Russia banned from the 2018 Winter Olympics in PyeongChang


Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, Mirumir said:

Thanks for proving that Russia's case isn't a unique one, but the country is being unfairly singled out.

 

Either implement a zero-tolerance policy or remain to be hypocrites.

 They're not being singled out. They had a large number of infractions there for a why they were a band. I just think the band was too broad. A few set group of Russians ruin it for the rest and I don't think that's right. They were caught cheating so therefore there needs to be penalties but I think they should penalize the individual not the whole team. Other countries have been penalized throughout the years but that was an individual basis again Russia had a high number of violations. The rest of the people have drugs in your system got approval the proper way.

 

Hopefully the Russians will can compete on a neutral basis because I going to miss watching them in the Olympics

8 minutes ago, FloatingFatMan said:

Russia was banned not because of individual cheats, but because of state run cheating.

Which was unraveled by one of THEIR scientists/doctors(Grigory Rodchenkov). His journal and testimony is what sealed the deal.

 

It doesn't surprise me to see a certain individual pointing the finger at the West, putting blame on everyone else except their own. This thread is about Russia being banned, I don't care what you think about the US or how the US some how is targeting Russia. Face the facts, Russian athletes were doping and were caught, Russian officials were caught tainting specimens and lying, their own chemist Grigory Rodchenkov has gone on record stating what he has done and has the journal to prove it. How this person can continue to twist this as "Western media being the bad guy again," I don't know what to tell you. Just swallow your pride and admit Russia messed up here severely. If this thread continues down the road it is headed, I will just have the mods lock it up. I am tired of the same old people turning this into a Russia vs USA, every chance they get.

Edited by Circaflex
  • Like 3
3 minutes ago, FloatingFatMan said:

We're still waiting...

When I said "in the future", I had a slightly longer timeline in my mind, counting in years possibly, not minutes or hours.

14 minutes ago, Mirumir said:

When I said "in the future", I had a slightly longer timeline in my mind, counting in years possibly, not minutes or hours.

So in other words, you HOPE that "one day", Wikileaks MIGHT have something like this to accuse western governments of, but you don't really know that they have because you're just making it all up?

 

Right.. Gotcha.

 

Try again when this actually happens. If ever.

 

  • Like 1
48 minutes ago, Mirumir said:

When I said "in the future", I had a slightly longer timeline in my mind, counting in years possibly, not minutes or hours.

So, grasping at imaginary straws!

44 minutes ago, FloatingFatMan said:

So in other words, you HOPE that "one day", Wikileaks MIGHT have something like this to accuse western governments of, but you don't really know that they have because you're just making it all up?

 

Right.. Gotcha.

 

Try again when this actually happens. If ever.

 

No, I know because I've studied the Cold War.

 

Doping at the Olympics has been an acute problem since the 1960's.

 

It's a cat and mouse game. 

 

Both the USA and USSR were trying to develop new performance enhancing drugs for which no tests had been done at the games yet.

 

New tests were added at each Olympiad and newer drugs kept on appearing.

  • Haha 1
12 minutes ago, Mirumir said:

No, I know because I've studied the Cold War.

 

Doping at the Olympics has been an acute problem since the 1960's.

 

It's a cat and mouse game. 

 

Both the USA and USSR were trying to develop new performance enhancing drugs for which no tests had been done at the games yet.

 

New tests were added at each Olympiad and newer drugs kept on appearing.

Sure, sure...

 

And I know you're just making stuff up because I studied the back of a pack of cigarettes I found in the street last year.

  • Like 2
49 minutes ago, MikeChipshop said:

Or... and bear with me here, I know you have an issue understanding a lot of things, but THEY GOT CAUGHT CHEATING. 

You know? Are you sure? Do you possess some uber cool telepathic mind-reading abilities?

 

Because I know that on January 1, 2016 WADA added meldonium to a list of banned substances at short notice, not giving the Russian athletes enough time to rid their systems of the drug, and then, to make things worse, they retroactively applied the new ban to the samples of the Russian athletes from the past...which is how this McClaren dude came up with such an astronomical number of 1,000 Russian doping athletes.

 

For the record, the average size of the Russian Olympic team is 300 athletes.

 

The damage had been done, and 1/3 of the team, 96 athletes were banned from going to Rio.

 

Then, forward a year later, this report comes up in September of this year:

 

Quote

 

WADA clears 95 Russian athletes implicated in McLaren Report due to ‘insufficient evidence’

 

The World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) has closed its investigation in regard to 95 of the 96 Russian athletes implicated in its McLaren Report as there 'simply may not be sufficient evidence required to sanction', it has told RT.

