Do you Hackintosh?


Recommended Posts

I just wondered if anyone in the community uses a Hackintosh, whether just for curiosity, experimentation, or as a system to get real-life work done (most likely video and music production Id guess, or just general day to day consumption of media).

 

I currently run a Ryzen based Hackintosh as a daily driver, it's great and the only thing that I really can't get access to is Adobe Lightroom (not a big deal as I use Photoshop). I'm running a Ryzen 3600 on an Asus Tuf X570 plus Wifi with 32 gig of ram, really only because I like to use macOS messaging integration (I use an iPhone), and I am an amateur hobbyist when it comes to a piece of tech I try and tinker with it as much as possible.

 

I've had several Hackintosh machines in the past, an intel 4770k/Gigabyte board hack, and just picked up a Dell e5470 laptop which worked great with macOS too.

 

So, would be interested in anyone else's experiences, especially if you have jumped into using Opencore as opposed to Clover - my Ryzen machine is using Opencore and it seems to give a much more of an authentic 'Mac' experience i.e. my Apple TV app works, which I haven't managed to get working on my old intel systems. 

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1391019-do-you-hackintosh/
Share on other sites

my last attempt at a hackintosh failed miserably; but that could have to do with the hardware in my computer wasn't compatible enough. (edit: my last attempt was also like 6-7 years ago too so processes could have improved for getting it going)

I've heard it's rather nice once running properly though.

 

I do like MacOS, just wish it wasn't officially locked to their hardware.

Personally I never have.  I installed OSX years and years ago on Virtual Box using Chameleon or something like that.  I have a MacBook Pro and I actually really like how well OSX Runs.  I have a Dell Laptop with similar specs to the MPB and it feels way more sluggish with Windows 10 than the MBP with OSX feels.

Just now, adrynalyne said:

I need a machine that works though. If it was a hobby, sure. 

Yeah its always the issue, I know if I want to use my Dell laptop full time Im going to have to switch out the wifi card inside it, which I dont really want to do. Intel-wise is the safest, and use a Gigabyte board. The Hackintosh Reddit and tonymacx86.com are excellent resources. I'm sorely tempted to build a 9900k Hackintosh, but I really can't even use both the full-tower systems I have at once right now, never mind a totally overkill 'build on a whim' third machine just because I want to.

I have OSX running as a secondary OS on my Dell XPS that I can boot into on the rare occasions I need to push an app store update through Xcode.

 

I used a MacBook Pro for 5 years before this and honestly running it on the XPS 13 barely feels any different once it's set up. Minor updates (10.15.x -> 10.15.y) rarely cause any issues, so it's really only once a year with major updates (10.x -> 10.y) that you need to worry. I'm still using Clover and while I don't use OSX full time anymore, I feel like it's stable enough on the XPS that I could, if I wanted to. 

12 minutes ago, ZakO said:

I have OSX running as a secondary OS on my Dell XPS that I can boot into on the rare occasions I need to push an app store update through Xcode.

 

I used a MacBook Pro for 5 years before this and honestly running it on the XPS 13 barely feels any different once it's set up. Minor updates (10.15.x -> 10.15.y) rarely cause any issues, so it's really only once a year with major updates (10.x -> 10.y) that you need to worry. I'm still using Clover and while I don't use OSX full time anymore, I feel like it's stable enough on the XPS that I could, if I wanted to. 

Dunno. A minor update took out my Clover setup. That was the time I decided it wasn’t worth it anymore. 

  • 2 months later...

I've been doing it since Maverics. First with a laptop, but it never really worked 100%.

 

Couple of years ago I build a desktop for my work machine and for some casual gaming and it has worked with zero problems. All you really need is the right hardware, Clover and three kexts. I wouldn't take an iMac over this.

 

https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/331330-streacom-db4-fanless-mini-itx-build/

 

db4-000-000.thumb.jpg.f1ea6d4a5d4accae9469fd86f78bfa36.thumb.jpg.dfac93facc72acd44dde7851b9d4ffd4.jpg

I was going to have a go at it back in around 2016-17. I had read a bit on it at the time and had the links to do it, but i was on an AMD system and IIRC it was easier on an Intel.

 

It was purely for one game which i played a ton at the time. It was a shooter and for some reason the fire rate on a couple of the main weapons in the game were true on Mac/iOS devices but not on Android/PC. You could always tell when you came up against a Mac or an iOS player.

 

IIRC they dumbed down the fire rate for all users which meant it was pointless me going for a hackintosh in the end.

