No network connection for 30ish seconds after desktop (Win 10)


Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, NinjaGinger said:

I had exactly the same problem and it was my ISP so there it is possible.

No its not... We are not talking about windows taking time to show it has internet access.  He is saying its taking 30 some seconds before the nic shows it is even connected to the local network.

 

Have you tried disable power management on the nic...

15 minutes ago, NinjaGinger said:

 

I had exactly the same problem and it was my ISP so there it is possible.

It is the local connection.  Not pulling an up address for 30 seconds.  This the local network before it even tries to get out to the internet.   It could be a switch issue.  

You could try turning off hybrid boot... Which I believe is default on windows 10...

 

powercfg -h off

 

The shut it down... Then turn it back on..

problem is with Killer E2200 Gigabit Ethernet Controller driver, downgrage to 2019y drivers and disable sleep mode

 

image.thumb.png.55bcd0b8e5d8a901c2d91514982c4fe7.png

9 minutes ago, Marujan said:

problem is with Killer E2200 Gigabit Ethernet Controller driver, downgrage to 2019y drivers and disable sleep mode

 

image.thumb.png.55bcd0b8e5d8a901c2d91514982c4fe7.png

possibly for that one but there are two other NIC's that are having this issue also

so Killer drivers have no way to set speed / duplex to 1000 Full only 100 Full so set it to that... rebooted same issue

 

went to the switch set the port to 100 FDX and got a connection instantly

 

This is on my unifi switch, need to try it on my catalyst tomorrow...

 

but that gets rid of 1Gbps... ugh

 

Same solution on my 10Gbe NIC.... but of course no more 10GbE

 

Not really a solution but maybe more insight into the problem

51 minutes ago, NinjaGinger said:

 

I had exactly the same problem and it was my ISP so there it is possible.

I’m not going to suggest that you don’t know what you’re talking about, just that you have no idea what everyone else is talking about...

  • Like 1
3 hours ago, BudMan said:

Yeah that would point to an issue with the neg of speed.. which why I would suggest trying same a dumb switch to see if you see the same issue.

used a cheapo trendnet 8 port unmanaged switch, same issue.... not as long but it's there... it's about 10ish seconds on it

 

 

 

well 2 systems at work turned out to be exacerbated by Wireshark's npcap driver, adds a lot of time to the NIC startup....

 

but it does get faster on the catalyst switch when you have fastpath turned on and set to 100 FDX on both ends

 

systems with npcap take 40-50 seconds to get a NIC enabled, remove npcap and it drops to 20 seconds... turn on 100 FDX and it's instant

Not sure if this helps any but I was fixing a laptop the other day and when I fresh installed windows everything seemed fine. After patch Tuesday updates got applied from the 9th I remember seeing this happen although I didn`take much notice!

 

Do these systems all have the latest patches from last week? Could that be when/where the problem started. I`ll try another couple of laptops later to see if they have the same "issue".

 

Good luck.

12 minutes ago, Riggers said:

Not sure if this helps any but I was fixing a laptop the other day and when I fresh installed windows everything seemed fine. After patch Tuesday updates got applied from the 9th I remember seeing this happen although I didn`take much notice!

 

Do these systems all have the latest patches from last week? Could that be when/where the problem started. I`ll try another couple of laptops later to see if they have the same "issue".

 

Good luck.

probably, when windows does a clean install it "gets latest patches" during the install never seem to have any available when it gets done to install, and the work systems get patched weekly

The network adapter troubleshooter could be worth a shot, nothing in Event Viewer that might point towards any issue? Uninstall wireless network adapter could be another. I wonder if the network cards although being different makers could all still have the same chip in, that may explain it somewhat, because why now, all of a sudden, out of the blue, on different networks!

 

 

30 minutes ago, Riggers said:

The network adapter troubleshooter could be worth a shot, nothing in Event Viewer that might point towards any issue? Uninstall wireless network adapter could be another. I wonder if the network cards although being different makers could all still have the same chip in, that may explain it somewhat, because why now, all of a sudden, out of the blue, on different networks!