 

 

As for the allegations of swapping samples at Sochi, that's a cool fantasy. 

 

I'm certain the Russian whistleblower  story-teller and traitor who shared his fantasy with the NYT will be handsomely rewarded. 

 

As you know, Russia is being fined $15 million by the IOC which is a blatant extortion in itself because there was no court decision. What's happened to the innocent until proven guilty mantra you are all so fond of? It doesn't apply to the Russians, because you think we are different, I know.

 

And I'm sure the traitor will get a nice cut from that amount.

1 hour ago, Mirumir said:

You know? Are you sure? Do you possess some uber cool telepathic mind-reading abilities?

Do I need too? (Hint: No). You can try your best to spread your nonsense and Russian propaganda on this site, but until there's actually hard evidence to back up your claims then no one is going to buy it.

3 hours ago, Mirumir said:

In the future, WikiLeaks will release info about state run cheating in the western countries and we'll have the last laugh.

If that happens, I will be with the rest condemning it.   But I would not be laughing about it as I am not laughing about this either.   And perhaps you need to go back and read the link I posted where it shows what athletes were banned or had medals strip because guess what, not only Russians are listed.

Edited by techbeck

Russia engaged in state sanctioned cheating and has been rightfully banned. It was aware of the rules and conspired to circumvent them, which is a clear violation of the principles of the Olympics. It was right to ban Russia from the Olympics.

 

There is a separate issue of countries like the UK and US exploiting the medical exemptions of the Olympics to aid the performance of athletes. UK athletes like Bradley Wiggins and US athletes like Serena Williams and Simone Biles all benefited from medical exemptions allowing them to take performance enhancing drugs. The difference is that they are playing within the rules, it's just that the rules are unfair.

 

There is plenty of criticism to go around but what Russia did is demonstrably worse and absolutely deserving of a ban.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2
2 hours ago, Mirumir said:

I'm certain the Russian whistleblower  story-teller and traitor who shared his fantasy

So you're under the belief that he created a fake journal, and Russia never doped? The Russian officials never tainted specimens? Are you saying, Russia did not cheat and did not use performance enhancing drugs?

https://www.npr.org/sections/thetorch/2016/07/19/486595080/report-russia-used-mouse-hole-to-swap-urine-samples-of-olympic-athletes

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/05/13/sports/russia-doping-sochi-olympics-2014.html

  • Haha 2

 

Quote

Usmanov urges IOC to let Russia flag fly at 2018 Olympics

 

LAUSANNE, Switzerland (AP) — A leading Russian sports official has urged the IOC to reverse a ban on the country's flag from the Pyeongchang Olympics.

Alisher Usmanov, the president of the International Fencing Federation, said the legal principle of "No guilt, no punishment" means clean Russian athletes are being denied "basic human rights."

 

"Even though discrimination in any shape or form contradicts the principles of the Olympic Movement, the IOC's decision certainly does put clean Russian athletes on an uneven playing field with athletes from other countries,"

 

 

Quote

Top figure skater is face of Russia’s Olympic dilemma

 

Figure skater Evgenia Medvedeva is speaking out against the International Olympic Committee’s ban on Russian athletes competing for the nation in the forthcoming Winter Olympics.

 

“In 2014, I was 14 years old,” the 18-year-old competitor wrote in a statement Tuesday to the IOC’s executive board, per Ice Network. “I have not even entered the adult national team of my country.

 

“For me personally, Pyeongchang [South Korea] should be the first chance to plunge into the unique atmosphere of the Olympic Games. I do not understand why I and my Russian teammates can lose this chance.”

 

On Tuesday, the IOC announced they had banned Russian from participating in the Winter Games after the nation was found tampering with over 100 urine samples during 2014’s Sochi Games in an attempt to conceal steroid usage. The country was also hit with a $15 million fine.

 

Expected to be a gold-medal contender, Medvedeva, a two-time world champion, scoffed at the idea she and her fellow Russians would be able to compete under the name “Olympic Athlete from Russia” (OAR), drug tests pending, and is unsure if she will compete.

 

“I cannot accept the option that I would compete in the Olympic Games without the Russian flag as a neutral athlete,” Medvedeva said. “I am proud of my country, it is a great honor for me to represent it at the Games. It gives strength and inspires me during the performances.”

