Covid: Is your job essential?


COVID: Is your job essential?  

72 members have voted

  1. 1. Is your job essential?

    • Yes
      47
    • No
      19


Recommended Posts

Just curious on whose job is deemed essential or not.  Currently most of my family are still working with some getting pay cuts/less hours.   A few out of work.

 

My job, we have Navy contracts.  We also provide backup power systems for hospitals and nuclear power plants.  So I am still working every day and going in to the office.  I can also work from home.

 

My GF is also a PA and she is seeing patients daily with COVID.  So I have some concern for her.

 

If you are still working, put yes.  If you are not working because of COVID, then No.

Edited by techbeck
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1394155-covid-is-your-job-essential/
Share on other sites

My employer supplies safety and automation solutions for government, nuclear, aerospace, and pretty much all manufacturing companies in the US, so we're still open.  Besides a slight dip in sales, I've been completely unaffected luckily.

My job is essential to the firm.  My firm is involved in major contracts globally.  Some of those contracts are with the NHS.  Business is currently up (by quite a margin) for us.

 

Is my job essential to the world continuing?  Not at all.

 

I'm currently working from home, but working as per normal.

 

I've no idea how to answer - lol

I work in a call center that troubleshoots credit card machines so we're deemed essential

 

I'm not even on the phones lol. I write/maintain the website for our troubleshooting references the agents use.

I'm still going into work every day because they have me also helping get everyone setup for BCP in case the agents need to work from home.

I marked "yes" according to the original post, but I wouldn't consider it essential. I work in IT Support. The Forum have said that if you can work from home then you should. Except for our team, where we need to have one person in the office each day. I was in on Tuesday, but aside from that we're working from home. Well, I was until about 4 hours ago. Now I'm on holiday for a week.

I dunno, kinda.

 

I support engineers who fix boilers for a large boiler manufacturer, so it's keeping hot water and heating going.

 

Did I need to spend two weeks in an office/call centre environment? Not really, especially now, seeing as they let us work at home in the end.

 

This was never the plan, one day they had a meeting to say that there is zero chance that we can work at home and to quash any questioning of it. The next day they did a 180, it was really weird.

3 minutes ago, Nick H. said:

I marked "yes" according to the original post, but I wouldn't consider it essential. I work in IT Support. The Forum have said that if you can work from home then you should. Except for our team, where we need to have one person in the office each day. I was in on Tuesday, but aside from that we're working from home. Well, I was until about 4 hours ago. Now I'm on holiday for a week.

Nick H. - part of the problem is that there was a LOT of resistance to letting folks WFH in the government (despite the government being set up for it for years) and it came from up the chain; it's as if they are "counting bodies".  I'm really wondering - was someone LITERALLY "counting bodies supervised" - and that is what drove the resistance to working from home?  The same is true in telecom (even cable companies).  Yes; I'm serious - the entirety of the cable company support network can work from home - and has been able to since 1988 using existing technologies.  The question is where is the resistance coming from - and WHY is it coming from there?

1 minute ago, PGHammer said:

Nick H. - part of the problem is that there was a LOT of resistance to letting folks WFH in the government (despite the government being set up for it for years) and it came from up the chain; it's as if they are "counting bodies".  I'm really wondering - was someone LITERALLY "counting bodies supervised" - and that is what drove the resistance to working from home?  The same is true in telecom (even cable companies).  Yes; I'm serious - the entirety of the cable company support network can work from home - and has been able to since 1988 using existing technologies.  The question is where is the resistance coming from - and WHY is it coming from there?

I would not like to host a 750+ people video conference using 1988 technology...

I'm retired so I voted for my wife and said yes, although I don't have a clue why her job is essential! It wasn't a week ago when she got laid off but went back to work this week. As of now, I don't know how long she will be back to work, but with the hours she's working this week and Saturday, doubt if it's just for 1 week. I think she'll have to go through the health questionnaire and getting a new permission to drive slip.

 

She works for a company making office furniture.

