Recommended Posts

Hi there,

 

I'm running a network where I have a small home office with a few wired PC's, a small server and a few wireless devices. I'm connecting it to my Internet connection which is across the house and has an Xbox, Roku, Alexa, and similar devices.

 

The Office was wired for DirecTV and there's a cable near the Internet router. So, I set up MoCA to bridge them, but it's not 100% reliable. I have two ASUS RT-AC68R (802.11 ac) routers, one as an access point and the other as a AP. I've tried running the AP as a bridge, but it's also not 100% reliable.  I tried running both at the same time and as a mesh, but loops seem to cause the MoCA bridge to go completely crazy (I thought STP would handle this).

 

I needed to get some new switches at some point, so I picked up two used PowerConnect 2808 managed switches.

 

Can I connect two Dell PowerConnect 2808 switches via both MoCA and WiFi bridge mode at the same time or should I just give up and try to make the entire office wireless?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1377002-connecting-lan-segments-question/
Share on other sites

Your going to have to draw up this mess...

Quote

tried running the AP as a bridge

What do you think an AP is ;)

 

I have no idea what your doing - and where you thought STP would of come into play with some moca bridge and AP?

 

Draw this up and we can discuss.. What device make and model do you have for moca bridge.

Apologies for the diagram, I don't have Visio right now.

 

I omitted the wireless devices on the network, it's the usual household stuff, phones, tablet, etc..

The MoCA bridge consists of two Actiontec ECB6200K02s. 

The switches are currently both Netgear GS108E "managed" switches. The Dell switches are on their way.

The APs are ASUS RT-AC68R and also have a 4 port switch on board.

I've tried using the ActonTec's plugged into both the Netgear and the Asus with no changes.

 

I really want some kind of redundant link or maybe a load balanced link, so when the MoCA adapter decides to go out the home office computers keep working using WiFi.

 

Running Ethernet would be the best solution, but I can't do that at this time. 

Network Layout.png

That drawing is fine...

 

There should be no problem with such a connection and there wouldn't be any loop there - unless your trying to setup some sort of backhaul over the wireless devices as well?  Ie a client bridge sort of setup..

 

Could you give more details of how you have your office AP setup?

 

Here is how you would do it.. On your livingroom wifi router this would be just normal typical soho setup.. Your network is say 192.168.0/24 running dhcp on this box  and your SSID setup lets call it HomeSSID.. Now to use your office device as just an AP... connect a LAN port to your switch, turn off its dhcp server and set its lan IP to be on your network 192.168.0.X/24  Setup its SSID to be HomeSSID..

 

There you go.. there would be no loops or issues.

 

When you say your having issues.. Take your laptop into the livingroom and plug into switch port either on your switch or your router and then run say iperf between the laptop and workstartion... What speeds you seeing over the moca connection?  Run a long ping, say like 1000 or more packets... Are you seeing any loss?

 

When you say you want a backup connection.. You want a wifi backhaul incase the moca goes out.. Are rats going to chew through the cable?  If your really worried about the devices going bad.. Buy another set as spare ;)

 

You could setup a wifi backhaul but its way more effort than its worth, You prob be better off with some real AP, like unifi which could drop to wireless uplink on case of wired network connectivity but since they are poe that prob going to be some really odd failure mode.

 

If you want multiple paths for redundancy, run another cable or ethernet or fiber ;)  Or buy wifi bridges and use those and sure with managed switches you could setup a lagg for failover redundancy.  Do you really think those moca devices are going to just fail?

That's the current connection in the diagram, I tried using WiFi at one point, but it's not reliable as there are too many walls between the two. The Office AP is just set up with the same SSID as the router using Ethernet to MoCA as a backhaul.

 

The MoCA connection dies under heavy load. If 3 computers are downloading at full speed it will drop packets and eventually reset, coming back up a minute or so later and repeating the process shortly after. 

 

Running Ethernet will be the best solution, but the house is old enough to need lots of wall drilling and outside cabling, there's no common attic or basement between the two rooms, I was hoping to avoid that. When the new switches arrive, I was thinking about using a lagg with the 2 bridges (one WiFi, one MoCA), if that's possible. That's my real question, is that a workable solution? Can I use both at the same time and load balance and also have some redundancy if one goes down?

 

You can sure but its not going to be very good because the speeds are going to be way different..

