Recommended Posts

Please don't screw this up, please don't screw this up, please don't......

 

 

Quote

//

 

Entertainment Weekly has learned exclusively that Jason Reitman will direct and co-write an upcoming film set in the world that was saved decades previously by the proton pack-wearing working stiffs in the original 1984 movie, which was directed by his father, Ivan Reitman.

 

“I’ve always thought of myself as the first Ghostbusters fan, when I was a 6-year-old visiting the set. I wanted to make a movie for all the other fans,” Reitman says. “This is the next chapter in the original franchise. It is not a reboot. What happened in the ‘80s happened in the ‘80s, and this is set in the present day.”

 

Sony Pictures has dated the film for Summer 2020, with plans to start shooting in a few months.

 

It’s still too soon to reveal the plot of the screenplay, who the new characters will be, or whether the original actors like Dan Aykroyd, Ernie Hudson, or Bill Murray will return. Harold Ramis died in 2014.

 

“This is very early, and I want the film to unwrap like a present. We have a lot of wonderful surprises and new characters for the audience to meet,” says Reitman, who co-wrote the screenplay with Monster House and Poltergeist remake filmmaker Gil Kenan.

 

//snip

 

Entertainment Weekly

 

Same world as the original...directed by the son of the original director.  I have hopes for this...looking forward to future information (casting) and trailers.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1378769-ghostbusters-2020/
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, sava700 said:

About time -the one with the women (no disrespect) was absolutely garbage!!

I enjoyed the all women one, it was fine. My main issue wasn't them or the movie itself, but the decision to reboot the franchise and pretend the originals didn't happen. They could of been the daughters of the original Ghostbusters or just randoms who got inspired by them, so many ways to respect the originals. Instead that just pretend it didn't happen. So I don't need to pretend that movie didn't exist, because it did that itself by removing itself from the canon of the original movies.

 

I have mixed feelings about this, however, if they could get Rick Moranis to make a cameo (or even a bigger part) that would be awesome. Since Harold Ramis has left this world, I'd assume they'll just have it the character has passed on too since this looks to be picking up quite a few years after Ghostbusters 2. I hope they don't try to CGI him back, I loved the character Egon but I don't want someone else playing him and/or using CGI trickery to make it seem he is back. Out of respect to the actor. Considering the ages of the surviving actors, this will most likely be a "passing the torch" to the next generation type of movie. This is what the all female Ghostbusters *should* of been. Let's seen if they can get it right this time...

  • Like 2
34 minutes ago, Xerxes said:

I enjoyed the all women one, it was fine. My main issue wasn't them or the movie itself, but the decision to reboot the franchise and pretend the originals didn't happen. They could of been the daughters of the original Ghostbusters or just randoms who got inspired by them, so many ways to respect the originals. Instead that just pretend it didn't happen. So I don't need to pretend that movie didn't exist, because it did that itself by removing itself from the canon of the original movies.

 

I have mixed feelings about this, however, if they could get Rick Moranis to make a cameo (or even a bigger part) that would be awesome. Since Harold Ramis has left this world, I'd assume they'll just have it the character has passed on too since this looks to be picking up quite a few years after Ghostbusters 2. I hope they don't try to CGI him back, I loved the character Egon but I don't want someone else playing him and/or using CGI trickery to make it seem he is back. Out of respect to the actor. Considering the ages of the surviving actors, this will most likely be a "passing the torch" to the next generation type of movie. This is what the all female Ghostbusters *should* of been. Let's seen if they can get it right this time...

I tried to get through the last one after it came to video but gave up on it quickly.  To be fair, I plan to run at it again. A 5.3 rating makes it at least watchable.

""I’ve always thought of myself as the first Ghostbusters fan, when I was a 6-year-old visiting the set. I wanted to make a movie for all the other fans,” Reitman says."

 

Let's hope he can actually do it. Just because he's the guys son doesn't mean he's capable of making the same kind of movie.

  • Like 2
1 minute ago, trag3dy said:

""I’ve always thought of myself as the first Ghostbusters fan, when I was a 6-year-old visiting the set. I wanted to make a movie for all the other fans,” Reitman says."

 

Let's hope he can actually do it. Just because he's the guys son doesn't mean he's capable of making the same kind of movie.

Ivan is allegedly on board too...

1 minute ago, jnelsoninjax said:

So will this be a reboot or a completely different story? I thought the original was not all that good, but then again it was the 80's as well, CGI has made massive improvements.

