recently but,

 

The next question is what size HDDS do we want minimum off next gen? 4TB minimum? HDDS this gen where way to small, The portable USB with several TB on my xbox has saved me from release from ever really needing to delete a title. Sony fell behind in this regard for years and it blew my mind we only just got what was massively needed. Just look at the sizes of a couple of CoDs and the Remastered.

 

Will Sony and Microsoft even provide the content on the disc or get away with minimum pressing and still demand the large downloads on every title? We're pretty much slowly transitioned to always connected now which was a massive blow up at the start of the generation. Have people become more accepting? Or has internet just progressed that much? It has in Australia and don't find myself no where near as outraged as I was when Microsoft first tried announcing it.

 

What happens to these massive game sizes and downloads for those still without a 4K next gen will people deal with the downloads for down sampling?

 

Anyway will have preorder day one, ability to play 3 generations of great games on one console, 4K gaming, that's all I need. 

 

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1334576-xbox-one-x/#findComment-597943172
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Vandalsquad said:

The next question is what size HDDS do we want minimum off next gen? 4TB minimum? HDDS this gen where way to small, The portable USB with several TB on my xbox has saved me from release from ever really needing to delete a title. Sony fell behind in this regard for years and it blew my mind we only just got what was massively needed. Just look at the sizes of a couple of CoDs and the Remastered.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1334576-xbox-one-x/#findComment-597943218
Share on other sites

I can't seem to edit in this forum anymore.  Sigh.  It's a good forum when it works...which is not often enough.

 

I was going to say I'll continue being happy with a 1TB included as long as I can use an external.  I don't know about what they plan past X1X/PS4P, but I don't expect them to go past 1TB for the default.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1334576-xbox-one-x/#findComment-597943222
Share on other sites

I think by the simple nature of the hardware, PC games still also being sold on DVDs and never making the move to BDs, games on steam, install sizes, are smaller because they're probably using more compression compared to the consoles which would rather just not compress, to speed up loading and so on, and take up more of your disk space.

 

But still, I mean look here, I just grabbed Dishonored 2 from the Steam summer sale and it says it needs 60GB, I'd say that's around the new average for AAA games.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1334576-xbox-one-x/#findComment-597943402
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, George P said:

I think by the simple nature of the hardware, PC games still also being sold on DVDs and never making the move to BDs, games on steam, install sizes, are smaller because they're probably using more compression compared to the consoles which would rather just not compress, to speed up loading and so on, and take up more of your disk space.

 

But still, I mean look here, I just grabbed Dishonored 2 from the Steam summer sale and it says it needs 60GB, I'd say that's around the new average for AAA games.

Hey it may be an outlier but FF13 needed 60GB on PC.  Titanfall did.  It's not 'normal'  on either system but it does happen.

 

Recore is around 6-7GB on the console and 9 on PC or something, and that has a retail release.

 

Looks like install sizes should be getting a lot more dynamic than usual.

http://wccftech.com/xbox-one-x-will-always-download-4k-assets-regardless-connected-tv/

Quote

As part our developer readiness for Xbox One X, we have made available a feature which will give them significant flexibility when it comes to what gets installed on a user’s console. In addition to 4K specific assets, developers have options when it comes to language specific assets as well, which depending on the title, can drastically reduce the install footprint. This ability to intelligently install the best assets for each console and language are available on all Xbox One devices, and it will be up to the developer of the game to determine the specific implementation.

