LineageOS, anyone use it?


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, BritBronco said:

Have it running on old Galaxy s3, made it great to use again, only as a mini tablet and gps unit though since we dont use virgin for cell service anymore.

What's your take on it? Does it perform better than stock Android?

Just now, jnelsoninjax said:

What's your take on it? Does it perform better than stock Android?

It definitely works better than the stock on the old s3. All the bloatware is gone. Plus it was a more up to date version of android. Your mileage may vary, if you phone is working fine I probably wont bother, but its nice that some of the older phone can get a new OS with the security updates included when the providers drop support.

9 minutes ago, BritBronco said:

It definitely works better than the stock on the old s3. All the bloatware is gone. Plus it was a more up to date version of android. Your mileage may vary, if you phone is working fine I probably wont bother, but its nice that some of the older phone can get a new OS with the security updates included when the providers drop support.

I understand, I was just curious about it, certainly worth remembering.

Heres my take as someone who compiled and contributed to cyanogenmod, slimrom, aospa and a few others. If you want a fully functional phone, dont bother with an AOSP rom unless you for sure know the OEM provides the necessary blobs for developers. Without these blobs, youll get a less than stellar experience compared to the stock rom. If your phone runs AOSP out of the box, your experience should be the same, I cannot remember off the top of my head if moto was good about this, but plenty of others werent. You also have to take into account your provider, some roms are cross compatible but not necessarily built with xyz carrier in mind. A quick search on XDA showed a few bricked moto x4s from an OTA update to lineage. I personally wouldnt use a third party ROM on my daily driver phone anymore, hence why I use an iPhone now.

Just now, Circaflex said:

Except they dont have the same phone, and the thing with custom ROMs is the experience is and can be vastly different between the devices due to the OEM support.

From what I understand, he was asking about the OS, not the same phone...

2 minutes ago, Mindovermaster said:

From what I understand, he was asking about the OS, not the same phone...

You do see how silly that sounds right? That's the point I am making, warwagons experience with Lineage will and can be completely different because he is on a different device.

 

For example, warwagons phone might be properly supported, so he could say it runs great, extends his battery life, etc etc but that most likely wont be the same case with OPs device.

1 minute ago, Circaflex said:

You do see how silly that sounds right? That's the point I am making, warwagons experience with Lineage will and can be completely different because he is on a different device. 

I thought Lineage uses are the same on every phone it provides, no?

 

If you use Android Oreo vs Lolipop, YES, it is leaps and bounds different.

 

Not sure what direction you are coming from here... An OS is an OS, no matter the hardware used...

3 minutes ago, Mindovermaster said:

I thought Lineage uses are the same on every phone it provides, no?

No

 

3 minutes ago, Mindovermaster said:

Not sure what direction you are coming from here... An OS is an OS, no matter the hardware used...

No again. I suggest you look into the custom ROM scene, you are far off and incorrect with that statement. Do the research and if you still are coming to the same conclusion, I will gladly explain it to you. The keywords you will want to use, are "blobs," "aosp support," "proprietary drivers," "device blobs."

10 hours ago, jnelsoninjax said:

I really do not know anything about it, other then it is a replacement to the Android OS. Has anyone used it/currently use it?

So LineageOS is one of many "custom roms" for Android. Custom roms are unofficial Android images that you can install on your phone. There are a few reasons why you want to do this:

 

  • Keeping your old phone alive. Hardware manufacturers don't want to keep supporting phones forever and so there will come a time when a phone stops getting updates. With custom roms, the community provides updates to keep your phone up and running. This also include security updates which is pretty important if you want to keep using your old phone.
  • Getting extra features. Many custom roms provide unique features that you won't find on OEM skins. This can include things like theme engines, custom gestures, granular privacy control, etc. 
  • Making your phone run faster. This is related to the first point. A lot of phone manufacturer load bloat onto their phone which you either cannot uninstall or are baked right into Android. With custom roms, you decide what is on your phone and most of them provide a near-stock Android experience. This usually means that your phone will run smoother than it ever did.

