Did you (or plan to) upgrade your hardware for Windows 11?


Recommended Posts

I have done a slight upgrade that pertains to Windows 11. I bought a TPM module for my Gigabyte board GIGABYTE GC-TPM2.0_S for €13.99 I will be installing it today. But my board already had the software level TPM. A module is safer because it doesn't reset with BIOS updates or if the battery is removed.

 

My setup is fully compliant with Windows 11:

  • Gigabyte Aorus Z390 Pro Wi-Fi
  • Intel i9-9990K
  • 32GB DDR4 G Skill Ripjaws (2x16)
  • KFA2 2070 RTX SUPER

I'm running off the assumption that the final insider build will have the standard expiry date stuff that they usually do, I'll keep using that for about a year before i upgrade.

 

I'm gonna upgrade on my timescale not Microsofts. 😄

 

 

Nope, as I still think there is a reasonable chance (baring any major motherboard hardware failure) ill be using the same motherboard, which I had since May 2012, beyond Oct 2025 (end of Win10 support).

 

but I am glad I can do pretty much everything I need to on Linux Mint, which I fully switched over to in Jan 2019. because with my current hardware, i5-3550 CPU/1050 Ti 4GB GPU etc, it will likely have proper support (i.e. proper NVIDIA drivers) until at least 2027(i.e. Mint v21.x series), possibly 2029(i.e. Mint v22.x series), given the general release pattern of Mint.

  • Like 2

Possibly. I'm wafting to see just how locked down the workarounds are to get it installed on unsupported hardware. My guess will be ... not very locked down.

  • Like 2

Hello,

 

I am not planning on any major hardware upgrades for Windows 11 at the current time.  All of my computers have TPM (either daughtercards or embedded support) so that will not be an issue.  If a newer GPU becomes available at a reasonable price I might consider it, but that is not an upgrade specifically due to Windows 11.

 

Regards,

 

Aryeh Goretsky

 

  • Like 1

Nope. My desktop is a i7-770k so I am kinda figuring it will run it. My notebook cant run it and I am thinking of trying a MacBook with a m1 chip. I havent had a apple system since my mac mini g3.

Not intentionally to run Windows 11. I am still toying with the idea of getting a new computer, but my reasons would be for gaming. If that computer meets the requirements for Windows 11 then ok, but otherwise Windows 10 will have continued support until 2025 so I'll be ok with that.

Not for windows 11, but my current pc is getting a bit long in the tooth anyway..  It works fine for most everything I do..  But am looking at upgrade just to be able to transcode video faster with x265..  I really need a more current video card for this - and pc is just getting dated, and can not run the latest and greatest cards, etc. 

 

Like to move to nvme for ssd as well.  Quite a few updates in hardware and tech available in current hardware - so its time.  But my desire to update has zero to do with windows 11.

If I get new hardware then I will switch to ubuntu completely, I will use proton to play steam games, the very few I do, but there is an slight performance penalty, which will be noticeable in my current laptop. So indeed, windows 10 is my last OS as I do not like forced requirements in a OS

  • Like 1

My laptops are Windows 11 compatible but no if they weren't, I would absolutely not be upgrading to newer hardware unless the full utility value of those machines died down some day due to the software running very slow or developing some hardware defect.

 

I've an older one from 2014 capable of running Windows 7, 8.1, 10 which I kept on 7/8.1 only as Windows 10 slows it down even with Spectre/Meltdown fixes disabled and no firmware updates that caused a massive performance slowdown. The other one from 2020 I will keep on a stable, highly tuned version of Windows 10 for its entire life, even though it's a powerful machine capable of running Windows 11. The newest one from 2021, I will soon be selling as it comes with Modern Moron Standby which I cannot tolerate and wastes power in sleep mode. I will be replacing it with a new machine with ACPI S3 sleep which will obviously be capable of running Windows 11.

