Recommended Posts

It was a better ep than the one before, interesting plot for sure though nothing new in the scifi space.   The comedy was a step up for sure and the best for season 2 so far.

5 hours ago, George P said:

The comedy was a step up for sure and the best for season 2 so far.

The comedy was well balanced with the main plot although I don't think the Bortus mustache thing needed to go on as long as it did & I could actually do with an episode without Bortus in it.

On 2/2/2019 at 9:10 AM, FloatingFatMan said:

but can we please have a story that's not a redo of a TNG episode? 

No chance.

 

It's happened before in the first season too.

 

And, actually, I like seeing Seth giving his own spin on some of the familiar themes from Star Trek.

On 2/2/2019 at 12:10 AM, FloatingFatMan said:

I enjoyed it, but can we please have a story that's not a redo of a TNG episode?  This was essentially the same as the season 4 TNG ep "In Theory" where Data has a girlfriend.

This happens in a lot of shows where similar events/plots are redone over and over.  Original content is getting rare these days.  More often than not, I can tell what is going to happen soon after I start watching a show or movie. 

 

Personally, I didn't care much for last weeks episode.   Cheesy at times and just blah.  Funnies part was at the end when Isaac was trying to breakup with the Dr.   I also do not like the Isaac charter much nor Bortus.   Data/Worf copy cat wanna bes.

I dunno, I love Isaac quite a bit. I feel like he's (is he a he or an...it?) a decent take on the Data type of character, he just needs some more development imo Bortus is literally Worf, just kinda dumber (but not dumb if you know what I mean) with tons of backstory and what not. I feel like he's also a fun character but just needs some different storylines going forward.

2 hours ago, techbeck said:

Isaac is the poor mans android IMO.   Maybe the character didn't look so cheap.  And yes, I know it is a TV show.

Can't be too fancy with the budget for a scifi show on Fox of all networks, you know how fast they like to kill their shows.

5 hours ago, techbeck said:

Isaac is the poor mans android IMO.   Maybe the character didn't look so cheap.  And yes, I know it is a TV show.

Maybe Seth saw how Data visibly aged and decided to go another route, or maybe it was just purely so that they could do the Mr Potato Head scene, idk but it doesn't bother me.

7 hours ago, techbeck said:

Isaac is the poor mans android IMO.   Maybe the character didn't look so cheap.  And yes, I know it is a TV show.

An android (as noted numerous times in TNG) is built to resemble a humanoid. Issac is part of a completely manufactured race who consider themselves better than humanoids

  • Like 2
8 hours ago, George P said:

Can't be too fancy with the budget for a scifi show on Fox of all networks, you know how fast they like to kill their shows.

They go all out with other characters.  Looks to me they didn't know how to develop this character and this is what they came up with.

2 hours ago, Son_Of_Dad said:

An android (as noted numerous times in TNG) is built to resemble a humanoid. Issac is part of a completely manufactured race who consider themselves better than humanoids

Yes, I got that but still my point holds.  Looks like a cheap Data and they could have done more with the costume IMO.  If they consider themselves better than humanoids, does not look it.  I know it is not the same character as TNG, but again...could have done more IMO.

5 hours ago, Steven P. said:

Maybe Seth saw how Data visibly aged and decided to go another route, or maybe it was just purely so that they could do the Mr Potato Head scene, idk but it doesn't bother me.

That was funny...and the scene where he cut off Gordon's leg was funny as well.  I dunno, the last episode just made me dislike the character even more than I was.  But just MO on the subject.

I rather enjoyed the last episode. I'm getting kinda tired of all the Maclen (sp) story lines also - but this one was really well done. I like how they are literally Star Trek'ing current social topics like TOS and TNG did especially. And they usually tone down the comedy for this serious stuff, which is the right move. I also thought the new security officer (I keep forgetting her name lol) did really well in this one, so I'm glad she's getting screen time and not just written off as a secondary character since she came on the ship. Looking forward to next week's episode :)

I thought both were quite good. Orville doesn't have years of canon they have to make people happy about, so they can just do whatever and it works in context of the show that week. Discovery literally won't be able to make everyone happy and I've come to accept that since its basically the same situation as Enterprise at this point.

6 hours ago, LOC said:

Orville doesn't have years of canon they have to make people happy about, so they can just do whatever and it works in context of the show that week.

When does Discovery even attempt that? Given every man and his dog is aware of Section 31 in this weeks episode, who when first introduced Starfleet would not even acknowledge the existence of. The Discovery writers are doing "whatever"?

2 hours ago, Son_Of_Dad said:

When does Discovery even attempt that? Given every man and his dog is aware of Section 31 in this weeks episode, who when first introduced Starfleet would not even acknowledge the existence of. The Discovery writers are doing "whatever"?

That's what I mean though - Orville can get away with whatever because they are a new show with no lore yet to speak of more or less. Discovery, whether you agree with the canon they are going with (or messing with depending on how you look at it of course) is more a hindrance to them than anything else (maybe some wooden acting from time to time also) and it seems no matter what they do, no one will be happy. New fans will be confused to hell, old die hard Trekkies like me and the rest of us will either be alright with it or become an angry mob with pitchforks and torches. And as for Section 31, it has barely been touched on in any form (books might flesh them out but they aren't canon) from DS9 to Enterprise. We barely know anything about how they truly operate and do things. As mentioned previously, perhaps something happens between Discovery's era and DS9 to make them the shadowy black ops presented there.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • Lilly-Livered American Media Are Scared
    • Really? Despite the memory price rises, nothing can kill it? I thought something would.
    • I think there will be a 27H1 for actual users of 26H1 The 25h2 supports ARM too : Snapdragon X, Snapdragon X Plus and Snapdragon X Elite
    • Poll: Grand Theft Auto VI price predictions, cast your vote by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe After years of waiting, Rockstar will be solidifying the launch date of Grand Theft Auto VI with the launch of pre-orders next week. While the studio has confirmed a date for this occasion, it is yet to attach a price to the highly anticipated game. So let's see what our readers think it will cost at launch. The Grand Theft Auto VI pre-orders will kick off on June 25 for digital and physical editions. Unless some last-minute changes happen, the release date will be November 19, 2026, across Xbox Series X|S and PlayStation 5. Unfortunately, there's still no information about a PC version from the developer or the publisher Take-Two. Now the question becomes, how much will Grand Theft Auto VI cost at launch? The game is predicted by some analysts to be the biggest launch of an entertainment product ever. With the amount of hype that has been built behind it and with ballooning development costs, Take-Two may price this Grand Theft Auto entry differently from other AAA titles. The current price of a AAA game is $69.99. That norm almost rose to $79.99 before calming down. But with such a massive release, Grand Theft Auto VI may be the game that pushes the boundary again. It's also possible that Take-Two keeps the price relatively low to increase the number of players that jump in early and keep them hooked on Grand Theft Auto Online to spend on microtransactions for years to come. Keep in mind that the below poll is asking for a prediction of the standard edition price, not a deluxe or any other special edition that Take-Two will introduce for additional benefits. Also, there is the chance of the company splitting up the campaign and online portions. If you think that will happen, put your vote on what you think will be the total cost of the two. Poll Poll: How much will Grand Theft Auto VI cost? $59.99 $69.99 $79.99 $89.99 $100 or more Submit Vote If you have a very specific prediction in mind, sound off in the comments below.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      AMV earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      513
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      171
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      82
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!