Recommended Posts

 

Congress didn't take the hint, Shuttle was an extremely flawed design. They then cancelled Shuttle replacements (HL-20 & HL-42) a few years later, continuing to fly at high risk. Then came Colombia, and they still kept flying.

 

Worse; there were several other near disasters the public is largely unaware of.

 

Only now, 33 years later, are we correcting those mistakes.

Edited by DocM
  • Sad 2
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1379182-otd-jan-28-1986-challenger/
Share on other sites

I was heading back to my office after a Health Dept. meeting and stopped at a waiting room to watch the launch on CNN.  Within seconds after the breakup almost the entire room was in tears; patients, staff, everyone. 

 

Knowing I was an aerospace fan another staffer asked if they could have survived, mentioning the launch escape rocket atop Mercury and Apollo. I said "No, the Shuttle doesn't have a launch escape system." 

 

The "W-T-F ?!?"  looks I got....

 

Another item many people don't know is that they survived the explosion, dying when the crew cabin hit the water at ~200 mph.

 

No parachute on the crew cabin.

  • Sad 3
13 minutes ago, FloatingFatMan said:

I was at the launch.

 

I tried to go back to the space center in 1999 whilst on my honeymoon, there was a launch scheduled and everything, but when it came to it... I bailed.

 

I didn't avoid watching launches, but after reading the Rogers Commission Report I became a strong proponent of retiring the Shuttle ASAP. Too many design problems, with more revealed after the Columbia Accident Investigation Board.  

3 minutes ago, DocM said:

 

I didn't avoid watching launches, but after reading the Rogers Commission Report I became a strong proponent of retiring the Shuttle ASAP. Too many design problems, with more revealed after the Columbia Accident Investigation Board. 

I guess that's the difference between seeing it on TV, and being there in person... Feeling the emotional impact as the shockwave reached us and the raw emotion of 1000's of people in shock, horror and grief.

 

I will never forget that, man... Never.

 

  • Sad 1

I watched the launch (as did everyone else) on TV. We couldn't believe what we were seeing. Then the shock of what had just happened, the 1980's journalistic style of "sanitized news" ... they were trying to be as analytic as possible, going over every piece of camera footage they had, etc. ... and then the bombshell that they'd identified the Crew Compartment as it was falling and tracked it all the way down to the water and that it was possible that at least one astronaut survived the explosion ... insane. :no: 

 

Then President Reagan coming on to make his infamous speech that evening.

 

It was a dark, dark day. I remember it well.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Guess it's one of those things best used by devs to thoroughly test stuff.
    • is it all upside down there? traffic lights reverted too?
    • Bluesky COO warns social media regulations could destroy competition from small startups by Paul Hill Fears that increasing government control of social media risks regulatory capture by the biggest social media firms were raised again recently. Bluesky’s chief operating officer said in an interview that social media bans for children and tighter regulations for social media firms risk creating a world where there are only a few social media platforms run by companies with the deepest pockets. Regulations on social media firms have been very lax since they appeared for mainstream users in the 2000’s. This gave Meta, Snapchat, and Google time to build up their user bases and get entrenched, with Meta being the most successful. Now that Meta has succeeded, it has been attempting regulatory capture. By pushing for more regulations of social media, Meta hopes to make it more difficult for rivals to challenge it. For its part, it doesn’t need to worry about the cost of regulation because it has a lot of money to spend, whereas startups do not. Speaking to CNBC, Rose Wang, Bluesky’s chief operating officer, said: “I support the protection and the safety of youth, the question that we have then is at what cost, because essentially what I’m scared of is in the long term, we’re headed to a world where there’s about three to five platforms, and extreme heavy regulation of those platforms, and basically the whole compliance teams of these platforms are 10 times the size of our entire team. So, basically, we’re living in a world where it’s almost impossible for smaller entrants to come in and build healthier spaces. These platforms have led to a place where the bottom line is the thing that drives what they do... so I understand why governments have to step in and regulate, because the platforms have done nothing right.” She said that while she is not against regulation, there needs to be more channels between the small to mid-sized players and regulators to help protect them. She says that big tech players, on the other hand, “who we know are circumventing regulation,” need to be regulated. Essentially, the Bluesky position is one of nuance, rather than absolutes. While Bluesky’s proposal may preserve competition in the social media space, it still doesn’t address the massive privacy implications these age verification measures introduce, such as handing over sensitive identity documents to access age-gated content. Source: CNBC
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      249
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      71
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      70
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!