 

58 minutes ago, Circaflex said:

So you're under the belief that he created a fake journal, and Russia never doped? The Russian officials never tainted specimens? Are you saying, Russia did not cheat and did not use performance enhancing drugs?

https://www.npr.org/sections/thetorch/2016/07/19/486595080/report-russia-used-mouse-hole-to-swap-urine-samples-of-olympic-athletes

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/05/13/sports/russia-doping-sochi-olympics-2014.html

Is there any other evidence out there of Russia tampering with the samples at Sochi other than the account of just ONE individual? There was another butt-hurt couple being jealous at other teammates I believe that chose to immigrate to the States. They are all part of what we call Russia's Fifth Column. That's it. No investigation (a biased IOC or WADA report doesn't count), no trial, no evidence.

 

The issue is politically motivated.

 

Nothing surprises me anymore. There are also forces out there that challenge the choice of Russia as the host of the FIFA World Cup next year.

7 minutes ago, Mirumir said:

 

Is there any other evidence out there of Russia tampering with the samples at Sochi other than the account of just ONE individual? There was another butt-hurt couple being jealous at other teammates I believe that chose to immigrate to the States. They are all part of what we call Russia's Fifth Column. That's it. No investigation (a biased IOC or WADA report doesn't count), no trial, no evidence.

There was a 97-page report into the matter that found overwhelming evidence of Russian interference, corroborating earlier evidence that had been received by the IOC. It's not all based on the testimony of one person, as you claim. Dr Rodchenkov was only part of the equation.

 

From the report:

Quote

The veracity of Dr. Rodchenkov’s statements to The New York Times article is supported by the forensic analysis of the IP which included laboratory analysis of the salt content of samples selected by the investigative team.  The London WADA accredited Laboratory, at the request of the IP, advised that of the forensically representative samples tested, 6 had salt contents higher than what should be found in urine of a healthy human. The forensic examination for marks and scratches within the bottle caps confirmed that they had been tampered with.  Both findings support the evidence of Dr. Rodchenkov.

Then there was the mass destruction of samples when an investigation was initiated into the matter. It's clear Russia had something to hide.

 

Then there's the physical evidence:

Quote

Dr Rodchenkov prepared a schedule of 37 athletes whose samples were potentially a problem if another accredited laboratory were to analyze them.  A meeting was held with Deputy Minister Nagornykh in which the jeopardy of the laboratory was discussed were something not done to deal with the selected samples. The upshot of that meeting was that Deputy Minister Nagornykh
resolved to call in the “magicians”.  That night the FSB visited the laboratory and the next day sample bottles were in the laboratory without their caps.  The IP found that these samples all had negative findings recorded on ADAMS.
 
The IP forensic examination of these bottles found evidence of scratches and marks confirmed tampering. A urine examination of 3 of the samples showed that the DNA was not that of the athlete involved.

As for you claim that there is no evidence, that's not true. Many athletes were cleared due to a lack of evidence but that doesn't in any way suggest they are innocent. There is plenty of evidence to support Russia's meddling in the anti-doping tests but not enough to meet the threshold required to sanction individual athletes. It's also worth noting that Dr Rodchenkov, the main witness, was not available to provide evidence against the athletes.

 

If it's all just an international conspiracy against Russia then you must be able to provide some evidence of that. Afterall, extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.

On 07/12/2017 at 3:21 AM, FloatingFatMan said:

 

After a bit more thought on this, and a little reading up, are you seriously comparing known and proven drug cheats to people with known medical conditions who were/are not taking any performance enhancing drugs?  Do you seriously want to go there, and end up looking even more ridiculous? 

 

The only hypocrisy here is your feeble attempts at excusing your country's consistent attempts at cheating whilst blaming others who are not.

I agree with you but what happened with Russia should raise concerns outside of just Russia. Sadly it seems nobody cares about it. Like Russia is the demon everything is fine. That's a very foolish attitude by WADA imo.

 

A list of names was published not too long ago with athletes taking prohibited drugs because of a medical condition. Now i don't know if the list was accurate but i don't remember anyone denying it or anything. But maybe it was denied i'm not following drugs abuse in sports too much. That list was sort of massive like personally i don't know many people who takes drugs because of medical condition and those who are could not be athletes like not even close because of said medical condition. So it raises some concerns honestly. Again maybe i'm wrong i'm not following the subject closely but it seems like more and more athletes are taking something because of a medical condition. And often the medical condition is sort of officially vague. I don't know anyway but for an outsider not following this too much it looks like it.

 

When you look at how easy it was for Russia to cheat it should raise big concerns imo. Let's remember that Armstrong was actually caught cheating twice but got away using fake medical papers signed by a real doctor. Is it still as easy to get a medical exemption using fake papers as it was when Armstrong got his?

