Recommended Posts

I've been hooked on watching these alien conspiracy documentaries. Many of them I don't believe, but I watched one on YouTube last night called Zero Point. it was an interview with mainly one guy and a few others who were involved with US-made craft that were back engineered from alien spacecraft. The guys seemed highly credible to me and went into great detail about the theories of and how field propulsion works. They apparently have had this technology for a long time and it's capable of faster than light travel. Plus field energy would pretty much destroy the world economy which is based on fossil fuels.

 

After watching this, it doesn't seem so outlandish anymore than we've recovered craft and reverse engineered them. What do you guys think?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1367176-zero-point-and-field-propulsion/
Share on other sites

There have been videos and papers on zero point energy and when applied to propulsion, it does make sense, as the faster you go, the more mass is consumed in the process. 
Eg: With a car, whether it be petrol or electric, the faster you go, the more petrol is consumed, or electric power needed from the battery.
So with that in mind, space craft would require massive amounts of energy to travel faster than light, zero point and field propulsion *could* work but to my knowledge anyway, there is no confirmed means to produce it, and it isn't even known to be a thing at this stage anyway (at least publicly). 
If you can link the video in question, it would be easier to pull it apart for the science and see if it what he or she is talking about is or can be backed up, or as most videos like this tend to be, hypothetical. 

27 minutes ago, patseguin said:

I've been hooked on watching these alien conspiracy documentaries. Many of them I don't believe, but I watched one on YouTube last night called Zero Point. it was an interview with mainly one guy and a few others who were involved with US-made craft that were back engineered from alien spacecraft. The guys seemed highly credible to me and went into great detail about the theories of and how field propulsion works. They apparently have had this technology for a long time and it's capable of faster than light travel. Plus field energy would pretty much destroy the world economy which is based on fossil fuels.

 

After watching this, it doesn't seem so outlandish anymore than we've recovered craft and reverse engineered them. What do you guys think?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_propulsion#Spacecraft

We know why electromagnetic propulsion works, we just don't know what to put together to make it work well.

Sure, we could move through space without fuel (aside from starlight + solar panels), we'd just be moving incredible slow and or with an incredibly slow acceleration, especially relative to the vast distances between things.

9 minutes ago, Anarkii said:

There have been videos and papers on zero point energy and when applied to propulsion, it does make sense, as the faster you go, the more mass is consumed in the process. 
Eg: With a car, whether it be petrol or electric, the faster you go, the more petrol is consumed, or electric power needed from the battery.
So with that in mind, space craft would require massive amounts of energy to travel faster than light, zero point and field propulsion *could* work but to my knowledge anyway, there is no confirmed means to produce it, and it isn't even known to be a thing at this stage anyway (at least publicly). 
If you can link the video in question, it would be easier to pull it apart for the science and see if it what he or she is talking about is or can be backed up, or as most videos like this tend to be, hypothetical. 

 

That video was amazing! After watching it I was expecting them to go into great detail about the actual propulsion system in the ARV, with full technical specs and everything. 
The science at the end of the video does seem plausible,  specially how the flux around the craft would create a few thousand volts if not more and its own magnetic field, what I find interesting though is with those plans freely available on the internet, why no one has created a working prototye in their garage and put it on YouTube or something. 
The other thing that I found really interesting was the controls. It was amazingly simple, like too simple and yet, would work perfectly on X, Y and Z axies. 
Impressive find mate! 

On 7/4/2018 at 9:28 AM, Anarkii said:

That video was amazing! After watching it I was expecting them to go into great detail about the actual propulsion system in the ARV, with full technical specs and everything. 
The science at the end of the video does seem plausible,  specially how the flux around the craft would create a few thousand volts if not more and its own magnetic field, what I find interesting though is with those plans freely available on the internet, why no one has created a working prototye in their garage and put it on YouTube or something. 
The other thing that I found really interesting was the controls. It was amazingly simple, like too simple and yet, would work perfectly on X, Y and Z axies. 
Impressive find mate! 

Yeah for sure. I couldn't believe that it only had like 600 views. You are right about the controls though. Very simplistic looking. It's hard to image plopping an interstellar course without a computer or any kind of automation. My guess is that they have made the ARV's with simple controls for "local" traveling. They mentioned being to Mars in only a few minutes. I have always been a bit of a sceptic on ARV's but after watching this video, I am convinced that they have them and the field propulsion. They just can't go public with it because our current world economy would collapse.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • If only Windows would have a toggle switch named "Get the latest updates as soon as possible" inside Windows Update settings... But nah, let's hide the new stuff inside a controlled feature rollout, even if the user is explicitly asking for the new stuff as soon as possible.
    • After watching the Apple event earlier this week it is quite the contrast. Apple is going back and tweaking the code to make things more efficient in many areas of MacOS. Windows is boosting your electric build to hide their issues.
    • It is silly there is no simple way to check whether this profile has been activated. CFRs are normal, but trying to even hide the fact if it's on / off seems silly, especially for something so user-facing. Surely Microsoft is "proud" of their engineering efforts on this one and ought to display it somwhere in the GUI.
    • Many Linux distros are not known for excellent battery life, so I'm not sure that is the best example. A more apt example may be Apple, but Apple's CPUs are simply far more efficient than Intel & AMD at single-threaded tasks like these, so "boosting" is not as power-hungry and less heat-inducing. Not to mention Apple will hardly engage P-cores for basic UI tasks; they use a pretty complicated QoS scheme to only activate P-cores for more serious workloads like HTML / JS execution or decompression or application launch. Microsoft is (smartly) doing it for launch, but also for UI tasks, which is the more nonsensical part: why ... do Windows 11's UIs need modern CPUs to boost? It should load so quickly that there's not even time for the CPU to boost.
    • I've not seen any controlled testing and, judging by Microsoft's mentality, within a year, they'll have added so much more bloat, it'll undo any perceptible latency benefit and we'll have boosted the CPU clocks for nothing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      slackerzz earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      FBSPL earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      499
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      198
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      157
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      84
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      74
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!