Tesla Cybertruck

By DocM
in The Neobahn

 Share

Recommended Posts

Proficient

Thrackerzod

Posted
Posted
On 25/06/2024 at 11:59, wakjak said:

Oh **** off. Next you're going to tell me that the windshield wiper will just stop working. Impossible. This truck is the best designed truck ever created....

https://mashable.com/article/tesla-cybertruck-wiper-recall
 

GAHHD DAMNIT!

The Edsel didn't have this many problems. Wasn't it bad enough it's the ugliest vehicle ever created, it had to be a pile of junk too?

Grand Master

Xenon

Posted
Posted
On 25/06/2024 at 12:08, Thrackerzod said:

The Edsel didn't have this many problems. Wasn't it bad enough it's the ugliest vehicle ever created, it had to be a pile of junk too?

In all honestly I am really surprised that there has not been a class action lawsuit about knowingly selling a defective product. But then again, the people who buy them are musk's fanboys. 

  • +primortal, +Nik Louch and margrave
  • Like 3
Grand Master

DocM

Posted
  • Author
Posted
On 25/06/2024 at 10:24, primortal said:

 

 

In 2023 the Ford F-150 was recalled 57 times, 6 million vehicles.

https://www.newsweek.com/ford-recalls-6-million-cars-f150-axle-defect-safety-concerns-1857538#:~:text=An NHTSA pie chart illustrates,recalls issued across the industry.

 

This new one sounds like a fun ride...

https://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/ford-recalls-550000-pickup-trucks-transmissions-suddenly-downshift-111396299

"DETROIT -- Ford is recalling more than 550,000 pickup trucks in the U.S. because the transmissions can unexpectedly downshift to first gear no matter how fast the trucks are going.

The recall covers certain F-150 pickups from the 2014 model year. Ford's F-Series pickups are the top-selling vehicles in the U.S.

Ford says in documents posted Tuesday by U.S. safety regulators that the downshifting can cause drivers to lose control of the trucks, increasing the risk of a crash."

 

Also this year, 820,000 Silverado 2500s were recalled, a safety issue with the tailgate.

https://www.cnn.com/2024/03/02/business/gm-recall-trucks-tailgate/index.html

In case you haven't heard, the mechanical emergency keys can fail too, and a dead battery in the fob is not a fun day either. 

My take on keyless entry is all of them need redundant car-side power in addition to the vehicle's 12/48 volt accessory systems. It's only job is to make the f'ing doors work.

I wasn't responding because the conversation was going from the usual inane to aggressive 6th grade pile on crap. Sometimes you guys act like you're still in puberty.

  • +Nik Louch, Matthew S. and BritBronco
  • Facepalm 3
Grand Master

+primortal Subscriber²

Posted
  • Subscriber²
Posted
On 25/06/2024 at 13:37, DocM said:

 

In 2023 the Ford F-150 was recalled 57 times, 6 million vehicles.

https://www.newsweek.com/ford-recalls-6-million-cars-f150-axle-defect-safety-concerns-1857538#:~:text=An NHTSA pie chart illustrates,recalls issued across the industry.

 

This new one sounds like a fun ride...

https://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/ford-recalls-550000-pickup-trucks-transmissions-suddenly-downshift-111396299

"DETROIT -- Ford is recalling more than 550,000 pickup trucks in the U.S. because the transmissions can unexpectedly downshift to first gear no matter how fast the trucks are going.

The recall covers certain F-150 pickups from the 2014 model year. Ford's F-Series pickups are the top-selling vehicles in the U.S.

Ford says in documents posted Tuesday by U.S. safety regulators that the downshifting can cause drivers to lose control of the trucks, increasing the risk of a crash."

 

Also this year, 820,000 Silverado 2500s were recalled, a safety issue with the tailgate.

https://www.cnn.com/2024/03/02/business/gm-recall-trucks-tailgate/index.html

In case you haven't heard, the mechanical emergency keys can fail too, and a dead battery in the fob is not a fun day either. 

My take on keyless entry is all of them need redundant car-side power in addition to the vehicle's 12/48 volt accessory systems. It's only job is to make the f'ing doors work.

I wasn't responding because the conversation was going from the usual inane to aggressive 6th grade pile on crap. Sometimes you guys act like you're still in puberty.

You never fail in your whataboutism rhetoric.