 

In the end both Russia and US Postal team were caught in big part because of whistle blowers and not because the WADA did a tremendously good job. It should raise big concerns.

30 minutes ago, LaP said:

A list of names was published not too long ago with athletes taking prohibited drugs because of a medical condition. Now i don't know if the list was accurate but i don't remember anyone denying it or anything. But maybe it was denied i'm not following drugs abuse in sports too much. That list was sort of massive like personally i don't know many people who takes drugs because of medical condition and those who are could not be athletes like not even close because of said medical condition. So it raises some concerns honestly. Again maybe i'm wrong i'm not following the subject closely but it seems like more and more athletes are taking something because of a medical condition. And often the medical condition is sort of officially vague. I don't know anyway but for an outsider not following this too much it looks like it.

The difference is that athletes with medical exemptions are not breaking the rules. Are the rules unfair? Absolutely, because the exemptions are clearly being used to enhance performance. But as the rules stand they are not cheating. Russia could have decided to exploit the same loopholes to allow performance enhancing drugs to be taken legally but instead chose a state organised scheme to cheat drugs tests, which is in clear violation of the rules.

 

Frankly the Olypmics has lost any credibility it may once have had. It's not about individual talent but the billions invested in developing athletes, methods of circumventing the rules and outright cheating. At the end of the day why do we even care that one person from a particular country can run slightly faster than another person from a different country?

1 hour ago, Mirumir said:

Yep and Saddam had WMD's.

I'm not anti Russia but the ban is fair, they were caught and have to pay the price. The medical exemptions i don't agree with, if you need to take something that is a banned substance you should in no way be allowed to compete.

 

I fully expect other countries such as the UK are running secret drug trials to get that extra edge, but unless you have evidence what can you do??

 

In swimming they have those over engineered fluid dynamic (??) suite that are expensive giving anyone who can't afford one a disadvantage right from the start, doesn't seem to be in the spirit of the Olympics but it's legal.

Quote

If it's all just an international conspiracy against Russia then you must be able to provide some evidence of that.

The evidence is all around us. It's not a conspiracy when you have a Western leader or a NATO general calling Russia an existential threat which must be contained and isolated on a regular basis.

 

The Western political elite allows itself to implement more provocative anti-Russian actions compared to the height of the Cold War: personal sanctions, troops and ABM deployment in the Baltics ("not one inch eastward"), economic sanctions, and now sports sanctions.

 

The pressure is being felt. But hey, listen, it's Russia who is the real aggressor.

Dr Mark Bonar has no part in the OP unless he has been tied to doping Olympic athletes.  So far, what I have seen is

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-sport-doping-britain/british-doctor-alleges-he-doped-150-sports-people-idUSKCN0WZ0TJ

Quote

 

The Sunday Times reported that Dr Mark Bonar prescribed banned drugs to 150 sports figures including several Premier League footballers.

The paper said Dr Bonar claimed his “clients” included an England cricketer, British Tour de France cyclists, a British boxing champion, tennis players and martial arts competitors as well as footballers.

 

 

  • 1 month later...
Quote

 

Top sports court overturns IOC’s ban on 28 Russian athletes in groundbreaking ruling

 

The Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) has cleared 28 Russian athletes and dropped their life-bans over alleged doping. Their results have been reinstated and the athletes are eligible to compete in the 2018 Winter Games.

 

According to the ruling, in 28 cases filed by the Russian athletes the evidence was “insufficient” to establish that “an anti-doping rule violation (ADRV) was committed by the athletes.”

 

“With respect to these 28 athletes, the appeals are upheld, the sanctions annulled and their individual results achieved in Sochi 2014 are reinstated,”

 

More than 170 Russian athletes will participate in the upcoming games wearing a grey gestapo prisoner type of a uniform:

 

grey.thumb.jpg.1fb9ba93b3e04bdf4e4aaf02020bb4b9.jpg

 

 

 

