smartphone does a monopoly of websites, apps, social networks, etc?


Recommended Posts

On pc and notebook you can see several websites, have different options for different programs to use, use different search engines, some different video channels, unknown social networks, etc. On the smartphone, there is only one social network; facebook, a single video site; youtube ends up installing only the most popular programs, it only uses google, etc. Which generates a superficiality and monopoly.

  • Facepalm 2
On 16/11/2021 at 09:24, Jim K said:

huh?  

on the windows pc you can install several programs, but on the smartphone you can only install the programs that are in the catalog.

on windows you can use several browsers and open several tabs, on the smartphone you only open one or a few tabs. on your smartphone you only access facebook, on pc windows you can access other unpopular social networks.

etc

On 16/11/2021 at 07:27, kifirefox said:

on the windows pc you can install several programs, but on the smartphone you can only install the programs that are in the catalog.

on windows you can use several browsers and open several tabs, on the smartphone you only open one or a few tabs. on your smartphone you only access facebook, on pc windows you can access other unpopular social networks.

etc

Without knowing the specific websites you're referring to ... if those websites create an app then Google/Apple will host it.  If they don't create an app...then hopefully their website is mobile friendly.  If they do neither...it really isn't the fault of Google/Apple.  Though, I'm still not entirely sure if the point you're trying to make.

 

On 16/11/2021 at 07:33, Nick H. said:

My smartphone has several browsers, and more tabs open than my laptop. :blink:

 

I don't understand the point about smartphone apps. 

Depends I guess.  Personally, my banking apps are far easier to use than their mobile website.  Same with YouTube.  Some sites like Twitter/Reddit ... I just use the browser.

  • Like 1
On 16/11/2021 at 12:08, kifirefox said:

On the smartphone, there is only one social network; facebook,

Not true

On 16/11/2021 at 12:08, kifirefox said:

a single video site; youtube

Not true

 

On 16/11/2021 at 12:08, kifirefox said:

ends up installing only the most popular programs

You install what you want to install

 

On 16/11/2021 at 12:08, kifirefox said:

it only uses google

Not true

 

 

On 16/11/2021 at 09:08, warwagon said:

I'm sorry! 🤣 That does not sound fun! I loath using the internet on a smart phone.

Well I read neowin and other tech / entertaining sites on the phone way more then on PC.

 

My brave browser has 20+ tabs open sometimes.

 

I don't think I ever opened so many tabs on PC 

 

Anyway the OP is wrong. I use unpopular Mighty Networks for social media.

 

There is a good chose of communication apps like telegram and you certainly don't have to use Google - it is just convenient to..

 

Other video sites are easily accessible through browsers too, they might even be apps for them but I did not need them so far for short videos like similar to YouTube and you know that certain hub ;) but for movies and shows I have amazon and Netflix 

 

So I really don't get the original post ...

On 16/11/2021 at 08:17, E.Worm Jimmy said:

Well I read neowin and other tech / entertaining sites on the phone way more then on PC.

 

My brave browser has 20+ tabs open sometimes.

I'm old fashion, I feel WAY more productive with a monitor mouse and keyboard. Probably because I'm also typing a lot and also loath cellphone onscreen keyboards.

  • Like 1
On 16/11/2021 at 09:43, warwagon said:

I'm old fashion, I feel WAY more productive with a monitor mouse and keyboard. Probably because I'm also typing a lot and also loath cellphone onscreen keyboards.

I got used to it though it is probably not the best option. If you practice enough you can use onscreen pretty well.

 

Also I don't always want to run to my PC. 

 

If your case you are surrounded by them so I can see why you always use it. 

I still think that pc can open more tabs and more browsers than a smartphone. because i open more than 100 tabs, and i use firefox add on, snaplink and open 10 or more tabs at the same time. it's a lot more sites i visit on pc than on android smartphone.

On 17/11/2021 at 07:52, kifirefox said:

I still think that pc can open more tabs and more browsers than a smartphone. because i open more than 100 tabs, and i use firefox add on, snaplink and open 10 or more tabs at the same time. it's a lot more sites i visit on pc than on android smartphone.

outside of flagships, most smartphones still only have like 2GB RAM, that's going to be your only limiting factor on how many tabs can be open.

 

you can open as many tabs as you want on your smartphone browser of choice, doesn't mean performance isn't going to drop at a certain point (unless the browser starts putting tabs to sleep which many modern browsers do now thankfully)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • According to Microsoft, Cause: One of the drivers controlling the device notified the operating system that the device failed in some manner.   https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/topic/error-codes-in-device-manager-in-windows-524e9e89-4dee-8883-0afa-6bca0456324e
    • This looks awesome, I will request access via Steam later this afternoon!
    • Personally, I’ve found that it’s usually worth investing in the infrastructure you don’t want to replace later, especially cabling. Running Cat6A (or better, depending on your needs) during an upgrade is relatively inexpensive compared to having to re-cable a few years down the road. For switches I try to balance current specs with realistic growth. If my budget allows it Ill choose switches with higher uplink speeds which leaves room for expanding later on, but I don’t necessarily overspend on access ports if the endpoints won’t benefit from them anytime soon. One lesson I’ve learned is that planning for scalability pays off. It’s much easier to add devices, VLANs, or higher-bandwidth workloads when your network infrastructure already supports it than to replace hardware later.  What is your budget like?
    • I hate the term, "future-proof." We saw it back in the 90's / 2000's, if not before. You cannot future-proof anything, since there is no definition of how far into the future you plan on prepping for. Best idea is to tell us what you currently have and what its use is at the moment, and we can then offer ideas about some areas that might need an upgrade and other areas that can be left alone.
    • I can agree that it is being used in a small capacity. I worked for a company where their engineers still used XP, and when asked why it was because their sensor software wasn't compatible with newer operating systems and the software was discontinued so they couldn't upgrade the software. Given that the sensors were still in use by companies, they had to continue using XP to support the sensor, otherwise the price to the company would have gone into the millions or billions. Our response was simple: Ok, you can keep the XP machine. But we're removing it from the network. "But then it can't access the Internet or folder shares!" Yup, kinda the point. If someone wants to continue using an unsecure OS they can do, I have no problem with that. But it should be isolated. Simple. I had a fight with a guy in the engineering department for weeks before he finally relented. But we digress.   What do I plan on doing to commemorate the anniversary? Nothing. I have fond memories of the OS, but at the end of the day it's just an OS. If I had some time I might see if I could install it on my Raspberry Pi for a laugh. But my reflex memory with today's OS ideas would probably get me frustrated and I'd uninstall it after 5 mins.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      539
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      269
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      154
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      99
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!