I am going to looking for a new phone, recommendation please


Recommended Posts

I am currently using an LG K10, and I hate it, the battery life is horrible and it has a few other annoyances. I have been considering getting The Nextbit Robin, it seems to me to be a decent phone and it is only $120 which I find to be very reasonable. My goal would be to stay below $150, and the only requirement is that it be unlocked and Android. I have an Asus Zenfone 2 that I need to replace the screen on and that will only cost $30, but I would do that for a backup. Please offer me some suggestions as to what brand to look for.

2 minutes ago, Brandon H said:

If you have Amazon Prime the Honor 6X is discounted to $149.99 right now.

It's the phone I have right now and I can say it's a great device for its worth.

 

https://www.amazon.com/Honor-6X-Unlocked-Smartphone-Gray/dp/B01MRZFBBH/ref=sr_1_3?s=wireless&ie=UTF8&qid=1510260597&sr=1-3&keywords=honor+6x&dpID=51y5Cu%2Bv8dL&preST=_SY300_QL70_&dpSrc=srch

Looks like a decent phone, what do you like about it?

Just now, jnelsoninjax said:

Looks like a decent phone, what do you like about it?

the dual camera is really nice, takes great pictures I think, even in low light.

I'd say the fingerprint reader is a neat feature but that's starting to become common on devices. it is nice though

 

it's a 720p screen which is plenty for a 5.5 in screen IMO. The only real feature that it does not have that other 'flagships' do is NFC and I can do without contactless payments

 

Battery lasts me 2 days with general use as well which I find impressive with any Android device anymore

Just now, Brandon H said:

the dual camera is really nice, takes great pictures I think, even in low light.

I'd say the fingerprint reader is a neat feature but that's starting to become common on devices. it is nice though

 

it's a 720p screen which is plenty for a 5.5 in screen IMO. The only real feature that it does not have that other 'flagships' do is NFC and I can do without contactless payments

 

Battery lasts me 2 days with general use as well which I find impressive with any Android device anymore

Sounds like a good phone all around, I will defiantly consider it.

Just now, jnelsoninjax said:

Sounds like a good phone all around, I will defiantly consider it.

yeah my only gripe with Huawei/Honor was that they didn't have an App Drawer on their UI but they changed that when they updated to Nougat early this year.

1 minute ago, jnelsoninjax said:

Do you have this one? I know LG are decent phones, but this K10 is pissing me off!

I'd personally stay away from LG, their track record with Boot Loop issues is not great even affecting their latest devices still.

2 minutes ago, jnelsoninjax said:

Do you have this one? I know LG are decent phones, but this K10 is pissing me off!

Nope, used to have lg3, g4, skipped the g5.

1 minute ago, Brandon H said:

yeah my only gripe with Huawei/Honor was that they didn't have an App Drawer on their UI but they changed that when they updated to Nougat early this year.

Well launchers can solve that too!

14 minutes ago, Draconian Guppy said:

Well launchers can solve that too!

true, but the nova launcher and that tend to cause additional slow down in my experience so I like to keep it close to native :)

  • Like 1
15 hours ago, Brandon H said:

true, but the nova launcher and that tend to cause additional slow down in my experience so I like to keep it close to native :)

There are free launchers with app drawers (Microsoft Launcher, Lawnchair Launcher, if you're willing, even the Google Pixel Launcher 2 - and that's just three examples - none of which cost diddly).

15 hours ago, Brandon H said:

true, but the nova launcher and that tend to cause additional slow down in my experience so I like to keep it close to native :)

Never experience slow down myself.  I used APEX and Nova .  Used APEX for years until recently switching to Nova.  Nova is updated more often.

 

Anyway, see if you can pickup a Nexus device or a Pixel.  First gen Pixels should be discounted, or they were.  Personally, when I get tired of my 6p, I am going Pixel.  Longer support, faster updates, vanilla OS.  I had 1 Samsung Device.  Samsung Vibrant, aka SGS1.  Nice phone, but I hated Touchwiz.