I did.  I put OS X on a Dell 10 mini and it was rock solid and worked fine on the small screen too.

The I built a Hackintosh system at home and it was mostly ok but not great.

Those serve as my route in to eventually just buying a Mac Mini for desktop and Macbook Pro for everything else.

2 hours ago, margrave said:

I still think Apple should just sell the OS with the caveat that it 'runs better on Apple hardware' and just tell people that drivers must be gotten from the hardware manufacturers.

Agreed. Been saying it for years and it would create competition which is good for the consumer. 

  • Like 2
18 hours ago, margrave said:

I still think Apple should just sell the OS with the caveat that it 'runs better on Apple hardware' and just tell people that drivers must be gotten from the hardware manufacturers.

+1

 

I for example use money on App Store and other Apple services on hacintosh. If this would someday end, I would just go back to Windows because there is not any hardware on Apple that would fit for what I need. Mac mini is too little, iMac has internal monitor and Mac Pro is too much for what I need. iMac usually has had the hardware best suited for my needs, but I want to pick the monitor myself.

5 hours ago, Joni_78 said:

+1

 

I for example use money on App Store and other Apple services on hacintosh. If this would someday end, I would just go back to Windows because there is not any hardware on Apple that would fit for what I need. Mac mini is too little, iMac has internal monitor and Mac Pro is too much for what I need. iMac usually has had the hardware best suited for my needs, but I want to pick the monitor myself.

iMac also has the issue of soldering components so it's not very user upgradable or repairable ...

I did it years back when I think I got Snow Leopard running on an old Celeron D that I was using for school but then I just bought a MBP, although it is getting on in age a bit now (its a 2012 model).

 

@forster how did you get it running on your Ryzen if you don't mind me asking? I have a Ryzen 5 2600X and am struggling to find decent info about it.

 

Thanks! 🙂

16 minutes ago, Asharae said:

I did it years back when I think I got Snow Leopard running on an old Celeron D that I was using for school but then I just bought a MBP, although it is getting on in age a bit now (its a 2012 model).

 

@forster how did you get it running on your Ryzen if you don't mind me asking? I have a Ryzen 5 2600X and am struggling to find decent info about it.

 

Thanks! 🙂

@Asharae I was lucky enough to find someone who had the same board as me over here and he was kind enough to attach his original bootloader. Since that starting point I've revised and updated it. This my motherboard but there's a good list of success stories on that forum with other boards and setup, mostly it's the board that's the decider as to whether you can get it to run on AMD. After that, you need to add the AMD patches for your processor to the config.plist, and have the right boot flags as per your setup.

 

I use Opencore, I used to use Clover, and before that the old pirated Apple bootloader that someone famously tried to sell for public computer builds. Those were the days :) 

 

There's basically two types of people you will find over there, and on the reddit, half will say that they will help and give you a resource that works or to start on, and the other half are very much of the opinion that you should read all the websites and learn everything the hard way. Admittedly, the resources and explanations for Opencore are getting better, but its still aways from a 'one size fits all'.

 

Fingers crossed you get it sorted, my build is really stable, updates fine, and Ive got my head around enough of the jargon that I can update my plist file kind of okay but its still hit and miss with my level of understanding.  Let us know how you get on :) 

  • Like 1
On 4/12/2020 at 2:25 PM, margrave said:

I still think Apple should just sell the OS with the caveat that it 'runs better on Apple hardware' and just tell people that drivers must be gotten from the hardware manufacturers.

It would hurt the brand ultimately.  Non-tech users would ignore the advice and there would be a litany of "Apple doesn't work on my Toshiba" posts, which other non-tech users would latch on to.

33 minutes ago, forster said:

the other half are very much of the opinion that you should read all the websites and learn everything the hard way

Elitist idiots, cannot stand that type.

  • Like 2

I don't think it would hurt it. Windows is doing it currently and doing quite well.

 

In the past Apple licensed other hardware manufacturers to make Mac devices, and they had to stop it because they made better ones, cheaper.

 

It didn't hurt the brand as much as it showed how overpriced they are, and how Apple has been taking advantage of the uninformed/uneducated.

 

A luxury computer to me is a joke. It makes sense with cars thanks to extra features like heated seats, etc. What luxury features can be placed on a computer?!

 

Heated keyboard? Oh wait they did have those heated batteries for a while. Which illustrated how they are buying cheap hardware and charging a premium for it for no reason other than an Apple logo being placed on it.

