Does anyone have a specially designed backpack for the DSLR camera?


Recommended Posts

I have a carrying case that came with my camera which holds the camera, and two lenses, however I have added additional items like extra batteries and lens filters, so I really do not have room in the bag anymore. I know that there are backpacks designed for DSLR cameras, and they have a crazy price range. So I am wondering does anyone use a specially designed backpack or do you simply use a standard backpack?

11 hours ago, jnelsoninjax said:

Are they laptop backpacks or specific for cameras?

Extra large professional and gaming DELL laptop backpacks 👍💪

 

I can fit a 17" laptop and a DSLR with all the accessories (pretty much all the sensitive equipment that I wouldn't trust checking-in when I'm travelling by plane and carry it on with me in the cabin) inside one.

 

Edited by Peresvet
  • Thanks 1

I have a few specific DSLR backpacks. When working out what I wanted, I bought 3. 2 sit in my wardrobe and my go to i will dig out later because I’m forgetful and will let you know.

 

A generic or non-dslr backpack is NOT up to the task if you take your equipment seriously 

OK so my go-to is a Vanguard Uprise 46: https://www.amazon.co.uk/Vanguard-UP-Rise-II-48-Expanding/dp/B008OHO1RY

 

My previous was LowePro Flipside 400 AW - great bag, but the back opening just became more of a chore for me: https://www.amazon.co.uk/Lowepro-Flipside-400-Camera-Backpack/dp/B073C7Z3K5/ref=asc_df_B073C7Z3K5

 

I also own the Vanguard Messenger but feel it's more of an "additional" bag rather than a main.  Used rarely when equipment demands.

4 hours ago, Human.Online said:

OK so my go-to is a Vanguard Uprise 46https://www.amazon.co.uk/Vanguard-UP-Rise-II-48-Expanding/dp/B008OHO1RY

 

My previous was LowePro Flipside 400 AW - great bag, but the back opening just became more of a chore for me: https://www.amazon.co.uk/Lowepro-Flipside-400-Camera-Backpack/dp/B073C7Z3K5/ref=asc_df_B073C7Z3K5

 

I also own the Vanguard Messenger but feel it's more of an "additional" bag rather than a main.  Used rarely when equipment demands.

These look nice, but apparently are only sold in the UK :( I checked Amazon.com and it can not find the bag

OK, the LowePro is sold in the US, but the Vanguard is not

2 hours ago, Human.Online said:

A generic or non-dslr backpack is NOT up to the task if you take your equipment seriously 

DELL's professional and gaming lines of backpacks are as far from generic as you can get.

 

They feature extra thick protective layers (which protect your gear, duh) and make them comfortable to wear even when they're fully loaded and heavy.

24 minutes ago, Peresvet said:

DELL's professional and gaming lines of backpacks are as far from generic as you can get.

 

They feature extra thick protective layers (which protect your gear, duh) and make them comfortable to wear even when they're fully loaded and heavy.

“Duh”

 

They are designed for laptops and I’m sure they are great at that. If you knew the first thing about compartmentalised backpacks for photography, you’d know that you’ve not got a clue what you’re talking about.

45 minutes ago, jnelsoninjax said:

These look nice, but apparently are only sold in the UK :( I checked Amazon.com and it can not find the bag

OK, the LowePro is sold in the US, but the Vanguard is not

In fairness if you want the LowePro I’d sell it for a good price plus shipping.

 

But the take away you need here is about easy access, compartments and where the security needs to be.

I store my lenses individually in nicely padded, double-zippered Sigma cases.

 

I don't need any of the compartmentalized BS.  The first thing I did when I got my first LowePro case, was throwing away that "removal camera compartment" that made compartmentalization possible. Since then, my photo gear collection grew and I needed a lot more space.

 

DELL's backpacks also look (subjectively) a tonne better and provide a better value.

 

 

1 hour ago, Human.Online said:

“Duh”

 

They are designed for laptops and I’m sure they are great at that. If you knew the first thing about compartmentalised backpacks for photography, you’d know that you’ve not got a clue what you’re talking about.

In fairness if you want the LowePro I’d sell it for a good price plus shipping.

 

But the take away you need here is about easy access, compartments and where the security needs to be.

What exactly is the issue with the bag? I couldn't really tell from the pictures what you mean about the back opening. Also the LowePro Flipside 400 is listed on Amazon for $129.36, You've got me curious about what a good price would be! :)

2 hours ago, Peresvet said:

I don't need any of the compartmentalized BS

 

🤦‍♂️

2 hours ago, jnelsoninjax said:

What exactly is the issue with the bag? I couldn't really tell from the pictures what you mean about the back opening. Also the LowePro Flipside 400 is listed on Amazon for $129.36, You've got me curious about what a good price would be! :)

The way it opens.  Manu open from the "front" and by that I mean "the bit that faces away from your back".  This one, the "back" opens, and by that I mean "the bit that sits against your back".

 

Dude, I'd let it got for like $80 seeing as it's been used ONCE.  My only concern is shipping it out to you as you're in Floriday (where incidentally I shall be in late September).  I'm not gonna push a sale here cos that feels crass - just a dude trying to help a dude.

