Recommended Posts

I'm in the process of moving and choosing a cable/internet package. And could use some advice/recommendations/tips on just how fast of internet speed do I really need.

At the most/peak family times 3 smart tvs streaming some service (including an xbox), 1 laptop and 2 smartphones all connected to wifi in the house. Again at the most and this wouldn't be a regular thing.

I'm trying to be frugal in paying for a plan. So what do you think would be sufficient or even best, 150Mbps or 400Mbps. Thanks!

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1383133-150mbps-400mbps/
Share on other sites

Yup, I would agree. I get away with more devices than that on a 15Mbps connection. The only problem that I really have is relatively long downloads of games. Hoping to get an upgrade soon. We're on DSL and maxed out, but they're trenching fiber to the house next week!

All my provider says is that 400Mbps is better for a "bigger household" whatever that means. No one downloads huge files expect for buying a game every now and then and that's not a critical thing such as just being able to have internet service. We're mostly web surfers and TV streamers and video gaming on the weekends in our house.

If it is too low and everyone is streaming etc, it will affect download speed, maybe where you're  from it is generally alot higher than in the UK so you will probably be ok but it is an important valid question and I wouldn't  signup without knowing it. 

2 minutes ago, SnoopZ said:

If it is too low and everyone is streaming etc, it will affect download speed, maybe where you're  from it is generally alot higher than in the UK so you will probably be ok but it is an important valid question and I wouldn't  signup without knowing it. 

Right like if someone is uploading a big file it'll start to slow down what everyone is watching. Yeah I appreciate the question for sure, thanks! Yeah right now between everyone a Microsoft Word document for school or some photos taken on the phone uploaded to the store we get photos printed are par for the course for uploading. Now that certainly could change with interests in the house and would be something to think about then.

Upload speed is more than just if something is uploading something...

 

You do understand that download something at speed X requires a certain amount of upload speed Y.. You have to send the ACKs back.. So while while if only a few streams you might be able to max out the download they say you have with the upload they provide - say a 100/10 plan... But if you have say 5 clients all doing downloads, that 10 might not be enough to get 100 down... You fill up the upload pipe, etc..  So now vs your clients sharing 100, maybe they are actually sharing max 70 or 80...

 

Understanding what your paying for is very good idea, is it 100/10 or 100/5 is it 400/12 etc. etc.

  • Like 3

If your like me and you get the 150 which is "good enough", you'll soon wish you got the 400.   :)  For instance, I got the Intel i9 7960X to save a bit of money and the whole time I have been wishing I got the 7980XE.....  But that's me...... :)

 

25 minutes ago, xrobwx said:

If your like me and you get the 150 which is "good enough", you'll soon wish you got the 400.   :)  For instance, I got the Intel i9 7960X to save a bit of money and the whole time I have been wishing I got the 7980XE.....  But that's me...... :)

 

What does a CPU have to do with internet speed? It all depends on what you are doing with it. ;)

Currently using 250/20 Package from Xfinity,  think provides enough bandwidth for our household of 10 devices,   while If I could afford it, i'd probably go for Extreme 400, or Gigabit, but guess 250 is fine for our needs at this point.    Overall happy with connection,  though sometimes wish I had picked a little faster processor for PC in 2017,  Intel I7 7700K versus 7700 that I ended up getting, but guess it's fine.

 

 

On 5/26/2019 at 3:54 PM, bikeman25 said:

Currently using 250/20 Package from Xfinity,  think provides enough bandwidth for our household of 10 devices,   while If I could afford it, i'd probably go for Extreme 400, or Gigabit, but guess 250 is fine for our needs at this point.    Overall happy with connection,  though sometimes wish I had picked a little faster processor for PC in 2017,  Intel I7 7700K versus 7700 that I ended up getting, but guess it's fine.

 

 

Yeah I'm thinking I'll be alright too. Sure I've got lots of devices "connected" but in reality they all aren't downloading/streaming all at the same time either. Like I said in my original post there might be 3 smart TVs streaming some service and someone surfing the web. We're not big gamers nor is anyone downloading movies/mp3s like we all did before streaming services lol.

