General Science topics


 Share

Recommended Posts

dipsylalapo

A few articles that I read last night. 

  • Even though electric cars are still in the minority, they seem to be taking a toll on the amount of oil that is being used. Source
  • Scientists in the Ozone think that the Ozone layer will completely heal within 50 year. Source
  • France is banning pesticides that kill bees. Hail bess. Source

Despite all the crap that happens in the world, at least there's some good new. 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Draggendrop

A Super-Spicy Plant Could Help End the Opioid Crisis

 

pain-relief-resiniferatoxin-rtx-1200x628.thumb.jpg.265370c593a9f130dc816bc0d4eaefb3.jpg

 

Quote

Watch Your Tongue

 

You probably don’t go around biting into plants covered in needles. But if you happened to chomp down on Euphorbia resinifera, a cactus-like plant also known as the resin spurge, you’d seriously regret it — and not for the reason you might think.

The plant’s active ingredient, resiniferatoxin (RTX), is incredibly spicy — a full 10,000 times hotter than the world’s hottest pepper on the scale used to measure hotness. But in an ironic twist, RTX could actually be the future of pain relief.

 

Nerves Ending

 

According to a newly published story in WIRED, researchers across the globe have taken a keen interest in RTX as a painkiller.

They’ve discovered that, when injected into the body, the chemical binds to TRPV1, a molecule found in the nerve endings that sense pain. This opens a channel in the nerve ending that calcium can then flow through. This calcium overload deactivates the pain-sensing nerve without affecting other sensory neurons, such as those that allow a person to feel a light touch.

RTX researcher Michael Iadarola has tested RTX on dogs, injecting the chemical into the animals’ knees to alleviate joint pain, with promising results.

“It is profoundly effective there, and lasts much, much longer than I might have expected, maybe a median of 5 months before the owners of the dogs asked for reinjection,” he told WIRED. “The animals went from basically limping to running around.”

 

Crisis Diverted


Besides simply being effective, RTX has numerous benefits over existing painkillers: It doesn’t require frequent dosing, targets only the area causing pain, and doesn’t produce a potentially addictive high.

If the powerful chemical becomes widely available for human use, it could eventually begin to replace opioids as the go-to medication for addressing major pain issues — helping society address its major opioid addiction issue in the process.

https://futurism.com/this-game-uses-artificial-intelligence-to-recruit-new-players

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

DocM

I've used capsaicin-infused patches to relieve chronic  pain and it works. If this works better, and given my refusing opioids for obvious reasons, count me in.

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

DocM

Saw that on the news 😄

Link to post
Share on other sites

Beittil

To bad it only works when coming into town apparently 😛 From the other direction its going to be like.. 'Whut?' and then you floor it some more 😛

Link to post
Share on other sites

Draggendrop

 

nailed it...

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Draggendrop

SWARMS OF DRONES CAN NOW PLANT TREES IN AREAS DEVASTATED BY FIRES

 

droneseed-plant-trees-wildfire-1200x628.

 

Quote

Every year, wildfires in the U.S. burn an average of 7 million acres, and our current method of replacing lost trees isn’t exactly ideal. “Even at the most sophisticated companies in the world, planters are superheroes that use bags and a shovel to plant trees,” entrepreneur Grant Canary told TechCrunch.

 

That’s why he founded DroneSeed in 2015. The company has developed drones capable of both deciding where to plant seeds and actually planting them — two tasks previously carried out by humans.

 

The drone uses lidar to create a 3D map of an area and a multispectral camera to gather details about its soil and vegetation. From that data, an AI model determines the ideal spot to plant a new tree.

 

The drones don’t simply throw seeds at the ground, though — DroneSeed has developed special “seed vessels.” These are small pucks of nutrients with a seed at their center and a dusting of capsaicin on their exterior to deter animals from eating them.

 

Team Effort


DroneSeed is the first company to receive a multi-craft, over-55-pounds unmanned aerial vehicle license from the Federal Aviation Administration. That means its drones can work in swarms of up to five crafts to cover larger areas.

 

The company has already tested its tech with nonprofits and U.S. timber companies, and it plans to kick off its first commercial post-fire restoration project in December.