  • +Raze, margrave and +Nik Louch
  • Like 3
Grand Master

Jim K Global Moderator

Posted
  • Global Moderator
Posted
On 25/06/2024 at 12:37, DocM said:

In case you haven't heard, the mechanical emergency keys can fail too, and a dead battery in the fob is not a fun day either. 

My take on keyless entry is all of them need redundant car-side power in addition to the vehicle's 12/48 volt accessory systems. It's only job is to make the f'ing doors work.

I wasn't responding because the conversation was going from the usual inane to aggressive 6th grade pile on crap. Sometimes you guys act like you're still in puberty.

Yet, with a dead FOB...you can use the mechanical key backup to gain entry and the dead FOB can be used to start the car (usually requires holding the FOB next to the start engine button).  Are you really suggesting that both FOB and mechanical key could fail, I mean sure...I guess...but come on.  🤡

Not shocking you came back without backing up the following claim "On some vehicles, this one a 2019 Hyundai, most are going completely keyless. "

 

On 25/06/2024 at 07:07, illumination said:

https://jalopnik.com/tesla-cybertruck-unexpectedly-accelerates-into-home-wit-1851557475

....yeah, I wouldn't doubt if the problem with that one was the driver.

Grand Master

adrynalyne

Posted
Posted (edited)
On 25/06/2024 at 10:37, DocM said:

 

In 2023 the Ford F-150 was recalled 57 times, 6 million vehicles.

https://www.newsweek.com/ford-recalls-6-million-cars-f150-axle-defect-safety-concerns-1857538#:~:text=An NHTSA pie chart illustrates,recalls issued across the industry.

 

This new one sounds like a fun ride...

https://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/ford-recalls-550000-pickup-trucks-transmissions-suddenly-downshift-111396299

"DETROIT -- Ford is recalling more than 550,000 pickup trucks in the U.S. because the transmissions can unexpectedly downshift to first gear no matter how fast the trucks are going.

The recall covers certain F-150 pickups from the 2014 model year. Ford's F-Series pickups are the top-selling vehicles in the U.S.

Ford says in documents posted Tuesday by U.S. safety regulators that the downshifting can cause drivers to lose control of the trucks, increasing the risk of a crash."

 

Also this year, 820,000 Silverado 2500s were recalled, a safety issue with the tailgate.

https://www.cnn.com/2024/03/02/business/gm-recall-trucks-tailgate/index.html

In case you haven't heard, the mechanical emergency keys can fail too, and a dead battery in the fob is not a fun day either. 

My take on keyless entry is all of them need redundant car-side power in addition to the vehicle's 12/48 volt accessory systems. It's only job is to make the f'ing doors work.

I wasn't responding because the conversation was going from the usual inane to aggressive 6th grade pile on crap. Sometimes you guys act like you're still in puberty.

I’m just waiting for you to back up the comment you made about most vehicles are going keyless, in reference to not having a manual unlock method. 
 

Nothing childish nor aggressive about asking you to back that up. So when are you gonna answer me?

Grand Master

+Nik Louch Subscriber²

Posted
  • Subscriber²
Posted
On 25/06/2024 at 18:37, DocM said:

Sometimes you guys act like you're still in puberty.

Says the guy who comes here and lies, deflects, flip-flops on the truth and generally just wants Musk and Trump to turn up to his gym so he can see them in the changing room…

Grand Master

Xenon

Posted
Posted
On 25/06/2024 at 13:37, DocM said:

In 2023 the Ford F-150 was recalled 57 times, 6 million vehicles.

https://www.newsweek.com/ford-recalls-6-million-cars-f150-axle-defect-safety-concerns-1857538#:~:text=An NHTSA pie chart illustrates,recalls issued across the industry.

So what. Do you think that it excuses how bad the cybertruck is?

Enthusiast

gft77

Posted
Posted
On 25/06/2024 at 08:07, illumination said:

https://jalopnik.com/tesla-cybertruck-unexpectedly-accelerates-into-home-wit-1851557475

 

It's a feature, not a bug.  Maybe the Tesla shareholders will give Musk a couple billion more in bonus money when they hear about this.  They do seem to live in opposite world.

Grand Master

Circaflex

Posted
Posted

Sure the tech is nice, but I cannot get over the design over this vehicle, it is downright ugly. I see so many of them in my area now and they are just hideous. Tesla is a bunch of computer nerds attempting to build a vehicle, I much prefer Rivian's approach which was car people adding tech to a vehicle.

