Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, FloatingFatMan said:

Yeah, you want to be standing WELL back when they test that bugger...

Not so much the Spaceship. Its hop, suborbital cruise & SSTO (single stage to orbit) liftoff thrust will be a little bit less than a Falcon Heavy, but the Booster is going to be one loud sonofabitch.

  • Like 1

Wonder what Walter Kronkite would characterize the entire experience like? We all remember the play-by-play during Saturn/Apollo 4's launch. Too bad he's no longer with us to witness it when it happens.

"Sea Change" inbound, per Academia sources. Management is not gonna let this go any further than it has already, and OldSpace influences have collectively lost face to the point of embarrassment. Expect that trend to continue.

And there's no word on what the fairing issue was either. Too much kinetic energy with the firing bolts that cut it loose that could impact something on the bird? Too much flex on the bottom ends of the fairing that could possibly strike the birds' bottom end when they separate? Who knows?

I know The Big Bang Theory show has been mentioned on the forum  a few times. I was wondering if anyone has caught the spin off Young Sheldon. The latest episode, A Patch, A Modem, And A Zantac, has a cameo of Elon. The episode is about Sheldon proving NASA wrong in the early 90s. Worth a watch. 

  • Like 2

From a Port of LA board meeting

 

Quote

On November 15, 2017, SpaceX submitted an application for additional premises in order to accommodate the MA/Mr. Steven, a 205-foot long vessel dedicated to recovering the fairing portion of rockets which protect the spacecraft and reduce drag during flight.

 

plus other tidbits about their facilities.

 

https://www.portoflosangeles.org/Board/2017/December 2017/121417_Regular_Agenda_Item_8.pdf

  • Like 1

http://m.yna.co.kr/kr/contents/?cid=AKR20171218046600063&site=0800000000

 

Korea's test moon orbit line shoots in America 'Space X'



Korea Aerospace Research Institute has selected SpaceX (USA) as a launching service for the Korea Pathfinder Lunar Orbiter (KPLO), which will be launched in 2020, Said.

Space X's launch vehicle is Falcon 9.

It is 70 meters long and weighs 549 tons. 1 and 2 stage liquid propulsion engine.

The launch will be the Cape Canaveral Air Force Base in Florida, USA.

Antexis of India participated in the open bidding for the trial lunar launch service.

The company chose Space X as the preferred bidder through the evaluation and negotiated the final contract on the 15th.

In his first phase of the moon exploration project (2016-2020), he cooperated with NASA to develop and operate a trial lunar orbiter.

Based on this plan, we plan to acquire lunar orbiter design and core technology, establishment of deep space communication ground station, development of lunar missions payload, space internet, space navigation and navigation technology.

The Korean lunar orbit line is 550kg.

Five domestic development payloads (high-resolution camera, wide-field polarized camera, lunar gamma-ray spectrometer, moon magnetic field detector, space Internet) and one NASA development payload (shadow camera) are installed.

The test lunar orbiter enters the lunar orbit with its own propulsion system after the launch and then travels around the lunar polar orbit and transmits high resolution video and observation data to the earth.

NASA uses deep space ground stations to support the communications, tracking and navigation required for the successful operation of the moon orbit.

According to an official from the company, "The trial lunar orbiter is undergoing a detailed design review after the system preliminary design review in September." If the successful completion of the integrated electrical function test, structural model verification test, We will be able to fire as scheduled, "he said.

[email protected]

  • Love 1

LC-39A's RSS (rotating service structure) is almost gone with both legs removed and the platform gone. This is in preparation for Falcon Heavy, and the attachment of the Commercial Crew access arm. The arm probably won't be attached until after Falcon Heavy launches.

 

Zoom/crop

39A_RSS_removal_12-20-2017.thumb.jpg.90f80d32e48e5f88faf9ad1435e4886e.jpg

 

Before

5a3afc4991a7d_byerss(1).thumb.jpg.b1f548e447a3200924a15468be8bc8ea.jpg

A bit more powerful than predicted. I called it at 204,000 lbf (and change) in calculations, and its' official stats came in at 205,000. Nice. Most efficient rocket engine ever. We'll be studying it for years and years in Academia, I think.

 

And it broke the 200:1 TWR ceiling .... :yes: .... that's a huge deal. No other engine has been able to do that, in any Space Program.

 

So at the end of SpaceX's KeroLOX engine development, they achieve what nobody else could ... and I bet they do the same with the CH4/LOX engines. They're already in uncharted territory with Raptor, and so is Blue with the BE-4.

 

It'll be an interesting couple of years.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • If you don't care to read what I said, then you prove my point. Maybe written media is beyond your attention span. Titles are not summaries my friend.
    • Nobody asked... in fact, I said "I don't care about political leanings"  
    • TLDR. Here is a far better title (just a basic example): Windows 11 26H2 to allow disabling Web search results
    • Restore will get my vote, only if to see if things are any different, doubt it though but Labour and Conservatives too out of touch and same thing over and over and over…, Lib Dem who?
    • There is nothing wrong with this title. You have completely missed the plot when it comes to "clickbait." The issue was never that a title tries to entice you to click, that is how titles have worked for over 100 years. The issue is when the title subverts expectations, getting you to click expecting something that isn't there. The classic clickbait example is "Boyfriend caught cheating, what happens next will shock you," then what happened next is the girlfriend was upset...which is probably the least shocking outcome imaginable. If sounds like what you want is for the titles to be a collection of 10-word summaries that you can skim, get the just of the story, and only click if you want more details. That is not, never has been, and never will be what titles are. You can go all the way back to print newspapers during the great depression and see the same thing. The newspaper was locked in a vending machine, all you can see is the headline, you choose to put in 5¢ to buy the paper and read the rest if you want. Those headlines were written in a way to sell the paper, not just to provide a summery. Here are two actual headlines from that time, "Wall Street Lays an Egg," or "Stocks Hit Bottom?" Maybe you'd say something like "it was wrong then and it's still wrong now." Okay, fine opinion to have, but it isn't like Neowin is doing something unjurnalistic, they are just following the age-old standards for written media.
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      525
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      199
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      94
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      82
    5. 5
      neufuse
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!