11 hours ago, techbeck said:

Never experience slow down myself.  I used APEX and Nova .  Used APEX for years until recently switching to Nova.  Nova is updated more often.

 

Anyway, see if you can pickup a Nexus device or a Pixel.  First gen Pixels should be discounted, or they were.  Personally, when I get tired of my 6p, I am going Pixel.  Longer support, faster updates, vanilla OS.  I had 1 Samsung Device.  Samsung Vibrant, aka SGS1.  Nice phone, but I hated Touchwiz.

From what I am seeing on the Pixels, they haven't dropped much in the price, still almost $500, as for the Nexus, I am seeing Motorola and LG, which one is the better choice?

13 hours ago, The Evil Overlord said:

at this point, anything by motorola

I would have thrown in on the nokia 8, it is extremely good, and very capable, but I'm losing faith in their promise to keep it updated.

how come?

On 11/10/2017 at 7:27 PM, jnelsoninjax said:

From what I am seeing on the Pixels, they haven't dropped much in the price, still almost $500, as for the Nexus, I am seeing Motorola and LG, which one is the better choice?

I will mention what I managed to discover as a result of breaking my LCD on a Microsoft 950 XL.

 

1. Ignore brand. Every model has specific characteristics.

 

2. I dislike Android a lot compared to Windows but that's subjective and bears little on the hardware choices other than coming from an ecosystem where the OS is constantly updated it is a rude awakening to realize how isolated and petrified the Android marketplace is on that issue. That is the reason for the price premium on the Google Pixels and even Nexus phones. If you don't care about Android updates, then skip the Pixels as poor value.

 

3. After careful study, if you care at all about camera quality, only the "Hero" models will have good cameras. It is the first hardware reduction made when the manufacturer makes mid range phones. Older Hero models will have better cameras than new mid-range models. FWIW, in real testing I could not find an affordable Android with a camera as good as the 950XL and so that sucks but it's a reality I just have to accept given my constraints.

 

4. I broke my LCD and the repair cost was $200 to $300 and turn around was horrible so I had a limited budget to zero in on an older Android "Hero" quality phone as a stop gap until I could repair the 950XL. The candidates narrowed down to Samsung S6 Edge Plus, Samsung S7, Samsung S7 Edge, LG V20 and although I looked at Huwei and other even unknown brands, the availability made them out of the running in a limited time frame.

 

5. I decided on a V20 due to the large screen that was almost as good as a 950XL and the drop testing results which put it far ahead of other phones. My thinking was the last thing I needed was another broken LCD any time soon and the V20 is cleverly designed to break open on impact to specifically reduce drop stress on the LCD. This design accomplishment would be defeated by using a case so now I'm a bit conflicted on that. We'll see...

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 1
24 minutes ago, DevTech said:

I will mention what I managed to discover as a result of breaking my LCD on a Microsoft 950 XL.

 

1. Ignore brand. Every model has specific characteristics.

 

2. I dislike Android a lot compared to Windows but that's subjective and bears little on the hardware choices other than coming from an ecosystem where the OS is constantly updated it is a rude awakening to realize how isolated and petrified the Android marketplace is on that issue. That is the reason for the price premium on the Google Pixels and even Nexus phones. If you don't care about Android updates, then skip the Pixels as poor value.

 

3. After careful study, if you care at all about camera quality, only the "Hero" models will have good cameras. It is the first hardware reduction made when the manufacturer makes mid range phones. Older Hero models will have better cameras than new mid-range models. FWIW, in real testing I could not find an affordable Android with a camera as good as the 950XL and so that sucks but it's a reality I just have to accept given my constraints.

 

4. I broke my LCD and the repair cost was $200 to $300 and turn around was horrible so I had a limited budget to zero in on an older Android "Hero" quality phone as a stop gap until I could repair the 950XL. The candidates narrowed down to Samsung S6 Edge Plus, Samsung S7, Samsung S7 Edge, LG V20 and although I looked at Huwei and other even unknown brands, the availability made them out of the running in a limited time frame.