 

Eventually, it could help us ensure that we’re able to plant news trees at least as quickly as we lose them — and given the fact that wildfires are growing both more common and more destructive, the tech couldn’t come at a more opportune time.

https://futurism.com/the-byte/droneseed-plant-trees-wildfire

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Draggendrop

 

 

 

 

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Beittil

That first one is more like "What happens to my brain when imperial units impact it" :(

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Draggendrop

 

This system works well in tough weather conditions...I'll vouch for it.

 

--------------------------------------------

 

Got back from the doctor's office today...after several tests...did not need to see this...and fall off the keyboard.....

 

 

lets make it real bad...

 

DtNTcLZW0AI-E0D.jpg

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Draggendrop

First high-speed full-body 3D scanner ready for clinical tests on humans

 

Quote

Scientists from the University of California Davis in partnership with Shanghai-based United Imaging Healthcare (UIH) have developed a scanner capable of producing 3D images of the entire human body at once. The first images were released on November 17, 2018 and, as promised, they provide a level of detail not available in any other device in the world. Named EXPLORER, the machine has been 13 years in the making and was funded by grants from the National Cancer Institute and the National Institutes of Health. The initial concept for EXPLORER was devised by UC Davis scientists Simon Cherry and Ramsey Badawi, and another 40+ scientists make up the team involved in its development from multiple universities.

 

First3DScan2.jpg

The first full-body 3D scans performed by EXPLORER. | Credit: UC Davis

 

Quote

Using a type of sectional imaging called PET (positron emission tomography), EXPLORER can produce a whole body scan in as little as 20 to 30 seconds, which is about 40 times faster than current scan capabilities. The machine is also unique in its overall sensitivity, specifically 40 times higher than existing commercial systems. This enhanced capability means much higher resolution images, significantly lower radiation dosage requirements, quicker scans, and the ability to track radiotracers for a longer period of time. The fast scanning ability could also avoid the need for anesthesia in young children.

 

PET is a safe medical imaging technique that either maps the location or tracks the movement of dye placed into the body containing miniscule amounts radioactive elements (“radiotracers”). Certain organs and tissue absorb the dye, providing information for doctors to analyze and assess their functionality. Specifically, a PET scan shows where the dye collects. Through this method, blood flow and oxygen activity can be measured, along with many other functions, and it is commonly used to detect cancer, heart problems, and issues with the central nervous system.

 

Given the improvements provided by EXPLORER, the team’s scientists and UIH, the company that built it, hope their machine will improve things in the clinical environment such as diagnosing and tracking diseases, providing detailed information about drug therapies, and obtaining better data on cancer that has metastasized. They are further working together to install the EXPLORER system in Sacramento and plan to begin imaging patients in June of 2019. The goal overall is to make EXPLORER available to the international clinical research community.

https://www.teslarati.com/full-body-human-3d-scanner-clinical-tests/

 

EXPLORER Dynamic Total Body Scan. 

video is 26 seconds

 

 

 

This would be very handy for me right now....

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

DocM

The difficulty with positron emission tomography is the cost. First, the machines are very expensive. Second,  the half-life of the isotopes used is so short, 1.5-120 min for most to  78.41 hours for 89Zr, the facility needs an on-site cyclotron (particle accelerator) to make them just before use.  

 

$$$$

Edited by DocM
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Unobscured Vision

... which means any procedures used with said devices are going to be exorbitantly expensive ... Medical is going to want to profit (endlessly) from their investments.

 

As @DocM said, $$$$.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Draggendrop

I'm a little old fashioned...but if the scan is for a child with cancer...the state can cover the cost.

 

It's a statement for the type of society one has.

 

Us old farts can use a chainsaw and polaroid.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Jim K
On ‎12‎/‎1‎/‎2018 at 3:20 PM, DocM said:

The difficulty with positron emission tomography is the cost. First, the machines are very expensive. Second,  the half-life of the isotopes used is so short, 1.5-120 min for most to  78.41 hours for 89Zr, the facility needs an on-site cyclotron (particle accelerator) to make them just before use.  

