Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Steven P. said:

Even guests can block sponsored content, the link to instructions is in each of those articles. Judging the whole site by its (user generated) forum content is stupid plus political sections are blocked from guest view (so we don't encourage signups just for that). Open to all feedback, but not stupidity.

Well said ste! 

 

if you dont want to read an article...guess what you have that power, dont click the link...it aint hard to comprehend.

 

why dont some get this, I cannot understand, this site isnt a charity or out there for the better good of humanity, its a business for some, so ads and page hits = income. Its their livelyhood. 

 

I dont get these posts, if your going to leave, leave, it aint hard, just dont return, you dont have to broadcast it!

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
3 minutes ago, Mando said:

Well said ste! 

 

if you dont want to read an article...guess what you have that power, dont click the link...it aint hard to comprehend.

 

why dont some get this, I cannot understand, this site isnt a charity or out there for the better good of humanity, its a business for some, so ads and page hits = income. Its their livelyhood. 

 

I dont get these posts, if your going to leave, leave, it aint hard, just dont return, you dont have to broadcast it!

Or, like a complete idiot, think they're playing it safe by opening another account, rant on that one, and go back to their main account, and continue viewing/commenting.

Actually, I think the OP has it backwards.

 

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/28/business/media/jimmy-fallon-tonight-show-ratings-colbert-kimmel-decline.html

 

Jimmy Fallon, in trying to avoid politics has seen his viewers depart in droves...

 

In times of turmoil and upheaval, people don't want a safe haven from politics, they want to make sense out of it somehow and actually object if the giant gorilla in the room is being ignored. It is impossible to please everyone, but Neowin provides a safe well moderated forum with intelligent members to engage in conversation or debate and try to make sense of it all. The tech world does not exist in a vacuum - it is part of an ever changing human civilization and is changed by culture and in turn it has a powerful effect on our culture.

 

To avoid discussing how subjects of interest to Neowin visitors fit in to the greater world is just plain sillyness.

 

 

 

Weird. I can see a lot of discussion on the forums and been from outside united states sometimes I see a lot of Pro Trump (very weird to me) and a lot of people called liberals.

I can see a lot sponsored content but I support that pay the bill BUT at the end of the day I've been on Neowin for the Microsoft related news and I still enjoy it, so that been said, good luck broth'.

 

See ya.

2 hours ago, LimeMaster said:

I believe OP's issue is with articles like these. The filtering systems you currently have in place do not cover articles with political based content written by the news staff.

Huh? Donald Trump's Twitter account was deactivated and a guy who claimed did it gave an interview. Things involving Twitter will be covered on a tech site. Are we saying if it was Beyoncé's Twitter account the article would be OK? The news involved a politician but it wasn't really about politics. I hate living in the age of snowflakes...

Edited by oldtimefighter
  • Like 3
58 minutes ago, techbeck said:

Ignore the RWN forums, then not much else to look at.  A lot of forums are just not to active.

I said this about 2-3 years ago. Honestly the Politics/RWN forums should be removed. At least that's what I would do if I wanted a successful tech site, followed with other changes to increase participation in the tech forums. However anything that draws page views generates ad-revenue, so nothing is going to change.

14 minutes ago, oldtimefighter said:

Huh? Donald Trump's Twitter account was deactivated and a guy who claimed did it gave an interview. Things involving Twitter will be covered on a tech site. Are we saying if it was Beyoncé's Twitter account the article would be OK? The news involved a politician but it wasn't really about politics. I hate living in the age of snowflakes...

The problem here is that the article is about a major political figure. It's clear from the OP that Mark is fed up with politics. It's tech related, sure. But it covers controversial content that not everyone is clearly fond of. The comment section probably doesn't help its case either.

9 minutes ago, xendrome said:

I said this about 2-3 years ago. Honestly the Politics/RWN forums should be removed. At least that's what I would do if I wanted a successful tech site, followed with other changes to increase participation in the tech forums. However anything that draws page views generates ad-revenue, so nothing is going to change.

I don't think the path to improving Neowin involves removing anything. Figuring that out would just be a distraction.

 

Quite the opposite. It needs more stuff! The tech content needs to be "techier" and not just an endless stream of product announcements. More reviews of real equipment used by real tech people instead of metal eye candy. Investigative analysis. Trends. More editorials and opinion pieces. Get some tech excitement happening!

 

  • Like 3

The forums have a lot of active politics.  However, there isn't a lot of that in the news sections. If you go to the verge or ars, the front pages are plagues with propaganda political BS

2 minutes ago, DevTech said:

 It needs more stuff! The tech content needs to be "techier" and not just an endless Stream of product announcements. More reviews of real equipment used by real tech people instead of metal eye candy. Investigative analysis. Trends. More editorials and opinion pieces. Get some tech excitement happening!

 

This is pretty much spot on for neowin.

  • Like 1
1 hour ago, techbeck said:

Ignore the RWN forums, then not much else to look at.  A lot of forums are just not to active.

The best way to fix that is to post more non-political content. More fun stuff in Member's Metropolis, for instance. Or a review of your latest toy.

 

Maybe I should take my pwn advice and pay more attention to my Transformers collection thread in the Hobby Room.

  • Like 1
14 minutes ago, DConnell said:

The best way to fix that is to post more non-political content. More fun stuff in Member's Metropolis, for instance. Or a review of your latest toy.

 

Maybe I should take my pwn advice and pay more attention to my Transformers collection thread in the Hobby Room.