 

But Windows 11 will go on it, if and only if they keep the classic Taskbar intact with everything working correctly with it (currently some things are broken such as the emoji panel) and if I can disable some of the very regressive changes to Explorer such as the dumbed down toolbar and the dumbed down context menus. Otherwise, I will install Windows 10 21H2 even on brand new hardware. I have absolutely no hopes from the new Taskbar of Windows 11.

 

The new Taskbar is missing way too many features for them to restore or fix (I don't think there is enough talent or concern for the end user left at Microsoft to rebuild the taskbar as it was with newer frameworks). They will just omit a ton of functionality and call it complete. Just like Microsoft destroyed Start and could never again build a decent UI, the same thing has happened with the new Taskbar. Normal users will love it and keep wondering what's missing or broken, but it's not for me.

 

So, no, hardware upgrade just for a new OS? NO. Upgrading existing systems to Windows 11? Also NO except for the newest machine for running experiments like Windows 11 if the core UI becomes usable. 😛

For personal use no, I won't be upgrading my hardware. Currently the only thing which is holding it back is my CPU - Ryzen 5 1600X which I purchased in late 2018 so it's not even two years old for me yet. There wouldn't be a particularly huge difference if I upgraded to a 3rd gen Ryzen 5 so I'm just not going to do it.

 

By time Windows 10 goes out of support, that hardware will need upgrading anyway so I'll just wait if Microsoft lock 11 down too far. For personal use I switched back to Windows from Linux when Vista came around as I was so impressed with it, it was also around this time I decided to get into PC gaming however I don't game as much as I used to and with proton existing, it may be feasible for me to switch back to Linux as a primary OS in the next few years anyway.

 

I've also started investing into Apple's hardware and have been very impressed with both M1 and Mac OS (it's come a long way since I last used it properly in version 9.x). So Windows 11 overall is becoming a very low priority for me for personal use.

 

As for professional use, I am happy we recently refreshed our hardware with 11th gen intel i5s so the Windows 11 hardware restrictions won't be an issue and can be rolled out without issue once it has been released and ready.

If i come across a reasonably priced Gaming Laptop to replace my current one that is NOT Windows 11 Compatible unlike my Main Desktop,  Then i'd pull the trigger and upgrade that machine most likely

 

Main System should have no trouble though

Gigabyte B460M_DS3H

Intel 10700

16GB of Ram

Nvidia Geforce 1660 Super

500GB M.2 Nvme boot drive

1TB Game Sata SSD

1TB Storage drive

 

My options are waiting with the Laptop til Windows 10 Support ends in 2025, or upgrading it sooner, all depends on funds and such what i'll do at this point

 

Nope I'm running it on 2 systems:

 

Ryzen 2600 on a B350 mobo (built-in TPM)

16gb 3000 ram 

Nvidia 2060 6gb 

 

Ryzen 5800x on a B550 mobo (built-in TPM)

32mb 3600 ram

Nvidia 3070 8gb 

I have absolutely no intentions of upgrading to Windows 11 on either of the 2 computers I have here that are capable of running it. In fact, those 2 computers that can run Windows 11 may not even have Windows 10 on them for the duration of it's support!

  • 2 months later...

Windows 11 is a factor in both desktop (motherboard and components) and portable (notebook) upgrades/replacements planned for next week.  The desktop side is planned out - the only decision left is the portable side.  For once, I am purchasing brick and mortar due to supply-chain disruption (not Amazon).

I upgraded mine without spending a lot of money and sold my old MB/CPU/RAM for $200.  This setup will last me several years and is fast enough for what I do. As a software/hardware tech for a large office, I always take on the new OS so I know as much about it as possible before it makes it's way into the office. 

