The Flash (2022: Warner)


Recommended Posts

On 18/05/2023 at 08:13, nerim said:

What's REALLY weird is your obsession with my posts and your desire to smack me down every chance you get. I say what I do primarily because it's what she/they want, because she definitely reads these pages. 

His point was, instead of just saying friend you said, trans friend. As the old Tina Turner song says... "What's trans, got to do, got to do with it?" ...oh wait .. 🤣

Ok, now let's all get back on topic.

On 18/05/2023 at 14:13, nerim said:

What's REALLY weird is your obsession with my posts and your desire to smack me down every chance you get. I say what I do primarily because it's what she/they want, because she definitely reads these pages. 

You seem to be a lot more obsessed with me. I have no idea who you are and absolutely no attachment to any former conversations… and yet you seem to be really hung up on them!?

On 20/05/2023 at 04:58, DocM said:

Stephen King weighs in

 

Random celeb opinion usually means either nothing or they have been sponsored into giving it. King on the other hand tends to just say stuff and I’ve rarely found his movie opinions wrong.

I've started rewatching movies ahead of this and watched Batman and Batman Returns the last two nights.  Next up is Man of Steel.  I'll move to BvS:DoJ Ultimate Edition, then Snyder's Justice League.  Aquaman after that most likely since I have a feeling there will be a lead into its sequel from The Flash.  I think that should cover me with the major connections to The Flash movie.  

 

I am likely going to skip WW, SS, Shazam, TSS, Birds of Prey and WW84, but will get them in if I have some time.  I've seen them all, most multiple times, but none likely have a direct connection to this, especially the backstory WW movies.  I've recently seen Shazam 2 and Black Adam so I'm good there.

 

Might also throw in Superman and Superman 2.  

I sometimes forget how much better BvS:Doj UE and Zack Snyder's JL are vs their theatrical counterparts.  Infinitely better.  

 

BvS still has some issues even in the UE, but much more coherent in its story telling.  

 

1 week away!!!!!

The movie was solid overall, I enjoyed it.  I thought the story was great, it had some pretty funny parts, the action was great and at times grand.  A few parts/moments I could have done without... 1 part I absolutely hated (we can wait a few days before discussing that...).  But overall pretty good.

Some of the effects looked a bit off but nothing looked terrible to me.  

 

FYI for people going - there is only 1 post-credit scene and it is after all of the credits roll.  I enjoyed it, but if you need to get out of there immediately, you aren't missing anything major.

On 16/06/2023 at 10:53, Innervisions33 said:

>

Some of the effects looked a bit off but nothing looked terrible to me.  

>

Oddities during Flash's travels were intentional to show his point of view, an example being color shifting, lighting. Likely the Doppler shift of colors etc. I'll have to look up the article I read about it...

Got it...

OTOH, CGI was a problem with the DCEU films  such as Justice League. I don't think James Gunn will put up with that in his films

Edited by DocM
On 17/06/2023 at 23:43, camili932 said:

just saw this movie, not bad at all - but 2,5 hours movie is way too long

You young whippersnappers have no endurance 🤣

Hellowship of the Rings: 2h 58m

Gone With The Wind: 3h 47m

Cleopatra: 4h 8m

On 18/06/2023 at 19:12, DocM said:

You young whippersnappers have no endurance 🤣

Hellowship of the Rings: 2h 58m

Gone With The Wind: 3h 47m

Cleopatra: 4h 8m

Indeed!  I went to the theater for the Lord of the Rings Extended Edition Marathon where they showed them all back to back to back.  Fun day!

As for The Flash, I went on opening night and loved it!  I thought Ezra Miller did a great job with the role and all the cameos were amazing!  This is one of the better DC movies in my opinion.  That said, the box office numbers don't look good.

On 17/06/2023 at 11:20, DocM said:

Oddities during Flash's travels were intentional to show his point of view, an example being color shifting, lighting. Likely the Doppler shift of colors etc. I'll have to look up the article I read about it...

Got it...

OTOH, CGI was a problem with the DCEU films  such as Justice League. I don't think James Gunn will put up with that in his films

 

Yes, I had read that as well so I was aware of that going in.  Like I said, things looked a bit off, but nothing looked terrible to my eyes... so I am buying their story.

On 19/06/2023 at 10:56, Innervisions33 said:

 

Yes, I had read that as well so I was aware of that going in.  Like I said, things looked a bit off, but nothing looked terrible to my eyes... so I am buying their story.