Well, a lot of the people who posted tech a lot are no longer here.   Some also stated they are leaving because of what the forums  are like now.  There are also a few members here who make a lot of noise and put off people posting or commenting as well.  But as long as the trouble brings clicks, it seems to be ignored.

I don't mind reading and discussing politics and real world news and issues most of the time. When there are times that I don't want to read such things I just ignore the necessary areas.

 

Although as has been pointed out, this person in particular wouldn't have even seen those forums if they only registered today, which suggests they are talking about front page articles. In those situations I find it very easy to not click on a link if the article doesn't interest me. I also don't find the articles to be political though, the above example of Trump's Twitter account has absolutely nothing to do with politics. It is to do with a man coming forward saying that he deactivated the account by accident. There was no political agenda on his part, the only link to politics is that the account belongs to Donald Trump. Is this article political? How about this one? Or this one? They all mention areas of government (well the one with the Queen is a bit grey, she's the head of state not the head of government).

 

I can't say I've noticed anything politically charged in the articles themselves. Our community might bring political discussion in to the comments section of said articles, but then you can just ignore the comments section.

5 minutes ago, Nick H. said:

Although as has been pointed out, this person in particular wouldn't have even seen those forums if they only registered today,

You don't need to be logged in to the site to view the RWN forums.  There is political posts just in RWN and RWI.  He probably would have been fed up a couple years earlier if he saw the Domestic forums...or just by reading all the troll posts.

7 minutes ago, techbeck said:

You don't need to be logged in to the site to view the RWN forums.  There is political posts just in RWN and RWI.  He probably would have been fed up a couple years earlier if he saw the Domestic forums.

Right ... just the Domestics Politics subforum isn't visible until you've registered. 

 

RWI/RWN is visible to non-members ... and political discussions can spill over (due to the nature of the original topic).

5 minutes ago, techbeck said:

You don't need to be logged in to the site to view the RWN forums.

RWN isn't allowed to have political discussions though? Although I admit, since the start of 2016 everything is now political, be it SJW, snowflakes/ultra left or right or someone being offended for their beliefs :( 

  • Like 2
2 minutes ago, techbeck said:

You don't need to be logged in to the site to view the RWN forums.  There is political posts just in RWN and RWI.  He probably would have been fed up a couple years earlier if he saw the Domestic forums.

Huh, you're right. It's been a while since I've been logged out. :laugh:

 

The point still stands though. If you don't want to read something from those forums then no one is forcing you to do so. Likewise for front page articles. I don't understand the need to leave a site (and do so publicly) when there is plenty of other great content to read.

  • Like 2
4 minutes ago, Jim K said:

Right ... just the Domestics Politics subforum isn't visible until you've registered. 

 

RWI/RWN is visible to non-members ... and I guess political discussion can spill over (due to the nature of the original topic).

A lot of the forums are trolled and turned in to politcal issues/attacks in those forums and some people do post political topics there.

4 minutes ago, Steven P. said:

RWN isn't allowed to have political discussions though? Although I admit, since the start of 2016 everything is now political, be it SJW, snowflakes or someone being offended for their beliefs :( 

Not sure I understand the question.  But things have been more non tech related on this site starting before 2016.  I used to come to this site years ago and ask questions on issues and get several replies back soon after.  Now, I am lucky to get one reply so I stopped posting those topics.  Then there are members that ruin any change of having an actual adult/good conversation about a topic.  I miss the Neowin of old and I know a lot of members agree.

6 minutes ago, Nick H. said:

 I don't understand the need to leave a site (and do so publicly) when there is plenty of other great content to read.

The content in other forums besides RWN is becoming more and more lacking.  Looking at the last post time now, most of the forums are hours or days since the last reply.  It is like that a lot while RWN seems to always have some action.  So really, ignore all RWN posts and not a lot left to read.   And no forum activity or lack of replies puts people off on posting new content.  Site needs to go back to being tech focused and issues need to be addressed as well.

12 minutes ago, techbeck said:

A lot of the forums are trolled and turned in to politcal issues/attacks in those forums and some people do post political topics there.

Not sure I understand the question.  But things have been more non tech related on this site starting before 2016.  I used to come to this site years ago and ask questions on issues and get several replies back soon after.  Now, I am lucky to get one reply so I stopped posting those topics.  Then there are members that ruin any change of having an actual adult/good conversation about a topic.  I miss the Neowin of old and I know a lot of members agree.

I think that's isolated, I have seen tech related questions get answered within minutes,. or at least within the day/short amount of time.

 

You stopping asking your questions has actually contributed to the decrease of activity, with fewer active topics and replies, of course it's going to get worse, so why contribute to that?

 

The OPs statement isn't all that intelligent to me, and even lacks actual examples yet here we are at the end of page two of replies.

29 minutes ago, Steven P. said:

The OPs statement isn't all that intelligent to me, and even lacks actual examples yet here we are at the end of page two of replies.

It's the old "There are no stupid questions.."

 

Lots of points and discussion has been sparked by whatever the original post was. It can all be worthless of course or a point that is useless can spark a reply that leads to a discussion that sparks a great idea for you.

 

Too many people get annoyed by threads that go off-topic, yet if anyone in the universe can recognize that crazy process as a wellspring of human creativity, it should be the tech people at Neowin!

 

  • Like 3
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Are you going to do performance benchmarks comparing all states? I'd be interested in seeing that in the next "part".
    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      78
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!