 

 

ASUS Prime H470M-PLUS/CSM

 

Intel Core i7-10700KF

 

Corsair Vengeance LPX 16GB

  • 1 month later...
On 06/10/2021 at 23:33, warwagon said:

....maybe....but if I can run windows 11 on unsupported hardware i'm going to.

warwagon - it's possible - my G3258 desktop does (Pro for Workstations) despite no TPM and too few cores - and all I am missing is the Windows Subsystem for Android.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Dude, im talking about simply disable it from settings app. Because of the eu regulation, you could disable it here for years.
    • One big question about Mars was answered thanks to Einstein's 100 year old theory by Sayan Sen Image via DepositPhotos Scientists at the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have calculated how time passes on Mars compared with Earth, adding detail to how timekeeping would need to work beyond Earth’s orbit. The study, published in The Astronomical Journal, found that clocks on Mars run an average of 477 microseconds, or millionths of a second, faster per day than clocks on Earth. A microsecond is one millionth of a second, a very small unit used in precise scientific timing systems such as atomic clocks, which measure time using consistent atomic behavior. This difference is not constant. Because Mars moves around the Sun in a non-circular path (an eccentric orbit, meaning its distance from the Sun changes over time instead of staying fixed) and is affected by gravity from other bodies, the daily difference can vary by as much as 226 microseconds over a Martian year. The study also identifies smaller repeating changes of about 40 microseconds per day linked to synodic cycles (repeating periods that describe how planets line up with each other as they orbit the Sun from different positions). These longer patterns affect how time differences slowly rise and fall. To make these estimates, researchers compared Mars with Earth and the Moon. The work looks at relativistic proper time (the time actually measured by a clock depending on its speed and the strength of gravity where it is located, as described in Einstein’s relativity). This shows that each world has its own slightly different “rate” of time. This becomes more important as space missions expand into cislunar space (the region between Earth and the Moon) and toward Mars. On Earth, time systems rely on atomic clocks and satellites, which stay closely synchronized for navigation and communication. The study is based on Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity, which shows that time is affected by gravity and motion. Stronger gravity makes clocks run slower, while weaker gravity makes them run faster. “The time is just right for the Moon and Mars,” said NIST physicist Bijunath Patla. “This is the closest we have been to realizing the science fiction vision of expanding across the solar system.” A day on Mars is about 40 minutes longer than on Earth, and a Martian year lasts 687 Earth days. But the main question is not just about days and years, but how fast time itself passes. An atomic clock placed on Mars would function normally, but compared with one on Earth, the two would slowly drift apart due to differences in gravity and motion. This requires careful calculation of what is similar to a time-zone difference across planets. Researchers modeled Mars using a reference surface and included gravitational effects from the Sun, Earth, the Moon, and other planets. This includes a multi-body gravitational system (often described as a three-body or four-body problem, where predicting motion becomes difficult because multiple large objects all pull on each other at the same time through gravity). Mars also follows a Keplerian orbit (an idealized elliptical orbit based on simple gravitational laws that assume smooth motion, before adding real-world disturbances from other bodies). In addition, the researchers accounted for solar tides (small changes in gravitational force caused by the Sun that slightly distort planetary motion and timing, especially in systems involving Earth and the Moon). These combined effects are described as relativistic proper-time offsets (small but measurable differences in elapsed time between locations caused by gravity and motion), which must be included when comparing clocks across planets. “But for Mars, that’s not the case. Its distance from the Sun and its eccentric orbit make the variations in time larger. A three-body problem is extremely complicated. Now we’re dealing with four: the Sun, Earth, the Moon and Mars,” Patla explained. “The heavy lifting was more challenging than I initially thought.” Although the differences are extremely small, they matter for navigation and communication systems that depend on precise timing. Even modern networks on Earth, such as mobile systems, rely on timing accuracy at very small fractions of a second. Communication between Earth and Mars currently takes about four to 24 minutes or more depending on planetary positions, meaning signals are not real-time. A shared and accurate time system could help future missions reduce confusion in navigation and data exchange. “If you get synchronization, it will be almost like real-time communication without any loss of information. You don’t have to wait to see what happens,” Patla said. Researchers note that fully developed interplanetary communication networks are still far in the future. However, understanding how time behaves across planets helps prepare for those systems. “It may be decades before the