Recommended Posts

I just upgraded our server with a Windows Server Essentials 2016 box and I can't seem to get the VPN to work.

 

So I wanted to ask on here.

 

I have a VPN Router that I AM able to connect to, but I don't have access to anything on the server.

 

I looked into the Anywhere Access, but that appears to require that I connect to the server from //server/connect and install the software, which bricked two computers and so I elected not to go that route. Instead I logged in to the server from the workstations. This works great while we're here, but not remotely. It DID work remotely prior to the upgrade.

 

Is there a setting I need to change to make the server accessible through my VPN router? If I'm connected to the router through VPN, I should have access to the server as if I'm here since that's the point of it...?

 

Any help is greatly appreciated.

I have read that like 3 times - can not make heads or tails other than your having problem..

 

You have a VPN router, and your trying to run VPN on your server?  Drawing would go a long way here!!!

1 hour ago, M_Lyons10 said:

I just upgraded our server with a Windows Server Essentials 2016 box and I can't seem to get the VPN to work.

 

So I wanted to ask on here.

 

I have a VPN Router that I AM able to connect to, but I don't have access to anything on the server.

 

I looked into the Anywhere Access, but that appears to require that I connect to the server from //server/connect and install the software, which bricked two computers and so I elected not to go that route. Instead I logged in to the server from the workstations. This works great while we're here, but not remotely. It DID work remotely prior to the upgrade.

 

Is there a setting I need to change to make the server accessible through my VPN router? If I'm connected to the router through VPN, I should have access to the server as if I'm here since that's the point of it...?

 

Any help is greatly appreciated.

Just to make sure I am reading this correctly, your issue is that while connected to the VPN you cannot access your server through explorer? If you connect to the VPN and use explorer, can you manually access the server by say entering \\servername or \\ip-of-surver? Do you have "Use default gateway on remote network." enabled or disabled?

I'm sorry it took me so long to get back to this, I wanted to try to explain it better.

 

Now, my prior setup was like this.  I had a VPN router (SSL VPN to be specific) that was connected to the server (which was running WIndows Server 2003).  Remote computers would connect to the VPN Router and would then have access to any resources on the server just as they would if they were in the office (SQL Server databases, documents, etc.).  This worked extremely well.

 

Recently I upgraded the server to a Windows Server 2016 Essentials machine.  I have SQL Server up and running and I have set up shared storage for various things.  Now, whe we are in the office, we have access to all of these shared resources.  We have access to the SQL Server databases, we have access to and are able to save files back to the server's storage, etc.  However, when I connect remotely to the VPN Router, I do not have access to any of the resources on the server.  I don't have access to SQL Server or any of the storage.  When I try to browse to the server in file explorer, it can't find the server.  Even though, I'm connected to the same router that the office itself uses.

 

Now, it makes no sense to me why this would not be working, and didn't know if there's a setting on the server that would somehow prevent this?  But I see no reason why it shouldn't work. 

 

I also saw that Windows Server 2016 Essentials has a remote vpn setup where the server would handle all of this, but in reading through it, it looks like it requires the Windows Server Essentials Connector to be installed, which I have been unable to get working.  During initial setup, I got two computers to connect using the Connector, while two other computers were rendered unable to boot and required Windows to be reinstalled...  I'm not sure what the issue is with Connector, but I can't risk going through that again...

I hope that explains things better.  If I've left anything important out, please let me know and I will fill in the blanks.

 

Thanks again everyone for your help.

What server you running has ZERO to do with your vpn clients connecting to it.. ZERO!!!  I take it your still running this vpn router - what is it?  Are you tunnel the vpn clients via a different network or you using a tap sort of connection where the clients get an IP on the same L2?

 

Your not going to be able to do "browsing" to a file share if your on a different L2.. You would have to access via \\ipaddress or \\fqdn that resolves to the IP.

 

If your on a different network you would also have to worry about the the servers firewall not allowing access to remote networks.

