Covid: Is your job essential?

By techbeck
in Poll Station

 Share

COVID: Is your job essential?  

72 members have voted

  1. 1. Is your job essential?

    • Yes
      47
    • No
      19

Recommended Posts

Grand Master

techbeck

Posted
Posted (edited)

Just curious on whose job is deemed essential or not.  Currently most of my family are still working with some getting pay cuts/less hours.   A few out of work.

 

My job, we have Navy contracts.  We also provide backup power systems for hospitals and nuclear power plants.  So I am still working every day and going in to the office.  I can also work from home.

 

My GF is also a PA and she is seeing patients daily with COVID.  So I have some concern for her.

 

If you are still working, put yes.  If you are not working because of COVID, then No.

Edited by techbeck
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1394155-covid-is-your-job-essential/
Share on other sites
Grand Master

Astra.Xtreme

Posted
Posted

My employer supplies safety and automation solutions for government, nuclear, aerospace, and pretty much all manufacturing companies in the US, so we're still open.  Besides a slight dip in sales, I've been completely unaffected luckily.

Grand Master

+Nik Louch Subscriber²

Posted
  • Subscriber²
Posted

My job is essential to the firm.  My firm is involved in major contracts globally.  Some of those contracts are with the NHS.  Business is currently up (by quite a margin) for us.

 

Is my job essential to the world continuing?  Not at all.

 

I'm currently working from home, but working as per normal.

 

I've no idea how to answer - lol

Grand Master

Brandon H Supervisor

Posted
  • Supervisor
Posted

I work in a call center that troubleshoots credit card machines so we're deemed essential

 

I'm not even on the phones lol. I write/maintain the website for our troubleshooting references the agents use.

I'm still going into work every day because they have me also helping get everyone setup for BCP in case the agents need to work from home.

Grand Master

Nick H. Supervisor

Posted
  • Supervisor
Posted

I marked "yes" according to the original post, but I wouldn't consider it essential. I work in IT Support. The Forum have said that if you can work from home then you should. Except for our team, where we need to have one person in the office each day. I was in on Tuesday, but aside from that we're working from home. Well, I was until about 4 hours ago. Now I'm on holiday for a week.

Guest

Posted
Posted

I dunno, kinda.

 

I support engineers who fix boilers for a large boiler manufacturer, so it's keeping hot water and heating going.

 

Did I need to spend two weeks in an office/call centre environment? Not really, especially now, seeing as they let us work at home in the end.

 

This was never the plan, one day they had a meeting to say that there is zero chance that we can work at home and to quash any questioning of it. The next day they did a 180, it was really weird.

Grand Master

PGHammer

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Nick H. said:

I marked "yes" according to the original post, but I wouldn't consider it essential. I work in IT Support. The Forum have said that if you can work from home then you should. Except for our team, where we need to have one person in the office each day. I was in on Tuesday, but aside from that we're working from home. Well, I was until about 4 hours ago. Now I'm on holiday for a week.

Nick H. - part of the problem is that there was a LOT of resistance to letting folks WFH in the government (despite the government being set up for it for years) and it came from up the chain; it's as if they are "counting bodies".  I'm really wondering - was someone LITERALLY "counting bodies supervised" - and that is what drove the resistance to working from home?  The same is true in telecom (even cable companies).  Yes; I'm serious - the entirety of the cable company support network can work from home - and has been able to since 1988 using existing technologies.  The question is where is the resistance coming from - and WHY is it coming from there?

Grand Master

Nick H. Supervisor

Posted
  • Supervisor
Posted
1 minute ago, PGHammer said:

Nick H. - part of the problem is that there was a LOT of resistance to letting folks WFH in the government (despite the government being set up for it for years) and it came from up the chain; it's as if they are "counting bodies".  I'm really wondering - was someone LITERALLY "counting bodies supervised" - and that is what drove the resistance to working from home?  The same is true in telecom (even cable companies).  Yes; I'm serious - the entirety of the cable company support network can work from home - and has been able to since 1988 using existing technologies.  The question is where is the resistance coming from - and WHY is it coming from there?

I would not like to host a 750+ people video conference using 1988 technology...

Grand Master

cork1958

Posted
Posted

I'm retired so I voted for my wife and said yes, although I don't have a clue why her job is essential! It wasn't a week ago when she got laid off but went back to work this week. As of now, I don't know how long she will be back to work, but with the hours she's working this week and Saturday, doubt if it's just for 1 week. I think she'll have to go through the health questionnaire and getting a new permission to drive slip.

 

She works for a company making office furniture.

Grand Master

PGHammer

Posted
Posted (edited)
12 minutes ago, kalkal said:

I dunno, kinda.

 

I support engineers who fix boilers for a large boiler manufacturer, so it's keeping hot water and heating going.

 

Did I need to spend two weeks in an office/call centre environment? Not really, especially now, seeing as they let us work at home in the end.

 

This was never the plan, one day they had a meeting to say that there is zero chance that we can work at home and to quash any questioning of it. The next day they did a 180, it was really weird.

Of course they can - The folks doing the actual repairs can park the trucks at home; heck the DISPATCHERS can dispatch from home as well - existing technology (it has been available for over ten years - if not twenty)! Again - what's driving the resistance?  Something smells - and it's not the cologne.

Grand Master

PGHammer

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Nick H. said:

I would not like to host a 750+ people video conference using 1988 technology...

You don't have to use 1988 tech - tech has advanced since them - you can do it using Teams - or Skype - or even Facebook Messenger (the latter costs nothing - and likely is already in the houses of the folks doing the work).