12 minutes ago, kalkal said:

I dunno, kinda.

 

I support engineers who fix boilers for a large boiler manufacturer, so it's keeping hot water and heating going.

 

Did I need to spend two weeks in an office/call centre environment? Not really, especially now, seeing as they let us work at home in the end.

 

This was never the plan, one day they had a meeting to say that there is zero chance that we can work at home and to quash any questioning of it. The next day they did a 180, it was really weird.

Of course they can - The folks doing the actual repairs can park the trucks at home; heck the DISPATCHERS can dispatch from home as well - existing technology (it has been available for over ten years - if not twenty)! Again - what's driving the resistance?  Something smells - and it's not the cologne.

2 minutes ago, Nick H. said:

I would not like to host a 750+ people video conference using 1988 technology...

You don't have to use 1988 tech - tech has advanced since them - you can do it using Teams - or Skype - or even Facebook Messenger (the latter costs nothing - and likely is already in the houses of the folks doing the work).

1 minute ago, PGHammer said:

Of course they can - The folks doing the actual repairs can park the trucks can home; heck the DISPATCHERS can dispatch from home as well - existing technology (it has been available for over ten years - if not twenty)! Again - what's driving the resistance?  Something smells - and it's not the cologne.

I'm not following, the engineers pretty much have the short straw in that they physically have to repair boilers at people's homes. I on the other hand was on the end of the phone for the engineers, and now doing that at home thank god! Feel bad for them, however I've no doubt that if they had the option, that they would be working from home instead of working out in the field.

1 minute ago, kalkal said:

I'm not following, the engineers pretty much have the short straw in that they physically have to repair boilers at people's homes. I on the other hand was on the end of the phone for the engineers, and now doing that at home thank god! Feel bad for them, however I've no doubt that if they had the option, that they would be working from home instead of working out in the field.

Again - do they have Facebook Mesenger or Skype?  You can dispatch from your house - using either.

3 minutes ago, PGHammer said:

Again - do they have Facebook Mesenger or Skype?  You can dispatch from your house - using either.

Dispatch what?

 

We're talking about Gas Safe engineers on Gas appliances, you need to be Gas Safe trained to work on any Gas appliance, for fairly obvious reasons...

7 minutes ago, cork1958 said:

I'm retired so I voted for my wife and said yes, although I don't have a clue why her job is essential! It wasn't a week ago when she got laid off but went back to work this week. As of now, I don't know how long she will be back to work, but with the hours she's working this week and Saturday, doubt if it's just for 1 week. I think she'll have to go through the health questionnaire and getting a new permission to drive slip.

 

She works for a company making office furniture.

it still can be done to an extent from home.  Furnitureland South literally has their entire staff WFH - and they make mid-end to high-end furniture for half the United States.  Our own rep is WFH - her office is in Greensboro - however, her home is not.  WE are located in Maryland,  It's why I asked what is driving the resistance.

2 minutes ago, kalkal said:

Dispatch what?

 

We're talking about Gas Safe engineers on Gas appliances, you need to be Gas Safe trained to work on any Gas appliance, for fairly obvious reasons...

I'm talking about sending out the repair folks.  Can you or can you not you not send out repair folks via Skype or Facebook Messenger?

6 minutes ago, PGHammer said:

I'm talking about sending out the repair folks.  Can you or can you not you not send out repair folks via Skype or Facebook Messenger?

Oh we're nationwide, sure, we're not exactly small and we have full background telephony set up, and all we needed was a VPN to work from home the exact way we worked in the office.