 

$$$$

Not necessarily ... especially since F18 is the most frequently used isotope.  You do not need a cyclotron on-site.  Another common isotope (for cardiac), Ru82, is produced onsite through a generator which last 4-8 weeks before needing replacement.  Ga68 can be from a generator as well (good for about one year).  

 

You do have N13, C11 and O15 ... but they are less commonly used and, yes, you would need a Cyclotron in house or a 3rd party (Cardinal Health, GE Healthcare, etc) very close by (O15 certainly needs to be in house).

 

Anyway ... most of the time you'll be getting F18.

 

The Zr89 half life is incredibly long ...

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

DocM

Isotope cows help, but they are not a complete  solution. You still need the ability to generate or quickly acquire the less commonly used radionuclides, and outside of metropolitan centers that means having a cyclotron available. it may not be the  institution's, but it's going to cost either way. 

 

Another cost driver is the combined CT and pet scanners costing north of $2.5 million, unless you buy a reconditioned one. When pricing this system,  much further north and if there is additional hardware there won't be any reconditioned ones on the market.

Edited by DocM
Link to post
Share on other sites

Jim K
1 hour ago, DocM said:

Isotope cows help, but they are not a complete  solution. You still need the ability to generate or quickly acquire the less commonly used radionuclides, and outside of metropolitan centers that means having a cyclotron available. it may not be the  institution's, but it's going to cost either way. 

 

Another cost driver is the combined CT and pet scanners costing north of $2.5 million, unless you buy a reconditioned one. When pricing this system,  much further north and if there is additional hardware there won't be any reconditioned ones on the market.

I did PET for about 10 years (Wilford Hall Medical Center)...we didn't have a cyclotron in house.  I've never heard of isotope "cows" .. assuming you mean a nuclear pharmacy + couriers?  GE Healthcare, Cardinal Health, independent nuclear pharmacies are plentiful...and they are a "complete" solution.  If you are in the middle of nowhere ... your local clinic probably won't have a PET scanner anyway.  Also as mentioned, the other common isotope Ru82, can be produced with a generator (similar to Tc99m)

Link to post
Share on other sites

DocM

Isotope cows =   generators.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

Jim K
2 hours ago, DocM said:

Isotope cows =   generators.  

 

"Isotope cows help, but they are not a complete  solution. "

 

Which is inaccurate. Most nuclear medicine studies utilize Tc99m which is eluted from a Mo99 generator. PET radioisotopes Ru82 and Ga68 are eluted from generators.  F18 is not...it is from a cyclotron.

 

Moly cow ... haven't heard that in a long time. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

DocM
19 hours ago, Jim K said:

 

"Isotope cows help, but they are not a complete  solution. "

 

Which is inaccurate. Most nuclear medicine studies utilize Tc99m which is eluted from a Mo99 generator. 

 

Agreed, but most nuclear medicine studies are not a PET or variant.

Quote

PET radioisotopes Ru82 and Ga68 are eluted from generators.  F18 is not...it is from a cyclotron.

 

Worldwide, 25% of PET installations have a co-sited cyclotron due to the real need for high activity/short half-life isotopes.  Until the distribution system is improved, or high sensitivity scanners like EXPLORER are proven effective and affordable, co-sited cyclotrons are still going to be necessary at many institutions.

 

Quote

 

Moly cow ... haven't heard that in a long time. 

That's because I've been around a very long time. I can remember non-intensified fluoroscopy systems, and the use of primitive ultrasound to diagnose a cerebral midline shift.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Jim K
2 hours ago, DocM said:

 

Agreed, but most nuclear medicine studies are not a PET or variant.

 

Worldwide, 25% of PET installations have a co-sited cyclotron due to the real need for high activity/short half-life isotopes.  Until the distribution system is improved, or high sensitivity scanners like EXPLORER are proven effective and affordable, co-sited cyclotrons are still going to be necessary at many institutions.

 

That's because I've been around a very long time. I can remember non-intensified fluoroscopy systems, and the use of primitive ultrasound to diagnose a cerebral midline shift.

