Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, trag3dy said:

For me it's not the thumbs down that bothers me but when a specific user goes through an entire thread and down votes every post you make without leaving any sort of response to any of it that bothers me.

 

I've even had posts where someone made a good point and I'd reply with something as innocuous as "fair enough" or something similar and even that gets thumbed down without a response. At that point they're not doing it because they disagree they're doing it because they have some sort of weird vendetta and it feels extremely childish.

 

I feel like if you're going to go through an entire thread an down vote every post a person makes a reason should be required otherwise why are you there? If you're not adding anything to a conversation then it amounts to being a low caliber troll at that point.

 

This is true, it becomes an a way of trolling that has no repercussions. They should at least reply with some substance. The fact that the notifications are within seconds of each other shows it is just an personal attack for them. They don’t read they fast!

  • Like 4
37 minutes ago, adrynalyne said:

This is true, it becomes an a way of trolling that has no repercussions. They should at least reply with some substance. The fact that the notifications are within seconds of each other shows it is just an personal attack for them. They don’t read they fast!

100% agree with what you have said. The fact that this "feature" can be used to troll, or bring back arguments from months ago, without repercussions is disappointing. This thread is a little ironic, but I had it happen to me the first day they went active. Someone went back to posts from January and disliked a handful of them, from a thread where many arguments had happened, warnings were given out, yet they want to go back and dig it up in order to stir things up. This really showed the immaturity of some here at Neowin. It is a silly feature that does nothing for the community. One can easily see how there are groups of members who "target" each other and will dislike their posts no matter what. Sure, the dislikes don't do anything to your rep(which is pointless in itself), but they do potentially stir things up and if you make a comment like "hey why don't you add to the convo rather than just dislike everything" results in a warning for "calling someone out." Silly feature needs to disappear, but then again with the move to being more like Facebook and doing anything in their power to cater to the new crowd because of clicks and revenue, I doubt anything changes.

  • Like 2

I support the current reactions (and highly recommend a facepalm reaction :p) . I have not encountered any issues with it (heck, people like whatever I say :laugh:), but yes some people act childish with that dislike. Maybe some checks with the dislike button will be helpful. Something like "more than X dislikes to a particular person in a single thread brings the attention of a mod". 

23 minutes ago, Tuskd said:

Something like "more than X dislikes to a particular person in a single thread brings the attention of a mod". 

I mentioned this before, but most web forums that have a rep system are also setup so that you can only +rep someone so many times before you are told to "spread additional reputation around before adding rep to this user again" and similarly to -rep.

I really don't know why this was reopened since Neobond himself was not keen on changing the system. And it seems the majority agrees too. The thread no longer serves a valid purpose really. It's highly unlikely that the few who supported the change will bring new stuff to bring new stuff to the table.

13 hours ago, Circaflex said:

100% agree with what you have said. The fact that this "feature" can be used to troll, or bring back arguments from months ago, without repercussions is disappointing. This thread is a little ironic, but I had it happen to me the first day they went active. Someone went back to posts from January and disliked a handful of them, from a thread where many arguments had happened, warnings were given out, yet they want to go back and dig it up in order to stir things up. This really showed the immaturity of some here at Neowin. It is a silly feature that does nothing for the community. One can easily see how there are groups of members who "target" each other and will dislike their posts no matter what. Sure, the dislikes don't do anything to your rep(which is pointless in itself), but they do potentially stir things up and if you make a comment like "hey why don't you add to the convo rather than just dislike everything" results in a warning for "calling someone out." Silly feature needs to disappear, but then again with the move to being more like Facebook and doing anything in their power to cater to the new crowd because of clicks and revenue, I doubt anything changes.

Hmm, I made it very clear that was a test several times. The dislikes were quickly removed. But I would like to point oot that you're no better on that matter because you essentially did the same thing. Only difference being that you spread them out through different threads.

 

Anyway, I genuinely apologise for how much grief this has caused you. I hope you can learn to forgive me.

  • Like 2
  • Love 1

I want to echo a similar sentiment to @Circaflex, there are several users who just downvote every post I make in a thread and even some that simply upvote every post I make in a thread with little contribution. While I think it is a useful tool for those of us to react to things without having to resort to words (not everyone is excellent at getting their opinion across), it is odd when you see the same users regardless of the topic up/downvoting you. It almost feels as if you're being stalked by these users on a daily basis... just going to your new posts and just reacting in their usual pattern to everything in a thread.

