Jerry Jones gives Cowboys players ultimatum: Stand for anthem or sit for game


Recommended Posts

Circaflex    3,644
4 minutes ago, techbeck said:

if you cannot understand what that means to the men and women that fought for this country and which allowed these players to make the money they are making, then goodbye.  It started off as a protest to police injustice but now it has turned in to something else.  Needs to stop.

Serious question, did you serve? Kneeling is not disrespecting the flag; trying to stop a peaceful protest is disrespectful.  Vets fought for equal rights and the ability to protest your government. If you did not serve, quit being so defensive over something you never defended.

  • Like 7
Link to post
Share on other sites
+primortal    19,197
2 hours ago, techbeck said:

Dallas Cowboys owner Jerry Jones said Sunday any player who disrespects the flag will not play.

 

Jones’ comments, the strongest made on the anthem controversy, came after he was asked about Vice President Mike Pence leaving the game in Indianapolis early after several San Francisco 49ers players took a knee during the national anthem.

 

"I know this, we cannot ... in the NFL in any way give the implication that we tolerate disrespecting the flag," he said following the Cowboys’ 35-31 loss to the Green Bay Packers. "We know that there is a serious debate in this country about those issues, but there is no question in my mind that the National Football League and the Dallas Cowboys are going to stand up for the flag. So we're clear."

 

Jones and the rest of the team knelt arm-in-arm before the national anthem before a game against the Arizona Cardinals two weeks ago, days after President Trump reignited the anthem-protest controversy.

 

More....

http://www.foxnews.com/sports/2017/10/09/jerry-jones-gives-cowboys-players-ultimatum-stand-for-anthem-or-sit-for-game.html

 

Good deal.  Detroit Lions owner said that if players stopped kneeling, then she will donate money to organizations to help their cause.  Also, Kaepernick reached bottom and stated that he will stand for the anthem if he is allowed to play again. 

Gee, I wonder if this has anything to do about this, http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/353362-trump-called-cowboys-jerry-jones-four-times-asking-him-not-to-kneel

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
techbeck    7,583
3 minutes ago, Circaflex said:

Serious question, did you serve? Kneeling is not disrespecting the flag; trying to stop a peaceful protest is disrespectful.  Vets fought for equal rights and the ability to protest your government. If you did not serve, quit being so defensive over something you never defended.

Nope...didn't serve but I have family members who did, and currently are and they feel the same way I do.  And do not really need to serve to see how this is disrespectful.   And you do not need to serve to defend and support the rights of others.  Your comment "If you did not serve, quit being so defensive over something you never defended." is useless as it means that anyone protesting for or against this issue and did not serve, doesnt have a voice or right to try and defend it.  I defend and support people's rights no matter their color, religion, or sexual preference, and I have stood with people like this as well.  So yes, I defend people's rights and never said people cannot protest.  Just this is not the place to do so.

Link to post
Share on other sites
+primortal    19,197

I've asked this in the other thread

Anyone wish to answer?

 

Cause if you don't stand like Trump asked then turn around complaining about kneeling makes one a hypocrite cause both are disrespecting the flag.

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites
Xenon    12,709

L9BQhs2.thumb.jpg.e995aa5026154d1d0a69819cb24eded8.jpg

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
techbeck    7,583
1 minute ago, primortal said:

I've asked this in the other thread

Anyone wish to answer?

 

Cause if you don't stand like Trump asked then turn around complaining about kneeling makes one a hypocrite cause both are disrespecting the flag.

If I am in the room, sure.  Just like I do when I go to my nieces/nephews sporting events in Jr/High school.

Link to post
Share on other sites
NJ Louch    9,655
12 minutes ago, techbeck said:

if you cannot understand what that means to the men and women that fought for this country and which allowed these players to make the money they are making, then goodbye.  It started off as a protest to police injustice but now it has turned in to something else.  Needs to stop.

And can you not comprehend that the men and women who fought against oppression and to maintain civil liberties, the rights of the American people - and how having all of the above manipulated towards intolerance, injustice and used as a whipping stick against anyone who goes against such regimes?  This is exactly why we NEED such protest.  In fact, do deny the protest and to shut it down is exactly what they were supposedly fighting against.

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
techbeck    7,583
2 minutes ago, Nefarious Trigger said:

And can you not comprehend that the men and women who fought against oppression and to maintain civil liberties, the rights of the American people - and how having all of the above manipulated towards intolerance, injustice and used as a whipping stick against anyone who goes against such regimes?  This is exactly why we NEED such protest.  In fact, do deny the protest and to shut it down is exactly what they were supposedly fighting against.