What?  Look, you said that generators are "not a complete solution."  They are for Ru82 and Ga68.  There aren't generators for F18 which is why your "Isotope cows help, but they are not a complete  solution. " is confusing because they are different methods of yielding different radioisotopes.

 

I have no idea where you get your "25% of PET installations have a co-sited cyclotron" ... but that is still very different than your original comment of "facility needs an on-site cyclotron" ...

 

I mean ... I do this for a living now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Draggendrop

Just had to post these...

 

Stellar's Sea Eagle...

 

 

and happy Cappies...

 

Companionable Capybaras

 

Quote

Native to most of South America, the capybara is the largest rodent on Earth. Capybaras can grow to be two feet tall (61 cm) and weigh as much as 175 pounds (79 kg). They are social animals by nature, and they have gained a level of fame worldwide for their seeming ability to make individuals from other species feel at ease in their presence. Collected here: images of capybaras young and old, in the wilds of South America, in safari parks in Europe, hot springs in Japan, and elsewhere, often pictured with a companion or two.

great images at the link...

https://www.theatlantic.com/photo/2018/11/photos-companionable-capybaras/576991/

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Jim K

That is one pretty bird.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Draggendrop

 

 

 

// Thought Alert...

 

Dt2xXQrWsAMk0XC.thumb.jpg.fe459709a9ab81f5a6a6073493c0a1dc.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Jim K pinned this topic

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Ather Fawaz
      New research shows that near-term quantum computers can learn to reason
      by Ather Fawaz



      The applications and development of quantum computers have steadily picked up pace in the last few years. We've seen researchers applying this novel method of computation in a variety of domains including quantum chemistry, fluid dynamics research, open problems, and even machine learning, all with promising results.

      Continuing this trend, UK-based startup Cambridge Quantum Computing (CQC) has now demonstrated that quantum computers "can learn to reason". Confusing at first, this claim is based upon new research coming out of CQC. Dr. Mattia Fiorentini, Head of Quantum Machine Learning at the firm, and his team of researchers investigated using quantum computers for Variational Inference.

      Variational Inference is a process through which we approximate a given probability distribution using stochastic optimization and other learning techniques. Jargon aside, this means a quantum computer outputs potential solutions to inferential questions such as that given the grass is wet and it's cloudy, what's the more probable cause for it? Rain or sprinklers? Formally, the question is posed as follows:

      The team's work, titled Variational inference with a quantum computer, has been published on the pre-print repository arXiv and highlights what the firm believes to be a promising indicator that quantum computers are great for Variational Inference, and by extension, at reasoning.

      In the paper, the researchers demonstrate their results on Bayesian Networks. Three different problem sets were tested. First, was the classic cloud-sprinkler-rain problem that was described above. Second, was the prediction of market regime switches (bull or bear) in a Hidden Markov Model of simulated financial time series. Third, was the task of inferring likely diseases in patients given some information about symptoms and risk factors.

      Using adversarial training and the kernelized Stein discrepancy, the details of both which can be found in the paper, the firm optimized a classical probabilistic classifier and a probabilistic quantum model, called Born machine, in tandem.

      Adversarial method Kernelized Stein discrepancy method Once trained, inference was carried out on the three problems defined earlier, both on a quantum simulator and on IBM Q's real quantum computers. In the truncated histograms shown below, the magenta bars represent the true probability distribution, blue bars indicate outputs from a quantum computing simulator, and grey bars indicate the output from real quantum hardware from IBM Q. The results on real quantum computer hardware are marred by noise and this causes slower convergence compared to the simulation. That is to be expected in the NISQ era, however.

      Truncated histogram of the posterior distribution for a hidden Markov model Histogram of the posterior distribution for a medical diagnosis task The probability distribution of the quantum simulator closely resembles the true probability distribution, indicating that the quantum algorithm has trained well, and that the firm's adversarial training and the kernelized Stein discrepancy methods are powerful algorithms for the intended purpose.

      The firm believes that this is yet an indicator that "sampling from complex distributions is the most promising way towards a quantum advantage with today’s noisy quantum devices." And that its new inference methods "can incorporate domain expertise". Moving forward, the firm envisions "a combination with other machine learning tasks in generative modeling or natural language processing for a meaningful impact."

