I am going to looking for a new phone, recommendation please


Recommended Posts

I am currently using an LG K10, and I hate it, the battery life is horrible and it has a few other annoyances. I have been considering getting The Nextbit Robin, it seems to me to be a decent phone and it is only $120 which I find to be very reasonable. My goal would be to stay below $150, and the only requirement is that it be unlocked and Android. I have an Asus Zenfone 2 that I need to replace the screen on and that will only cost $30, but I would do that for a backup. Please offer me some suggestions as to what brand to look for.

2 minutes ago, Brandon H said:

If you have Amazon Prime the Honor 6X is discounted to $149.99 right now.

It's the phone I have right now and I can say it's a great device for its worth.

 

https://www.amazon.com/Honor-6X-Unlocked-Smartphone-Gray/dp/B01MRZFBBH/ref=sr_1_3?s=wireless&ie=UTF8&qid=1510260597&sr=1-3&keywords=honor+6x&dpID=51y5Cu%2Bv8dL&preST=_SY300_QL70_&dpSrc=srch

Looks like a decent phone, what do you like about it?

Just now, jnelsoninjax said:

Looks like a decent phone, what do you like about it?

the dual camera is really nice, takes great pictures I think, even in low light.

I'd say the fingerprint reader is a neat feature but that's starting to become common on devices. it is nice though

 

it's a 720p screen which is plenty for a 5.5 in screen IMO. The only real feature that it does not have that other 'flagships' do is NFC and I can do without contactless payments

 

Battery lasts me 2 days with general use as well which I find impressive with any Android device anymore

Just now, Brandon H said:

the dual camera is really nice, takes great pictures I think, even in low light.

I'd say the fingerprint reader is a neat feature but that's starting to become common on devices. it is nice though

 

it's a 720p screen which is plenty for a 5.5 in screen IMO. The only real feature that it does not have that other 'flagships' do is NFC and I can do without contactless payments

 

Battery lasts me 2 days with general use as well which I find impressive with any Android device anymore

Sounds like a good phone all around, I will defiantly consider it.

Just now, jnelsoninjax said:

Sounds like a good phone all around, I will defiantly consider it.

yeah my only gripe with Huawei/Honor was that they didn't have an App Drawer on their UI but they changed that when they updated to Nougat early this year.

1 minute ago, jnelsoninjax said:

Do you have this one? I know LG are decent phones, but this K10 is pissing me off!

I'd personally stay away from LG, their track record with Boot Loop issues is not great even affecting their latest devices still.

2 minutes ago, jnelsoninjax said:

Do you have this one? I know LG are decent phones, but this K10 is pissing me off!

Nope, used to have lg3, g4, skipped the g5.

1 minute ago, Brandon H said:

yeah my only gripe with Huawei/Honor was that they didn't have an App Drawer on their UI but they changed that when they updated to Nougat early this year.

Well launchers can solve that too!

14 minutes ago, Draconian Guppy said:

Well launchers can solve that too!

true, but the nova launcher and that tend to cause additional slow down in my experience so I like to keep it close to native :)

  • Like 1
15 hours ago, Brandon H said:

true, but the nova launcher and that tend to cause additional slow down in my experience so I like to keep it close to native :)

There are free launchers with app drawers (Microsoft Launcher, Lawnchair Launcher, if you're willing, even the Google Pixel Launcher 2 - and that's just three examples - none of which cost diddly).

15 hours ago, Brandon H said:

true, but the nova launcher and that tend to cause additional slow down in my experience so I like to keep it close to native :)

Never experience slow down myself.  I used APEX and Nova .  Used APEX for years until recently switching to Nova.  Nova is updated more often.

 

Anyway, see if you can pickup a Nexus device or a Pixel.  First gen Pixels should be discounted, or they were.  Personally, when I get tired of my 6p, I am going Pixel.  Longer support, faster updates, vanilla OS.  I had 1 Samsung Device.  Samsung Vibrant, aka SGS1.  Nice phone, but I hated Touchwiz.

11 hours ago, techbeck said:

Never experience slow down myself.  I used APEX and Nova .  Used APEX for years until recently switching to Nova.  Nova is updated more often.

 

Anyway, see if you can pickup a Nexus device or a Pixel.  First gen Pixels should be discounted, or they were.  Personally, when I get tired of my 6p, I am going Pixel.  Longer support, faster updates, vanilla OS.  I had 1 Samsung Device.  Samsung Vibrant, aka SGS1.  Nice phone, but I hated Touchwiz.

From what I am seeing on the Pixels, they haven't dropped much in the price, still almost $500, as for the Nexus, I am seeing Motorola and LG, which one is the better choice?

