Looking for an unlocked android phone >$200 range


Recommended Posts

My nieces' partner is in need of a new phone, and each time they receives a 'new' device, it is a used, and most of the time, damaged device from their mother who controls their money. I am willing to help and purchase a decent device and am looking for something around $200 or so, and needs to be unlocked. I checked Amazon and the selection is crap from what I can see. At this point I do not care brand or feature(s), just something new that works good. Right now I am looking for some guidance on what brand(s) to look at.

On 10/11/2021 at 10:50, spikey_richie said:

You won't get much at that price point, best you'll get is something like a Pixel 4a. That starts at $349, although Google have no stock.

Sad, but true at this point in time. What would a better price range be?

On 10/11/2021 at 11:18, InsaneNutter said:

The OnePlus Nord N100 would be a good phone you can buy new for $179, battery life should also be good with a 5000 mAh battery.

I like the looks of that one, I'll show it to them and see what they say

Hello,

 

I have used a number of Motorola smartphones in the past and been generally happy with them.  In the price range you are discussing, I would suggest looking at a Motorola edge, Moto G Power, Moto G Pure, Moto G Stylus, or Motorola One.

 

I have also heard good things about Nokia phones, and the Nokia 3.4, Nokia 5.3, Nokia G10 and Nokia G20 are in your price range.

 

On the Samsung side, a Samsung A12 might be an option.

 

I would suggest avoiding anything manufactured by BLU due to repeated issues with their phones being preloaded with non-removable spyware.

 

Regards,

 

Aryeh Goretsky

 

  • Like 1
  • 2 weeks later...
On 10/11/2021 at 14:53, goretsky said:

Hello,

 

I have used a number of Motorola smartphones in the past and been generally happy with them.  In the price range you are discussing, I would suggest looking at a Motorola edge, Moto G Power, Moto G Pure, Moto G Stylus, or Motorola One.

 

I have also heard good things about Nokia phones, and the Nokia 3.4, Nokia 5.3, Nokia G10 and Nokia G20 are in your price range.

 

On the Samsung side, a Samsung A12 might be an option.

 

I would suggest avoiding anything manufactured by BLU due to repeated issues with their phones being preloaded with non-removable spyware.

 

Regards,

 

Aryeh Goretsky

 

I still recommend the Pixel 3a (albeit refurbished/pre-owned) for several reasons: it still has one of THE best cameras of any Android phone, despite the age of the phone, Android 12 supports it directly, it is deployable on any carrier that supports Android at all, and it is not a wallet-buster.

The Moto G Power (the one I use) has their brand new 2021 version for $180 on their site. It's an excellent phone.  Whoever says you can't get a good unlocked Android mobile phone for ~ $200 is incorrect.  Google Pixel 4a for $349?  That's a joke.

 

https://www.motorola.com/us/smartphones-moto-g-family#

On 10/11/2021 at 15:50, spikey_richie said:

You won't get much at that price point, best you'll get is something like a Pixel 4a. That starts at $349, although Google have no stock.

Really? you can get the Moto G Power or pretty much any other Moto G phone for over $100 less and they are super good phones. 

  • Like 1
On 20/11/2021 at 17:04, devHead said:

The Moto G Power (the one I use) has their brand new 2021 version for $180 on their site. It's an excellent phone.  Whoever says you can't get a good unlocked Android mobile phone for ~ $200 is incorrect.  Google Pixel 4a for $349?  That's a joke.

 

https://www.motorola.com/us/smartphones-moto-g-family#

How is the camera compared to the Pixel (even the Pixel 3 or 3a)?  The same question needs to be asked as far as performance goes (something that the Pixel 3a in particular takes some lumps for, despite my own lack of complaints in that area).

You can buy any phone, but it will not compatible with your cell operator for 100%.

 

Check cell coverage in your area 1st, choose operator(price), then take a phone at last.

 

t-mobile: 2-4-12-41-66-71 bands

att: 2-4-5-12-14-29-30-40-66 bands

vzw: 2-4-5-13-46-48-66 bands

 

 

https://www.cellmapper.net

https://www.signalbooster.com/pages/what-is-lte-frequency-band-why-do-carriers-use-different-ones

 

I'm loving my Nokia G20.  Stock Android One without any pre-installed crapware, and since it's Android One it'll get security updates for years to come.  My Nokia 3.1 STILL gets current updates.  128GB of storage, decent camera, dual SIM, micro SD expansion slot, etc.  The only thing I don't like is that they seem to have skimped on the 2.4Ghz radio.  It doesn't have 5Ghz WiFi, which means that if I've got it bluetoothed to my watch and then I take a call on something like Signal while connected to WiFi, the audio breaks up and gets interrupted because I guess the bluetooth and WiFi share an antenna and interfere with one another.  This isn't an issue if I'm running over mobile data, so it's gotta be something with the WiFi/Bluetooth radio.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • In the boot options in the UEFI is set to legacy or CMS? It needs to be set to UEFI if it's not already.
    • Researchers claim Microsoft's quantum breakthrough is flawed by basic Python errors by Karthik Mudaliar Microsoft's aggressive roadmap to deliver a commercial quantum supercomputer by 2029 has now hit a bit of a snag, and it's not because of a complex sub-zero dilution refrigerator, but rather because of a few lines of basic Python code. A new critique published in the scientific journal Nature argues that simple software errors effectively manufactured the breakthrough that Microsoft's foundational research claimed back in 2025 into Majorana-based topological qubits. Topological quantum computing, the path that Microsoft chose for its research, relies on creating and controlling "Majorana zero modes." These are exotic quasiparticles that theoretically offer vastly superior error resistance compared to the highly sensitive superconducting qubits currently being championed by rivals like Google and IBM. However, physically proving you have created these particles requires sifting through massive amounts of complex electrical conductance data to isolate a specific "topological gap." Because of the sheer volume of data, physicists rely heavily on custom software pipelines to process the results. This is where the Python scripts come in. Now, according to the critique, Microsoft’s data processing software contained fundamental programming errors that ultimately skewed the published results. By mishandling data arrays or deploying incorrect logic within the Python script, the software supposedly discarded "noisy" or contradictory data. Which is why it only highlighted the specific electrical measurements that supported the topological-gap claim. The researchers behind the critique argued that this makes the findings invalid, suggesting the heralded "quantum leap" was actually a false positive generated by bad code and not a product of groundbreaking physics. However, Microsoft is pushing back hard against these allegations. The Redmond giant has formally rejected the criticism, saying that it's just a minor anomaly rather than a fatal flaw. According to the company, while there may have been a minor oversight in the data parsing scripts, it does not alter the fundamental reality of their physical experiment. Just weeks ago, Microsoft unveiled the Majorana 2 quantum processor, a milestone so significant that the company boldly accelerated its timeline for a commercial quantum supercomputer from 2035 down to 2029. But the new software allegations reopen an old wound. Microsoft's quantum division faced a remarkably similar crisis when a landmark 2018 paper on Majorana particles was famously retracted in 2021 after independent physicists discovered the data had been inappropriately cropped. That historical baggage makes the current Python-related allegations particularly sensitive. If the foundational math and data processing for the 2025 breakthrough are genuinely flawed, the highly anticipated 2029 commercial timeline could easily be delayed or, worse, cancelled.
    • Because of what they have done to VMware I will never buy anything Broadcom again.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      467
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      123
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      82
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!