Sequel this time. They tried doing a reboot and well it didn't end well. So now they are giving fans what they really want, a true sequel! although it probably won't be the sequel most fans expect. The original (surviving) actors are getting on abit now, it will most likely be more a "passing the torch" type of movie. I got no problem with that as that is what the all female movie *should* of been. Pay respect to the guys who started it, have one last hurrah and by the end the new guys are ready to take over. That is what I'm hoping for anyway. So take with a grain of salt...

6 hours ago, Xerxes said:

I hope they don't try to CGI him back, I loved the character Egon but I don't want someone else playing him and/or using CGI trickery to make it seem he is back. Out of respect to the actor.

I see what you're saying, but at the same time I think it could be kinda cool if there were maybe a passing shot of him as a ghost, similar to the way Ron Jeremy appears in the first film: you'd miss him if you didn't know to look for him.

  • Like 2
8 hours ago, jnelsoninjax said:

So will this be a reboot or a completely different story? I thought the original was not all that good, but then again it was the 80's as well, CGI has made massive improvements.

The original holds strong - it's not about the CGI, it's about it being a damned funny comedy that uses the supernatural as a setting.  The CGI in the all-female reboot was fine, but the film itself was dirge.

I have not seen the all female one, what was it called? I might have to see about watching it just to say I did!

55 minutes ago, Human.Online said:

The original holds strong - it's not about the CGI, it's about it being a damned funny comedy that uses the supernatural as a setting.  The CGI in the all-female reboot was fine, but the film itself was dirge.

Oh, I agree with you there, for its time the movie was a damned good one, but it wasn't all that good, it just was a more radical approach to the supernatural genre, which there weren't many at that time.

5 minutes ago, jnelsoninjax said:

but it wasn't all that good

Not arguing just curious, what did you dislike about it?

 

I found it scary in places (I was about 5),I did and do still find it funny & engaging - to the point it's become iconic and utterly quotable, almost a template for it's genre.

Looking forward to see what Ivan Reitman's son comes up with but I am confident it won't destroy the franchise like the terrible reboot one did.

 

I saw the Ghostbusters maxipad one at Christmas (it was on TV) and Hollyweird needs to stop trying to be all PC, because it is getting old.

5 hours ago, Nick H. said:

I see what you're saying, but at the same time I think it could be kinda cool if there were maybe a passing shot of him as a ghost, similar to the way Ron Jeremy appears in the first film: you'd miss him if you didn't know to look for him.

That would be cool actually if the other original cast members come back.  Don't include him as a normal CGI character, but showing him like this would be a nice tribute in the film.

 

Never could bring myself to watch the reboot.

5 hours ago, Steven P. said:

I saw the Ghostbusters maxipad one at Christmas (it was on TV) and Hollyweird needs to stop trying to be all PC, because it is getting old.

So here's the thing... I don't see it as "being PC" because it absolutely wasn't - it was just a bad film, unfunny and simplistic with a weak story.  Sony knew this, but very slyly wound up the "Hollywood being PC" brigade so they could ad-homonym.  "Didn't like the film?  That's because you're a scared little misogynist."

 

So why wasn't it PC?

 

The original, we have Winston - very much a member of the team who happens to be black.  It's not part of his "character" per-se, he's not a stereotype or such - he just happens to be black.

Then the new version we have Patty, very much the equivalent many would argue as the sole black member of the group.  And we see her stereotyping it up with "aw hell naw" comments and so on.

The maxipad reboot was very much a step backwards for actually addressing and integrating black people into the movies.

1 hour ago, Human.Online said:

So here's the thing... I don't see it as "being PC" because it absolutely wasn't - it was just a bad film, unfunny and simplistic with a weak story.  Sony knew this, but very slyly wound up the "Hollywood being PC" brigade so they could ad-homonym.  "Didn't like the film?  That's because you're a scared little misogynist."

 

So why wasn't it PC?

 

The original, we have Winston - very much a member of the team who happens to be black.  It's not part of his "character" per-se, he's not a stereotype or such - he just happens to be black.

Then the new version we have Patty, very much the equivalent many would argue as the sole black member of the group.  And we see her stereotyping it up with "aw hell naw" comments and so on.

The maxipad reboot was very much a step backwards for actually addressing and integrating black people into the movies.