13 hours ago, The Evil Overlord said:

at this point, anything by motorola

I would have thrown in on the nokia 8, it is extremely good, and very capable, but I'm losing faith in their promise to keep it updated.

how come?

On 11/10/2017 at 7:27 PM, jnelsoninjax said:

From what I am seeing on the Pixels, they haven't dropped much in the price, still almost $500, as for the Nexus, I am seeing Motorola and LG, which one is the better choice?

I will mention what I managed to discover as a result of breaking my LCD on a Microsoft 950 XL.

 

1. Ignore brand. Every model has specific characteristics.

 

2. I dislike Android a lot compared to Windows but that's subjective and bears little on the hardware choices other than coming from an ecosystem where the OS is constantly updated it is a rude awakening to realize how isolated and petrified the Android marketplace is on that issue. That is the reason for the price premium on the Google Pixels and even Nexus phones. If you don't care about Android updates, then skip the Pixels as poor value.

 

3. After careful study, if you care at all about camera quality, only the "Hero" models will have good cameras. It is the first hardware reduction made when the manufacturer makes mid range phones. Older Hero models will have better cameras than new mid-range models. FWIW, in real testing I could not find an affordable Android with a camera as good as the 950XL and so that sucks but it's a reality I just have to accept given my constraints.

 

4. I broke my LCD and the repair cost was $200 to $300 and turn around was horrible so I had a limited budget to zero in on an older Android "Hero" quality phone as a stop gap until I could repair the 950XL. The candidates narrowed down to Samsung S6 Edge Plus, Samsung S7, Samsung S7 Edge, LG V20 and although I looked at Huwei and other even unknown brands, the availability made them out of the running in a limited time frame.

 

5. I decided on a V20 due to the large screen that was almost as good as a 950XL and the drop testing results which put it far ahead of other phones. My thinking was the last thing I needed was another broken LCD any time soon and the V20 is cleverly designed to break open on impact to specifically reduce drop stress on the LCD. This design accomplishment would be defeated by using a case so now I'm a bit conflicted on that. We'll see...

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 1
24 minutes ago, DevTech said:

I will mention what I managed to discover as a result of breaking my LCD on a Microsoft 950 XL.

 

1. Ignore brand. Every model has specific characteristics.

 

2. I dislike Android a lot compared to Windows but that's subjective and bears little on the hardware choices other than coming from an ecosystem where the OS is constantly updated it is a rude awakening to realize how isolated and petrified the Android marketplace is on that issue. That is the reason for the price premium on the Google Pixels and even Nexus phones. If you don't care about Android updates, then skip the Pixels as poor value.

 

3. After careful study, if you care at all about camera quality, only the "Hero" models will have good cameras. It is the first hardware reduction made when the manufacturer makes mid range phones. Older Hero models will have better cameras than new mid-range models. FWIW, in real testing I could not find an affordable Android with a camera as good as the 950XL and so that sucks but it's a reality I just have to accept given my constraints.

 

4. I broke my LCD and the repair cost was $200 to $300 and turn around was horrible so I had a limited budget to zero in on an older Android "Hero" quality phone as a stop gap until I could repair the 950XL. The candidates narrowed down to Samsung S6 Edge Plus, Samsung S7, Samsung S7 Edge, LG V20 and although I looked at Huwei and other even unknown brands, the availability made them out of the running in a limited time frame.

 

5. I decided on a V20 due to the large screen that was almost as good as a 950XL and the drop testing results which put it far ahead of other phones. My thinking was the last thing I needed was another broken LCD any time soon and the V20 is cleverly designed to break open on impact to specifically reduce drop stress on the LCD. This design accomplishment would be defeated by using a case so now I'm a bit conflicted on that. We'll see...

Thanks for the nicely laid out thoughts. I really used to love LG phones, but after having two that have really disappointed me, I am not so sure what to think about them. Second, looking at Amazon I see the LG V20 from about $299, which I guess if I was getting a good phone I would say that would not be too bad of an investment, I am slightly confused about the phone, Amazon shows me an AT&T unlocked phone as well as a T-Mobile unlocked phone, both of which are different prices (of course!), I am using a carrier who uses AT&T network, so should I consider getting the AT&T unlocked, or does it make any difference?

3 minutes ago, jnelsoninjax said:

Thanks for the nicely laid out thoughts. I really used to love LG phones, but after having two that have really disappointed me, I am not so sure what to think about them. Second, looking at Amazon I see the LG V20 from about $299, which I guess if I was getting a good phone I would say that would not be too bad of an investment, I am slightly confused about the phone, Amazon shows me an AT&T unlocked phone as well as a T-Mobile unlocked phone, both of which are different prices (of course!), I am using a carrier who uses AT&T network, so should I consider getting the AT&T unlocked, or does it make any difference?