 

The crux was "We don't have the support structure" in place to make it feasible. Well, we're working at home now at the very least, not sure why they were so against this, old habits I guess.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • I sort of agree with you on that. I had a telescope - a real hefty thing, although only around 500CHF - that got me so fascinated about the stars and planets. I would stare for hours, amazed that I could see the craters of the moon or the rings of Saturn in "realtime" (quotations because, y'know, speed of light and whatnot). A friend of mine has a telescope like the one mentioned in the review, and the pictures are amazing to look at. But there is something missing for me. I may as well just go to NASA's website and look through their gallery.
    • As opposed to catching bad press because it's the engine's fault? You didn't really think this through did you? lol. The engine has all the tools a dev needs to optimize their game, Epic isn't gonna hold their hand to make sure they use them. Also, Epic isn't forcing anyone to use Lumen, Nanite or super high resolution meshes and textures. Most of the stuttering can easily be fixed by generating a PSO cache and compiling every shader before loading the game, it's up to the developer to set it up properly.
    • I think it depends on what you're looking for to do, and the time you have to spare. With my Dwarf 3, I easily spend 3-4 hour sessions; half an hour driving to an un-light polluted place, another half hour unpacking and setting up the smart scope + tripod for equatorial tracking, then 15 more minutes mucking around with settings and shooting calibration frames, spending a few hours shooting, merging with past photo sessions, etc. It's crazy how time flies and I often get home later than I expected. It's something I still need to set aside a good part of an evening to do, all in all. For one session, where you often need like four for best results when it comes to deep space objects. Even with a smart scope like Dwarf 3, regular non-astro photography is still way more approachable to people getting into photography. I find this is a time consuming niche no matter how I go about it. With practice, I can probably begin cutting time here but I think where smart scopes find their home is among people who love to shoot the night sky but don't have the spare time to go deep with the "navigator level" attunement to the night sky itself in addition to everything else. Having said this, _if_ you have even more time to spend on this hobby, it will probably be even more rewarding to do it more by hand and learn the skies and the details of how it all works.
    • I misread the title and thought Teams itself would be redesigned. Imagine having this one as a native WinUI app.
    • Dell, HP PCs ran into endless reboot, BitLocker recovery loops but Windows 11 isn't to blame by Sayan Sen Last month Neowin reported on a major issue on Dell systems wherein a bug in its official support tool was leading to endless blue screen of death (BSOD) and restarts. Following our report, Dell officially acknowledged its SupportAssist-related crash issue, confirming that the culprit is not Microsoft's operating system but rather a faulty version of its own remediation software. In a newly published support advisory, Dell stated that version 5.5.16.0 of Dell SupportAssist Remediation and Alienware SupportAssist Remediation can trigger blue screen errors and unexpected system restarts. The company notes that the problematic component operates independently of the main SupportAssist application, meaning users should not remove the primary SupportAssist software when troubleshooting the issue. According to Dell, the crashes are linked specifically to the SupportAssist Remediation service, which is bundled with SupportAssist OS Recovery Tools, and as such it has since released an updated version, 5.5.16.1, which is said to resolve the problem. Affected users are advised to first verify whether version 5.5.16.0 is installed by checking the Installed Apps section in Windows Settings. If so, Dell recommends updating SupportAssist OS Recovery Tools through either SupportAssist's "Update Software" feature or Dell Command Update. Dell also advises users to back up important data before performing the update and to ensure systems remain connected to power throughout the installation process. If you are still having issues though make sure to report to the Dell support forum. As it turns out though Dell is not the only PC maker currently dealing with update-related headaches as HP is also facing a separate but probably equally frustrating issue involving recent Windows Secure Boot updates that were released with recent Windows 11 Patch Tuesdays. Similar to Dell, HP also put up its own support article where it explains the issue. The company says that affected devices could hit a brick wall when booting as they run into a BitLocker recovery loop after the April 2026 updates. The problem appears to affect systems wherein the new UEFI Secure Boot CA 2023 certificates fail to apply properly. As such affected users will find themselves entering their recovery key over and over again despite the system otherwise functioning normally. HP says such PCs should be updated to the latest available BIOS version and configured with the necessary Secure Boot certificates before installing Microsoft's Windows 11 Patch Tuesday updates. Systems that are already experiencing the problem may require BIOS configuration changes to restore normal boot behavior. Admins can find information regarding that in the support article here on HP's official website.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      246
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!