2 minutes ago, margrave said:

I don't think it would hurt it. Windows is doing it currently and doing quite well.

 

In the past Apple licensed other hardware manufacturers to make Mac devices, and they had to stop it because they made better ones, cheaper.

 

It didn't hurt the brand as much as it showed how overpriced they are, and how Apple has been taking advantage of the uninformed/uneducated.

 

A luxury computer to me is a joke. It makes sense with cars thanks to extra features like heated seats, etc. What luxury features can be placed on a computer?!

 

Heated keyboard? Oh wait they did have those heated batteries for a while. Which illustrated how they are buying cheap hardware and charging a premium for it for no reason other than an Apple logo being placed on it.

Ish - I cant defend the overpriced gear that they sell. But given that I pretty much run my Hackintosh full time it's not because Ive anything against Windows, I just really like the integration. I like the newer wireless keyboard and trackpad, they have been the best performing bits of bluetooth gear Ive used for purpose.

 

Also, heated seats are nice on a cold day - why would you not want them 😛 

 

I do get a bit bored of the 'on you're using something else other than me and thats stupid' line, if someone makes a choice for something as trivial as an electronic device I hardly think it's worth calling names. If you dont like it, dont use it, move on, it's fine.

9 minutes ago, margrave said:

I don't think it would hurt it. Windows is doing it currently and doing quite well.

No they aren't.  Microsoft plunge a LOT of time and effort (hence, cash) into ensuring that their OS works on as many devices as possible.  You said that Apple shouldn't do this but rather say "Hey it works fine on our gear".  They are very different things and it absolutely would damage the Apple brand.

 

10 minutes ago, margrave said:

In the past Apple licensed other hardware manufacturers to make Mac devices, and they had to stop it because they made better ones, cheaper.

That is one interpretation.  The other is that Apple stopped such practices because they wanted to bring their operations back home and own the ecosystem fully.

 

11 minutes ago, margrave said:

It didn't hurt the brand as much as it showed how overpriced they are, and how Apple has been taking advantage of the uninformed/uneducated.

Or just those who have bought into the ecosystem by choice.  Apple gear being "overpriced" is a common comment, but also commonly disputed for a number of cases.  When you factor in the ecosystem, the resale and so on - it's not actually as bad as people make out.

 

13 minutes ago, margrave said:

A luxury computer to me is a joke. It makes sense with cars thanks to extra features like heated seats, etc. What luxury features can be placed on a computer?!

That's YOUR call for YOU.  You are not the entire market.

 

13 minutes ago, margrave said:

Heated keyboard? Oh wait they did have those heated batteries for a while. Which illustrated how they are buying cheap hardware and charging a premium for it for no reason other than an Apple logo being placed on it.