On 5/26/2019 at 3:09 PM, BudMan said:

Upload speed is more than just if something is uploading something...

 

You do understand that download something at speed X requires a certain amount of upload speed Y.. You have to send the ACKs back.. So while while if only a few streams you might be able to max out the download they say you have with the upload they provide - say a 100/10 plan... But if you have say 5 clients all doing downloads, that 10 might not be enough to get 100 down... You fill up the upload pipe, etc..  So now vs your clients sharing 100, maybe they are actually sharing max 70 or 80...

 

Understanding what your paying for is very good idea, is it 100/10 or 100/5 is it 400/12 etc. etc.

I'm not sure what files are being uploaded from Netflix/Hulu/YouTube would be significant enough to impact their service? I mean I can't imagine any of these services having required returned information being so heavy as to negatively affect their streaming service because that would negatively affect their subscriber count. I get what you're saying. However, like I said in my original post we're not gamers, least not yet, and we don't download huge files. We stream video services and surf the web. But thanks for the post, I'll have to Google what ACKs are lol.

On 5/26/2019 at 3:20 PM, xrobwx said:

If your like me and you get the 150 which is "good enough", you'll soon wish you got the 400.   :)  For instance, I got the Intel i9 7960X to save a bit of money and the whole time I have been wishing I got the 7980XE.....  But that's me...... :)

 

Dude my computer is a laptop from 2013 and I still think it's plenty of power lol. So I think I'm fine on that front. But yeah maybe down the road I'll see a need to increase download speed. But I just can't justify paying for something that I won't really use or mostly use. I mean we're out of the house for most of the day and when we are using the internet heavily it's just for watching TV and surfing the web. And even that's for just a few hours out of the day. So all the "speed" isn't even being used most of the time and for most of the year right.?

Be ready for a very deep rabbit hole ;)  And keep in mind that your going to be using different window sizes, and then there SACK so you don't need to send ack for every packet, etc

 

My point is that you NEED upload speed to be able to download anything..  If you have lots of different sessions going on - say multiple streaming sessions to multiple devices, your going to need more upload then if just 1 stream, etc.  And yeah your prob not going to run into an an issue unless your upload is very limited..  But its a very good idea to know what your upload limit is..

 

Here is an example what talking about that your uploading when downloading.

 

This is during a speedtest, you can see what currently downloading at, and the upload being used to support that download.

 

speedtest.thumb.png.694b9b44b9172f632b3e61da1a8ba9bc.png

 

There are many factors at play.. the RTT between locations, the window sized being used, any loss on the line, is SACK being used?  Are there a lot of retrans, etc. etc.

 

The take away here again is that is not all about the download speed they say they can provide, if they do not provide enough upload.. Normally this is not an issue true - but you should be aware of what your paying for vs 100, is 100/10, 100/5, 100/20, etc. etc.

 

In a perfect world we would all have symmetrical where we get X/X, same up as down vs X/Y for bandwidth packages.

Can you tell us your ISP then we can tell you what your upload will be based on your chosen package?

 

To give a real world example of what Budman and I are saying, my parents internet used to be bad with 6mbit download and 1mbit upload, this worked fine when it was 2 people browsing but when there were 4 people browsing it just ground to a halt and if someone wanted to make a simple VoIP call that was also impossible.

On 5/28/2019 at 2:25 AM, SnoopZ said:

Can you tell us your ISP then we can tell you what your upload will be based on your chosen package?

 

To give a real world example of what Budman and I are saying, my parents internet used to be bad with 6mbit download and 1mbit upload, this worked fine when it was 2 people browsing but when there were 4 people browsing it just ground to a halt and if someone wanted to make a simple VoIP call that was also impossible.