 

Edited by dwLostCat
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1334576-xbox-one-x/#findComment-597943468
Share on other sites

Some footage from Assassin's Creed Origins on the One X. Definitely a good looking game. The more I see the more I think that November is going to be an expensive month :p

 

 

So I haven't watched all of it yet, but the first few minutes and I see skin/kill animals and think Far Cry. I see using an eagle to spot faraway targets/explore the area and I think Watch Dogs :p

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1334576-xbox-one-x/#findComment-597952844
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Dude, im talking about simply disable it from settings app. Because of the eu regulation, you could disable it here for years.
    • One big question about Mars was answered thanks to Einstein's 100 year old theory by Sayan Sen Image via DepositPhotos Scientists at the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have calculated how time passes on Mars compared with Earth, adding detail to how timekeeping would need to work beyond Earth’s orbit. The study, published in The Astronomical Journal, found that clocks on Mars run an average of 477 microseconds, or millionths of a second, faster per day than clocks on Earth. A microsecond is one millionth of a second, a very small unit used in precise scientific timing systems such as atomic clocks, which measure time using consistent atomic behavior. This difference is not constant. Because Mars moves around the Sun in a non-circular path (an eccentric orbit, meaning its distance from the Sun changes over time instead of staying fixed) and is affected by gravity from other bodies, the daily difference can vary by as much as 226 microseconds over a Martian year. The study also identifies smaller repeating changes of about 40 microseconds per day linked to synodic cycles (repeating periods that describe how planets line up with each other as they orbit the Sun from different positions). These longer patterns affect how time differences slowly rise and fall. To make these estimates, researchers compared Mars with Earth and the Moon. The work looks at relativistic proper time (the time actually measured by a clock depending on its speed and the strength of gravity where it is located, as described in Einstein’s relativity). This shows that each world has its own slightly different “rate” of time. This becomes more important as space missions expand into cislunar space (the region between Earth and the Moon) and toward Mars. On Earth, time systems rely on atomic clocks and satellites, which stay closely synchronized for navigation and communication. The study is based on Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity, which shows that time is affected by gravity and motion. Stronger gravity makes clocks run slower, while weaker gravity makes them run faster. “The time is just right for the Moon and Mars,” said NIST physicist Bijunath Patla. “This is the closest we have been to realizing the science fiction vision of expanding across the solar system.” A day on Mars is about 40 minutes longer than on Earth, and a Martian year lasts 687 Earth days. But the main question is not just about days and years, but how fast time itself passes. An atomic clock placed on Mars would function normally, but compared with one on Earth, the two would slowly drift apart due to differences in gravity and motion. This requires careful calculation of what is similar to a time-zone difference across planets. Researchers modeled Mars using a reference surface and included gravitational effects from the Sun, Earth, the Moon, and other planets. This includes a multi-body gravitational system (often described as a three-body or four-body problem, where predicting motion becomes difficult because multiple large objects all pull on each other at the same time through gravity). Mars also follows a Keplerian orbit (an idealized elliptical orbit based on simple gravitational laws that assume smooth motion, before adding real-world disturbances from other bodies). In addition, the researchers accounted for solar tides (small changes in gravitational force caused by the Sun that slightly distort planetary motion and timing, especially in systems involving Earth and the Moon). These combined effects are described as relativistic proper-time offsets (small but measurable differences in elapsed time between locations caused by gravity and motion), which must be included when comparing clocks across planets. “But for Mars, that’s not the case. Its distance from the Sun and its eccentric orbit make the variations in time larger. A three-body problem is extremely complicated. Now we’re dealing with four: the Sun, Earth, the Moon and Mars,” Patla explained. “The heavy lifting was more challenging than I initially thought.” Although the differences are extremely small, they matter for navigation and communication systems that depend on precise timing. Even modern networks on Earth, such as mobile systems, rely on timing accuracy at very small fractions of a second. Communication between Earth and Mars currently takes about four to 24 minutes or more depending on planetary positions, meaning signals are not real-time. A shared and accurate time system could help future missions reduce confusion in navigation and data exchange. “If you get synchronization, it will be almost like real-time communication without any loss of information. You don’t have to wait to see what happens,” Patla said. Researchers note that fully developed interplanetary communication networks are still far in the future. However, understanding