Got the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine


Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, Barney T. said:

Hi All,

 

Just a PSA, As a front line health care worker, I received the 1st of two COVID vaccines last Wednesday. I wanted to get it due to my age and exposure to COVID-19 patients on a daily basis. I must say that despite a sore arm and one day of some malaise, I feel fine. Going back for #2 dose during the first week of January. I am extremely grateful for the many scientists, researchers, and volunteers who did the research on this vaccine. I am blessed to be one of the first to get it and encourage others to do the same. Yes, there were two (so far) who had reactions, but this is expected in a huge population getting the vaccine. There will be a few who don't tolerate it. 

 

Please consider getting whatever vaccine is offered to you. COVID-19 is no joke and the residual effects are horrid.  Best always to all of my fellow Neowinians this holiday season!

Posted by my coworker:

"

Seriously folks, COVID is legit and it is killing our loved ones every day. I’m genuinely so grateful to have had the opportunity to receive this vaccine, and I am so grateful that after 10 LONG months we finally have a measure of protection.

Thank you

Pfizer

scientists for developing this vaccine. I don’t think anyone can fully appreciate the emotions that my fellow healthcare workers and I feel to finally be protected. To be valued. To be loved.

After 10 months of caring for these patients like they were our families, WE are finally being taken care of.

Until you stand by a patient’s bed sobbing as they die alone, you don’t get to criticize. Until you stand by dozens or hundreds of these rooms, you will never comprehend the pain we will carry with us for the rest of our lives. As we approach this holiday season, I am pleading with you to find some compassion in our heart for your fellow humans. Healthcare workers are beyond exhausted. Please don’t make us carry the weight of even more people dying."

22 minutes ago, Barney T. said:

Hi All,

 

Just a PSA, As a front line health care worker, I received the 1st of two COVID vaccines last Wednesday. I wanted to get it due to my age and exposure to COVID-19 patients on a daily basis. I must say that despite a sore arm and one day of some malaise, I feel fine. Going back for #2 dose during the first week of January. I am extremely grateful for the many scientists, researchers, and volunteers who did the research on this vaccine. I am blessed to be one of the first to get it and encourage others to do the same. Yes, there were two (so far) who had reactions, but this is expected in a huge population getting the vaccine. There will be a few who don't tolerate it. 

 

Please consider getting whatever vaccine is offered to you. COVID-19 is no joke and the residual effects are horrid.  Best always to all of my fellow Neowinians this holiday season!

 

A lot of skeptics and conspiracy theorists out there who don't believe in the vaccine Barney so it would be awesome if you can keep us updated on its effects on you during the next few weeks.

 

Thanks.

 

 

I am of the mindset if one is reasonably healthy, and not too old, their body almost certainly will fight it off naturally without much issue. so why put something foreign into ones body (it's simply a matter of trust and I won't take the risk with the vaccine when the virus it's supposed to protect against only has a very small chance to kill the common person). I won't be surprised if there's a greater risk from the vaccine than from the virus itself for the common person.

 

there is A LOT of non-stop fearmongering for this virus from the corrupt leftist media when in reality ones chances of dying from it if they are not old and reasonably healthy is extremely low (even if you are on the old side, it's not a death sentence as the odds are still good for you, just not as good as someone a bit younger) but they will never tell people this as they want to use fear from this virus to control people with masks non-stop etc. but a lot of us see through their BS and are not playing their games. ever notice how it's always the left trying to control people locking down the country when shutting down the economy is far worse for most people than the overrated virus itself. sure, ill admit the virus is bad but only if you happen to be one of a very limited amount of people who react badly to it. the percentages are greatly in the common persons favor to not worry. if there was like say something in the ball park of a 20% death rate, it might be a different story then as taking a chance on the vaccine etc might be worth it. but as is, the virus is massively overblown.