Might want to check how often those unlocked versions get updated. I was researching it when I was searching for my last cell phone and the unlocked version seemed abysmal when it came to updates.

6 minutes ago, jnelsoninjax said:

Thanks for the nicely laid out thoughts. I really used to love LG phones, but after having two that have really disappointed me, I am not so sure what to think about them. Second, looking at Amazon I see the LG V20 from about $299, which I guess if I was getting a good phone I would say that would not be too bad of an investment, I am slightly confused about the phone, Amazon shows me an AT&T unlocked phone as well as a T-Mobile unlocked phone, both of which are different prices (of course!), I am using a carrier who uses AT&T network, so should I consider getting the AT&T unlocked, or does it make any difference?

Motorola

4 hours ago, jnelsoninjax said:

Thanks for the nicely laid out thoughts. I really used to love LG phones, but after having two that have really disappointed me, I am not so sure what to think about them. Second, looking at Amazon I see the LG V20 from about $299, which I guess if I was getting a good phone I would say that would not be too bad of an investment, I am slightly confused about the phone, Amazon shows me an AT&T unlocked phone as well as a T-Mobile unlocked phone, both of which are different prices (of course!), I am using a carrier who uses AT&T network, so should I consider getting the AT&T unlocked, or does it make any difference?

Every manufacturer makes a wide variety of model variations mainly to provision different radio bands.

 

Versions: H990N (Hong Kong); H990DS (Global Dual-SIM); H910 (AT&T); H918 (T-Mobile); LS997 (Sprint); US996 (US Cellular); VS995 (Verizon); H990T (Mexico). Also known as LG V20 Dual H990DS/H990N with dual-SIM card slots.

 

Sometimes, there is a model that has all the bands (often called "international version" but not always) and sometimes not. 

 

For the V20, I was particularly interested getting the new Band 66 LTE which is in the H918 and the H915. I think the AT&T model has a disabled Band 66 which might be able to get turned on in the future with the right firmware patch but that is never a sure thing.

 

For the most part you just try to find out what bands your carrier is using and what bands your next choice of carrier might use and try to get as amny radios as you can for the price to give you "mobility" :) - being "unlocked" is useless if the right radio is missing.

 

This logic applies to all brands of phones for the most part and is part of the slimeball game that carriers like to play.

 

 

5 hours ago, warwagon said:

Might want to check how often those unlocked versions get updated. I was researching it when I was searching for my last cell phone and the unlocked version seemed abysmal when it came to updates.

There are 5 types of updates:

 

1. Carrier specific firmware adjustments for the radios.

 

2. Android Security updates.

 

3. Android OS updates

 

4. Samsung/LG/etc misc apps updates.

 

5. Carrier crapware updates

 

Android OS updates are extremely rare and few unless you have a Google branded phone. Microsoft and Apple are a breath of fresh air in that department but bring along other issues. In theory if you have a Hero phone, it will get an major Android update or two but might take 6 months or more after the code was available on a Google phone.

 

Security updates and Manufacturer updates will come no matter what and you don't want crapware updates (or crapware)

 

So the only problematic update would be radio adjustment which is important of course and would need to be investigated on a case by case basis for each phone model and each carrier.

 

 