 

5. I decided on a V20 due to the large screen that was almost as good as a 950XL and the drop testing results which put it far ahead of other phones. My thinking was the last thing I needed was another broken LCD any time soon and the V20 is cleverly designed to break open on impact to specifically reduce drop stress on the LCD. This design accomplishment would be defeated by using a case so now I'm a bit conflicted on that. We'll see...

Thanks for the nicely laid out thoughts. I really used to love LG phones, but after having two that have really disappointed me, I am not so sure what to think about them. Second, looking at Amazon I see the LG V20 from about $299, which I guess if I was getting a good phone I would say that would not be too bad of an investment, I am slightly confused about the phone, Amazon shows me an AT&T unlocked phone as well as a T-Mobile unlocked phone, both of which are different prices (of course!), I am using a carrier who uses AT&T network, so should I consider getting the AT&T unlocked, or does it make any difference?

3 minutes ago, jnelsoninjax said:

Thanks for the nicely laid out thoughts. I really used to love LG phones, but after having two that have really disappointed me, I am not so sure what to think about them. Second, looking at Amazon I see the LG V20 from about $299, which I guess if I was getting a good phone I would say that would not be too bad of an investment, I am slightly confused about the phone, Amazon shows me an AT&T unlocked phone as well as a T-Mobile unlocked phone, both of which are different prices (of course!), I am using a carrier who uses AT&T network, so should I consider getting the AT&T unlocked, or does it make any difference?

Might want to check how often those unlocked versions get updated. I was researching it when I was searching for my last cell phone and the unlocked version seemed abysmal when it came to updates.

6 minutes ago, jnelsoninjax said:

Thanks for the nicely laid out thoughts. I really used to love LG phones, but after having two that have really disappointed me, I am not so sure what to think about them. Second, looking at Amazon I see the LG V20 from about $299, which I guess if I was getting a good phone I would say that would not be too bad of an investment, I am slightly confused about the phone, Amazon shows me an AT&T unlocked phone as well as a T-Mobile unlocked phone, both of which are different prices (of course!), I am using a carrier who uses AT&T network, so should I consider getting the AT&T unlocked, or does it make any difference?

Motorola

4 hours ago, jnelsoninjax said:

Thanks for the nicely laid out thoughts. I really used to love LG phones, but after having two that have really disappointed me, I am not so sure what to think about them. Second, looking at Amazon I see the LG V20 from about $299, which I guess if I was getting a good phone I would say that would not be too bad of an investment, I am slightly confused about the phone, Amazon shows me an AT&T unlocked phone as well as a T-Mobile unlocked phone, both of which are different prices (of course!), I am using a carrier who uses AT&T network, so should I consider getting the AT&T unlocked, or does it make any difference?

Every manufacturer makes a wide variety of model variations mainly to provision different radio bands.

 

Versions: H990N (Hong Kong); H990DS (Global Dual-SIM); H910 (AT&T); H918 (T-Mobile); LS997 (Sprint); US996 (US Cellular); VS995 (Verizon); H990T (Mexico). Also known as LG V20 Dual H990DS/H990N with dual-SIM card slots.

 

Sometimes, there is a model that has all the bands (often called "international version" but not always) and sometimes not. 

 

For the V20, I was particularly interested getting the new Band 66 LTE which is in the H918 and the H915. I think the AT&T model has a disabled Band 66 which might be able to get turned on in the future with the right firmware patch but that is never a sure thing.

 

For the most part you just try to find out what bands your carrier is using and what bands your next choice of carrier might use and try to get as amny radios as you can for the price to give you "mobility" :) - being "unlocked" is useless if the right radio is missing.

 

This logic applies to all brands of phones for the most part and is part of the slimeball game that carriers like to play.

 

 

5 hours ago, warwagon said:

Might want to check how often those unlocked versions get updated. I was researching it when I was searching for my last cell phone and the unlocked version seemed abysmal when it came to updates.