 

it's simply a matter of trust and in this regard I am not exactly putting a lot of trust in big pharma as they generally put $ ahead of ones health as you can see by the standards of drugs advertised on TV declining as you see a fair amount advertise stuff and not long after there are those lawyer commercials suing for damages etc. plus, a good percentage of the stuff they advertise on TV, the side effects are worse than the problem it's trying to fix etc. this just further proves my point that big pharma puts $ ahead of a genuine concern for peoples health. basically they can be good at saving ones life in a emergency, but for the more casual thing I would not be too trusting of them as I am of the mindset the less prescription drugs one is on the better for ones overall health in the long term. but I realize some people ain't got much choice, but short of the high priority cases where it's really needed, the less the better.

 

I suspect the typical leftist around here will probably try to claim I am a "conspiracy theorist" etc, but you got to admit at least some of way I say is not a stretch for me to claim it.

 

p.s. no offense to the OP.

19 minutes ago, ThaCrip said:

I am of the mindset if one is reasonably healthy, and not too old, their body almost certainly will fight it off naturally without much issue. so why put something foreign into ones body (it's simply a matter of trust and I won't take the risk with the vaccine when the virus it's supposed to protect against only has a very small chance to kill the common person). I won't be surprised if there's a greater risk from the vaccine than from the virus itself for the common person.

 

there is A LOT of non-stop fearmongering for this virus from the corrupt leftist media when in reality ones chances of dying from it if they are not old and reasonably healthy is extremely low (even if you are on the old side, it's not a death sentence as the odds are still good for you, just not as good as someone a bit younger) but they will never tell people this as they want to use fear from this virus to control people with masks non-stop etc. but a lot of us see through their BS and are not playing their games. ever notice how it's always the left trying to control people locking down the country when shutting down the economy is far worse for most people than the overrated virus itself. sure, ill admit the virus is bad but only if you happen to be one of a very limited amount of people who react badly to it. the percentages are greatly in the common persons favor to not worry. if there was like say something in the ball park of a 20% death rate, it might be a different story then as taking a chance on the vaccine etc might be worth it. but as is, the virus is massively overblown.

 

it's simply a matter of trust and in this regard I am not exactly putting a lot of trust in big pharma as they generally put $ ahead of ones health as you can see by the standards of drugs advertised on TV declining as you see a fair amount advertise stuff and not long after there are those lawyer commercials suing for damages etc. plus, a good percentage of the stuff they advertise on TV, the side effects are worse than the problem it's trying to fix etc. this just further proves my point that big pharma puts $ ahead of a genuine concern for peoples health. basically they can be good at saving ones life in a emergency, but for the more casual thing I would not be too trusting of them as I am of the mindset the less prescription drugs one is on the better for ones overall health in the long term. but I realize some people ain't got much choice, but short of the high priority cases where it's really needed, the less the better.

 

I suspect the typical leftist around here will probably try to claim I am a "conspiracy theorist" etc, but you got to admit at least some of way I say is not a stretch for me to claim it.

 

p.s. no offense to the OP.

This is so wrong, it's a headache to go through...

 

Quote

there is A LOT of non-stop fearmongering for this virus from the corrupt leftist media when in reality ones chances of dying from it if they are not old and reasonably healthy is extremely low (even if you are on the old side, it's not a death sentence as the odds are still good for you, just not as good as someone a bit younger)

It might not kill you. You might just have to live with brain, lung and heart damage for the rest of your life. Coolio, dodged a bullet there(!)

Quote

they will never tell people this as they want to use fear from this virus to control people with masks non-stop etc.

I laugh at how wearing a mask is being controlled.

Quote

ill admit the virus is bad but only if you happen to be one of a very limited amount of people who react badly to it.

Good point. It's like a fire, it's only bad for you if you're flammable...

Quote

it's simply a matter of trust and in this regard I am not exactly putting a lot of trust in big pharma as they generally put $ ahead of ones health

While there is no avoiding the fact that in the US they are extorting people, you just need to look at reasonable health industries in other countries to realise that this vaccine is for the good of the population, not a money-grabbing scheme. You can blame the US industry for high prices, but not for offering a life-saving drug.