 

When you say 3 computers downloading at full speed that means what?  You saying your saturating the gig connection that those devices are suppose to be able to do?

 

I would using iperf generate a specific amount of traffic to find out where they have a problem.. When with your smart switches you can rate limit the connection over the moca to that speed.

 

BTW - did you just try powerline adapters?  That is going to be better than wifi to be honest..

7 hours ago, BudMan said:

You can sure but its not going to be very good because the speeds are going to be way different..

 

When you say 3 computers downloading at full speed that means what?  You saying your saturating the gig connection that those devices are suppose to be able to do?

 

I would using iperf generate a specific amount of traffic to find out where they have a problem.. When with your smart switches you can rate limit the connection over the moca to that speed.

 

BTW - did you just try powerline adapters?  That is going to be better than wifi to be honest..

Nowhere near the gig connection, it's a 150Mbps line out, so somewhere near that.  I'll see if I can duplicate with iperf. I think the adapters just can't handle lots of traffic from multiple computers at the same time. If I start a steam download on 2 PC's it will start to disrupt things, even with QoS on.

 

I did try powerline, which is what I used (with great success) before I moved here, unfortunately, it didn't work out and was far slower than WiFi.

 

The model of moca adapter you linked too says they can do gig..

 

https://www.actiontec.com/products/home-networking/ecb6200/

 

Your internet has zero to do with what those adapters should be able to handle..

 

Maybe its your router?  Maybe its your ISP... what exactly is your problem located is the issue it seems to me.. What firmware are you running on your main router?  I would test what those moca adapters through your switch can do.. You can use iperf to generate traffic and see what speeds you can get... You can have it run that for a long time... etc. etc..

 

If those adapters do not come close to their specs - then contact them for support, etc.  That connection should be rock freaking solid..

 

 

1 minute ago, BudMan said:

The model of moca adapter you linked too says they can do gig..

 

https://www.actiontec.com/products/home-networking/ecb6200/

 

Your internet has zero to do with what those adapters should be able to handle..

 

Maybe its your crap router?

 

 

It's not the router, the adapters drop the connection and the coax light goes off and back on. I'm thinking it's a flaw in that model.

Just now, BudMan said:

See my edit - then contact them..  Generate some traffic that you can control and then get with them on the details.

I will definitely do that. 

On 11/29/2018 at 1:22 PM, BudMan said:

Unless there is something wrong with the cable that connection should be rock solid.. Sure and the hell should be way better than some wifi bridge off soho equipment.

I ordered a cable tester to make sure. 

So what kind of bandwidth could you push with iperf?  You know I have a thread around here where I compile the latest iperf3 versions for windows and have it available for download.

9 hours ago, BudMan said:

So what kind of bandwidth could you push with iperf?  You know I have a thread around here where I compile the latest iperf3 versions for windows and have it available for download.

The new switch should arrive today, I'm testing after that is set up and while the family is out. I'll let you know.

 

Also, I downloaded your copy, thanks!

Interesting thing, I was able to plug in both MoCA and the AP (as a media bridge) with my newer switch and it did not cause the MoCA adapter to restart, even though it was essentially a loop. I'm wondering if part of the problem is my switch.

So the moca was only able to do 350?  Or was that your old switch?  Yeah not really a fan of some of the soho dumb switches.. I run the cicso sg300, have a 28 and 10 model on my home network.. Fair price and good switch.. they are near eol but get a couple more years out of them.. You can not go wrong spending a few extra bucks on a decent switch that is for sure..

 

No offense but trying to do a wifi, lan lagg is not doing anyone any favors... If your wire is failing then you need to figure out why it fails and makes sure it doesn't.. A wireless sort of backup is great for out of band access when say the fiber gets cut sort of thing... But its not something you would load share, etc..  Its akin to the old school dial up backup... Yeah if that wire goes down I will dial in via your pots line ;)

 

Or what that limit of your pcs?  You should really do some good testing..

PC -- wire -- Laptop = speed?

PC -- switch -- Laptop = speed?

PC -- moca -- cable --- moca -- laptop = speed?

PC -- switch -- moca -- cable -- moca -- laptop = speed?

PC -- switch -- moca -- cable -- moca -- switch -- laptop = speed?

 

Then swap out those ###### switches with your new switches, etc..  You need to figure out where problem or bottleneck actually is, etc.