Again, not againsts protesting...just not during the national anthem because lots take offense to it and it is causing more division.  If they were protesting other times, then this wouldnt be a big issue like it appears to be now.  And honestly, if all these players are doing is protesting 2min 1 time a week, does not do much just standing around.  Take action, do something else.  I am sure some are, but  then again, I am sure lots are not.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Circaflex    3,644

 

1 minute ago, techbeck said:

then this wouldnt be a big issue like it appears to be now.

Had trump and co not opened their big mouths, this wouldn't be the big deal it is. Trump is the whole reason the military was brought into these protests, it had nothing to do with the military originally.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
techbeck    7,583
1 minute ago, Circaflex said:

 

Had trump and co not opened their big mouths, this wouldn't be the big deal it is. Trump is the whole reason the military was brought into these protests, it had nothing to do with the military originally.

Uhh, no.  Military was upset before and were getting more and more upset.  Trump just brought it to a head quicker.  And it turned in to being a military issue because veterans were getting upset and felt disrespected.  It was a military issue as soon as vetrans stared feeling disrespectful. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
+primortal    19,197
4 minutes ago, techbeck said:

If I am in the room, sure.  Just like I do when I go to my nieces/nephews sporting events in Jr/High school.

Good for you :D

 

The time's I've been in sports bars I've never seen this since Trump starting having a hissy fit about than and did over here patrons complaining about them kneeling.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
techbeck    7,583
Just now, primortal said:

Good for you :D

 

The time's I've been in sports bars I've never seen this since Trump starting having a hissy fit about than and did over here patrons complaining about them kneeling.

I do forget or not pay attention sometimes at home, but I do not consciously do it...like these players are.  And I agree, practice what you preach or keep quiet. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites
Jim K    16,031
18 minutes ago, techbeck said:

The men and women (veterans) who got ###### off for people standing and who took offense to it.    This has been going on before Trump opened his big mouth and people were getting more and more frustrated.  Trump just made things come to a head quicker than they would haven.  And again, funny how 200+ NFL players protested after Trump opened his mouth and then the next week after, the numbers were way down.  Meaning they were just protesting Trump and his comments...not the issues at hand.

Well yes ... the protest grew louder because the person who is supposed to defend and represent the Constitution opened his mouth and basically told NFL players that their First Amendment rights aren't applicable on the field.  It is the NFL's responsibility to react to actions of their employees...not Trump's.  He is the one that turned this molehill into a mountain ... a handful of players kneeled and his mouth turned that handful into hundreds.

 

Edit:  Jerry Jones telling his employees that they will sit if they kneel ... good on him.  He set the rules ... his employees must follow or face the consequences.  That is how it should have always been.

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
techbeck    7,583
3 minutes ago, Jim K said:

Well yes ... the protest grew louder because the person who is supposed to defend and represent the Constitution opened his mouth and basically told NFL players that their First Amendment rights aren't applicable on the field.  It is the NFL's responsibility to react to actions of their employees...not Trump's.  He is the one that turned this molehill into a mountain ... a handful of players kneeled and his mouth turned that handful into hundreds.

Trump did not say that.  He said if you disrespect the flag, you should be fired.  If people are listening to him, then good but that is on them, not Trump.  Trump didnt order anything and do do so then I would agree he would be stomping on people's rights.  Also, the NFL was not doing jack about this.  They can fine you a lot of money for wearing the wrong color shoes while supporting a cause (forget which players were fined here) but cannot do so here?  NFL just didn't want to get their hands dirty. 

 

NFL or the owners do not need to listen to Trump.  A lot of people don't.  Just shows that there are owners who agree with how disrespectful this is.  I am sure some owners don't and we wont see anything from them.  Their right to do so.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Jim K    16,031
Just now, techbeck said:

Trump did not say that.  He said if you disrespect the flag, you should be fired.  If people are listening to him, then good but that is on them, not Trump.  Trump didnt order anything and do do so then I would agree he would be stomping on people's rights.  Also, the NFL was not doing jack about this.  They can fine you a lot of money for wearing the wrong color shoes while supporting a cause (forget which players were fined here) but cannot do so here?  NFL just didn't want to get their hands dirty. 