There's a lot of other reasons why you would want to install a custom rom but those are the top reasons I could come up with. 

 

What phone do you have? Some phones are better supported by LineageOS than others. LineageOS is practically ported to every phone by the community, but not every build is official. The unofficial build might be more buggy and will have less support. 

  • Thanks 1

Running 14.1 was almost trouble free. At one point my phone would not wake up and all I got was a black screen. Rebooting did not solve it either. To fix it I booted into recovery and cleared the cache and I haven't had an issue since.

 

Today I dirty flashed an unofficial version of Lineage OS 15.1 over 14.1 and so far so good. Looks pretty stable and he just added the March 2019 security updates.

 

The only thing that doesn't work as good on stock on both 14.1 and 15.1 is the camera focusing.

 

Since dirty flashing 15.1, it kind of feel like the there is more battery drain while idle than there was with 14.1. 14.1 was amazing on idle.

Hello,

 

I have played around a little with Lineage OS 14.1 and 15.1 on a Huawei Honor 5x, whose performance decreased over time with each update until it was more and more like using an entry-level device, instead of the mid-range device it behaved like when purchased.  With the installation of Lineage OS 14.1, the device again began to perform speedily, and was quite stable.  I installed Lineage OS 15.1 as soon as the it came out, and did have some problems with the Chrome browser freezing initially, but that seems to have gone away in subsequent builds.  I am using the device on Wi-Fi now, so have no idea of call quality or reliability.

 

Regards,

 

Aryeh Goretsky

 