It wasnt about racial equality but gender "justice", and this wasnt the only movie being re-done with all female characters... and whatever male characters were introduced, they were either dumb or evil... It's Hollywood's attempt to reset the gender baseline... from Movies to Games...

BTW original Ghostbusters were classic... and yes as someone else mentioned, it wasnt about the special effects but about the story and comedy behind it.

 

  • Like 3
23 minutes ago, Euphoria said:

It wasnt about racial equality but gender "justice", and this wasnt the only movie being re-done with all female characters... and whatever male characters were introduced, they were either dumb or evil... It's Hollywood's attempt to reset the gender baseline... from Movies to Games...

BTW original Ghostbusters were classic... and yes as someone else mentioned, it wasnt about the special effects but about the story and comedy behind it.

 

Yes! You hit the nail on the head.

On 1/17/2019 at 12:37 AM, sava700 said:

About time -the one with the women (no disrespect) was absolutely garbage!!

I am with you on this, the women one ruined it for me. This is a film series i grew up with and it got ruined by this utter garbage.

 

Hopefully this one is all male.

28 minutes ago, Orange said:

This is a film series i grew up with and it got ruined by this utter garbage.

While I agree, it was utter tripe... How did it it ruin it?  Did it go back and retrospectively alter the films?  Did it make you remember them less fondly?

 

Personally, it made me re-watch and enjoy the original (and GB2 is not an amazing film so let's not act like the "originals" did no wrong).  And you could argue that Sony/Columbia have learned what people actually want, and the 2016 re-hash made sufficient money to prompt them to keep the franchise on-radar but learn from the mistakes.

I'm optimistic. And as for Egon, I'd be up for an appearance as a ghost, perhaps played by his voice actor from The Real Ghostbusters. 

 

The new cast doesn't have to be all-male IMO, just handled better than the reboot. Perhaps borrow some ideas from Extreme Ghostbusters, which had a more diverse cast of characters without feeling forced or pandering. Only with better writing, of course. 

Will await casting and info on director, etc until I decide to see it. I'm hoping it is at least as socially conscious as the 'reboot' film and that they hire cast and crew from a non-profit service that seeks to diversify cast and crew such as Free The Bid. If it's just some chest thumping ultra-macho type film then I doubt I'll be interested.