Once again ... what the NFL does and how they react to their employees is on them.  If they want to fine you for wrong color shoes ... that is on them.  Trump should have kept his nose out of how the league enforces their rules ... not throw gasoline on a small matchstick.

 

Also, disrespect the flag.  Hmmm...is it disrespecting or trying to make a point?  Are these players burning the flag, stomping on the flag, giving it the middle finger?  Or have they just been kneeling?

Link to post
Share on other sites
techbeck    7,583
2 minutes ago, Jim K said:

Also, disrespect the flag.  Hmmm...is it disrespecting or trying to make a point?  Are these players burning the flag, stomping on the flag, giving it the middle finger?  Or have they just been kneeling?

For Veterans who are taking offense to this, not standing and kneeling is the same thing as stomping on the flag.  Disrespect is disrespect no matter how you look at it.  You do not need to do a physical act to show disrespect towards something.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Circaflex    3,644
7 minutes ago, techbeck said:

For Veterans who are taking offense to this, not standing and kneeling is the same thing as stomping on the flag.  Disrespect is disrespect no matter how you look at it.  You do not need to do a physical act to show disrespect towards something.

No it is not the same thing. For every offended Veteran there is another non-offended veteran. Not everyone who has served finds this disrespectful, there are many who have voiced their opinion in support of these peaceful protests.

  • Like 5
Link to post
Share on other sites
PsYcHoKiLLa    2,598
2 hours ago, techbeck said:

What, Trump does not get an opinion either?  And dictate what?  He didn't order the owners to fire players, he said they should be fired.   There are also a lot of people boycotting and expressing their distaste with they pocket books.  NFL ratings are down and the NFL has dropped to the least popular professional/college sport.

 

You want to protest, peacefully, I am all for it.  But again, doing so during the national anthem sends the wrong message.  That  really is my main gripe with the whole protesting at the anthem.

Doing so during the anthem sends exactly the message it's supposed to send, if you want ALL citizens to be proud of their country then make sure they feel they can by not allowing the police force to murder them during routine traffic stops. It's not as if these are isolated incidents, this crap has been happening for decades, enough is enough. The fact that a few hot dog munching, beer swilling fat idiots feelings have been hurt is less than meaningless compared to that.

 

To expect people to show respect for the flag of a country which treats them with contempt and turns a blind eye to them being murdered by the police forces is moronic.

Edited by PsYcHoKiLLa
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
NJ Louch    9,655

So to summarise, you feel that protest shouldn't be divisive and because veterans are offended then it's wrong to protest.

 

These veterans are absolutely misunderstanding the situation.  The disrespect is from those who have usurped what they originally stood against and twisted it to "Look, these players are disrespecting your actions".  ######.  The veterans did not fight for a flag, for a piece of music or for people to stand during a sporting event.  They fought for liberty, choice, a freedom from oppression, the right to protest, the ability to not go with the powerful.  This is so sickening how that's been twisted by Trump and his cohorts.

  • Like 5
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Rippleman    3,851
41 minutes ago, techbeck said:

The men and women (veterans) who got ###### off for people standing and who took offense to it.    This has been going on before Trump opened his big mouth and people were getting more and more frustrated.  Trump just made things come to a head quicker than they would haven.  And again, funny how 200+ NFL players protested after Trump opened his mouth and then the next week after, the numbers were way down.  Meaning they were just protesting Trump and his comments...not the issues at hand.

This is exactly it. This lunacy side of anti-trump is like a disease. Right after they started kneeling, he should have said "to show respect, knee for the flag" they all would have started standing. If its anti-trump, the idiots will follow the crowd.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Jim K    16,031
18 minutes ago, techbeck said:

For Veterans who are taking offense to this, not standing and kneeling is the same thing as stomping on the flag.  Disrespect is disrespect no matter how you look at it.  You do not need to do a physical act to show disrespect towards something.

I find people stomping on the flag (or desecrating it) very offending ... kneeling in a peaceful manner ... not as much.  I find calling "some" white nationalists "very fine people" offending.

 

We all get offended ... really isn't the job of the Executive Branch to say to the NFL that they should "Get that son of a bitch off the field."  It is the player's First Amendment rights ... it is the owner's responsibility to take action or not.  Jerry Jones has ... it is his right as the owner.  

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites
techbeck    7,583
14 minutes ago, PsYcHoKiLLa said:

The fact that a few hot dog munching, beer swilling fat idiots feelings have been hurt is less than meaningless compared to that.