 

 

no events i can find

 

the 10GbE one at least has an aquantis chip, one as an Intel chip and the other is a Realtek so all different chipsets

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The laptop in the bedroom is an Acer with i7-10510U CPU. Acer's website states they will not be upgrading it so I had little choice other than disable secure boot. I know next to nothing on these matters so hopefully it will be fine.
    • GitHub removes manual model selection from Copilot free and student plans by Karthik Mudaliar GitHub is removing the ability to manually select an AI model from its Copilot Free and Student plans, making its automatic routing system the default and only way to choose a model. This means users on these tiers will no longer be able to deliberately select a particular OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, or Microsoft model for a task. In its announcement, GitHub said Copilot Auto will dynamically choose what it considers the best model for each request. Free and Student accounts will retain access to models from multiple families, although the available selection will continue to depend on the restrictions attached to each plan. GitHub did not identify a fixed pool of models that Auto will always use, and its documentation warns that model availability can change over time. GitHub describes Auto as more than a random fallback system. On supported surfaces, its task-optimization technology evaluates the complexity of a request alongside real-time information about model health and availability. Straightforward prompts can be routed to faster and less expensive models, while more demanding coding tasks may be sent to higher-cost reasoning models. The company says this approach should reduce rate limiting, latency, and failed requests. Auto generally selects one model along natural prompt-caching boundaries rather than repeatedly switching models during a session, as GitHub found that mid-session changes increased costs without producing sufficient improvements in output quality. Users can still check which model generated a response. In Copilot Chat, the information appears when hovering over an answer, while Copilot CLI and the Copilot cloud agent display the selected model alongside their output. Auto is available in Copilot Chat, Copilot CLI, and the cloud agent, with the exact implementation and release status varying between supported development environments. The latest restriction follows several months of adjustments to Copilot’s individual plans. GitHub temporarily halted new Pro, Pro+, and Student subscriptions in April as it sought to manage demand and service reliability. It later introduced token-based billing and began gradually reopening individual-plan registrations on June 17. Alongside the picker change, GitHub is retiring the “Preview” label from Microsoft-developed models. It argues that the label is no longer necessary because Auto handles model routing and models are continuously updated behind the scenes.
    • Look up 'inflation' kid. Ask an AI for the numbers between both games.
    • Google reportedly set to lose two key Gemini and DeepMind researchers to Anthropic by Karthik Mudaliar Google is reportedly preparing to lose two more prominent artificial intelligence researchers, with Gemini contributors Jonas Adler and Alexander Pritzel planning to join rival AI developer Anthropic. According to a report from Bloomberg, both researchers are viewed internally as important contributors to Google’s flagship Gemini model family. Adler worked on Google’s AI coding efforts, while Pritzel was involved in the process used to train AI systems. Neither company has publicly confirmed the moves. The report also does not say when the researchers will formally leave Google or what positions they will hold at Anthropic. Training a large AI model requires decisions covering its architecture, data preparation, distributed computing infrastructure, and post-training methods that shape how the finished system behaves. Researchers with experience operating at the scale of Gemini are consequently difficult to replace quickly. Both Adler and Pritzel have previously contributed to Google DeepMind’s scientific research as well. They are listed among the authors of the company’s work on expanding AlphaFold protein-structure predictions across entire proteomes, alongside AlphaFold researchers including John Jumper. The reported departures arrive shortly after another important change within Google’s Gemini organization. Gemini co-lead Noam Shazeer is leaving Google for OpenAI, after returning to the search company in 2024 through its deal with Character.AI. Shazeer is particularly well known as one of the authors of the Transformer paper, whose architecture became the foundation for most modern large language models. Anthropic, meanwhile, has been recruiting recognizable figures from other leading laboratories. OpenAI co-founder and former Tesla AI director Andrej Karpathy joined Anthropic’s pre-training team in May. His move, followed by the reported recruitment of several Google researchers, suggests Anthropic is strengthening the research teams responsible for the core capabilities of future Claude models rather than concentrating solely on product and enterprise sales. The competition is complicated by the companies’ extensive commercial relationships. Anthropic competes directly with Google’s Gemini models, but it also relies on Google as an infrastructure partner. In April, Anthropic announced an expanded agreement with Google and Broadcom covering multiple gigawatts of next-generation Tensor Processing Unit capacity. TPUs are Google-designed accelerators used to train and run large AI models. via Bloomberg
    • This article makes my head hurt. Lots of confusing words
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      461
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!