      Further details can be found in this blog post and the paper on arXiv. If you are interested, you can check out Dr. Mattia's interview on YouTube here.

    • By zikalify
      TWIRL 6: Blue Origin prepares for a human space flight
      by Paul Hill



      Welcome to This Week in Rocket Launches 6, it looks set to be a bit of an interesting week with Blue Origin planning to launch its New Shepard NS-15 mission which will prep the firm for a crewed flight next time around. We’ve also got launches from SpaceX, Rocket Lab, Roscosmos, China, and ExPace which will re-attempt a mission originally slated for last week.

      Monday, March 29
      The first rocket we could see take off this week is ExPace’s Kuaizhou KZ-1A carrying the Jilin Gaofen 2D satellite that will join the Jilin 1 Earth observation constellation. The payload, also known as Jilin 28, is a 230 kg satellite that will be used to take photos of Earth from 535 km. The launch of this rocket is not set in stone but it could go up from Monday.

      SpaceX is also looking to carry out its Starship SN11 mission on Monday. The firm was aiming for a launch last Friday but it was ultimately scrubbed. Similarly to the last two test flights, SN11 will fly to 10 km before attempting to land. During the SN10 mission, Starship did land but it also managed to catch fire which caused the ship's destruction several minutes later. The SN11 mission will be streamed by SpaceX on its YouTube channel when Starship is ready to launch.

      Thursday, April 1
      The first rocket that we could see launch on Thursday is Rocket Lab’s Electron. As part of its STP-27RM mission, Rocket Lab will launch an experimental payload for the U.S. Air Force. The Payload is a space weather instrument called Monolith and is part of the Space Test Program. It will demonstrate the ability of small satellites to support large aperture payloads. While the mission is eligible for launch on Thursday, it could launch later.

      Another mission that will take off from Thursday is the New Shepard NS-15. Blue Origin, who makes New Shepard, is the firm owned by Amazon’s Jeff Bezos. It will be using a booster rocket called Tail 4 which itself comes equipped with an improved BE-3PM engine. The CC 2.0-2 RSS First Step capsule has been upgraded for astronauts who will also come aboard and then leave again before the rocket launch – this will prepare them for NS-16 which will be a crewed mission. You’ll be able to find a stream of the event here. As with the other launches so far, this mission is also marked with a No Earlier Than (NET) tag so it may happen after Thursday. Below is a video from the NS-14 mission:

      The final launch on Thursday will come from Roscosmos who is launching a Soyuz 2.1b with the 4th Resurs-P satellite. The Resurs-P series of satellites are Earth observation satellites that are used by several Russian governmental agencies including Russia’s meteorological agency. The launch was delayed from November 2019 and November 2020.

      Friday, April 2
      The final launch of the week will come from China. The Long March CZ-4C will carry the Gaofen 12-02 remote sensing satellite which will perform high-res Earth observation. The satellite has a sub-meter level resolution which is suited for urban planning, crop yield estimation, and disaster prevention. The mission is being launched for the China High-definition Earth Observation System (CHEOS).

    • By Ather Fawaz
      Lack of thrust and an ad hoc solution to SN8's explosion led to Starship SN10's fiery ending
      by Ather Fawaz



      Less than a week ago, SpaceX almost succeeded in completing a flawless test flight for the Starship SN10. And things were looking up until a few moments after a successful ascent and touchdown back to earth. Just like the SN8 and SN9 predecessors before it, SN10 too met a fiery, explosive ending.

      It was unclear why the rocket exploded, especially after it had touched down and remained stationary for close to a minute. SpaceX founder and CEO, Elon Musk, has now cleared up some confusion on that front. Musk tweeted that "the SN10 engine was low on thrust due (probably) to partial helium ingestion from the fuel header tank." And that the prototype plummeted towards the earth at an impact velocity of 10m/s that crushed some legs and parts of the skirt.