 

If you have a chance, get vaccinated. There's just no two ways about it.

35 minutes ago, ThaCrip said:

I am of the mindset if one is reasonably healthy, and not too old, their body almost certainly will fight it off naturally without much issue. so why put something foreign into ones body (it's simply a matter of trust and I won't take the risk with the vaccine when the virus it's supposed to protect against only has a very small chance to kill the common person). I won't be surprised if there's a greater risk from the vaccine than from the virus itself for the common person.

 

Potentially, but the big problem isn't the people with mild cases that make a full recovery with ease, or even asymptomatic cases - the problem is that those people can and are still spreading it and infecting people who are vulnerable to it.  I'll get the vaccine when it's available to me, not because I'm so concerned with protecting myself, but because I want to help protect others.

43 minutes ago, ThaCrip said:

 

p.s. no offense to the OP.

No offense at all. Everyone has to decide for themselves. I would stress that I've seen the ravages of this disease and have zipped up my share of body bags. It's no disease to take lightly. No politics, no fictitious info. Just facts.

My wife got her first dose yesterday as she is front line.  She said she felt flush for a few minutes but it went away and was able to drive home safely.  This morning she says her arm is sore but otherwise feeling normal. Co-signing the comments of the OP and thank you for what you do.

Thank you for sharing this, Barney. I'm extremely glad vaccines are starting to become available and I'm looking forward to things getting better, so keep us posted on how things go. I'm (thankfully) in a low-risk group so it might be some time before I get my chance, but I hope the people who need it the most get it ASAP. Best of luck to you and thank you for your work!

indospot - even though you may be low-risk NOW, will you stay there?  (I got whacked with cancer - three different sorts - over the past three years - and I was at low risk for ANY of them.  If I was at risk for ANY cancer - it would have been LUNG cancer (former smoker) - that is merely what cancer taught me.)  Covid-19 is - if anything - nastier than cancer.  The risk is NOT worth it, folks.

25 minutes ago, PGHammer said:

indospot - even though you may be low-risk NOW, will you stay there?  (I got whacked with cancer - three different sorts - over the past three years - and I was at low risk for ANY of them.  If I was at risk for ANY cancer - it would have been LUNG cancer (former smoker) - that is merely what cancer taught me.)  Covid-19 is - if anything - nastier than cancer.  The risk is NOT worth it, folks.

Oh I'm not trying to say I don't want it, it's just that here in Portugal we'll be focusing on piority groups until April, at least. I'd get the vaccine right now if I could.

58 minutes ago, PGHammer said:

indospot - even though you may be low-risk NOW, will you stay there?  (I got whacked with cancer - three different sorts - over the past three years - and I was at low risk for ANY of them.  If I was at risk for ANY cancer - it would have been LUNG cancer (former smoker) - that is merely what cancer taught me.)  Covid-19 is - if anything - nastier than cancer.  The risk is NOT worth it, folks.

Yep, know all about cancer and it's effect after having survived 1 bout with it myself. I consider myself slightly high risk due to age and COPD, although fairly healthy for the most part. I know I won't be able to get shot anytime soon but will definitely do what I can to avoid getting infected in the first place and will get shots when it's my turn. Heck, by then, there will have been millions that have already received it so you'll know if it's safe or not!

 

At OP, please do keep us updated on your status since receiving shot.

8 hours ago, spacelordmaster said:

 

A lot of skeptics and conspiracy theorists out there who don't believe in the vaccine Barney so it would be awesome if you can keep us updated on its effects on you during the next few weeks.

 

Thanks.

 

 

Too late. The vaccines nano-probes have already assimilated into the deep state collective and programmed his responses for future updates. Not to mention he'll now be infertile and die too young. 