Grand Master

Slugsie

Posted
Posted
On 26/06/2024 at 17:28, Xenon said:

So what. Do you think that it excuses how bad the cybertruck is?

DocMs statement is also incorrect. Ford issued 57 recalls across ALL their vehicles, not the F150. How many models does Ford sell in the USA?

Grand Master

Steven P. Administrators

Posted
  • Administrators
Posted

Comparing a poor quality build like the Cybertruck to Ford recalls is also a bit dumb. Usually, Ford recalls are due to a poor quality part that failed or was installed wrong, or as in my case, a recall on a BMW E46 because they discovered after 20 years that the airbag could suddenly go off, (after a couple of accidents and deaths from the issue happened in Europe), and this was the fault of the airbag manufacturer, not BMW itself.

  • Sikh and +primortal
  • Like 2
Grand Master

Xenon

Posted
Posted
On 05/07/2024 at 07:22, Slugsie said:

DocMs statement is also incorrect. Ford issued 57 recalls across ALL their vehicles, not the F150. How many models does Ford sell in the USA?

Of course it is. He never tells the truth about anything. Don't trust a thing he says. 

Grand Master

Matthew S.

Posted
Posted
On 05/07/2024 at 10:38, Steven P. said:

Comparing a poor quality build like the Cybertruck to Ford recalls is also a bit dumb. Usually, Ford recalls are due to a poor quality part that failed or was installed wrong, or as in my case, a recall on a BMW E46 because they discovered after 20 years that the airbag could suddenly go off, (after a couple of accidents and deaths from the issue happened in Europe), and this was the fault of the airbag manufacturer, not BMW itself.

It's a BMW what do you expect? 😛 (I hate them slightly less than tesla's )

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Posts

    • AMD RX 9070 GRE AI, Blender benchmarks vs 9070 XT, 7800XT, Nvidia RTX 5070, 4070