 

I don't pay too much mind to it, but it's really weird behavior that has changed the way I feel about posting on this forum. Whether or not it prevents or results in more crap being slung around remains to be seen. Those being vocal about things typically don't stop at downvotes unless they feel they have nothing to truly add to a conversation anymore.

  • Like 1
1 minute ago, Emn1ty said:

I want to echo a similar sentiment to @Circaflex, there are several users who just downvote every post I make in a thread and even some that simply upvote every post I make in a thread with little contribution. While I think it is a useful tool for those of us to react to things without having to resort to words (not everyone is excellent at getting their opinion across), it is odd when you see the same users regardless of the topic up/downvoting you. It almost feels as if you're being stalked by these users on a daily basis... just going to your new posts and just reacting in their usual pattern to everything in a thread.

 

I don't pay too much mind to it, but it's really weird behavior that has changed the way I feel about posting on this forum. Whether or not it prevents or results in more crap being slung around remains to be seen. Those being vocal about things typically don't stop at downvotes unless they feel they have nothing to truly add to a conversation anymore.

I share that sentiment, it a little too lenient here now and trolls are running free.

Ok, to some I am a troll, hell I've admitted it freely in the past, but I try to keep it within certain threads where it's not hurting anyone. It bugs me a little that some trolls do get away with no repercussions to content that would have gotten me warning points in the past, and as such, I feel less enthused to visit.

  • Like 2
21 hours ago, Circaflex said:

I mentioned this before, but most web forums that have a rep system are also setup so that you can only +rep someone so many times before you are told to "spread additional reputation around before adding rep to this user again" and similarly to -rep.

We had a 100 like restriction previously, which was changed to unlimited likes in January. Maybe it should revert?

8 hours ago, LimeMaster said:

I really don't know why this was reopened since Neobond himself was not keen on changing the system. And it seems the majority agrees too. The thread no longer serves a valid purpose really. It's highly unlikely that the few who supported the change will bring new stuff to bring new stuff to the table.

Steve is open to feedback and asked us behind the scenes for info on how much work it has caused since it was introduced. Closing the topic off prevented members from sharing the issues they've seen and went unreported. Since it was closed we've had quite a few reports, mostly generated by the Playboy news this week. The feature might not disappear and could be tweaked. I think it's good to have transparency with the members to help direct the development of the site, which is why I re-opened the topic.

 

I'm not very concerned about how much work it causes for us, that's why we have mods to begin with. It's not just a badge without responsibilities. My worry about it being implemented originally was it would kill off discussion and give people less reason to reply at all. Instead it has turned into a tool for trolling, seemingly. So I would still like for those who have experienced issues to let us know, either in this topic or privately if they wish, and for suggestions or tweaks to be made.

32 minutes ago, Andrew said:

We had a 100 like restriction previously, which was changed to unlimited likes in January. Maybe it should revert?

Steve is open to feedback and asked us behind the scenes for info on how much work it has caused since it was introduced. Closing the topic off prevented members from sharing the issues they've seen and went unreported. Since it was closed we've had quite a few reports, mostly generated by the Playboy news this week. The feature might not disappear and could be tweaked. I think it's good to have transparency with the members to help direct the development of the site, which is why I re-opened the topic.

 

I'm not very concerned about how much work it causes for us, that's why we have mods to begin with. It's not just a badge without responsibilities. My worry about it being implemented originally was it would kill off discussion and give people less reason to reply at all. Instead it has turned into a tool for trolling, seemingly. So I would still like for those who have experienced issues to let us know, either in this topic or privately if they wish, and for suggestions or tweaks to be made.

Alright, fair enough. I do apologise for sort-of being part of that. My wrongfulness clearly has been @Circaflex's mind for months now, even though I was using it to test how the feature worked. I mostly just picked random reactions, however he seems rather upset when the disagree one was used. His repeated mentioning of it and the Playboy thread are the primary reasons I originally created this thread.

 

@Brandon H's implementation of the feature thing seems pretty neat. It would certainly make reacting to a post more meaningful, and it would reduce mass dislike abuse since it takes much more effort to explain things. 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
24 minutes ago, LimeMaster said:

Alright, fair enough. I do apologise for sort-of being part of that. My wrongfulness clearly has been @Circaflex's mind for months now, even though I was using it to test how the feature worked. I mostly just picked random reactions, however he seems rather upset when the disagree one was used. His repeated mentioning of it and the Playboy thread are the primary reasons I originally created this thread.