Sure it's Xfinity.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Zoom Workplace 7.1.0.41345 by Razvan Serea Zoom Workplace for Windows is a reliable video conferencing tool that makes it easy to connect and collaborate. With features like messaging, file sharing, and app integrations, it’s designed to streamline teamwork. You’ll get high-quality audio and video, strong security with end-to-end encryption, and an intuitive interface—all of which help remote teams and businesses stay productive and connected. Zoom Workplace key features: High-Definition Video & Audio: Provides clear, reliable communication for virtual meetings. End-to-End Encryption: Ensures secure communication with strong data protection. Multi-Factor Authentication: Adds an extra layer of security for user accounts. Integration with Productivity Apps: Supports seamless integration with Microsoft Office, Google Workspace, and more. File Sharing: Easily share files during meetings for efficient collaboration. Real-Time Messaging: Enables team chat for ongoing communication. Collaborative Whiteboarding: Allows teams to brainstorm and collaborate visually. Webinar Support: Host large webinars with interactive features. Administrative Controls: Manage user permissions, meeting settings, and security features. Cloud Storage: Automatically stores meetings and files in the cloud for easy access. Cross-Platform Support: Available on Windows, macOS, and mobile devices. Meeting features: Virtual Backgrounds: Customize your background for meetings to maintain privacy or enhance professionalism. Touch Up My Appearance: Automatically smoothens skin tone for a more polished video appearance. Breakout Rooms: Divide meetings into smaller sessions for group discussions or workshops. Live Transcription: Automatically generate real-time captions during meetings for accessibility. Zoom Apps: Integrate third-party applications directly into Zoom for enhanced functionality. Meeting Reactions: Participants can use emojis for quick, non-verbal feedback during meetings. Polling: Conduct live polls during meetings to gather instant feedback from participants. Attention Tracking: Monitors participant attention during meetings to ensure engagement. Closed Captioning: Enable manual or automatic captions for a more inclusive experience. Webinar Replay: Record and share webinars with analytics for audience engagement. Download: Zoom 64-bit | 145.0 MB (Free, paid upgrade available) Links: Zoom Website | Zoom ARM64 | Zoom Installers | Release Notes Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • UK funds £60M AI labs to challenge US tech dominance with open-source models by Paul Hill The UK government has awarded £60 million to Oxford University and University College London to help keep the country in the AI race by focusing on open-source, low-hardware alternatives. This is in stark contrast to the expensive, closed-source, and high-hardware-requirement models being created in the United States and elsewhere. The money will be shared among two new academic research labs over six years to help them redesign the fundamental mathematics and architectures of AI to help the UK reduce its reliance on a handful of US tech firms. Commenting on the development, AI Minister Kanishka Narayan said: Initially, the government planned to fund just one lab with a £40 million investment, but with this update, two labs will now get access to a larger pool of funds. The labs are expected to invest in the top AI researchers at every career stage, with £2 million per lab being set aside for hiring at least ten doctoral students. The government hopes that this will grow the UK’s talent in the field of AI. The labs are also expected to work closely with the leaders in British AI research, such as the Alan Turing Institute and UKRI’s AI research hubs. This will allow the various teams to collaborate and create new solutions faster than they could alone. This development is pretty interesting for a number of reasons, chiefly that it could create a long-term challenge for US tech firms if these labs successfully scale these open-source architectures that bypass the proprietary ecosystems. It could also give British businesses and public sector organizations access to AI features without paying high licensing fees to foreign providers or needing to invest in specialized server infrastructure.
    • If I were them, I'm gonna hold out until the prices of these semiconductor parts normalize. $1,049 for a ~5 year old hardware is DoA, more so for gamers. On a deeper note, if Steam Machine is priced like this, we are soo effed up for the next gen Xbox console and PS6. With great AAA titles releasing at the end of the year, this just creates more demand...and more tears for me. Lol.
    • I suspect one reason its hard to justify subsidising is that it's not a locked down device like a traditional console is. In this climate sadly if it was a "good deal" you'd get people hoarding them for anything but gaming. The Lenovo Legion Go 2 with the Ryzen Z2 Extreme is £1300 here ($1720) for some context on how other SteamOS like devices are now priced. I got the older Z1 Extreme model for £300 with a dock, just shows how insane prices have got recently.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
    • Dedicated
      tuben earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      451
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      181
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      92
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      87
    5. 5
      neufuse
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!