My gf will be getting it towards the end of December. She works at a nursing home and she already signed up for it. First thing I'm going to do after I get it and after the allotted time period to become immune, is to go back to the "It's $5 store!" .. although now it's "retail rebel" and everything is now $10" :(

12 hours ago, ThaCrip said:

 

"there is A LOT of non-stop fearmongering for this virus from the corrupt leftist media when in reality ones chances of dying from it if they are not old and reasonably healthy is extremely low"

 

This is the problem with you peeps living in your ivory tower.  You eventually have to come out and be amongst the rest of us. My question to you is, what if you happen to contract Covid and shed it to others who happen to be in that risk group?  They could end up by your own actions like Christ Christie or worse Hermann Caine  My point is, you don't leave your comrades on the battlefield when the enemy is staring them down.  At least I would not.

What would you do if you saw a baby stroller in the street with a bus barreling towards it? Would you try to save the kid or whip out your cell phone and press record?  I know, you'd press record because not everyone hit by a bus dies and the bus driver just might miss.  smh.  I am keenly aware you have a "mindset" and my comment isn't to challenge that but to scream at the top of my lungs that with Covid, this isn't about you. Its about others.  Because of trumpers and people that think like you, we are clocking 300,000 plus dead so far and and estimated two  and a half million families who have to learn to move on from a loss of their loved ones.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
1 hour ago, Jazmac said:

This is the problem with you peeps living in your ivory tower.  You eventually have to come out and be amongst the rest of us. My question to you is, what if you happen to contract Covid and shed it to others who happen to be in that risk group?  They could end up by your own actions like Christ Christie or worse Hermann Caine  My point is, you don't leave your comrades on the battlefield when the enemy is staring them down.  At least I would not.

What would you do if you saw a baby stroller in the street with a bus barreling towards it? Would you try to save the kid or whip out your cell phone and press record?  I know, you'd press record because not everyone hit by a bus dies and the bus driver just might miss.  smh.  I am keenly aware you have a "mindset" and my comment isn't to challenge that but to scream at the top of my lungs that with Covid, this isn't about you. Its about others.  Because of trumpers and people that think like you, we are clocking 300,000 plus dead so far and and estimated two  and a half million families who have to learn to move on from a loss of their loved ones.

Not sure what point you are trying to make. The biggest issue with this pandemic is that it has become political. I have no idea why, well I do.. It's a very real virus and can have some nasty affects on people if they aren't careful or worse, they get it and have a lot of pre-existing conditions. I'm pretty sure any sane minded person ( L or R) would save the baby. The issue is, America has become very far left vs very far right, and the noise they are making is overtaking the real issues. The politicians (not just ELECT BUT PAY) WE PAY need to step up and make actual change. WE THE PEOPLE. WE THE PEOPLE. WE PAY THEM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! How has this gotten lost????????????

  • Like 1

PEOPLE:

 

The way I see it is simple:

 

1. If you don't take the vaccine and you get infected, you have a 50/50 chance that it will either damage/kill you/leave you without breath.

2. If you take the vaccine, there is a 50/50 chance that you will have a nasty reaction to it, but you won't die from it.

 

Either option is risky, and no matter which one you choose, we seem to be screwed anyways, so think about this for a minute:

 

Would you rather get a nasty reaction that will give you temporary pain and/or/maybe a slight fever OR would you rather get sick with fever and end up in a breathing tube with permanent lung damage?

 

Pick your poison. I choose the reaction.

 

On 18/12/2020 at 19:36, Jazmac said:

This is the problem with you peeps living in your ivory tower.  You eventually have to come out and be amongst the rest of us. My question to you is, what if you happen to contract Covid and shed it to others who happen to be in that risk group?  They could end up by your own actions like Christ Christie or worse Hermann Caine  My point is, you don't leave your comrades on the battlefield when the enemy is staring them down.  At least I would not.