      By hellowalkman · Posted

      AMD RX 9070 GRE AI, Blender benchmarks vs 9070 XT, 7800XT, Nvidia RTX 5070, 4070 by Sayan Sen Earlier this week, we shared the first part of our review of AMD's new RX 9070 GRE. It was about the gaming performance of the GPU, and we gave it an 8 out of 10. As a follow-up, similar to how we did with the 9070 XT and non-XT, we are doing a dedicated productivity review for the RX 9070 GRE as well, where we compare it against the 9070 XT, 9070, 7800 XT, as well as Nvidia's 5070 and 4070. This will include AI, rendering, compute, and more benchmarks. AI performance, especially, is a very important metric in today's world, and AMD also promised big improvements thanks to its underlying architectural improvements. We will be pitching it against the data we already have for the RX 9070, and RX 9070 XT, but also the Nvidia 5070 FE, MSI GeForce RTX 4070 VENTUS 2X 12G, and Gigabyte Radeon RX 7800 XT GAMING OC 16G as they are in a similar price class, but also because we do not have a comparable 5060 Ti card lying around here that we can compare it against. Before we get underway, this is a collaboration between Sayan Sen and Steven Parker, who lent me his test bed. Also, there was no editorial input from AMD. First up, the specs of the RX 9070, 9070 XT, and 9070 GRE, which were given to us by AMD: Radeon RX 9070 GRE Radeon RX 9070 Radeon RX 9070 XT Boost Clock: Game Clock: up to 2.79GHz up to 2.20GHz up to 2.52GHz up to 2.07GHz up to 2.97GHz up to 2.40GHz Stream Processors 3,072 (48 CU) 3,584 (56 CU) 4,096 (64 CU) Ray Accelerator 48 56 64 AI Accelerator 96 112 128 ROPs 96 128 Texture Mapping Units 192 224 256 Memory 12 GB GDDR6, 18Gbps Clock, 192-bit Bus 432 GB/s 16 GB GDDR6, 20Gbps Clock, 256-bit Bus Effective Memory Bandwidth: 640 GB/s Infinity Cache 48 MB (3rd Gen) 64 MB (3rd Gen) Card Bus PCI-E 5.0 X16 Output 2x HDMI 2.1b 2x DisplayPort 2.1a Power consumption 220W 304W Recommended PSU 650W 750W Slot width 2x 3x Price (SEP) $549 $599 As you can see from the specs above, it is less than the standard RX 9070 in every way that counts, except for slightly higher Boost and Game clock speed. Design Moving on, the RX 9070 GRE we were given is an XFX Swift triple-fan, dual-slot design with two 8-pin connectors. At 30cm (self-measured), it will fit in most systems easily. There is no RGB either. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE by XFX from all angles. Test system Our test system consists of the following: Lian Li O11 Dynamic Mini V2 Flow (Amazon|Newegg) ASUS Z890 ProArt Creator WiFi (Amazon|Newegg) Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus (Amazon|Newegg) Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet - 44x37 (Amazon|Newegg) 2x 16GB G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB (7200 MT/s in XMP) (Amazon|Newegg) Sabrent Rocket4 Plus 2TB SSD (Amazon) Windows 11 25H2 (Build 26200.8246) AMD shared a press driver based on the recently released Adrenaline 26.5.2 that we were required to use. We now move on to our benchmarks. First up, we have Geekbench AI running on ONNX. For some reason, the 9070 GRE does exceptionally well here in both half-precision (FP16) and single-precision (FP32). It manages to beat the RTX 5070 and RX 9070 non-XT, and is only behind the 9070 XT. Since Geekbench runs in short bursts instead of continuously hammering the graphics card, it seems the GRE's faster boost clocks are helping here. Next up, we move to the UL Procyon AI test suite, starting with the image generation benchmark. We chose the Stable Diffusion XL FP16 test since it is the most intense workload available on Procyon. The Nvidia cards do very well here, as even the 4070 out-muscles AMD's best fairy easily. The positive thing about the GRE is that it gets quite close to the 9070 non-XT in this test; this indicates that the VRAM does not play a very big role here, as SD XL relies on float16 (FP16). So this is something to keep in mind again. If you wish to work with float32 AI workloads, graphics cards with larger than 12 GB buffers would likely emerge as victors. Regardless, the gains are still massive on AMD's 9000 series compared to the 7000 series. Following image generation, we move to the text generation benchmark. This is one test where the 9070 GRE struggled, quite a lot. It seems that the 12 GB VRAM and lower memory bandwidth of the new Radeon 9070 GRE are hurting it quite a bit; the split is massive, especially in a test like Llama2, which packs 13 billion parameters. As such, in all the tests, the 9070 GRE is the slowest of the lot. Next, we tried Blender, and here the AMD GPUs were beaten by Nvidia. Rendering is something the Green team has always had a lead over the Red side, and it has not changed so far. On the positive side, though, the 9070 GRE shows significantly better results than the 7800 XT, which means AMD is on the right path. Catching up to Nvidia, though, will require a lot more effort. And we hope HIP and ROCm can keep improving. Wrapping up AI testing, we measured OpenCL throughput in the Geekbench compute benchmark. The RX 9070 GRE alongside the 9070 did not fare well here at all, even falling behind the 7800 XT. Interestingly, even the RTX 5070 could not beat the 4070 on OpenCL, so perhaps this suggests that OpenCL optimization may not have been a priority for either AMD or Nvidia in the modern era. Conclusion We reached the end of our productivity performance review of the 9070 GRE, and we have to say it's a mixed bag. Unlike the 9070 and 9070 XT, the GRE excels in some areas while losing ground fairly easily in others. Similar to how it happened in gaming, any time the card's memory subsystem gets hammered, it tends to fall behind the others. This was the case with text generation, wherein we saw the VRAM sometimes hit its maximum available 12 GB of usage with larger model sizes. So what do we make of the RX 9070 as a productivity hardware? It can certainly be used, but you have to know it has its limitations. For those looking for a GPU that can deal with more, AMD recently unveiled the Radeon AI PRO R9700, which is essentially a 32 GB refresh of the 9070 XT with some additional workstation-based optimizations. On a similar note, the new Ryzen AI Halo platform is something you can consider if you want to set up a local AI processing station. Considering everything, we rate AMD's Radeon RX 9070 GRE a 7.5 out of 10 for its productivity performance. Price is less of a factor for those looking at productivity cases compared to those considering the GPU for gaming, and as such, we felt it did quite decently on many occasions and can be handy if you need a 12 GB GPU and, for some reason, don't want to get Nvidia. Purchase links: RX 9070 / XT / GRE (Amazon US) As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Microsoft released new Defender update for Windows 11, 10, Server ISO installations

      By skinnyJM · Posted

      Does anyone here know if these updates are integrated into the UUP dump isos?
    • Motrix Next 3.9.4