surface of Mars is covered by the tracks of wandering rovers, but it is useful now to study the issues involved in establishing navigation systems on other planets and moons,” said Neil Ashby. “Like current global navigation systems like GPS, these systems will depend on accurate clocks, and the effects on clock rates can be analyzed with the help of Einstein’s general theory of relativity.” Patla added that the results also help improve understanding of time itself under relativity. “It's good to know for the first time what is happening on Mars timewise. Nobody knew that before. It improves our knowledge of the theory itself, the theory of how clocks tick and relativity,” he said. Source: NIST, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 by Razvan Serea TeraCopy is a compact program designed to copy and move files at the maximum possible speed, also providing you with a lot of features. Copy files faster. TeraCopy uses dynamically adjusted buffers to reduce seek times. Asynchronous copy speeds up file transfer between two physical hard drives. Pause and resume transfers. Pause copy process at any time to free up system resources and continue with a single click. Error recovery. In case of copy error, TeraCopy will try several times and in the worse case just skips the file, not terminating the entire transfer. Interactive file list. TeraCopy shows failed file transfers and lets you fix the problem and recopy only problem files. Shell integration. TeraCopy can completely replace Explorer copy and move functions, allowing you work with files as usual. TeraCopy is free for non-commercial use only. For commercial use you need to buy a license. The paid version of the program includes the following features: Copy/move to your favorite folders. Save reports as HTML and CSV files. Select files with the same extension/folder. Remove the selected files from the copy queue. TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 changelog: Added support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. Improved exception handling and automated bug report upload. Fixed several minor bugs and small memory leaks. Build 26 (June 24) Fixed a rare exception when a transfer completed. Features added since version 3.17: Enhanced speed graph. New multi-threaded copy engine. Support for copying to multiple targets. Queue system for managing multiple copy operations. Support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. TeraCopy entry in the modern Windows Explorer context menu. Integrated toolbar in the title bar. Why receive LocalSend transfers with TeraCopy? Handle file conflicts: Skip, overwrite, or rename files when a file with the same name already exists. LocalSend always creates another copy, which can waste time and disk space, especially when resuming an interrupted transfer. Filter unwanted files: Apply ignore lists or remove files manually before accepting a transfer, so unnecessary files are not downloaded. Better performance on fast networks: In tests over a 10 Gbps connection, TeraCopy received files several times faster than the standard LocalSend app on Windows. Download: TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 | 14.5 MB (Freeware, paid upgrade available) View: TeraCopy Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Briefly used Turbo Pascal (and Turbo C++) in 97 and soon after that I bought PC magazine that included a full version of Delphi 2. I still use Delphi today, some 29 years later.
    • Age of Empires Mobile comes to PC, here's how to carry over progress from your phone by Ivan Jenic Image: YouTube/Microsoft Microsoft just released Age of Empires Mobile for PC. The game, officially called Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, is available for free on Steam and Microsoft Store, almost two years after its initial release for handheld devices. Age of Empires is one of those franchises that entire generations grew up with. The original came out in 1997, and immediately got people hooked to building civilizations and crushing their enemies on the battlefield. However, the franchise today is a far cry from its roots, as Age of Empires Mobile is, well, a game optimized for handheld devices, and not a classic RTS title we’ve all loved for years. And, of course, it includes in-game purchases. The PC version is still a mobile game at its core, but it’s been optimized for desktop play. There’s mouse control, full keyboard compatibility, and a refined UI. Microsoft also refreshed the visuals with some 4k textures, so the game should look better on larger screens. The game supports Crossplay, so you can switch between your phone, tablet, and PC without losing anything. But linked progress doesn’t come out of the box, as you have to enable it first. Here’s how to link your progress: On your mobile device, open Age of Empires Mobile. Go to Settings (Gear icon) > Account. Select Bind Account and choose a sign-in option. Once you enable account binding, sign in on PC using the same method, and your progress will be accessible across all your devices. Xbox Game Pass subscribers also get a bonus reward pack on PC, which includes: 1 Monthly Pass Token 1 Custom Resource Chest 10 Universal 60-Minute Speed-Ups 1,000 Empire Coins Exclusive Player Portrait Frame You can find more info about Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, as well as download links, on the Age of Empires official website.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      458
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!