What would you do if you saw a baby stroller in the street with a bus barreling towards it? Would you try to save the kid or whip out your cell phone and press record?  I know, you'd press record because not everyone hit by a bus dies and the bus driver just might miss.  smh.  I am keenly aware you have a "mindset" and my comment isn't to challenge that but to scream at the top of my lungs that with Covid, this isn't about you. Its about others.  Because of trumpers and people that think like you, we are clocking 300,000 plus dead so far and and estimated two  and a half million families who have to learn to move on from a loss of their loved ones.

Blaming this on Trump supporters is extremely ignorant and laughable...

On 18/12/2020 at 05:41, Barney T. said:

Hi All,

 

Just a PSA, As a front line health care worker, I received the 1st of two COVID vaccines last Wednesday. I wanted to get it due to my age and exposure to COVID-19 patients on a daily basis. I must say that despite a sore arm and one day of some malaise, I feel fine. Going back for #2 dose during the first week of January. I am extremely grateful for the many scientists, researchers, and volunteers who did the research on this vaccine. I am blessed to be one of the first to get it and encourage others to do the same. Yes, there were two (so far) who had reactions, but this is expected in a huge population getting the vaccine. There will be a few who don't tolerate it. 

 

Please consider getting whatever vaccine is offered to you. COVID-19 is no joke and the residual effects are horrid.  Best always to all of my fellow Neowinians this holiday season!

@Barney T. Since the start of this horrible event, how many patients have you personally seen die as a direct result of the virus? I am really curious because everything that I hear/read from the media seems (to me at least) very biased/embellished. Also, once you get the vaccine, are you 'immune' from COVID-19, or are you simply more protected?

48 minutes ago, Astra.Xtreme said:

Blaming this on Trump supporters is extremely ignorant and laughable...

Ok, so then laugh. Its what trumpers do and not at all unexpected.

32 minutes ago, Jazmac said:

Ok, so then laugh. Its what trumpers do and not at all unexpected.