 

Sure to have to replace them in next few years.. But that will some 802.3bz, 10ge switch I am sure..  I know for sure the next switch I buy will not be 1 gig switch.. While it might not do 10ge copper it will for sure support 802.3bz..

 

If the netgear MS510TX was a bit cheaper be a good home soho switch for future proofing for sure!

 

You need to really clarify where the 350 bottleneck was.. if moca - I would be screaming to them about their 1gig claims!!

53 minutes ago, BudMan said:

So the moca was only able to do 350?  Or was that your old switch?  Yeah not really a fan of some of the soho dumb switches.. I run the cicso sg300, have a 28 and 10 model on my home network.. Fair price and good switch.. they are near eol but get a couple more years out of them.. You can not go wrong spending a few extra bucks on a decent switch that is for sure..

 

No offense but trying to do a wifi, lan lagg is not doing anyone any favors... If your wire is failing then you need to figure out why it fails and makes sure it doesn't.. A wireless sort of backup is great for out of band access when say the fiber gets cut sort of thing... But its not something you would load share, etc..  Its akin to the old school dial up backup... Yeah if that wire goes down I will dial in via your pots line ;)

 

Or what that limit of your pcs?  You should really do some good testing..

PC -- wire -- Laptop = speed?

PC -- switch -- Laptop = speed?

PC -- moca -- cable --- moca -- laptop = speed?

PC -- switch -- moca -- cable -- moca -- laptop = speed?

PC -- switch -- moca -- cable -- moca -- switch -- laptop = speed?

 

Then swap out those ###### switches with your new switches, etc..  You need to figure out where problem or bottleneck actually is, etc.

 

Sure to have to replace them in next few years.. But that will some 802.3bz, 10ge switch I am sure..  I know for sure the next switch I buy will not be 1 gig switch.. While it might not do 10ge copper it will for sure support 802.3bz..

 

If the netgear MS510TX was a bit cheaper be a good home soho switch for future proofing for sure!

 

You need to really clarify where the 350 bottleneck was.. if moca - I would be screaming to them about their 1gig claims!!

 

I tested all configurations,

Local direct and switch is 950.

PC -- moca -- cable --- moca -- laptop = 355

PC -- switch -- moca -- cable -- moca -- laptop = 350

PC -- switch -- moca -- cable -- moca -- switch -- laptop = 350

The 350 bottleneck is the MoCA adapter.

 

Wireless was 380.

 

I wouldn't rule out a bad cable somewhere, it's in the wall and not easily accessible. 

I found an updated firmware for the MoCA adapters, now I'm at 950Mbps! 

 

PC -- switch -- moca -- cable -- moca -- switch -- laptop = 950 Mbps now.

 

Now to see how stable it is.

 

You could just save yourself a ton of grief, time, thinking, testing etc etc by just running a nice friendly ethernet cable along the floor boards or the ceiling corner to the home office plain and simple - keep in place with duct tape or staples and then just yank it out after your adventures in hole drilling - why wait for the "promised land" when you can have it today?

 

 

1 hour ago, DevTech said:

You could just save yourself a ton of grief, time, thinking, testing etc etc by just running a nice friendly ethernet cable along the floor boards or the ceiling corner to the home office plain and simple - keep in place with duct tape or staples and then just yank it out after your adventures in hole drilling - why wait for the "promised land" when you can have it today?

 

 