 

@Brandon H's implementation of the feature thing seems pretty neat. It would certainly make reacting to a post more meaningful, and it would reduce mass dislike abuse since it takes much more effort to explain things. 

It's fine, you weren't to know how many reports it generated. My request for feedback attracted 3 or 4 reports almost immediately after I commented, and now we have 3 more member's feedback since we re-opened this topic. Keeping it open might generate more feedback.

 

I think the suggestion of providing reasons for reactions is pretty good but not without faults. We don't expect any justification for any other reaction, so it would be singling out those who use Dislike, and then it may even stop them using it because it involves more "effort". We'd may as well remove the reaction if that happened. Plus, it would be just as worthwhile to add the comment to the discussion, rather than a hover-mouse-over bubble.

20 minutes ago, Andrew said:

It's fine, you weren't to know how many reports it generated. My request for feedback attracted 3 or 4 reports almost immediately after I commented, and now we have 3 more member's feedback since we re-opened this topic. Keeping it open might generate more feedback.

 

I think the suggestion of providing reasons for reactions is pretty good but not without faults. We don't expect any justification for any other reaction, so it would be singling out those who use Dislike, and then it may even stop them using it because it involves more "effort". We'd may as well remove the reaction if that happened. Plus, it would be just as worthwhile to add the comment to the discussion, rather than a hover-mouse-over bubble.

Well I mean, there's no reason it can't be done with all reactions if you feel singling is bad. It's a simple fix to that concern. As for the comment thing, whilst that's true. The reason for the implementation would purely exist to stop abuse/complaints. If a member was using the system properly, they would have a reason for clicking the reaction. Typing a small sentence shouldn't be a problem if that's how they actually feel.

A suggestion, if I may.  Like and dislike both have connotations that could raise people's ire, especially in emotive threads.  However, changing them to Agree and Disagree do not, at least for me anyway.  Perhaps changing them to that would stop people abusing them?

  • Like 3

@LimeMaster,

 

Same thing to the rating system on other sites ... which lot of people leave bad ratings or false ratings.  

 

Especially that people go to other websites to leave bad comments or ratings, something like this:

 

Ford fans visits the Chevy website and leave comment like "Chevy sucks!" 

 

That has been going for many years since the rating and comment came out.

 

Nothing you could do about it unless admins decide to remove/disable the features to prevent from abuse and/or ban those abusers.

 

 

The features are used to let you know how visitors feel about said products or person's thoughts..  something like that.

5 hours ago, FloatingFatMan said:

A suggestion, if I may.  Like and dislike both have connotations that could raise people's ire, especially in emotive threads.  However, changing them to Agree and Disagree do not, at least for me anyway.  Perhaps changing them to that would stop people abusing them?