Guest

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, PGHammer said:

Of course they can - The folks doing the actual repairs can park the trucks can home; heck the DISPATCHERS can dispatch from home as well - existing technology (it has been available for over ten years - if not twenty)! Again - what's driving the resistance?  Something smells - and it's not the cologne.

I'm not following, the engineers pretty much have the short straw in that they physically have to repair boilers at people's homes. I on the other hand was on the end of the phone for the engineers, and now doing that at home thank god! Feel bad for them, however I've no doubt that if they had the option, that they would be working from home instead of working out in the field.

Grand Master

PGHammer

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, kalkal said:

I'm not following, the engineers pretty much have the short straw in that they physically have to repair boilers at people's homes. I on the other hand was on the end of the phone for the engineers, and now doing that at home thank god! Feel bad for them, however I've no doubt that if they had the option, that they would be working from home instead of working out in the field.

Again - do they have Facebook Mesenger or Skype?  You can dispatch from your house - using either.

Guest

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, PGHammer said:

Again - do they have Facebook Mesenger or Skype?  You can dispatch from your house - using either.

Dispatch what?

 

We're talking about Gas Safe engineers on Gas appliances, you need to be Gas Safe trained to work on any Gas appliance, for fairly obvious reasons...

Grand Master

PGHammer

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, cork1958 said:

I'm retired so I voted for my wife and said yes, although I don't have a clue why her job is essential! It wasn't a week ago when she got laid off but went back to work this week. As of now, I don't know how long she will be back to work, but with the hours she's working this week and Saturday, doubt if it's just for 1 week. I think she'll have to go through the health questionnaire and getting a new permission to drive slip.

 

She works for a company making office furniture.

it still can be done to an extent from home.  Furnitureland South literally has their entire staff WFH - and they make mid-end to high-end furniture for half the United States.  Our own rep is WFH - her office is in Greensboro - however, her home is not.  WE are located in Maryland,  It's why I asked what is driving the resistance.

Grand Master

PGHammer

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, kalkal said:

Dispatch what?

 

We're talking about Gas Safe engineers on Gas appliances, you need to be Gas Safe trained to work on any Gas appliance, for fairly obvious reasons...

I'm talking about sending out the repair folks.  Can you or can you not you not send out repair folks via Skype or Facebook Messenger?

Guest

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, PGHammer said:

I'm talking about sending out the repair folks.  Can you or can you not you not send out repair folks via Skype or Facebook Messenger?

Oh we're nationwide, sure, we're not exactly small and we have full background telephony set up, and all we needed was a VPN to work from home the exact way we worked in the office.

 

The crux was "We don't have the support structure" in place to make it feasible. Well, we're working at home now at the very least, not sure why they were so against this, old habits I guess.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Posts

    • Bluesky COO warns social media regulations could destroy competition from small startups

      By zikalify · Posted

      Bluesky COO warns social media regulations could destroy competition from small startups by Paul Hill Fears that increasing government control of social media risks regulatory capture by the biggest social media firms were raised again recently. Bluesky’s chief operating officer said in an interview that social media bans for children and tighter regulations for social media firms risk creating a world where there are only a few social media platforms run by companies with the deepest pockets. Regulations on social media firms have been very lax since they appeared for mainstream users in the 2000’s. This gave Meta, Snapchat, and Google time to build up their user bases and get entrenched, with Meta being the most successful. Now that Meta has succeeded, it has been attempting regulatory capture. By pushing for more regulations of social media, Meta hopes to make it more difficult for rivals to challenge it. For its part, it doesn’t need to worry about the cost of regulation because it has a lot of money to spend, whereas startups do not. Speaking to CNBC, Rose Wang, Bluesky’s chief operating officer, said: “I support the protection and the safety of youth, the question that we have then is at what cost, because essentially what I’m scared of is in the long term, we’re headed to a world where there’s about three to five platforms, and extreme heavy regulation of those platforms, and basically the whole compliance teams of these platforms are 10 times the size of our entire team. So, basically, we’re living in a world where it’s almost impossible for smaller entrants to come in and build healthier spaces. These platforms have led to a place where the bottom line is the thing that drives what they do... so I understand why governments have to step in and regulate, because the platforms have done nothing right.” She said that while she is not against regulation, there needs to be more channels between the small to mid-sized players and regulators to help protect them. She says that big tech players, on the other hand, “who we know are circumventing regulation,” need to be regulated. Essentially, the Bluesky position is one of nuance, rather than absolutes. While Bluesky’s proposal may preserve competition in the social media space, it still doesn’t address the massive privacy implications these age verification measures introduce, such as handing over sensitive identity documents to access age-gated content. Source: CNBC
    • Politically funny images of the World

      By Michael Scrip · Posted

    • Still using Classic Outlook? Microsoft highlights 15 reasons to switch to New Outlook

      By davesickofenshittification · Posted

      it dosnt support onprem exchange. it dosnt support mapi-calls. the views are all worse/limited. its slower. it cant see public folder calendars. we already have webmail. the list of other missing features is pretty huge but i only see it when customers call to say their email isnt working, and 9/10 times its cause they accidentality changed to outlooknew(new). Hold the line everyone!
    • Halo: Campaign Evolved is out next month with new prequel missions

      By ZipZapRap · Posted

      yeah, this looks beautiful. Damn this winter's going to be great.
    • 25th anniversary Xbox Series X unveiled with classic translucent green design

      By ZipZapRap · Posted

      Same. I want that controller!

  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      249
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      71
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      70
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      69
    Show More

  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!