how time behaves across planets helps prepare for those systems. “It may be decades before the surface of Mars is covered by the tracks of wandering rovers, but it is useful now to study the issues involved in establishing navigation systems on other planets and moons,” said Neil Ashby. “Like current global navigation systems like GPS, these systems will depend on accurate clocks, and the effects on clock rates can be analyzed with the help of Einstein’s general theory of relativity.” Patla added that the results also help improve understanding of time itself under relativity. “It's good to know for the first time what is happening on Mars timewise. Nobody knew that before. It improves our knowledge of the theory itself, the theory of how clocks tick and relativity,” he said. Source: NIST, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 by Razvan Serea TeraCopy is a compact program designed to copy and move files at the maximum possible speed, also providing you with a lot of features. Copy files faster. TeraCopy uses dynamically adjusted buffers to reduce seek times. Asynchronous copy speeds up file transfer between two physical hard drives. Pause and resume transfers. Pause copy process at any time to free up system resources and continue with a single click. Error recovery. In case of copy error, TeraCopy will try several times and in the worse case just skips the file, not terminating the entire transfer. Interactive file list. TeraCopy shows failed file transfers and lets you fix the problem and recopy only problem files. Shell integration. TeraCopy can completely replace Explorer copy and move functions, allowing you work with files as usual. TeraCopy is free for non-commercial use only. For commercial use you need to buy a license. The paid version of the program includes the following features: Copy/move to your favorite folders. Save reports as HTML and CSV files. Select files with the same extension/folder. Remove the selected files from the copy queue. TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 changelog: Added support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. Improved exception handling and automated bug report upload. Fixed several minor bugs and small memory leaks. Build 26 (June 24) Fixed a rare exception when a transfer completed. Features added since version 3.17: Enhanced speed graph. New multi-threaded copy engine. Support for copying to multiple targets. Queue system for managing multiple copy operations. Support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. TeraCopy entry in the modern Windows Explorer context menu. Integrated toolbar in the title bar. Why receive LocalSend transfers with TeraCopy? Handle file conflicts: Skip, overwrite, or rename files when a file with the same name already exists. LocalSend always creates another copy, which can waste time and disk space, especially when resuming an interrupted transfer. Filter unwanted files: Apply ignore lists or remove files manually before accepting a transfer, so unnecessary files are not downloaded. Better performance on fast networks: In tests over a 10 Gbps connection, TeraCopy received files several times faster than the standard LocalSend app on Windows. Download: TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 | 14.5 MB (Freeware, paid upgrade available) View: TeraCopy Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Briefly used Turbo Pascal (and Turbo C++) in 97 and soon after that I bought PC magazine that included a full version of Delphi 2. I still use Delphi today, some 29 years later.
    • Age of Empires Mobile comes to PC, here's how to carry over progress from your phone by Ivan Jenic Image: YouTube/Microsoft Microsoft just released Age of Empires Mobile for PC. The game, officially called Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, is available for free on Steam and Microsoft Store, almost two years after its initial release for handheld devices. Age of Empires is one of those franchises that entire generations grew up with. The original came out in 1997, and immediately got people hooked to building civilizations and crushing their enemies on the battlefield. However, the franchise today is a far cry from its roots, as Age of Empires Mobile is, well, a game optimized for handheld devices, and not a classic RTS title we’ve all loved for years. And, of course, it includes in-game purchases. The PC version is still a mobile game at its core, but it’s been optimized for desktop play. There’s mouse control, full keyboard compatibility, and a refined UI. Microsoft also refreshed the visuals with some 4k textures, so the game should look better on larger screens. The game supports Crossplay, so you can switch between your phone, tablet, and PC without losing anything. But linked progress doesn’t come out of the box, as you have to enable it first. Here’s how to link your progress: On your mobile device, open Age of Empires Mobile. Go to Settings (Gear icon) > Account. Select Bind Account and choose a sign-in option. Once you enable account binding, sign in on PC using the same method, and your progress will be accessible across all your devices. Xbox Game Pass subscribers also get a bonus reward pack on PC, which includes: 1 Monthly Pass Token 1 Custom Resource Chest 10 Universal 60-Minute Speed-Ups 1,000 Empire Coins Exclusive Player Portrait Frame You can find more info about Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, as well as download links, on the Age of Empires official website.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      458
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!