The fact that you are saying these are fat idiots who eat hot dogs and drink beer just shows you have no idea those who take offense to the protests.  And way to stereotype and try to label a certain demographic.

14 minutes ago, Nefarious Trigger said:

So to summarise, you feel that protest shouldn't be divisive and because veterans are offended then it's wrong to protest.

 

These veterans are absolutely misunderstanding the situation.  The disrespect is from those who have usurped what they originally stood against and twisted it to "Look, these players are disrespecting your actions".  ######.  The veterans did not fight for a flag, for a piece of music or for people to stand during a sporting event.  They fought for liberty, choice, a freedom from oppression, the right to protest, the ability to not go with the powerful.  This is so sickening how that's been twisted by Trump and his cohorts.

Nope, not what I said.  I think I was pretty  clear.  I said there are better ways to protest and if protests server to divide people more and more, they need to be rethought or not happen.   Also, not the place for this kind of protest as it is causing more problems than it is solving.

 

And you are right, people fought for liberty and justice and that is what the flag means and symbolizes.  Why veterans are upset.   And Trump did not start this.  Veterans/military personnel were upset before Trump opened his mouth.  This is very obvious.  Did Trump make it worse and bring more light to the situation, sure, but  saying Trump twisted things here is incorrect.

Link to post
Share on other sites
techbeck    7,583
10 minutes ago, Jim K said:

I find people stomping on the flag (or desecrating it) very offending ... kneeling in a peaceful manner ... not as much.

Me to....but I can also see how a lot of people would become offended by this and see it as disrespectful.  As soon as a large group of people take offense to something and it causes more division, things need to be rethought.

 

I am still interested to know how many of these 200+ players or doing something other than just standing around.   Like I said before, standing around does nothing to solve issues.

 

And now I am just repeating myself.  I do respect people's opinion here but I have my own and will leave it at that.

Link to post
Share on other sites
NJ Louch    9,655

Done here.  Symbolism over dealing with America's very obvious issues.  Rather not ruffle a few feathers than shine a light on the country's problems.  Gotcha...

Link to post
Share on other sites
techbeck    7,583
Just now, Nefarious Trigger said:

 Rather not ruffle a few feathers than shine a light on the country's problems.  Gotcha...

Not what I was saying but, ok then.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Jay Bonggolto
      NFL will virtually bring fans into stadiums via Microsoft Teams
      by Jay Bonggolto

      Microsoft announced today that it will provide virtual game day experiences to NFL fans using Teams as part of efforts to observe health standards amid the COVID-19 pandemic. The NFL will display spectators on LED screens in stadiums and on broadcast during key games.

      Fans will be featured via a virtual feed called Fan Mosaic, where the home team can invite them to watch games together through a VIP Teams meeting. They will also see the live game alongside a gallery view of other spectators in a dual screen display. Audio from the Teams meetings will be mixed with augmented crowd noise tailored for each stadium.

      The NFL will also install LED screens at each end zone in key games to let the players celebrate moments with fans when they score a touchdown. For each touchdown celebration, players can see the Fan Mosaic on the LED screens and connect with fans through the Bud Light Showtime cam.

      Teams will also be used by the league to manage operations throughout the season every week as the number of representatives onsite will be reduced. The NFL staff will use the videoconferencing tool for communication, document collaboration, and reporting, among others.

      Microsoft and NFL have been working since 2013 on many initiatives to provide support to coaching staff and referees as well as improve the fan experience. That partnership was extended earlier this year.

    • By Rich Woods
      Microsoft is extending its Surface deal with the NFL
      by Rich Woods

      Image via AP Today, Microsoft announced a multi-year extension of its partnership with the NFL, which has provided Surface hardware to the league since 2013. While there have been hiccups in the partnership over that time, such as with announcers calling them iPads or Patriots coach Bill Belichick ranting about them, it seems that those hiccups were exactly that.



      Aside from that extension, the partnership will also include Microsoft Teams, the company's collaboration service. Teams will be able to use Teams (pun intended) for general collaboration, for drawing up plays with Whiteboard integration, and more. In fact, several teams are already using Teams.

      "Since 2013, Microsoft has helped transform the NFL through technology around our game. Microsoft Surface has quickly become an authentic tool to the game of football and is vital during all NFL games for coaches, players, and NFL officials.," said Renie Anderson, Chief Revenue Officer and Executive Vice President of NFL Partnerships. "And now by working together to integrate Microsoft Teams across the League, together we aim to improve on communications and collaboration in a modern way."