      As spotted by Engadget, Chris Bergin of NASA Spaceflight pointed out that the helium ingestion was caused by the pressurization system that was added to the CH4 tank to prevent what caused the SN8 to explode. Musk replied to Bergin stating that this was a reasonable point, and that "...if autogenous pressurization had been used, CH4 bubbles would most likely have reverted to liquid. Helium in header was used to prevent ullage collapse from slosh, which happened in prior flight. My fault for approving. Sounded good at the time."

      Despite this, the SN10's touchdown represents a big step forward for the Starship program and SpaceX at large. The firm was quick on bringing the next prototype, the SN11, to the stand at Boca Chica, preparing for its test flight sometime later. As Austin Barnard photographed, the team of engineers on-site inspected every landing leg of the SN11. SpaceX hopes that the insight gained from its predecessors, including the SN10, will be used to do away with past mistakes and progress towards a successful test flight for the SN11.

    • By zikalify
      Apple shares Hearing Study insights for World Hearing Day
      by Paul Hill



      In time for World Hearing Day, which takes place globally on March 3, Apple has shared some of its findings from a study it is carrying out on the long-term auditory health of its users in the United States. Apple said the participation levels in this study are on a scale never seen before thanks to the ease of participation; users can partake in the study using an Apple Watch and iPhone and sharing their health data.

      One of the interesting findings revealed that 25% of participants experience environmental sounds higher than the World Health Organization’s (WHO) recommended limit. This noise can come from anywhere including traffic, machinery, and public transport. The WHO has estimated that 700 million people around the world will be affected by profound hearing loss by 2050 - with its Noise app on Apple Watch, the tech firm hopes to save some of its users from hearing loss.

      Another source of hearing loss is the way we use headphones to listen to music. One in ten of Apple’s participants listen to sounds through headphones at a level above WHO recommendations. Apple says that to protect hearing, users ought to listen to media at the lowest enjoyable volume rather than at full blast.

      The study seems to suggest that a lot of people are neglecting their ears; around 10% of participants have been diagnosed with hearing loss by a professional and over these, three-quarters do not use tools such as hearing aids or cochlear implants even though they can reduce the impact of hearing loss. Furthermore, Apple found that a huge 50% of participants hadn’t had their hearing tested by a professional in the last 10 years and a quarter of all participants reported a ringing in their ears which is a sign of hearing loss.

      To take part in the study yourself, head over to the App Store and download the Apple Research app. If you’re not sure how good your hearing is or lack access to testing facilities, the World Health Organization provides an app for Android and iOS called HearWHO where you have to listen out for numbers being read out in static, this can give you an estimate about how good your hearing is.

    • By Ather Fawaz
      Elon Musk claims that his wired-up Neuralink monkey is happy and enjoys playing video games
      by Ather Fawaz

      Image via The Telegraph Neuralink is Elon Musk's bold initiative to create an interface between a brain and a computer chip. Revealed back in 2017, the company was funded entirely out of Musk's own pocket. While many raised suspicions about the potential misuse of the technology, Musk insists that its raison d'etre is to cure medical injuries related to the spinal cord and brain and improve cognition and memory. Over the years, there have been a bunch of updates on the project. Perhaps most importantly, the chip was successfully implanted in a monkey, allowing it to control a computer with its brain. While the exact nature of this control wasn't entirely clear, Musk dubbed that result as "very positive."

      Building on this, Musk gave a couple of added details about Neuralink's tests on monkeys. Bloomberg reports that while speaking to Clubhouse, which is a private social app where users engage in informal conversations, Musk told several thousand listeners that his company has a happy monkey with Neuralink implanted in its skull who enjoys playing video games:

      When Neuralink's working was first highlighted, many people raised a concern that implanting a device in the skull would not only be a notoriously difficult procedure, but it might not look all that cosmetically pleasing either. Speaking to Joe Rogan on his podcast, the billionaire clarified that the device would sit flush with the skull. He further added on Clubhouse today that:

      Going back to his plugged-in monkeys, he further indicated that their videos could be released in about a month. As with the experiments before, the exact nature and details of the controllability of the computer are unclear. The videos could clear up the confusion, and for those, we shall be on the lookout.

      Source: Bloomberg