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • If Valve refused to let them make the case, I wonder if they've already partnered with someone else to do it? The fact that they didn't seek permission/licence before diving straight in is incredible though
    • OpenClaw now has native mobile apps on iOS and Android by Karthik Mudaliar OpenClaw, the viral open-source personal AI agent, now has its own mobile app, available on both Android and iOS. Users can pair the app with an existing OpenClaw gateway and can start using new mobile-native features that are now available on the app. The app supports all the existing features you'd already have seen on OpenClaw's TUI, as well as some more, such as real-time and background Talk mode, action approvals, sharing from iOS, and optional access to device capabilities such as camera, screen, location, photos, contacts, calendar, and reminders. These features are available on both the Android and iOS versions of the app. What's important with these apps is that they don't run OpenClaw on your phone, but are actually just companion apps that require a running OpenClaw Gateway on an existing device, on macOS, Linux, or Windows via WSL2. To pair the app with your existing OpenClaw gateway, users need to run the command "/pair qr" on the TUI or existing chat interface, which brings up a QR code. Users can then scan this QR code to pair it up with the mobile app. There's also an option to manually pair the app by entering the host and a port. Previously, OpenClaw had been available on phones via WhatsApp, Telegram, Slack, Discord, Microsoft Teams, Matrix, and others. Now, with a native mobile app, the interface is much cleaner and more focused on just the OpenClaw, of course, with the added support for camera, screen, location, and more. It's important to note that OpenClaw comes with its own security warnings. There's always a chance of prompt injection with these tools, so users are recommended to double-check authentication, tool policy, sandboxing, and execution approvals rather than prompts alone. For users well-versed with the AI harness, a native mobile app makes it easier to approve an automation, share a link, use voice, or let an agent react to phone-side context.
    • Google pitches Spanner as one database for all AI agents with these new featues by Karthik Mudaliar Google Cloud is introducing new features within Spanner, its distributed database, as a place where enterprises should keep their data, using which AI agents could make smarter and better decisions. In a detailed blog post, Google highlighted quite a few features coming to Spanner, including relational data, graph relationships, vector search, key-value access, full-text search, and operational analytics together in one database architecture. Google says that today's systems aren't well-made for AI agents. There could be data that is present in one system, search indexes in another, embeddings in a vector database, and relationship data in a graph database. This fragmentation isn't great for AI agents to do their jobs because they don't have access to all of this data in one place. This is where Google is positioning Spanner as a solution. Spanner is already a globally distributed relational database with strong consistency, and Google wants its customers to see it as a broader data layer for AI applications. The company introduced something called Spanner Graph, along with integrated vector search, full-text search, a Cassandra-compatible key-value endpoint, and a columnar engine for analytical queries on operational data. Google also added that its ScaNN-powered vector search can support indexes with more than 10 billion vectors, while the columnar engine can make some analytical scans up to 200 times faster. All of this isn't just exclusive to the Google Cloud Platform, and there's support for multi-cloud as well. This comes via Spanner Omni, which Google says is a downloadable, containerized version of Spanner that can run on Kubernetes and in environments outside Google Cloud, including Microsoft Azure and AWS, and even on-premises infrastructure as well as edge deployments. Google says that customers who are interested in the full-featured edition should contact the company, and there's no word on commercial availability or separate pricing. Those interested can read the full blog by Google Cloud, which details these features individually.
    • Kalmuri 4.2.5 by Razvan Serea Kalmuri is your all-in-one, portable screen capture and recording solution designed for speed, simplicity, and flexibility. Whether you need a full-screen snapshot, a custom area, a scrolling webpage, or smooth video recording, Kalmuri delivers with ease. Capture text instantly from images with built-in OCR, keep floating images on top for quick reference, and use the precise color picker for perfect design matching. Customize hotkeys to work your way and share results instantly with built-in upload options. Kalmuri runs without installation, making it ideal for USB use, and offers an intuitive interface that’s easy to learn. Kalmuri key features: Video recording support (designation of whole screen and area) Whole screen, active program, window control, area application Extract text from images using optical character recognition (OCR). Support for PNG, JPG, WEBP, BMP, GIF file formats MP4 video recording powered by FFmpeg for high-quality results Full web page capture Share the captured image on the web Color extraction function Printer output Hotkey settings Adjustable via keyboard for area capture (Arrow key, Ctrl+Arrow key, Shift+Arrow key) File name format (sequential, datetime) Free to use it at work, at home, in government offices, at school, etc. Using Kalmuri portable for video recording Kalmuri’s portable version doesn’t include FFmpeg, which is required for video recording. Without it, you’ll get an “error FFmpeg.exe not found” message. To fix this, download FFmpeg from the provided link, extract it, and place FFmpeg.exe in Kalmuri’s folder. Kalmuri will then recognize it automatically, allowing you to start recording in high quality instantly. Kalmuri 4.2.5 changelog: Fixed an intermittent crash when using Area Capture Improved stability for Area Capture and screen recording Resolved a capture issue that could occur right after startup Download: Kalmuri 4.2.5 | 24.2 MB (Freeware) Download: Kalmuri Portable 4.2.5 | 2.1 MB View: Kalmuri Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      Juan Dela earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Collagen Project earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      Wakeen1966 earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Rookie
      Almohandis went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      516
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      273
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      143
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      54
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!