 

edit:  I also question where does this vpn router sit?  Is it just your router, or some other you added?  Which if so then without routing on the server telling it how to get to the vpn tunnel network you would never be able to talk to the server because of asymmetrical routing..

 

So again going to ask for a DRAWING!!

On 9/16/2018 at 10:08 AM, BudMan said:

What server you running has ZERO to do with your vpn clients connecting to it.. ZERO!!!  I take it your still running this vpn router - what is it?  Are you tunnel the vpn clients via a different network or you using a tap sort of connection where the clients get an IP on the same L2?

 

Your not going to be able to do "browsing" to a file share if your on a different L2.. You would have to access via \\ipaddress or \\fqdn that resolves to the IP.

 

If your on a different network you would also have to worry about the the servers firewall not allowing access to remote networks.

 

edit:  I also question where does this vpn router sit?  Is it just your router, or some other you added?  Which if so then without routing on the server telling it how to get to the vpn tunnel network you would never be able to talk to the server because of asymmetrical routing..

 

So again going to ask for a DRAWING!!

I've attached a drawing of the network.  It's really not a complex setup at all.

There aren't multiple routers.  These computers remoting in are not on different networks.  The VPN Router is a Vigor product from Draytek and shows these remote computers as being connected (these computers recognize that they are connected as well).  However they do not have access to resources on the server.

 

The server is hard wired to the router.

 

All computers are wireless (when local) and connected through the internet (when remote).

 

I hope this helps my explanation make sense.

 

CCI09202018.jpg

13 hours ago, M_Lyons10 said:

connected (these computers recognize that they are connected as well).

Connected to what?  The tunnel network?  What IP does the client get.. The vigor support multiple types of vpn - which one are you using?

 

https://www.draytek.com/en/faq/faq-vpn/vpn.host-to-lan/windows-10-built-in-vpn-to-vigor-router/

 

These instructions are HORRIFIC!!! They have you enable PPTP.. JFC!!  That has not been secure for YEARS and YEARS... Please tell me you do not have that enabled..

 

See the tunnel network 192.168.46.. What does your client get for its IP when it connects.. simple ipconfig /all will show this.. Unless you are doing a bridged, layer 2 network where the client gets the same IP network as the server is on - your not going to be able "browse" for anything.. And again if your IP is different than your servers - its firewall is not going to allow you to talk to it.  So either you have to set that int he server, or you would have to be doing a bridged L2 connection or you would have to source nat the connection.

 

On 9/21/2018 at 6:30 AM, BudMan said:

Connected to what?  The tunnel network?  What IP does the client get.. The vigor support multiple types of vpn - which one are you using?

 

https://www.draytek.com/en/faq/faq-vpn/vpn.host-to-lan/windows-10-built-in-vpn-to-vigor-router/

 

These instructions are HORRIFIC!!! They have you enable PPTP.. JFC!!  That has not been secure for YEARS and YEARS... Please tell me you do not have that enabled..

 

See the tunnel network 192.168.46.. What does your client get for its IP when it connects.. simple ipconfig /all will show this.. Unless you are doing a bridged, layer 2 network where the client gets the same IP network as the server is on - your not going to be able "browse" for anything.. And again if your IP is different than your servers - its firewall is not going to allow you to talk to it.  So either you have to set that int he server, or you would have to be doing a bridged L2 connection or you would have to source nat the connection.

 

Connected to the network.  Connected to the router.  Connected to other computers on the network.

 

Nothing in the entire setup changed other than the Server.  The router is the same, the computers are the same.  Every computer is able to connect to the router both locally and through VPN.  They just can't connect to the server when working remote.

 

I will log in remotely and get you the ip addresses and everything, but the computers are connecting to the router without any issue whatsoever. 