And here's where you just go silly and show that you're really just being anti-apple.  Which is fine, but don't feel that your stance is shared by everyone.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Would you please fix your graphics. They are outdated and don't fit the article.
    • The Light of Life? We actually do glow till our Death, study finds by Sayan Sen Image by Rafael Rendon via Pexels A study by researchers at the University of Calgary has found that living organisms produce an extremely faint light known as ultraweak photon emission, and that this glow appears to drop significantly after death. The research was published in the Journal of Physical Chemistry in April 2025 and quickly drew widespread attention, leading to more than 200 news stories about the findings. Ultraweak photon emission (or UPE), sometimes called biophoton emission, refers to tiny amounts of light released by living cells as a result of normal biological activity. A photon is the basic particle of light, and researchers say every living system examined so far, including plants and animals, has been found to emit these photons. The glow is far too faint to be seen by the human eye. “I suppose it has a little to do with people being reminded of auras,” says Dr. Christoph Simon, PhD, one of the authors of the study and a professor in the Department of Physics and Astronomy in the Faculty of Science. “It is a fact that living beings glow. It’s a very weak glow, but it’s there and visible with very sensitive cameras.” According to the study, the light involved is extremely weak, ranging from 10 to 1,000 photons per square centimetre per second across a spectral range of 200 to 1,000 nanometres. For comparison, a nanometre is one-billionth of a metre and is commonly used to measure wavelengths of light. Detecting emissions at such low levels requires highly specialized equipment. To study the phenomenon, researchers used electron-multiplying charge-coupled device (EMCCD) and charge-coupled device (CCD) cameras. These imaging systems are designed to detect extremely small amounts of light, including individual photons, while minimizing background noise. The technology allowed researchers to capture signals that would otherwise be impossible to observe. The team worked with the Human Health Therapeutics Research Centre at the National Research Council of Canada (NRC) in Ottawa to examine photon emissions in mice. Researchers took two-hour exposure images of the animals before and after death and compared the results. “We saw that the level of light that they emit – this biophoton glow – is distinctly different between living and dead animals,” says Dr. Daniel Oblak, PhD, an associate professor in Physics and Astronomy and the corresponding author of the study. The images showed a clear decrease in photon emissions after death across the entire body of each mouse. According to the researchers, this provided direct evidence that living and dead tissue produce different levels of ultraweak photon emission. “It’s a very small amount and it’s, of course, very tricky to detect,” Oblak says. The study grew out of discussions between Simon, whose research interests include quantum biology, and Oblak, whose work focuses on detecting light for quantum communication experiments. Quantum biology is a field that explores whether processes described by quantum physics, which studies matter and energy at very small scales, may also play a role in living systems. “Since I work as a quantum physicist on light detection for quantum communication, I thought that experimentally we have a lot of the tools to be able to detect the light,” Oblak explains. The researchers also investigated UPE in plants and found that the light changed in response to stress. When plants were exposed to higher temperatures or physically injured, their photon emissions increased. Chemical treatments also affected the glow. Among the substances tested, the local anesthetic benzocaine produced the strongest emission response when applied to injured plant tissue. These findings suggest that ultraweak photon emission is closely linked to biochemical and metabolic activity inside living organisms. Metabolism refers to the chemical reactions that allow cells and organisms to stay alive and function. Because these reactions change when an organism experiences stress, injury or disease, researchers believe UPE may provide a way to monitor those changes. The researchers stress that the glow is a physical and biological phenomenon, not a metaphysical one. Oblak says more research is needed to understand exactly how the light is produced and what information it may reveal about the condition of living tissue. “We must understand what that is to figure out what’s happening,” he says. “If we can understand how that relates to certain influences on the body – stress, diseases – then that could be used as a diagnostic tool.” The researchers believe the technique could eventually help scientists study health and disease without invasive procedures. Because UPE can be measured without adding dyes, markers or labels, it may offer a way to monitor whether tissue is healthy, damaged or alive. In plants, it could help researchers better understand how organisms respond to injury, heat and other forms of stress. While the work is still in its early stages, the study demonstrates that ultraweak photon emission imaging can provide a non-invasive and label-free way to observe biological activity. Researchers say the approach could become a useful tool for studying vitality, stress responses and other important processes in both animals and plants. Source: University of Calgary, ACS publication This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Damn, I loved this show back in the day.  
    • Rufus 4.15.2393 Beta 2 by Razvan Serea Rufus is a small utility that helps format and create bootable USB flash drives, such as USB keys/pendrives, memory sticks, etc. Despite its small size, Rufus provides everything you need! Oh, and Rufus is fast. For instance it's about twice as fast as UNetbootin, Universal USB Installer or Windows 7 USB download tool, on the creation of a Windows 7 USB installation drive from an ISO (with honorable mention to WiNToBootic for managing to keep up). It is also marginally faster on the creation of Linux bootable USBs from ISOs. A non-exhaustive list of Rufus supported ISOs is available here. It can be especially useful for cases where: you need to create USB installation media from bootable ISOs (Windows, Linux, UEFI, etc.) you need to work on a system that doesn't have an OS installed you need to flash a BIOS or other firmware from DOS you want to run a low-level utility Rufus 4.15.2393 Beta 2 changelog: Add RISC-V 64 support to UEFI:NTFS Improve the guards for using the "silent" option Improve the ability to cancel during write retries Improve progress reporting for compressed image extraction Fix unrestricted XML entity expansion and integer overflow in ezxml parser (courtesy of @esadowski4) [GHSA-55r2-34wg-8mv9] Fix "silent" Windows installation failing at 75% in most cases [#2960] Fix a crash during boot when using UEFI:NTFS on Snapdragon X based ARM64 platforms [#2934] Fix the first WUE option always being checked by default [#2965] Fix an infinite loop when using Windows ISOs that contain multiple WIMs Fix "Enable runtime UEFI media validation" checkbox not always being properly enabled Other WUE improvements/fixes for OneDrive removal and username validation (with thanks to @christian8641) [#2984, #2991] Download: Rufus 4.15 Beta 2 | 1.9 MB (Open Source) Links: Rufus Home Page | Project Page @GitHub | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      AMV earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      515
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      171
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      83
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!