  • Facepalm 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Google adds built-in computer control to Gemini 3.5 flash by Karthik Mudaliar Google has added Computer Use as a built-in tool in Gemini 3.5 Flash, giving developers a single model that can reason about a task and operate graphical interfaces across browsers, mobile devices, and desktop environments. The feature is available through the Gemini API and Google’s Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform, although it remains a preview feature for now. Computer Use enables an AI agent to examine screenshots and return actions such as mouse clicks, scrolling, and keyboard input. A developer’s application must execute those actions, capture the resulting screen, and send it back to Gemini, creating a continuous loop until the task is completed. Google says the integration can be used for activities including repetitive form filling, application testing, research across multiple websites, and longer enterprise workflows. Gemini 3.5 Flash can work with browser, mobile, and desktop environments, whereas Google’s earlier standalone Computer Use model was primarily positioned around browser interaction. The main change is consolidation. Computer control was previously offered through the separate Gemini 2.5 Computer Use preview model. As Neowin reported when that model was introduced, it was designed to interpret a visual interface and generate actions without requiring a website-specific API. Google later brought Computer Use to preview versions of Gemini 3 Pro and Gemini 3 Flash in January 2026. The latest release now incorporates the tool into the stable Gemini 3.5 Flash model rather than requiring developers to select a specialized model solely for interface automation. Gemini 3.5 Flash itself was announced in May as Google’s latest fast model for coding and multi-step agent workflows. It supports a one-million-token input context window and up to 65,000 output tokens, along with adjustable thinking levels that let developers trade additional reasoning for lower latency and cost. Google also added that Gemini 3.5 Flash received targeted adversarial training for computer-use scenarios. The company is also offering safeguards that can require user confirmation before sensitive or irreversible actions and automatically stop a workflow when suspected prompt injection is detected. Its developer documentation describes configurable protections for areas such as financial transactions and changes to sensitive records. Google isn't the first to bring Computer Use to its platform. Anthropic has made computer control available through Claude, while OpenAI has continued improving computer-use performance in its recent models. Microsoft has also applied the concept to business workflows, including a Computer Use capability for the Researcher agent in Microsoft 365 Copilot.
    • After I installed KB5095093, the volume on my ARM laptop won't go above 20%. It's stuck on the hearing protection level, which is pretty much useless if you want to listen to anything. I rolled back.
    • Amazon Prime Day slashes Samsung's newest Galaxy Watch Ultra by 45 percent by Karthik Mudaliar Samsung’s flagship Android smartwatch has received one of its steepest Prime Day cuts. Amazon has dropped the 2025 Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra in Titanium Blue to $357.24, saving buyers around $292 from its $649.99 list price. That's a 45 percent discount (purchase link below). The 47mm Galaxy Watch Ultra uses a titanium casing and a 1.5-inch Super AMOLED display with a resolution of 480 x 480 and peak brightness of 3,000 nits. It includes LTE connectivity, Bluetooth 5.3, Wi-Fi, NFC, and dual-frequency L1+L5 GPS for more accurate outdoor route tracking. The 2025 model has 64GB of storage, a 590mAh battery, sapphire crystal glass, 10ATM water resistance, IP68 protection, and MIL-STD-810H durability testing. Its health and fitness tools include heart rate monitoring, sleep coaching, Energy Score, Running Coach, body composition analysis, temperature sensing, and ECG support, where available. This model is best suited to Android users who regularly run, hike, cycle, or train outdoors and want cellular access without carrying a phone. The larger battery, rugged construction, bright display, and dedicated Quick Button also make it a stronger option than Samsung’s regular Galaxy Watch models for extended workouts and demanding environments. Grab the Titanium Blue Galaxy Watch Ultra before the Prime Day price resets: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025) [Sold and Shipped by Amazon] Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Google begins rolling out its post-Epic Play Store billing model next week by Karthik Mudaliar Google has confirmed that its redesigned Play Store billing and fee structure will take effect on June 30, 2026, in the United States, the United Kingdom, and the European Economic Area. The changes will let eligible developers offer their own payment systems or send users to an external website for purchases, while separating Google’s platform service fee from the cost of using Google Play Billing. The rollout puts concrete dates and detailed rate cards behind the broader Android policy overhaul Google announced in March. That announcement followed a proposed settlement with Epic Games intended to resolve their long-running disputes over app distribution and payments, although the U.S. portion of the agreement still requires court approval. Under the new billing choice program, developers selling digital content or services can display an alternative payment option alongside Google Play Billing. They may also direct users to their own websites to complete a purchase. Developers can use Google’s standard payment-choice screen or design one that complies with the company’s user-interface rules. Choosing another payment processor does not eliminate Google’s cut altogether. The company will continue charging a service fee for transactions associated with apps distributed through Google Play, regardless of whether payment is handled by Google, an alternative provider, or a developer’s website. Google argues that this fee covers the value and infrastructure provided by Android and the Play Store. For developers earning up to $1 million annually, the service fee will generally be 10 percent. That rate also applies to auto-renewing subscriptions. When Google Play Billing is used in the U.S., U.K., or EEA, Google will add a separate 5 percent billing fee, and developers processing payments elsewhere will not pay that additional charge. This means Google’s familiar flat 30 percent commission is disappearing, but developers will not necessarily see a dramatic reduction on every transaction. An in-app purchase from an existing user processed through Google Play Billing can still reach a combined 30 percent. The biggest savings are likely to come from subscriptions, smaller developers covered by the $1 million tier, and companies able to move customers to their own payment infrastructure. Google is also offering lower rates through its Apps Experience and revamped Games Level Up programs. Apps and games that satisfy the company’s requirements can qualify for 15 percent service fees on new-install transactions and 20 percent on existing-install transactions. The criteria include performance and reliability standards, support for additional Android device categories, and selected platform features. Those program rates are scheduled to become available in the initial markets and Australia on September 30. For consumers, the immediate effect will depend on whether developers adopt alternative payments and pass any savings on through lower prices. For developers, however, June 30 begins a more flexible but considerably more complicated Play Store economy in which distribution, billing, install dates, revenue thresholds, and program participation can each affect Google’s final cut. Google is also separately developing a Registered App Stores program designed to simplify the installation of qualifying third-party stores. That initiative is expected to arrive with a major Android release later in 2026 and will launch outside the U.S. first. Google says the rest of the world will receive the changes by September 30, 2027, although billing rates for markets outside the US, UK, and EEA have not yet been announced.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      464
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!