 

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • JetBrains is working to cut false positives in RustRover 2026.2 by David Uzondu Recently, JetBrains released the fifth EAP build of its dedicated IDE, RustRover 2026.2, bringing improvements like a Run gutter icon for criterion_main! macro benchmarking and a feature that alerts you when there are unused traits in your current scope. Now, the company is out with a blog post addressing one of the "most common" complaints from users: false positives. In RustRover, a false positive occurs when the editor incorrectly highlights something as an error even though the project compiles and runs successfully. This mismatch flags a gap between the IDE's internal intelligence and the actual compiler. When the editor flashes red warnings over perfectly valid code, developers lose trust in the tool, which stalls momentum. Traditionally, RustRover runs cargo check to detect compiler errors and warnings, but it also relies on its own code analysis engine to power real-time features. To provide quick feedback, this engine parses your source code into a syntax tree while inferring types and resolving names as you type. Because this engine must work on broken, half-written code and react instantly, its logic sometimes diverges from the compiler's, producing false positives that do not exist in the compiler's eyes. JetBrains said that it has a "dedicated task force" focused specifically on identifying and fixing false positives by analyzing user reports and examining large-scale open-source projects. To speed up this process, the team built an internal system modeled after Crater, the famous Rust project that compiles and runs tests for every single crate published on crates.io. This automated pipeline compares the diagnostics from RustRover's analysis with actual compiler output to catch discrepancies before they reach users, ensuring smoother workflows. RustRover, for those who're unaware, is a dedicated IDE designed specifically for Rust developers. It's been around for a couple of years now, providing features like built-in debugging via LLDB, seamless cargo integration, advanced macro expansion, and HTML support. JetBrains distributes the app under two licensing models: a paid commercial subscription and a free option for non-commercial use.
    • Last year I bought the 2TB variant for $114 on Amazon. That's crazy that the 1TB is now 67% more expensive for half the storage, even with the newer T9 already on the market. And that's considered a good deal.
    • You can disable all non needed features from Brave. There is also Brave Origin which removes them entirely and it is free for Linux.
    • I wish I could use Brave but the tab suspension feature is horrible. It doesn't suspend them like Edge does. Even after 2h open with 70+ tabs (same as Edge), it has 2GB more consumption than Edge for no reason.
    • TeamViewer 15.78.4.0 by Razvan Serea TeamViewer is the fast, simple and friendly solution for remote access over the Internet - all applications in one single, very affordable module. Remote control of computers over the Internet, Instantly take control over a computer anywhere on the Internet, even through firewalls. No installation required, just use it fast and secure. Training, sales and teamwork, TeamViewer can also be used to present your desktop to a partner on the Internet. Show and share your software, PowerPoint presentations etc. File transfer, chat and more, Share your files, chat, switch the direction during a teamwork session, and a lot more is included in TeamViewer. TeamViewer key features: Cross-platform remote access (Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, iOS, IoT) Attended and unattended remote control Secure file transfer between devices Remote printing to local printers Multi-monitor support with easy switching Wake-on-LAN for sleeping devices Session links for quick connections (no password sharing) Web client access (no installation needed) End-to-end encryption (AES-256) Two-factor authentication and access controls AI-powered session insights and reporting Mass deployment and device management tools Customizable allow/block lists for security Command line and script execution remotely Performance monitoring and analytics dashboards TeamViewer 15.78.4.0 changelog: Improvements Permissions inheritance has been improved, increasing reliability when permissions are assigned to user group managers. Bugfixes Fixed a bug where 'Show details' button was not showing up on command bar upon selection of a device group. Fixed a bug which was causing the legacy groups to disappear when applying hide offline filter in basic view. Fixed a bug where devices were loading infinitely after login. Fixed a bug which was causing crash in application. Download: TeamViewer 15.78.4.0 | 32-bit | Portable | Mac | ~70.0 MB (Free for personal use) View: TeamViewer Home Page | Release Notes | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Primer1st earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Experienced
      JayZJay went up a rank
      Experienced
    • Reacting Well
      Sir_Timbit earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      rubentuben8 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      ARaclen earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      524
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      232
    3. 3
      Edouard
      135
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      88
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      82
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!