Recommended Posts

I'm in the process of moving and choosing a cable/internet package. And could use some advice/recommendations/tips on just how fast of internet speed do I really need.

At the most/peak family times 3 smart tvs streaming some service (including an xbox), 1 laptop and 2 smartphones all connected to wifi in the house. Again at the most and this wouldn't be a regular thing.

I'm trying to be frugal in paying for a plan. So what do you think would be sufficient or even best, 150Mbps or 400Mbps. Thanks!

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1383133-150mbps-400mbps/
Share on other sites

Yup, I would agree. I get away with more devices than that on a 15Mbps connection. The only problem that I really have is relatively long downloads of games. Hoping to get an upgrade soon. We're on DSL and maxed out, but they're trenching fiber to the house next week!

All my provider says is that 400Mbps is better for a "bigger household" whatever that means. No one downloads huge files expect for buying a game every now and then and that's not a critical thing such as just being able to have internet service. We're mostly web surfers and TV streamers and video gaming on the weekends in our house.

If it is too low and everyone is streaming etc, it will affect download speed, maybe where you're  from it is generally alot higher than in the UK so you will probably be ok but it is an important valid question and I wouldn't  signup without knowing it. 

2 minutes ago, SnoopZ said:

If it is too low and everyone is streaming etc, it will affect download speed, maybe where you're  from it is generally alot higher than in the UK so you will probably be ok but it is an important valid question and I wouldn't  signup without knowing it. 

Right like if someone is uploading a big file it'll start to slow down what everyone is watching. Yeah I appreciate the question for sure, thanks! Yeah right now between everyone a Microsoft Word document for school or some photos taken on the phone uploaded to the store we get photos printed are par for the course for uploading. Now that certainly could change with interests in the house and would be something to think about then.

Upload speed is more than just if something is uploading something...

 

You do understand that download something at speed X requires a certain amount of upload speed Y.. You have to send the ACKs back.. So while while if only a few streams you might be able to max out the download they say you have with the upload they provide - say a 100/10 plan... But if you have say 5 clients all doing downloads, that 10 might not be enough to get 100 down... You fill up the upload pipe, etc..  So now vs your clients sharing 100, maybe they are actually sharing max 70 or 80...

 

Understanding what your paying for is very good idea, is it 100/10 or 100/5 is it 400/12 etc. etc.

  • Like 3

If your like me and you get the 150 which is "good enough", you'll soon wish you got the 400.   :)  For instance, I got the Intel i9 7960X to save a bit of money and the whole time I have been wishing I got the 7980XE.....  But that's me...... :)

 

25 minutes ago, xrobwx said:

If your like me and you get the 150 which is "good enough", you'll soon wish you got the 400.   :)  For instance, I got the Intel i9 7960X to save a bit of money and the whole time I have been wishing I got the 7980XE.....  But that's me...... :)

 

What does a CPU have to do with internet speed? It all depends on what you are doing with it. ;)

Currently using 250/20 Package from Xfinity,  think provides enough bandwidth for our household of 10 devices,   while If I could afford it, i'd probably go for Extreme 400, or Gigabit, but guess 250 is fine for our needs at this point.    Overall happy with connection,  though sometimes wish I had picked a little faster processor for PC in 2017,  Intel I7 7700K versus 7700 that I ended up getting, but guess it's fine.

 

 

On 5/26/2019 at 3:54 PM, bikeman25 said:

Currently using 250/20 Package from Xfinity,  think provides enough bandwidth for our household of 10 devices,   while If I could afford it, i'd probably go for Extreme 400, or Gigabit, but guess 250 is fine for our needs at this point.    Overall happy with connection,  though sometimes wish I had picked a little faster processor for PC in 2017,  Intel I7 7700K versus 7700 that I ended up getting, but guess it's fine.

 

 

Yeah I'm thinking I'll be alright too. Sure I've got lots of devices "connected" but in reality they all aren't downloading/streaming all at the same time either. Like I said in my original post there might be 3 smart TVs streaming some service and someone surfing the web. We're not big gamers nor is anyone downloading movies/mp3s like we all did before streaming services lol.

On 5/26/2019 at 3:09 PM, BudMan said:

Upload speed is more than just if something is uploading something...

 

You do understand that download something at speed X requires a certain amount of upload speed Y.. You have to send the ACKs back.. So while while if only a few streams you might be able to max out the download they say you have with the upload they provide - say a 100/10 plan... But if you have say 5 clients all doing downloads, that 10 might not be enough to get 100 down... You fill up the upload pipe, etc..  So now vs your clients sharing 100, maybe they are actually sharing max 70 or 80...

 

Understanding what your paying for is very good idea, is it 100/10 or 100/5 is it 400/12 etc. etc.

I'm not sure what files are being uploaded from Netflix/Hulu/YouTube would be significant enough to impact their service? I mean I can't imagine any of these services having required returned information being so heavy as to negatively affect their streaming service because that would negatively affect their subscriber count. I get what you're saying. However, like I said in my original post we're not gamers, least not yet, and we don't download huge files. We stream video services and surf the web. But thanks for the post, I'll have to Google what ACKs are lol.