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • GitHub removes manual model selection from Copilot free and student plans by Karthik Mudaliar GitHub is removing the ability to manually select an AI model from its Copilot Free and Student plans, making its automatic routing system the default and only way to choose a model. This means users on these tiers will no longer be able to deliberately select a particular OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, or Microsoft model for a task. In its announcement, GitHub said Copilot Auto will dynamically choose what it considers the best model for each request. Free and Student accounts will retain access to models from multiple families, although the available selection will continue to depend on the restrictions attached to each plan. GitHub did not identify a fixed pool of models that Auto will always use, and its documentation warns that model availability can change over time. GitHub describes Auto as more than a random fallback system. On supported surfaces, its task-optimization technology evaluates the complexity of a request alongside real-time information about model health and availability. Straightforward prompts can be routed to faster and less expensive models, while more demanding coding tasks may be sent to higher-cost reasoning models. The company says this approach should reduce rate limiting, latency, and failed requests. Auto generally selects one model along natural prompt-caching boundaries rather than repeatedly switching models during a session, as GitHub found that mid-session changes increased costs without producing sufficient improvements in output quality. Users can still check which model generated a response. In Copilot Chat, the information appears when hovering over an answer, while Copilot CLI and the Copilot cloud agent display the selected model alongside their output. Auto is available in Copilot Chat, Copilot CLI, and the cloud agent, with the exact implementation and release status varying between supported development environments. The latest restriction follows several months of adjustments to Copilot’s individual plans. GitHub temporarily halted new Pro, Pro+, and Student subscriptions in April as it sought to manage demand and service reliability. It later introduced token-based billing and began gradually reopening individual-plan registrations on June 17. Alongside the picker change, GitHub is retiring the “Preview” label from Microsoft-developed models. It argues that the label is no longer necessary because Auto handles model routing and models are continuously updated behind the scenes.
    • Look up 'inflation' kid. Ask an AI for the numbers between both games.
    • Google reportedly set to lose two key Gemini and DeepMind researchers to Anthropic by Karthik Mudaliar Google is reportedly preparing to lose two more prominent artificial intelligence researchers, with Gemini contributors Jonas Adler and Alexander Pritzel planning to join rival AI developer Anthropic. According to a report from Bloomberg, both researchers are viewed internally as important contributors to Google’s flagship Gemini model family. Adler worked on Google’s AI coding efforts, while Pritzel was involved in the process used to train AI systems. Neither company has publicly confirmed the moves. The report also does not say when the researchers will formally leave Google or what positions they will hold at Anthropic. Training a large AI model requires decisions covering its architecture, data preparation, distributed computing infrastructure, and post-training methods that shape how the finished system behaves. Researchers with experience operating at the scale of Gemini are consequently difficult to replace quickly. Both Adler and Pritzel have previously contributed to Google DeepMind’s scientific research as well. They are listed among the authors of the company’s work on expanding AlphaFold protein-structure predictions across entire proteomes, alongside AlphaFold researchers including John Jumper. The reported departures arrive shortly after another important change within Google’s Gemini organization. Gemini co-lead Noam Shazeer is leaving Google for OpenAI, after returning to the search company in 2024 through its deal with Character.AI. Shazeer is particularly well known as one of the authors of the Transformer paper, whose architecture became the foundation for most modern large language models. Anthropic, meanwhile, has been recruiting recognizable figures from other leading laboratories. OpenAI co-founder and former Tesla AI director Andrej Karpathy joined Anthropic’s pre-training team in May. His move, followed by the reported recruitment of several Google researchers, suggests Anthropic is strengthening the research teams responsible for the core capabilities of future Claude models rather than concentrating solely on product and enterprise sales. The competition is complicated by the companies’ extensive commercial relationships. Anthropic competes directly with Google’s Gemini models, but it also relies on Google as an infrastructure partner. In April, Anthropic announced an expanded agreement with Google and Broadcom covering multiple gigawatts of next-generation Tensor Processing Unit capacity. TPUs are Google-designed accelerators used to train and run large AI models. via Bloomberg
    • This article makes my head hurt. Lots of confusing words
    • Google adds built-in computer control to Gemini 3.5 flash by Karthik Mudaliar Google has added Computer Use as a built-in tool in Gemini 3.5 Flash, giving developers a single model that can reason about a task and operate graphical interfaces across browsers, mobile devices, and desktop environments. The feature is available through the Gemini API and Google’s Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform, although it remains a preview feature for now. Computer Use enables an AI agent to examine screenshots and return actions such as mouse clicks, scrolling, and keyboard input. A developer’s application must execute those actions, capture the resulting screen, and send it back to Gemini, creating a continuous loop until the task is completed. Google says the integration can be used for activities including repetitive form filling, application testing, research across multiple websites, and longer enterprise workflows. Gemini 3.5 Flash can work with browser, mobile, and desktop environments, whereas Google’s earlier standalone Computer Use model was primarily positioned around browser interaction. The main change is consolidation. Computer control was previously offered through the separate Gemini 2.5 Computer Use preview model. As Neowin reported when that model was introduced, it was designed to interpret a visual interface and generate actions without requiring a website-specific API. Google later brought Computer Use to preview versions of Gemini 3 Pro and Gemini 3 Flash in January 2026. The latest release now incorporates the tool into the stable Gemini 3.5 Flash model rather than requiring developers to select a specialized model solely for interface automation. Gemini 3.5 Flash itself was announced in May as Google’s latest fast model for coding and multi-step agent workflows. It supports a one-million-token input context window and up to 65,000 output tokens, along with adjustable thinking levels that let developers trade additional reasoning for lower latency and cost. Google also added that Gemini 3.5 Flash received targeted adversarial training for computer-use scenarios. The company is also offering safeguards that can require user confirmation before sensitive or irreversible actions and automatically stop a workflow when suspected prompt injection is detected. Its developer documentation describes configurable protections for areas such as financial transactions and changes to sensitive records. Google isn't the first to bring Computer Use to its platform. Anthropic has made computer control available through Claude, while OpenAI has continued improving computer-use performance in its recent models. Microsoft has also applied the concept to business workflows, including a Computer Use capability for the Researcher agent in Microsoft 365 Copilot.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      463
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!