Clearly you let the media do your thinking...  Facts matter, but clearly you're not the type that cares about those...  Thanks for showing us your judgmental and delusional mindset. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • You literally have to do it on a desktop, which is incredibly annoying in our mobile-first world. What???
    • What part of "you can’t really depend on service providers to maintain features forever" is not clear enough?
    • Nope. That lack of surround sound capability (analog) won't fly with me. Sure, I use headphones most of the time, but still.
    • Creative Sound Blaster AE-X PCIe review: your headphones will love it by Steven Parker If you have been reading Neowin for any length of time, you may remember that I reviewed the Sound Blaster Audigy FX Pro back in April. I found it to be an excellent budget sound card, even though it lacked support for formats such as DTS over the included SPDIF port. Anyway, Creative reached out to me again asking if I was interested in reviewing the Sound Blaster AE-X. It is a card mainly targeted at headphone wearers, which I'll get into a bit later. Before we get underway, here is a disclaimer: Creative Labs provided a free sample without any review pre-approval. Here are the full specs of it: Creative Sound Blaster AE-X Dimensions: 179 x 126 x 18 mm Weight: 263g / 9.28 oz Platform: PCI-e DAC: ESS ES9039Q2M Connectivity Options Side: Rear: 1 x HD Audio Front Panel Connector, 1 x ⅛“ Headphone port, 1 x RCA Line-out (Left) port, 1 x RCA Line-out (Right) port, 1 x Coaxial SPDIF-out port, 1 x ⅛“ Mic in/Line-in port, 1 x TOSLINK SPDIF-in port Surround: No DNR / SNR: THD+N: 0.0001% Dynamic Range 130 dB Recording Resolution: PCM up to 32-bit / 192kHz (Stereo) Direct Mode: Line Out (Stereo): PCM up to 32-bit  384 kHz Coaxial SPDIF Out: PCM up to 24-bit 192.0 kHz Headphone Amp: PCM up to 32-bit / 384kHz (Stereo) Native DSD: DSD64, DSD128, DSD256 Output Impedance: 1Ω, Supported Headphone Impedance: 8–600Ω, IEM: 0.5Vrms, Low: 1.5Vrms, Mid: 3Vrms, High: 6Vrms, Maximum output power: 350mW @ 32Ω (High), Maximum output voltage: 6Vrms (High) Front Panel Headphone Amp: PCM up to 32-bit / 192kHz (Stereo) Native DSD: DSD64, DSD128 Output Impedance: 10Ω, Supported Headphone Impedance: 32–300Ω, Maximum output power: 40mW @ 32Ω, Maximum output voltage: 1.9Vrms ASIO: ASIO 2.3 Total Harmonic Distortion: THD+N: 0.0006% Dynamic Range: 114 dB Scout Mode: Yes EMI shielding: No (but it passed all the FCC emission tests) Operating temperature: 0–45°C Input Power: 12V⎓0.5A Warranty: 1 Year (MSRP) Price: $179.99 / £169.99 The Sound Blaster AE-X was announced at the end of May, and it becomes clear that it is mainly for headphone wearers. I should also note that the card does not support DDL/DTS encoding technology, but it is said to support decoding through the coaxial SPDIF port. I was able to test this working with the classic Windows Sound properties, but I could not get a DTS (decode) signal through my Logitech Z906, it defaulted to 3D sound whenever I played DTS content through Plex or Emby. In addition, this card only supports two channels (stereo) over the speakers. The surround support is limited to the Headphone Amp, so before I get underway, what we have here is a card mostly intended for headphone use, especially with its SPDIF In (Toslink) port where you could connect another device like a console. So what about the highlights of this card? The AE-X is powered by the ESS SABRE DAC (ES9039Q2M), which is capable of a 130 dB dynamic range. In addition, it supports 32-bit/384 kHz playback for deeper detail and clarity. The headphone amplifier delivers up to 350 mW @ 32Ω, which admittedly far surpasses standard onboard audio, offering support for studio-grade headphones. DSD256 and ASIO 2.3 are also supported. What doesn't it have? No support for What-U-Hear, Super X-Fi, or the SmartComms Kit No EMI shielding, but it passed all the FCC emission tests (from the FAQ) I also want to make it clear that I am no audiophile. For me, it's purely subjective and it should just "work" out of the box. First impressions As I said in the introduction, I was a bit sad to see that the AE-X only supports stereo output, meaning it would not be on par with my ALC1220 over my speakers, as I mentioned it seems like this card is marketed toward headphone users. Since I am not an avid gamer that would rule me out as a potential customer, but I can still test its capabilities! The card arrived in a nice-looking box, as shown above. It's quite a bit larger than the Audify FX Pro that I reviewed back in April, and at first I thought the covering meant that it was EMI shielded, but it isn't as mentioned above in the highlights section. What's in the box: 1 x Sound Blaster AE-X PCIe card 1 x 3.5 mm CTIA TRRS to Dual TRS Headset Splitter Cable 1 x Quick Start Guide Aside from the Quick Start Guide, which someone at my age (I guess) needs a magnifying glass to read thanks to the tiny fonts, Creative Labs also has the manual online, which first requires you to prove that you're human in order to access it (so I can't direct link it). Anyway, the box is mostly made up of cardboard, and the only plastic in it is the anti-static bag for the card itself. Design Top Bottom The card itself looks pretty cool and actually wouldn't look out of place in an all-white build. There's only one connector, and for some reason it is awkwardly