Setting Share Permissions & ACL's remotely to ubuntu 16.04 Samba file server via Windows Server 2012 r2


Recommended Posts

Hi all, 

 

I've been looking around the forums and trying to find an answer via search but I have been unable to thus far. I'm hoping someone can give me a hand. I'm very new to Linux and Samba but my bosses wanted me to set up a new file server on Ubuntu that can integrate with AD and have users be able to authenticate with their AD credentials. So far I have managed to get Ubuntu 16.04 installed, Kerberos configured and the system added to my AD domain. Everything is working fine. I am able to see my new file server in AD users and computers and DNS is working correctly, things are pingable and resolving right. 

 

My issue is that I am trying to use the instructions in the Samba wiki to set the share permissions and ACL on a share which I have created on my Samba server as it indicates that I shouldn't use the smb.conf to add the parameters, but instead use the Windows utilities ( https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_a_Share_Using_Windows_ACLs ) Unfortunately, despite everything else working correctly when I try to connect via my 2012 r2 server to the remote Samba I get an error " Computer <new server> cannot be managed. Verify hat the network path is correct, the computer is available on the network, and that the appropriate Windows Firewall rules are enabled on the target computer" Sadly, there are NO "Windows Firewall rules" since its a Ubuntu box and considering that the computer IS perfectly visible in the AD, the snap-in can find it when I 'browse', it can be ping'd and the UFW is off, I am at a loss as to what could possibly be the issue.

 

Anyone out there who has integrated a Ubuntu file server using Samba onto AD can point me in the right direction?

 

Thanks!

 

I think  that only applies to Windows systems. You are on Linux, use the smb.conf.

 

I am very shady on this, but I THINK that is what you're trying to get accross... If I'm wrong, shoot me in the foot...

@Mindovermaster I have tried both ways. Unfortunately I can't seem to get a windows user to be able to map to the samba share using only the AD credentials - which is what should be happening.  I can set up a share without the system being on the domain or using kerberos to authenticate but this is not what I am wanting. I need a ubuntu server to join my windows domain, to have users be able to map their shares using only their windows AD credentials. According to the article that I linked and the Samba wiki, this setup is completely possible - but I can't manage it. I was hoping someone had done it - and documented all the steps.

 

Thanks for trying. I think I am just going to have to set it up as a stand alone server , assign everyone their own samba passwords and have them map locally without it being a domain member.

did you validate your samba has extended ACLs enabled

 

smbd -b | grep HAVE_LIBACL

 

Does that come back that you HAVE_LIBACL?

 

If so and you joined it to the domain correctly, then yes you should be able to access via the windows tools..

 

What schema are you running you mention 2012r2 but are you actually running the 2012r2 schema -- you can check with dsquery or powershell.  Also what version of samba are you running?

 

What I can tell you off the top of my head, is yes this is very possible.. Problem is I have not done this in quite some time.. I would have to fire up some vms and run through it.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • In addition to the "sidebar app list" and "Collections" features, Microsoft will also deprecate the "Drop" feature. Before you publish this news and credit another site, here is the original source: https://x.com/i/status/2067838711870439583 .
    • Looks like the 7.1 is fake effects, can it at least do real 5.1? It says 'virtual 7.1' in all descriptions.
    • You can't, if you didn't notice, it doesn't support surround at all, it's right in the spec list.
    • Hi — I’m always interested in soundcards. Like displays, I just want to know I’m getting as much clean “sonic juice” into my brain as possible as the years take their toll. I’m not entirely sure what to take away from this review, though. It doesn’t really tell me whether the AE‑X is a good product or who it’s actually for. Most of what I’m getting is: there’s a driver to install, here’s what it looks like, and here’s what’s in the box. There’s a lot of emphasis on the SPDIF input. When you mention not needing to switch headphones between console and PC — does that mean the PC has to be powered on just to pass audio through? That seems like a fairly big waste of energy. Is this more something a streamer would use alongside a capture card? How are you testing the sound? (Also, you might want to clarify that you’re using the headphones in wired mode when you mention they’re wireless.) You mention the lack of EMI shielding — how much real‑world difference does that make compared with typical motherboard audio? On multi‑channel: what exactly isn’t supported? Does this mean Windows spatial audio (Dolby Atmos for Headphones, DTS Headphone:X, etc.) won’t work, or just that the card itself doesn’t decode surround formats? And are there any true multi‑driver “surround” headphones left that would even use that? You also highlight support for high‑impedance headphones — but what does that translate to in practice? How does it compare to driving the same headphones from a normal device, and does it make any difference for everyday, lower‑impedance models? In short, who is this card actually targeted at?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      89
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      76
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      74
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!