I like this idea, It would make a lot more sense too, because Neowin is a tech site.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Doogee and Ulefone regularly release phones with 10k-25k mAh batteries, but those are bricks. I don't understand how they could make it only weigh 220 grams with a battery that size.
    • Windows 10 quietly gets one more year of support and updates by Taras Buria Windows 10 reached its end of life at the end of 2025. Microsoft kicked off the Extended Security Updates program, aimed at giving regular consumers one more year of security-only updates. By doing so, Microsoft gave users more time and money to update their computers to a newer operating system or compatible hardware. Now, with the end of the Extended Security Updates program quickly approaching, Microsoft is making an important adjustment. Users discovered that the official support article for the program now lists a new end-of-support date: The Extended Security Updates program is not a new concept. It has been an official way for business consumers to continue receiving critical updates for unsupported Microsoft products for many years. However, all this time, it was a business-only, paid feature. With Windows 10, Microsoft brought ESU to regular consumers, allowing them to get security updates for Windows 10 past October 2025 essentially for free. When Windows 10 was approaching the end of support, many guessed that Microsoft might adjust its support timelines, and this is exactly what seems to be happening. Of course, Microsoft would love everyone to switch to new computers, such as its latest Surface devices, but in the days of ever-growing hardware prices, not everyone is lucky enough to have money for a new PC. Leaving hundreds of millions of customers with a Windows version that no longer receives security updates is a major risk that Microsoft is not willing to take. If you have a Windows 10 PC to enroll in the Extended Security Updates program, check out this guide to learn how to do so.
    • Sony announces Bungie layoffs that will affect "significant number of employees" by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe Sony today announced that major layoffs are happening at its first-party studio Bungie, the developer that has spawned series like Halo, Destiny, and Marathon over the past decades. The news arrives just weeks after Bungie delivered the final update to Destiny 2, and it's that team being hit with the layoffs the most. CEO of Sony Interactive Entertainment Hermen Hulst revealed the staff reduction today, calling it "painful news." "Over the past several months, together with Bungie leadership, we reviewed the studio’s long-term direction, development priorities, resource needs, and role within our broader portfolio strategy," said Hulst, explaining the decision. "We explored multiple alternatives before concluding that a reduction was necessary to align the studio’s resources with its current priorities and long-term goals." The layoffs will be hitting "a significant number of employees" across most of the Destiny franchise development team. It doesn't look like Sony is planning to continue the series following Destiny 2's sunsetting update. The studio is said to be in early stages of looking at other projects to pivot to, but it's said that keeping the size of the team at current levels is no longer feasible. "We know this decision has a profound impact on the people affected, their families, friends, and teammates," said Bungie leadership in a separate message on social media. "While these changes are necessary to best position the studio now and for the future, that does not lessen the difficulty of this moment or the impact it has on those affected." At the same time, "some" of the Marathon development team are also affected by the layoffs. The recently released multiplayer-only extraction shooter title hasn't seen a big boom of players either, but the company is reportedly hoping that the live service experience will pick up players with future updates.
    • Microsoft adds reusable skills and finance data connectors to Copilot in Excel by Karthik Mudaliar Microsoft is giving Copilot in Excel a collection of new features aimed squarely at finance teams. The update introduces reusable instructions for common tasks, connections to services such as FactSet and Morningstar, and a better way to review what Copilot intends to do before it starts changing a workbook. The most interesting addition is 'Skills' finally coming to Copilot in Excel. Skills let companies teach Copilot how to handle a recurring process, so employees do not need to write the same detailed prompt every month. Users can create skills that can specify the steps Copilot should follow, along with the required layout, formulas, and formatting. Microsoft says users can create their own skills by saving a SKILL.md file in OneDrive. The file is written using Markdown and tells Copilot when and how to perform the task. Once it is available, a user can select the skill in the Copilot pane or mention it in a prompt using the @ symbol. There is also a library of prebuilt finance skills for customers who do not want to create their own. Microsoft plans to let developers distribute additional skills through the Microsoft Marketplace and the Microsoft 365 Admin Center, with LSEG, Ramp, Rogo, samaya.ai, Velixo, and Vena among the first partners involved. The company says that it is also expanding the external data that Copilot can access from inside Excel. New connectors are being added for CB Insights, Daloopa, FactSet, Morningstar, PitchBook, and S&P Global data through technology developed by Kensho. There is a catch, however. Accessing these services may require a separate subscription from the relevant data provider, so a Microsoft 365 Copilot licence will not necessarily unlock all of them. FactSet is also only available in preview for now, with general availability planned for July. Microsoft is also trying to make Copilot’s workbook edits easier to inspect. Users can switch to a planning mode that shows which sheets, cell ranges, formulas, and assumptions Copilot intends to work with before it begins making changes. Once the work is complete, the Show Changes pane can distinguish edits made by Copilot from those made by human collaborators. The update continues Microsoft’s push to turn Excel Copilot from a chatbot into an agent that can carry out longer tasks. The company previously added an Agent Mode capable of planning and completing multi-step Excel work. Microsoft also recently acquired financial AI startup Fintool, another indication that finance is becoming a key target for its Excel AI strategy. Prebuilt skills, personalization, workbook rules, external connectors, planning mode, and Copilot attribution in Show Changes are generally available to Microsoft 365 Copilot customers using Excel on the web, Windows, and macOS. Custom skills are initially available to Microsoft 365 Insiders on Windows and Mac starting today. Microsoft plans to make them generally available across Windows, Mac, and the web over the next month. Partner-built skills are expected during the third quarter of the year. Availability may still differ depending on region and licensing.
    • Exactly. They serve different (although related) purposes.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      438
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      169
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      134
    4. 4
      Xenon
      77
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      75
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!