      The Miami Dolphins used Teams to plan Super Bowl LIV at Hard Rock Stadium, the New York Jets use it for their football and business operations, including the draft, and the Kansas City Chiefs use it to coordinate scouts.

      "In Microsoft Teams we can easily collaborate on files, manage shared calendars, host meetings, and utilize existing integrations," said Kim Rometo, Vice President and Chief Information Officer for the Miami Dolphins. "Teams made cooperation with the NFL possible throughout the regular season and with Super Bowl planning."

      Microsoft says it will continue supporting the Surface Sideline Viewing System and the Surface Instant Replay, and it will continue to develop new solutions for teams and for the league.

    • By LoneWolfSL
      BioWare says Anthem's core systems are being reinvented, halts seasonal updates
      by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe

      BioWare's online action RPG Anthem released just under a year ago, giving players a brand new alien world to explore using Iron Man-like exosuits. However, overall reactions to the title haven't been positive from both critics and players alike since then. The game's lead producer Ben Irving also departed from the studio in August last year.

      Today, BioWare general manager Casey Hudson took to the studio's official blog to reveal what the game's future looks like as the one year anniversary approaches. In the coming months, the studio will be working on a fundamental "longer-term redesign of the experience," as it has come to the conclusion that the game's shortcomings in the loot experience, progression, and end game aspects cannot be fixed using just updates or expansions.

      The studio will be "working to reinvent the core gameplay loop with clear goals, motivating challenges and progression with meaningful rewards – while preserving the fun of flying and fighting in a vast science-fantasy setting." Hudson said that unlike the work that was done previously, now there will be a team that will take its time to "test and iterate, focusing on gameplay first."

      However, pivoting the development team to making a new experience like this means that Anthem's current seasonal update approach is coming to an end. Events, store refreshes, and repeats of previous seasonal content will be the only pieces of content the current edition will see while behind the scenes work is being done to revitalize the game.

    • By LoneWolfSL
      Anthem joins EA Access and Origin Access Basic subscriptions
      by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe

      BioWare's most recent action RPG, Anthem, is now available on all subscription services that EA offers across PC, Xbox One, and PlayStation 4. Origin Access and EA Access subscribers can now play the Standard Edition of the live service-focused title without any restrictions.

      Previously, only those enrolled in the more expensive Origin Access Premier tier service on PC had the game available to them, with other subscriptions only getting a 10-hour trial. It's not a secret that the game has had a troubled journey. The game's lead producer Ben Irving also left BioWare recently. Hopefully, its injection to all of the Access services should pump up the player numbers by quite a margin for a while.

      Alongside Anthem, EA also announced seven more games for the Origin Access services on PC, with two of them being Premier exclusive. Note that some of the Basic additions were on the Premier tier previously. Here's the full list:

      Origin Access Premier

      FIFA 20 (September 19) Plants vs. Zombies: Battle for Neighborville Founder's Edition Origin Access Basic + Premier

      Anthem Ultimate Chicken Horse Yooka-Laylee Out of the Park Baseball 20 The Escapists 2 Vambrace: Cold Soul Origin Access and EA Access services cost $4.99 a month, while the PC exclusive Origin Access Premier service comes in at $14.99 per month. All services give subscribers unlimited access to a massive collection of games, discounts on EA titles (across all games on Origin), and trials for upcoming games. The Premier variant adds on access to all newly released EA games and some other third-party recent releases on top of all that.

    • By LoneWolfSL
      Anthem Lead Producer Ben Irving is departing BioWare
      by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe

      Anthem Lead Producer Ben Irving revealed today that he is leaving BioWare for a position in another company. The move comes after an eight-year stint at BioWare, with Irving previously working on the MMORPG Star Wars: The Old Republic also as the lead producer.

      The announcement arrived via a series of tweets made by Irving, where he described BioWare as "the dream place" to work at. Regarding Anthem, he said the action RPG has a "bright future" and "a great team working on it." It's unknown for now who will be stepping up to take the Lead Producer position now that Irving has left the scene.

      Following the less than ideal fan reception the RPG has garnered since launch, Anthem received its Cataclysm update last week after months of delays. We will have to see how the game progresses now that a new lead will be dropping in. Hopefully, it won't follow in the footsteps of Mass Effect: Andromeda.

      Don't forget that this is not the only project BioWare has cooking, as it's already confirmed that the next Dragon Age game is also under development.