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • GitHub removes manual model selection from Copilot free and student plans by Karthik Mudaliar GitHub is removing the ability to manually select an AI model from its Copilot Free and Student plans, making its automatic routing system the default and only way to choose a model. This means users on these tiers will no longer be able to deliberately select a particular OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, or Microsoft model for a task. In its announcement, GitHub said Copilot Auto will dynamically choose what it considers the best model for each request. Free and Student accounts will retain access to models from multiple families, although the available selection will continue to depend on the restrictions attached to each plan. GitHub did not identify a fixed pool of models that Auto will always use, and its documentation warns that model availability can change over time. GitHub describes Auto as more than a random fallback system. On supported surfaces, its task-optimization technology evaluates the complexity of a request alongside real-time information about model health and availability. Straightforward prompts can be routed to faster and less expensive models, while more demanding coding tasks may be sent to higher-cost reasoning models. The company says this approach should reduce rate limiting, latency, and failed requests. Auto generally selects one model along natural prompt-caching boundaries rather than repeatedly switching models during a session, as GitHub found that mid-session changes increased costs without producing sufficient improvements in output quality. Users can still check which model generated a response. In Copilot Chat, the information appears when hovering over an answer, while Copilot CLI and the Copilot cloud agent display the selected model alongside their output. Auto is available in Copilot Chat, Copilot CLI, and the cloud agent, with the exact implementation and release status varying between supported development environments. The latest restriction follows several months of adjustments to Copilot’s individual plans. GitHub temporarily halted new Pro, Pro+, and Student subscriptions in April as it sought to manage demand and service reliability. It later introduced token-based billing and began gradually reopening individual-plan registrations on June 17. Alongside the picker change, GitHub is retiring the “Preview” label from Microsoft-developed models. It argues that the label is no longer necessary because Auto handles model routing and models are continuously updated behind the scenes.
    • Look up 'inflation' kid. Ask an AI for the numbers between both games.
    • Google reportedly set to lose two key Gemini and DeepMind researchers to Anthropic by Karthik Mudaliar Google is reportedly preparing to lose two more prominent artificial intelligence researchers, with Gemini contributors Jonas Adler and Alexander Pritzel planning to join rival AI developer Anthropic. According to a report from Bloomberg, both researchers are viewed internally as important contributors to Google’s flagship Gemini model family. Adler worked on Google’s AI coding efforts, while Pritzel was involved in the process used to train AI systems. Neither company has publicly confirmed the moves. The report also does not say when the researchers will formally leave Google or what positions they will hold at Anthropic. Training a large AI model requires decisions covering its architecture, data preparation, distributed computing infrastructure, and post-training methods that shape how the finished system behaves. Researchers with experience operating at the scale of Gemini are consequently difficult to replace quickly. Both Adler and Pritzel have previously contributed to Google DeepMind’s scientific research as well. They are listed among the authors of the company’s work on expanding AlphaFold protein-structure predictions across entire proteomes, alongside AlphaFold researchers including John Jumper. The reported departures arrive shortly after another important change within Google’s Gemini organization. Gemini co-lead Noam Shazeer is leaving Google for OpenAI, after returning to the search company in 2024 through its deal with Character.AI. Shazeer is particularly well known as one of the authors of the Transformer paper, whose architecture became the foundation for most modern large language models. Anthropic, meanwhile, has been recruiting recognizable figures from other leading laboratories. OpenAI co-founder and former Tesla AI director Andrej Karpathy joined Anthropic’s pre-training team in May. His move, followed by the reported recruitment of several Google researchers, suggests Anthropic is strengthening the research teams responsible for the core capabilities of future Claude models rather than concentrating solely on product and enterprise sales. The competition is complicated by the companies’ extensive commercial relationships. Anthropic competes directly with Google’s Gemini models, but it also relies on Google as an infrastructure partner. In April, Anthropic announced an expanded agreement with Google and Broadcom covering multiple gigawatts of next-generation Tensor Processing Unit capacity. TPUs are Google-designed accelerators used to train and run large AI models. via Bloomberg
    • This article makes my head hurt. Lots of confusing words
    • Google adds built-in computer control to Gemini 3.5 flash by Karthik Mudaliar Google has added Computer Use as a built-in tool in Gemini 3.5 Flash, giving developers a single model that can reason about a task and operate graphical interfaces across browsers, mobile devices, and desktop environments. The feature is available through the Gemini API and Google’s Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform, although it remains a preview feature for now. Computer Use enables an AI agent to examine screenshots and return actions such as mouse clicks, scrolling, and keyboard input. A developer’s application must execute those actions, capture the resulting screen, and send it back to Gemini, creating a continuous loop until the task is completed. Google says the integration can be used for activities including repetitive form filling, application testing, research across multiple websites, and longer enterprise workflows. Gemini 3.5 Flash can work with browser, mobile, and desktop environments, whereas Google’s earlier standalone Computer Use model was primarily positioned around browser interaction. The main change is consolidation. Computer control was previously offered through the separate Gemini 2.5 Computer Use preview model. As Neowin reported when that model was introduced, it was designed to interpret a visual interface and generate actions without requiring a website-specific API. Google later brought Computer Use to preview versions of Gemini 3 Pro and Gemini 3 Flash in January 2026. The latest release now incorporates the tool into the stable Gemini 3.5 Flash model rather than requiring developers to select a specialized model solely for interface automation. Gemini 3.5 Flash itself was announced in May as Google’s latest fast model for coding and multi-step agent workflows. It supports a one-million-token input context window and up to 65,000 output tokens, along with adjustable thinking levels that let developers trade additional reasoning for lower latency and cost. Google also added that Gemini 3.5 Flash received targeted adversarial training for computer-use scenarios. The company is also offering safeguards that can require user confirmation before sensitive or irreversible actions and automatically stop a workflow when suspected prompt injection is detected. Its developer documentation describes configurable protections for areas such as financial transactions and changes to sensitive records. Google isn't the first to bring Computer Use to its platform. Anthropic has made computer control available through Claude, while OpenAI has continued improving computer-use performance in its recent models. Microsoft has also applied the concept to business workflows, including a Computer Use capability for the Researcher agent in Microsoft 365 Copilot.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      463
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!