Cute, but no.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft admits one of the most crucial Outlook features is currently broken by Sayan Sen Microsoft is making some decent progress when it comes to Windows 11. Recently we have confirmed reports of some rather useful improvements landing in the next version of the OS, 26H2, wherein GPU driver TDR crashes may finally be fixed, plus the company is also allowing users to disable web content on the Search. On the Outlook front though things have not been so rosy. Last month in May we reported several problems affecting basic functionalities on the app. These included a problem where documents would open blank or corrupt themselves. Following that, Quick Steps, a very useful feature, would no longer work correctly, and finally, Microsoft acknowledged a problem wherein images would fail to load up properly inside the email. Microsoft had resolved those bugs later and almost exactly a month after we reported on them, the company has now admitted a new similarly basic issue, this time on Macs. Users recently started noticing that Outlook would no longer display email threads properly as the original message itself was not displayed. An affected user Tsoumpas, C (ngmb) nicely described the problem in a forum post they made on Microsoft's site. They wrote: "Description of the issue: After updating Outlook for Mac [Version 16.110 (26061317)] on 18/6/2026, replying to any email no longer includes the original message in the reply window. Prior to the update, replies correctly contained the original email text below my response. Expected behavior: The original message should be included in the reply, as in previous Outlook versions and according to the configured reply settings. Actual behavior: The reply window contains only a blank composition area (or only my response), with none of the original email text included." Obviously this must be a highly frustrating for users as noted by several in that thread. The post, at the time of writing, has also been upvoted by more than 40 users indicating that is a fairly widespread bug. Thankfully Microsoft seems to have acknowledged the problem right around that time as it opened a new issue on its official website. In the support article, the company recommends switching to Outlook for Mac from the legacy app, where the problem appears to be happening.
    • PotPlayer 260622 by Razvan Serea PotPlayer is an extremely light-weight multimedia player for Windows. It feels like the KMPlayer, but is in active development. Supports almost every available video formats out there. PotPlayer contains internal codecs and there is no need to install codecs manually. Other key features include WebCam/Analog/Digital TV devices support, gapless video playback, DXVA, live broadcasting. Distinctive features of the player is a high quality playback, support for all modern video and audio formats and a built DXVA video codecs. A wide range of subtitles are supported and you are also able to capture audio, video, and screenshots. A comprehensive video and audio player, that also supports TV channels, subtitles and skins. Its been described on the Internet as The KMPlayer redux, and it pretty much is. Daum PotPlayer 260622 (1.7.22963) changelog: Removed Kakao TV Added pause function when navigating via the navigation bar Significantly improved internal stability Fixed an issue where colors appeared strange during RGB24 processing Improved playback for some HTTP streams Improved sync processing for the built-in audio renderer Fixed an issue where certain MP4 files behaved abnormally during playback Download: Daum PotPlayer (64-bit) | 54.7 MB (Freeware) Download: Daum PotPlayer (32-bit) | 61.1 MB View: Daum PotPlayer Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Tixati 3.44 is out.
    • Speccy 1.34.084 by Razvan Serea Speccy will give you detailed statistics on every piece of hardware in your computer. Including CPU, Motherboard, RAM, Graphics Cards, Hard Disks, Optical Drives, Audio support. Additionally Speccy adds the temperatures of your different components, so you can easily see if there's a problem! Processor brand and model Hard drive size and speed Amount of memory (RAM) Graphics card Operating system At first glance, Speccy may seem like an application for system administrators and power users. It certainly is, but Speccy can also help normal users, in everyday computing life. If you need to add more memory to your system, for example, you can check how many memory slots your computer has and what memory's already installed. Then you can go out and buy the right type of memory to add on or replace what you've already got. Download: Speccy 1.34.084 | 20.5 MB (Freeware) View: Speccy Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • ImgDrive 2.2.7 by Razvan Serea ImgDrive is a CD/DVD/BD emulator - a tool that allows you to mount optical disc images by simply clicking on them in Windows Explorer. If you have downloaded an ISO image and want to use it without burning it to a blank disc, ImgDrive is the easiest way to do it. ImgDrive features: One-click mounting of iso, cue, nrg, mds/mdf, ccd, isz images Runs on 32-bit and 64-bit Windows versions Mount ape, flac, m4a, wav, wavpack, tta file as AUDIO CD (16-bit/44.1kHz) Mount a folder as DVD/BD Mount images in command line Does not require rebooting after installation Support up to 7 virtual drives at the same time Support multi session disc image (ccd/mds/nrg) A special portable version is available Translated to more than 10 languages Support File Type: .ccd - CloneCD image files .cue - Cue sheets files of ape/flac/m4a/tta/wav/wv/bin .iso - Standard ISO image files .isz - Compressed ISO image files .nrg - Nero image files .mds - Media descriptor image files ImgDrive 2.2.7 changelog: Added command line parameter to set number of drives Added AACS-Auth support for HD DVD Bumped kernel driver version to 2.2.7 Download: ImgDrive 2.2.7 | 692 KB (Freeware, paid upgrade available) Download: ImgDrive Portable 535 KB View: ImgDrive Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      tuben earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      mnsgroup earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      522
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      199
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      94
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      82
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!