On 5/26/2019 at 3:20 PM, xrobwx said:

If your like me and you get the 150 which is "good enough", you'll soon wish you got the 400.   :)  For instance, I got the Intel i9 7960X to save a bit of money and the whole time I have been wishing I got the 7980XE.....  But that's me...... :)

 

Dude my computer is a laptop from 2013 and I still think it's plenty of power lol. So I think I'm fine on that front. But yeah maybe down the road I'll see a need to increase download speed. But I just can't justify paying for something that I won't really use or mostly use. I mean we're out of the house for most of the day and when we are using the internet heavily it's just for watching TV and surfing the web. And even that's for just a few hours out of the day. So all the "speed" isn't even being used most of the time and for most of the year right.?

Be ready for a very deep rabbit hole ;)  And keep in mind that your going to be using different window sizes, and then there SACK so you don't need to send ack for every packet, etc

 

My point is that you NEED upload speed to be able to download anything..  If you have lots of different sessions going on - say multiple streaming sessions to multiple devices, your going to need more upload then if just 1 stream, etc.  And yeah your prob not going to run into an an issue unless your upload is very limited..  But its a very good idea to know what your upload limit is..

 

Here is an example what talking about that your uploading when downloading.

 

This is during a speedtest, you can see what currently downloading at, and the upload being used to support that download.

 

speedtest.thumb.png.694b9b44b9172f632b3e61da1a8ba9bc.png

 

There are many factors at play.. the RTT between locations, the window sized being used, any loss on the line, is SACK being used?  Are there a lot of retrans, etc. etc.

 

The take away here again is that is not all about the download speed they say they can provide, if they do not provide enough upload.. Normally this is not an issue true - but you should be aware of what your paying for vs 100, is 100/10, 100/5, 100/20, etc. etc.

 

In a perfect world we would all have symmetrical where we get X/X, same up as down vs X/Y for bandwidth packages.

Can you tell us your ISP then we can tell you what your upload will be based on your chosen package?

 

To give a real world example of what Budman and I are saying, my parents internet used to be bad with 6mbit download and 1mbit upload, this worked fine when it was 2 people browsing but when there were 4 people browsing it just ground to a halt and if someone wanted to make a simple VoIP call that was also impossible.

On 5/28/2019 at 2:25 AM, SnoopZ said:

Can you tell us your ISP then we can tell you what your upload will be based on your chosen package?

 

To give a real world example of what Budman and I are saying, my parents internet used to be bad with 6mbit download and 1mbit upload, this worked fine when it was 2 people browsing but when there were 4 people browsing it just ground to a halt and if someone wanted to make a simple VoIP call that was also impossible.

Sure it's Xfinity.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • But building your own.. what? You can't build anything like the Steam Machine yourself. Even trying to get close costs a good deal more. Even just the CPU cooler in their price comparison is as big as the entire Steam Machine. If you want a regular gaming PC, then by all means, build that. If you want a a small console-like PC for the living room that is good for gaming, I'm not sure what else is a better deal. In the GN review, they only mentioned a small form factor Dell, which is like twice the size and hundreds of dollars more expensive.
    • Those are some popular multiplayer games. But hardly "all". Just those that don't work on Linux currently due to specific anti-cheat implementations. I think it's also fair to point out the literally thousands of games that don't work on the PS5. And it's not locked at 1080p. That's the default, which you can change.
    • Ubuntu Livepatch arrives on Arm64 to eliminate system reboots for kernel updates by Paul Hill Canonical has just announced that its Livepatch service now supports computers with Arm64 processors. For those who are not familiar, Livepatch allows users to apply important kernel updates without any service interruption or rebooting. While home users will benefit from this, it’s even more important for critical machines that absolutely should not be going offline at all. The feature is available as part of Ubuntu Core 26 for Arm64 and Ubuntu Core 20 and onwards for AMD64. According to Canonical, this will improve the security of systems that aren’t security-maintained daily or weekly, and it helps organizations work towards Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) compliance. If you are familiar with Ubuntu, you probably know that most packages can be updated without having to restart the system. There is one big exception to this, and that’s the kernel; it typically requires you to reload the system to boot into the new kernel. With Livepatch, Canonical has done something so that you don’t need to restart to begin using the new kernel. Aside from Ubuntu Core 26, users with Arm64 chips running Ubuntu 26.04 LTS can also use Livepatch. If you want to learn more about Livepatch, check out its product page. There, you can also find a button to join Ubuntu Pro (it’s free for several home devices) so that you can enable Livepatch. By linking your computer to Ubuntu Pro, you will also extend the life of your Ubuntu install from five years to ten years. If you are running Ubuntu, let us know in the comments if you have been looking forward to this feature on your ARM-based computer. If you’ve had a compatible AMD64 machine for a while and never used this feature, let us know why in the comments!
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
    • Dedicated
      tuben earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      500
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      207
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      97
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      89
    5. 5
      neufuse
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!