      By Copernic · Posted

      Motrix Next 3.9.4 by Razvan Serea Motrix Next is a modern, open-source cross-platform download manager built as the official next-generation successor to the original Motrix project. It has been completely rewritten using Tauri 2, Vue 3, TypeScript, and Rust, while still relying on the powerful Aria2 download engine for high-speed multi-protocol transfers. The app supports HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, BitTorrent, ED2K and magnet links, offering advanced features like multi-connection acceleration, task scheduling, bandwidth control, and batch download management. With a significantly reduced install size (around 20MB), it focuses on being lightweight, fast, and resource-efficient compared to traditional Electron-based download tools. Designed for Windows, macOS, and Linux, Motrix Next delivers a clean, modern UI inspired by Material Design 3 principles, with smooth animations and a minimal workflow. It improves usability through better download organization, system tray integration, and enhanced torrent handling including selective file downloads and tracker management. Motrix Next features: Multi-protocol downloads — HTTP, FTP, BitTorrent, Magnet, .torrent, ED2K, and Metalink tasks BitTorrent — Selective file download, DHT, peer exchange, encryption controls, metadata caching, GeoIP peer flags, and tracker probing Browser extension integration — Embedded Extension API with independent authentication, download confirmation, smart auto-submit, filename hints, referer/cookie forwarding, and real-time controls (Chrome Web Store · Edge Add-ons) Safe filename handling — Content-Disposition, RFC 2047, non-UTF-8, percent-encoded, and extensionless URL resolution with path traversal sanitization Download organization — Favorite and recent folders, optional file-type categorization, stale-record cleanup, and completed history backed by SQLite Concurrent downloads — Independent controls for active tasks, HTTP connections per server, segments per file, and BT peer limits Speed control — Global and per-task upload/download limits with day-of-week and time-of-day scheduling System integration — Tray operation, optional tray speed display, macOS Dock badge/progress, protocol handlers for magnet://, thunder://, and motrixnext:// Lightweight mode — Destroys the WebView on minimize-to-tray while Rust keeps the engine, task monitor, notifications, history, and extension routing alive Notifications and power options — Native task start/complete/failure notifications, keep-awake during downloads, and optional shutdown after completion Network controls — Scoped proxy support for downloads, app updates, and tracker updates, plus system proxy detection Auto-update channels — Stable, Beta, and Latest Across Channels policies with separate download and install phases Diagnostics — Structured logs, exportable diagnostic ZIPs, database integrity checks, automatic DB rebuild, and Linux GPU rendering fallback Personalization — Light/dark/system theme, 10 color schemes, 26 languages, and first-launch system language detection Motrix Next 3.9.4 changelog: Motrix Next 3.9.4 promotes the 3.9.4 beta cycle to stable. This release refreshes bundled engine binaries, improves task detail readability and copy actions, expands link handling for magnet and ED2K workflows, polishes responsive navigation and text wrapping, updates browser extension documentation, and refines network preference controls. New Features Task Detail copy actions — Added copyable values for task metadata and reusable render functions for long text fields. Magnet and ED2K lifecycle support — Added task lifecycle handling for magnet and ED2K links. History cleanup for deleted tasks — Deleted tasks can now remove matching history records. User-Agent management — Added user-agent management and improved related network preference controls. Browser extension documentation — Added the Firefox Add-ons link for the Motrix Next extension. Improvements Engine binaries — Updated bundled binaries for supported architectures. Task Detail readability — Long task names, URLs, tracker values, and copyable metadata now render more clearly. Deletion messaging — Refined localized task deletion text for clarity and consistency. Text wrapping — Improved URI input wrapping and task name multiline display. Navigation layout — Improved sub-navigation responsiveness. Disk allocation default — Changed the default file allocation method to trunc. Proxy controls — Improved proxy button styling in network preferences. Download: Motrix Next 64-bit | ARM64 | macOS ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Links: Website | macOS / Linux | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • AMD 9070XT

      By Steven P. · Posted

      NVIDIA officially supports Ubuntu, as linked above with the GeForce NOW Hands on I did in collaboration with Paul Hill.
    • AMD 9070XT

      By cooky560 · Posted

      TO be clear I am not running linux today, however I keep thinking about it. And I want to make sure there are minimal obstacles if I decide to make that switch in the coming months.

  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      250
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      67
    Show More

  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!