Recommended Posts

Just finished watching last night's episode....

 

Spoiler

Awesome character based episode, again The Orville is nailing these 2nd season character based shows. A great spin on the whole time travel/time whatever trope used by sci-fi but WHAT THAT ENDING I DON'T EVEN?!?

 

  • Like 2
23 minutes ago, LOC said:

Just finished watching last night's episode....

 

  Hide contents

Awesome character based episode, again The Orville is nailing these 2nd season character based shows. A great spin on the whole time travel/time whatever trope used by sci-fi but WHAT THAT ENDING I DON'T EVEN?!?

 

Yep! Especially that last line you wrote.

I usually don't like time travel episodes...

 

Spoiler

 

But that was very well done, focusing entirely on the characters instead of science fiction mumbo jumbo we've heard a billion times and don't care about.

 

That ending... was fantastic. So many questions raised. Next week is going to be interesting.

 

 

  • Like 3
Spoiler

Like they said in the episode, it could be two different timelines have been made now, instead of one linear one.  So her change might not change things.  Though, since they took the time to show it then it probably will.  Get ready for a back to the future type deal with people fading out of life.

 

I'd just like to point out that everytime they show kelly on screen my eyes just automatically go to her forehead pimple, or w/e it is, doesn't look dark enough to call a mole.   I can't stop myself from doing it to. :P

On 4/20/2019 at 1:51 AM, George P said:
  Hide contents

Like they said in the episode, it could be two different timelines have been made now, instead of one linear one.  So her change might not change things.  Though, since they took the time to show it then it probably will.  Get ready for a back to the future type deal with people fading out of life.

 

I'd just like to point out that everytime they show kelly on screen my eyes just automatically go to her forehead pimple, or w/e it is, doesn't look dark enough to call a mole.   I can't stop myself from doing it to. 😛

Spoiler

I think it will definitely be in the same timeline, not a split one. Time travel logic is usually pretty stupid.

 

I agree about the thing on her forehead though. In general, I think she looks too... not "perfect" but well makeuped, except for that one thing. I wouldn't want to diss the actress just because of that, just saying.

 

 

23 minutes ago, techbeck said:

To much time travel in shows.   Its like the writers are getting lazier and lazier.

I agree, but I like how they just ignored the usual mumbo jumbo and made it character based, not a sci-fi dilema, so I don't mind it here.

On 4/20/2019 at 3:51 AM, George P said:
  Hide contents

Like they said in the episode, it could be two different timelines have been made now, instead of one linear one.  So her change might not change things.  Though, since they took the time to show it then it probably will.  Get ready for a back to the future type deal with people fading out of life.

 

I'd just like to point out that everytime they show kelly on screen my eyes just automatically go to her forehead pimple, or w/e it is, doesn't look dark enough to call a mole.   I can't stop myself from doing it to. 😛

Same, I was always paying attention to it when she was on Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. too.

Watching the latest episode now.  Nice seeing how they include present day things into the show.  Few episodes ago, was the items in the times capsule.  This week,

Spoiler

twinkie

...haha

 

Spoiler

And Alara returns.  Nice.  Even if just for a cameo.  I liked her character.

 

Edited by techbeck
  • 2 weeks later...

Glad it's renewed. Season 2 was so much better than Season 1.

 

I feel like next season will be its last though. Viewer counts have been terrible this season and basically every episode saw it drop after the other, felt it was 50/50 as well and the only reason it was renewed was to be a haven for Anti-Discovery folk, that didn't seem to pan out like Fox though it would though.

10 minutes ago, shockz said:

Glad it's renewed. Season 2 was so much better than Season 1.

 

I feel like next season will be its last though. Viewer counts have been terrible this season and basically every episode saw it drop after the other, felt it was 50/50 as well and the only reason it was renewed was to be a haven for Anti-Discovery folk, that didn't seem to pan out like Fox though it would though.

With online viewing added in, it was pulling in 6+ million. Hardly that bad...

  • Like 2
2 minutes ago, FloatingFatMan said:

With online viewing added in, it was pulling in 6+ million. Hardly that bad...

It's bad. https://tvseriesfinale.com/tv-show/the-orville-season-two-ratings/. Online or not, that drop in the number of millions is not good at all for television viewers.

Yeah I'm super glad we are getting season 3 obviously, but all those reporting that we would be getting seasons 3 4 and 5 when it was announced, yeah I doubt that's happening. With The Orville ratings aren't so black and white like with most TV properties. Mind you, the DVR/next day numbers are quite high for the show and McFarlane is obviously a keeper at FOX. Even Disney knows that I'm sure. So they gave him season 3. But a season 4 or 5, not gonna lie it doesn't look good. Unless season 3 blows the ratings out of the water somehow.

Which is sad because season 2 got pretty phenomenal reviews and cred among the sci-fi crowd. The only real complaint I've seen about it is the borrowing of theme from Star Trek, which is fair but doesn't detract from it being good.

Awesome. Well deserved renewal. I hope they do a season 4 and that should be about that. There is rarely, if at all, any show in history that is good past season 4. Off the top of my head I can't think of a single one.

  • Like 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • Cjam 2.5.0.0 by Razvan Serea Cjam is a lightweight and fast MP3 editor for Windows that lets you cut, join, and edit MP3 files without re-encoding. This means your audio quality remains untouched, and edits happen instantly. Cjam is ideal for quick, lossless edits—whether you're trimming music, combining tracks, or preparing audio for learning tools or podcasts. It features batch processing, scripting support, cue and playlist file handling, and a simple interface. Cjam is perfect for anyone who needs efficient MP3 editing without the complexity of full audio suites. Cjam requires a PC running Windows 10 or later and Microsoft .NET 6.0 or later. Key features for Cjam: No Re-encoding: Edit MP3 files without losing quality. Cut and Join MP3: Easily cut, trim, and combine MP3 tracks. Batch Processing: Edit multiple files at once for faster workflows. Scriptable Interface: Automate tasks with a custom command language. Cue and Playlist Support: Handle CUE and playlist files for seamless audio management. Fast and Lightweight: Quick processing with minimal system resources. Lossless Audio Editing: Ensure your edits don't affect audio quality. Simple User Interface: Clean, intuitive design for easy navigation. File Format Support: Works with MP3, Cjam-specific file formats (CJAMC, CJAMJ, CJAM). Cjam 2.5.0.0 changelog: Added clipboard-based import/export support for mp3DirectCut Added clipboard-based export support for REAPER Added support for naming IMP3 elements Changed the Reset behavior to preserve Undo/Redo history; use Shift key + Reset button to clear it Added a new command parameter (qcp) Added 8 new entries to lang.txt (main_c124-126, main_d150-151, main_m082, vme_c014, vme_d005) Fixed a bug where the il parameter was incorrectly applied when pasting VMP3s into the main list Fixed several other minor bugs Download: Cjam 2.5.0.0 | 1.4 MB (Freeware) Links: Cjam Home Page | Cjam Manual | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • WTF! Nah, not this one. If you were back then using computers in the 90s or you had a clue, you'd know this was huge and was seen and overused absolutely everywhere and you'd take this article as no more than a retrospective story. That's all it is.
    • these "editors" get paid by the amount of articles and not the quality of content; hence why we get this random stuff from the same "editor" time and time again.
    • 256 times the quality of an audio cd? I think audio cd's sound good so even twice as good as that would be something.
    • It’s not about the NOx. It’s about the electrical field.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      91
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!