2 hours ago, Human.Online said:

🤦‍♂️

The way it opens.  Manu open from the "front" and by that I mean "the bit that faces away from your back".  This one, the "back" opens, and by that I mean "the bit that sits against your back".

 

Dude, I'd let it got for like $80 seeing as it's been used ONCE.  My only concern is shipping it out to you as you're in Floriday (where incidentally I shall be in late September).  I'm not gonna push a sale here cos that feels crass - just a dude trying to help a dude.

I can understand the shipping concerns as well, I'll PM you later

  • 1 month later...

I've been very happy with the LowePro Fastpack BP 250.  It can handle a DSLR body with a lens attached and can also fit several other lenses, a small tripod, and a laptop and tablet with room to spare.  I can post pictures if you would like. 

 

https://smile.amazon.com/gp/product/B00U3TQR6O/ref=ppx_yo_dt_b_asin_title_o06_s00?ie=UTF8&psc=1

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Can you read? I've said I'm willing to pay more for a notchless (no notch) 3:2 screen.
    • Not even an OLED display on the laptops. Also it seems that the laptop design isn't the same as the Surface Ultra model. Looks like bargain bin at high prices.
    • make your own notch - it's not that hard
    • VirtualBox 7.2.10 by Razvan Serea VirtualBox is a powerful x86 and AMD64/Intel64 virtualization product for enterprise as well as home use. Targeted at server, desktop and embedded use, it is now the only professional-quality virtualization solution that is also Open Source Software. Presently, VirtualBox runs on Windows, Linux, macOS, and Solaris hosts and supports a large number of guest operating systems including but not limited to Windows (NT 4.0, 2000, XP, Server 2003, Vista, 7, 8, Windows 10 and Windows 11), DOS/Windows 3.x, Linux (2.4, 2.6, 3.x, 4.x, 5.x and 6.x), Solaris and OpenSolaris, OS/2, OpenBSD, NetBSD and FreeBSD. Some of the features of VirtualBox are: Modularity. VirtualBox has an extremely modular design with well-defined internal programming interfaces and a client/server design. This makes it easy to control it from several interfaces at once: for example, you can start a virtual machine in a typical virtual machine GUI and then control that machine from the command line, or possibly remotely. VirtualBox also comes with a full Software Development Kit: even though it is Open Source Software, you don't have to hack the source to write a new interface for VirtualBox. Virtual machine descriptions in XML. The configuration settings of virtual machines are stored entirely in XML and are independent of the local machines. Virtual machine definitions can therefore easily be ported to other computers. VirtualBox 7.2.10 changelog: VMM: Fixed issue when CentOS 10 VM was not booting due to the message "Fatal glibc error: CPU does not support x86-64-v3" (​github:gh-642) Devices/EFI: Fixed booting issue when ARM VM had less than 1024 MiB of RAM assigned (​github:gh-679) USB: Fixed issue when it was not possible to attach USB device to headless VM on Apple Silicon/macOS 26.4.1 (​github:gh-631) Storage: Fixed issue when VIRTIO-SCSI device was not recognized as SSD device by guest system (​github:gh-634) Network: Fixed issue in E1000 emulation code which triggered debug log creation (​github:gh-645) Network: Fixed issue in E1000 emulation code which prevented OS/2 guest from booting (​github:gh-683) Linux Host: Fixed issue when VMs could not be started due to kernel oops (​github:gh-639) Linux Host and Guest: Fixed issue when kernel modules were failing to build with openSUSE 16.0 kernel Linux Host and Guest: Added initial support for kernel 7.1 Linux Host and Guest: Added extra fixes for RHEL 9.8 kernel (​github:gh-676) Linux Host and Guest: Added possibility to build source code using NASM instead of YASM as the assembler (​github:gh-520) Linux Guest Additions: Added initial support for Extended Data Control Protocol for clipboard sharing with Plasma on Wayland guests (​github:gh-33) Linux Guest Additions: Added extra fixes for preventing vboxvideo kernel module build with kernel version 7.0 and newer (​github:gh-655) OS/2 Guest Additions: Fixed issue when Shared Folders automount and clipboard sharing stopped working (​github:gh-551) Download: VirtualBox 7.2.10 | 170.0 MB (Open Source) Download: VirtualBox 7.2.10 Extension Pack | 19.1 MB View: VirtualBox Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • OK, now ask yourself how are they going to enforce that law? By requiring every single adult to prove their age and provide their legal identity documents to an UNREGULATED 3rd party company that already has a long track record of multiple data breaches. Not to mention, parliament have voted AGAINST this ban, twice, and Starmer is going ahead anyway. So, where's the democracy here, because that looks like dictatorship to me. The solution here is parental responsibility, not government control. Run some public service announcements on TV and UK social media teaching parents how to setup parental controls. That's already been proven to actually work. But the, this is not and has NEVER been about keeping kids safe. It's about control and monitoring. Watching what you're doing online and controlling what you can see and what you can say.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Prasann earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      Dys Topia earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      512
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      174
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      102
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      88
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!