There are 5 types of updates:

 

1. Carrier specific firmware adjustments for the radios.

 

2. Android Security updates.

 

3. Android OS updates

 

4. Samsung/LG/etc misc apps updates.

 

5. Carrier crapware updates

 

Android OS updates are extremely rare and few unless you have a Google branded phone. Microsoft and Apple are a breath of fresh air in that department but bring along other issues. In theory if you have a Hero phone, it will get an major Android update or two but might take 6 months or more after the code was available on a Google phone.

 

Security updates and Manufacturer updates will come no matter what and you don't want crapware updates (or crapware)

 

So the only problematic update would be radio adjustment which is important of course and would need to be investigated on a case by case basis for each phone model and each carrier.

 

 

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Amazon Prime Day 2026: Best Dolby soundbar deals from Sony, Samsung, JBL, Polk, and more by Sayan Sen Yesterday we covered the JBL BAR 800 which is a 5.1.2 Dolby Atmos/Vision soundbar. The unit is on sale for its lowest ever price of just $800 making it a solid offer. However, there are many more options to choose from and in this article, we have made a compilation of the best deals including from Sony, Polk, Yamaha, Denon, Samsung and more. Sony's BAR models are currently at their lowest prices which makes them solid offerings. The company's BRAVIA Theatre Bar lineup is designed to suit different home cinema needs. The Bar 5 is an entry-level 3.1-channel soundbar with a wireless subwoofer, supporting Dolby Atmos®, DTS:X, S-Force PRO Front Surround, and Vertical Surround Engine for immersive audio with clear dialogue. The Bar 6 upgrades to a 3.1.2-channel configuration by adding dedicated up-firing speakers for more convincing overhead Atmos effects while retaining the wireless subwoofer. At the premium end, the Bar 7, Bar 8, and flagship Bar 9 are single-soundbar solutions featuring Sony’s 360 Spatial Sound Mapping technology, which creates phantom speakers for a wider surround field. Bar 7 includes nine speaker units, Bar 8 increases this to eleven, and Bar 9 offers thirteen speaker driver units promising the most expansive soundstage and acoustic performance. All models should integrate seamlessly with compatible BRAVIA TVs and support the BRAVIA Connect app for setup and control. Get them at the links below: Sony BRAVIA Theater Bar 9 Soundbar (HT-A9000): $998.00 (Amazon US) (Was: $1498) Sony BRAVIA Theater Bar 8 Soundbar (HT-A9000): $798.00 (Amazon US) (Was: $998) Sony BRAVIA Theater Bar 7 Soundbar (HT-A7100): $618.00 (Amazon US) (Was: $768) Sony BRAVIA Theater System 6: $548.00 | Sony BRAVIA Theater Bar 6: $448.00 Sony BRAVIA Theater Bar 5 (HT-B500): $278.00 (Amazon US) (Was: $348) Sony HT-S400 2.1 soundbar: $198.00 (Amazon US) (Was: $248) Aside from those, we also have more discounts including from Samsung, Polk Audio, and more: Samsung Q-Series Soundbar HW-QS90H 7.1.2: $797.99 (Amazon US) (Was: $998) Polk Audio Signa S4: $336.00 (Amazon US) (Was: $449) Hisense AX3120Q: $229.00 (Amazon US) (Was: $259) Check out more soundbar deals that you may like at this link. Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Stellarium 26.2 by Razvan Serea Stellarium is a free open source planetarium for your computer. It shows a realistic sky in 3D, just like what you see with the naked eye, binoculars or a telescope. It is being used in planetarium projectors. Just set your coordinates and go. Stellarium key features: Realistic simulation of the sky, sunrise and sunset Default catalogue of over 600,000 stars Downloadable additional catalogues for up to 210 million stars Catalog data for all New General Catalogue (NGC) objects Images of almost all Messier objects and the Milky Way Artistic illustrations for all 88 modern constellations More than a dozen different cultures with their constellations Solar and lunar eclipse simulation Photorealistic landscapes (more are available on the website) Scripting support with ECMAScript (a few demo scripts are included) Extendable with plug-ins: 8 plug-ins installed by default, including: artificial satellites plug-in (updated from an on-line TLE database) ocular simulation plug-in (shows how objects look like in a given ocular) Solar System editor plug-in (imports comet and asteroid data from the MPC) telescope control plug-in (Meade LX200 and Celestron NexStar compatible) The major changes of this version: Added new sky culture Added new plugin: Planes Many improvements in plugins Many improvements in Core and GUI Many updates in sky cultures. [full release notes] Download: Stellarium 26.2 (64-bit) | 456.0 MB (Open Source) View: Stellarium Home Page | Other Operating Systems | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NASA: This asteroid may not kill us but it probably won't be far off either by Sayan Sen Image by Zelch Csaba via Pexels New observations by NASA's James Webb Space Telescope have eliminated the last remaining impact threat posed by asteroid 2024 YR4, ruling out the possibility that the near-Earth object could strike the Moon in December 2032. NASA said observations collected by Webb on February 18 and 26, 2026, enabled scientists to refine the asteroid's orbit enough to "rule out a chance of lunar impact on Dec. 22, 2032." Instead, asteroid 2024 YR4 is now expected to pass the Moon at a distance of about 13,200 miles (21,200 km). The agency stressed that the update "reflects improved precision in our understanding of where the asteroid is expected to be in 2032 rather than a shift in its orbital path." The announcement closes a remarkable chapter in planetary defence that began in late 2024, when the approximately 60-metre-wide asteroid briefly became the most closely watched near-Earth object in the world. Discovered on December 27, 2024, by the ATLAS telescope in Chile, 2024 YR4 initially appeared to have a small chance of colliding with Earth on December 22, 2032. As astronomers gathered more observations, the impact probability briefly climbed to around 3%—the highest ever recorded for an asteroid of its size—before steadily falling as its orbit became better understood. By early 2025, international observations had ruled out any significant risk to Earth. However, astronomers were left with another possibility: a roughly 4% chance that the asteroid could instead strike the Moon. "The probability that asteroid 2024 YR4 will strike the Moon on 22 December 2032 is now approximately 4%," the European Space Agency (ESA) had said last year, noting that "there is a 96% chance that the asteroid will not impact the Moon." ESA said such an impact, while unlikely, would have presented an extraordinary scientific opportunity. "It is a very rare event for an asteroid this large to impact the Moon – and it is rarer still that we know about it in advance. The impact would likely be visible from Earth, and so scientists will be very excited by the prospect of observing and analysing it," said Richard Moissl, Head of ESA's Planetary Defence Office. "It would certainly leave a new crater on the surface. However, we wouldn't be able to accurately predict in advance how much material would be thrown into space, or whether any would reach Earth," he added. The asteroid also exposed an important blind spot in planetary defence. Because 2024 YR4 approached Earth from the direction of the Sun, it remained hidden from ground-based telescopes until after its closest approach. "We looked into how Neomir would have performed in this situation, and the simulations surprised even us," Moissl said. "Neomir would have detected asteroid 2024 YR4 about a month earlier than ground-based telescopes did. This would have given astronomers more time to study the asteroid's trajectory and allowed them to much sooner rule out any chance of Earth impact in 2032." He added, "As an infrared telescope, like Webb, Neomir would have also immediately given us a much better estimate for the asteroid's size, which is very important for assessing the significance of the hazard." The latest NASA observations underscore the value of space-based infrared telescopes in tracking faint asteroids. According to NASA, Webb made "among the faintest ever observations of an asteroid," extending the object's observational record by nearly eight months at a time when it had become too faint for other telescopes. That additional data allowed scientists to eliminate the remaining uncertainty surrounding its 2032 flyby. Although asteroid 2024 YR4 is now confirmed to pose no threat to either Earth or the Moon, scientists say its discovery remains one of the most significant real-world tests of the international planetary defence system, demonstrating how continued observations can rapidly transform an object once considered hazardous into one whose future path is known with high confidence. Source: NASA, ESA This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
    • Apprentice
      daryld went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Contributor
      Carltonbar went up a rank
      Contributor
    • One Month Later
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      418
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      130
    4. 4
      Xenon
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!