placed on the side (front-facing) that is for the front panel audio connector, which will let you use the headphones through the front PC audio jack. Since the front panel Headphone Amp has fewer capabilities than the rear headphone port, I decided not to use it. Rear of card PCI-e interface The rear of the card is completely open and is normally where you would find the front panel connector. The PCIe interface side is completely covered, which initially made me think it was EMI shielded. I/O panel Side (front-facing) with Front panel connector On the outer rear bracket side we have the TOSLINK SPDIF in, Coaxial SPDIF out, RCA line out (Right), RCA line out (Left), Headphone out, and Mic/Line in ports. On the front facing portion of the card itself is the F-panel connector. Usage Test System Our test system consists of the following: AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D Gigabyte X870E AORUS MASTER (BIOS F12) Corsair RM1000x (2024) Thermal Grizzly Kyronaut (33x33x0,2mm) 2x 32GB Kingston Fury Beast RGB DDR5 6000MT/s CL36-38-38-80 T-Force Z540 2TB (PCIe Gen5) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Founders Edition (NVIDIA) Creative Sound Blaster AE-X Windows 11 25H2 Pro I installed the card into the Gigabyte X870E AORUS MASTER which includes the RealTek ALC1220 onboard audio. For our subjective listening tests, I used the Coaxial SPDIF port to my Logitech Z906 speakers. For headphone tests I used the OneOdio Studio Max 2 Wireless DJ Headphones that I reviewed last month. After installing the audio driver, I installed Creative Nexus, which is a relatively new app designed for the latest Sound Blaster cards. Then I discovered the AE-X needed both a driver update from 1.00.15.0001 to 1.01.09.000 and a firmware update from 1.00.06.0000 to 1.00.06.0002, then I was set to go. It should be noted that the card did not work without the driver (not Plug and Play). As you can see above, you can manage the firmware, driver, and inputs via Advanced Settings on the Device tab. By default Nexus enabled "Direct Mode". Upon clicking on Acoustic Engine, the Equalizer can be enabled and set to four different presets, which are: Gaming Music Movies Footsteps Enhancer There's also a dedicated Scout Mode for gamers. I mainly used Tidal and Spotify in the past week to listen to some of my Liked Songs (which now total over 700) in Shuffle mode; there were no pops or interference that I could hear. I also found a 5.1 Surround Music playlist on Tidal that sounded really great over Studio Max 2 headphones. When I reviewed the Audigy FX Pro, I went out and purchased a Logitech Z906 set second-hand for €100 specifically to use with the card, but in this instance all I could get on the AE-X was the 3D output of surround sound through Coaxial SPDIF and although it still sounded great, it isn't quite as good as DTS Interactive via my onboard Realtek ALC1220. Conclusion So what have I learned? The AE-X lacks multi-channel support for 5.1/7.1 setups and drops support for modern surround technologies like Dolby or DTS, functioning strictly as a stereo output device. So to really benefit, you will need Studio-grade headphones to "hear" the benefits of this card. With that being said, I can imagine it will appeal to gamers who are switching between console and PC. By utilizing the SPDIF in port, you could just plug your headphones into the AE-X (front or rear port) and then switch between PC and Console without having to move the headphones to a different port. As I said in the Sound Blaster Audigy review, the EQ in the Creative Nexus app offers safe presets, which allows a user to further tweak the lows, mids, and highs for a personal listening experience. Of course it all depends on the headphones you hook up to it. Speaking of headphones, I kind of wish I had higher-quality Studio-grade headphones to really test this card with; I'm not usually wearing headphones in my day to day duties. The only time I will wear them is if I want to listen to music very late at night and I don't want to disturb my neighbors, so my rating (verdict) is based on this fact. Someone with a PC/Console setup and wears headphone religiously to game, and consume media will benefit much more than I from the high-quality Headphone Amps that are included in the AE-X. Once again, I do feel like Creative could have gone the extra mile to support the S/PDIF port a bit more. Why include it if you're not supporting the main popular digital formats? It seems like the decision was more of a legacy-based one, offering uncompressed 2-channel PCM audio, for users with high-fidelity audio systems and external DACs. Maybe I will be lucky enough to review a card that truly includes all these features in the future. I am sure readers with far more knowledge on audio systems than me will correct me in the comments below. I'll just say I am happy to learn what I don't know! Where to buy The Sound Blaster AE-X is available to purchase now in preorder for $179.99 on the U.S. Creative website, or for £169.99 on the Creative UK website and will start shipping to customers from June 25.
    • $80 or 90%, anything else would be financial suicide one way or another.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      513
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      165
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      88
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!