Yeah, the SFX did indeed look odd when glimpsing into timelines.  That said, they looked soooo off, almost like a straight up cartoon, that it did look purposeful.  Either that, or they were really really short on funding.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I think there will be a 27H1 for actual users of 26H1 The 25h2 supports ARM too : Snapdragon X, Snapdragon X Plus and Snapdragon X Elite
    • Poll: Grand Theft Auto VI price predictions, cast your vote by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe After years of waiting, Rockstar will be solidifying the launch date of Grand Theft Auto VI with the launch of pre-orders next week. While the studio has confirmed a date for this occasion, it is yet to attach a price to the highly anticipated game. So let's see what our readers think it will cost at launch. The Grand Theft Auto VI pre-orders will kick off on June 25 for digital and physical editions. Unless some last-minute changes happen, the release date will be November 19, 2026, across Xbox Series X|S and PlayStation 5. Unfortunately, there's still no information about a PC version from the developer or the publisher Take-Two. Now the question becomes, how much will Grand Theft Auto VI cost at launch? The game is predicted by some analysts to be the biggest launch of an entertainment product ever. With the amount of hype that has been built behind it and with ballooning development costs, Take-Two may price this Grand Theft Auto entry differently from other AAA titles. The current price of a AAA game is $69.99. That norm almost rose to $79.99 before calming down. But with such a massive release, Grand Theft Auto VI may be the game that pushes the boundary again. It's also possible that Take-Two keeps the price relatively low to increase the number of players that jump in early and keep them hooked on Grand Theft Auto Online to spend on microtransactions for years to come. Keep in mind that the below poll is asking for a prediction of the standard edition price, not a deluxe or any other special edition that Take-Two will introduce for additional benefits. Also, there is the chance of the company splitting up the campaign and online portions. If you think that will happen, put your vote on what you think will be the total cost of the two. Poll Poll: How much will Grand Theft Auto VI cost? $59.99 $69.99 $79.99 $89.99 $100 or more Submit Vote If you have a very specific prediction in mind, sound off in the comments below.
    • Would you please fix your graphics. They are outdated and don't fit the article.
    • The Light of Life? We actually do glow till our Death, study finds by Sayan Sen Image by Rafael Rendon via Pexels A study by researchers at the University of Calgary has found that living organisms produce an extremely faint light known as ultraweak photon emission, and that this glow appears to drop significantly after death. The research was published in the Journal of Physical Chemistry in April 2025 and quickly drew widespread attention, leading to more than 200 news stories about the findings. Ultraweak photon emission (or UPE), sometimes called biophoton emission, refers to tiny amounts of light released by living cells as a result of normal biological activity. A photon is the basic particle of light, and researchers say every living system examined so far, including plants and animals, has been found to emit these photons. The glow is far too faint to be seen by the human eye. “I suppose it has a little to do with people being reminded of auras,” says Dr. Christoph Simon, PhD, one of the authors of the study and a professor in the Department of Physics and Astronomy in the Faculty of Science. “It is a fact that living beings glow. It’s a very weak glow, but it’s there and visible with very sensitive cameras.” According to the study, the light involved is extremely weak, ranging from 10 to 1,000 photons per square centimetre per second across a spectral range of 200 to 1,000 nanometres. For comparison, a nanometre is one-billionth of a metre and is commonly used to measure wavelengths of light. Detecting emissions at such low levels requires highly specialized equipment. To study the phenomenon, researchers used electron-multiplying charge-coupled device (EMCCD) and charge-coupled device (CCD) cameras. These imaging systems are designed to detect extremely small amounts of light, including individual photons, while minimizing background noise. The technology allowed researchers to capture signals that would otherwise be impossible to observe. The team worked with the Human Health Therapeutics Research Centre at the National Research Council of Canada (NRC) in Ottawa to examine photon emissions in mice. Researchers took two-hour exposure images of the animals before and after death and compared the results. “We saw that the level of light that they emit – this biophoton glow – is distinctly different between living and dead animals,” says Dr. Daniel Oblak, PhD, an associate professor in Physics and Astronomy and the corresponding author of the study. The images showed a clear decrease in photon emissions after death across the entire body of each mouse. According to the researchers, this provided direct evidence that living and dead tissue produce different levels of ultraweak photon emission. “It’s a very small amount and it’s, of course, very tricky to detect,” Oblak says. The study grew out of discussions between Simon, whose research interests include quantum biology, and Oblak, whose work focuses on detecting light for quantum communication experiments. Quantum biology is a field that explores whether processes described by quantum physics, which studies matter and energy at very small scales, may also play a role in living systems. “Since I work as a quantum physicist on light detection for quantum communication, I thought that experimentally we have a lot of the tools to be able to detect the light,” Oblak explains. The researchers also investigated UPE in plants and found that the light changed in response to stress. When plants were exposed to higher temperatures or physically injured, their photon emissions increased. Chemical treatments also affected the glow. Among the substances tested, the local anesthetic benzocaine produced the strongest emission response when applied to injured plant tissue. These findings suggest that ultraweak photon emission is closely linked to biochemical and metabolic activity inside living organisms. Metabolism refers to the chemical reactions that allow cells and organisms to stay alive and function. Because these reactions change when an organism experiences stress, injury or disease, researchers believe UPE may provide a way to monitor those changes. The researchers stress that the glow is a physical and biological phenomenon, not a metaphysical one. Oblak says more research is needed to understand exactly how the light is produced and what information it may reveal about the condition of living tissue. “We must understand what that is to figure out what’s happening,” he says. “If we can understand how that relates to certain influences on the body – stress, diseases – then that could be used as a diagnostic tool.” The researchers believe the technique could eventually help scientists study health and disease without invasive procedures. Because UPE can be measured without adding dyes, markers or labels, it may offer a way to monitor whether tissue is healthy, damaged or alive. In plants, it could help researchers better understand how organisms respond to injury, heat and other forms of stress. While the work is still in its early stages, the study demonstrates that ultraweak photon emission imaging can provide a non-invasive and label-free way to observe biological activity. Researchers say the approach could become a useful tool for studying vitality, stress responses and other important processes in both animals and plants. Source: University of Calgary, ACS publication This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      AMV earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      513
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      171
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      82
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!