Build 22621 "Standard hardware security not supported" In Device Security


Recommended Posts

Yesterday I noticed that Core Isolation and and core security information are missing from Device security.

 

Updated 5 PCs, all 5 PCs are fully windows 11 compatible with TPM2.0, Secure boot and everything... and all 5 that I upgraded so far, have the same exact issue.

Windows Security says I don't have standard hardware security, while MS info shows that its running.

 

I found similar issues in feedback hub, but those complaints where from 22200 (21H2) build from long time ago, there are few people complaining about the new 22621 too.

 

 

image.png.fd69916ed5d0c4623913bad1de539445.png

 

 

TPM info

image.png.6b99a7d54b55023fbba19caf65f2ddf8.png

 

 

MSinfo shows the security tools are running 

image.thumb.png.4f5d48172003e23287211715b98d697c.png

  On 27/05/2022 at 14:01, adrynalyne said:

Core Isolation is dependent on hardware VT, not TPM. Check the bios settings. 

Expand  

 

Hardware virtualization is running...

 

image.thumb.png.c536ab6381ab40658ee7e2d9abf1d414.png

 

and hardware virtualization on or not.. the device security tab in windows security should show security processor aka the TPM.

Windows 11 21H2 for comparison...

image.png.72e575cc3a10a68892f438cccb555edb.png

 

in Windows 11 22H2, it shows neither.

  On 27/05/2022 at 14:07, nekrosoft13 said:

 

Hardware virtualization is running...

 

image.thumb.png.c536ab6381ab40658ee7e2d9abf1d414.png

 

and hardware virtualization on or not.. the device security tab in windows security should show security processor aka the TPM.

Windows 11 21H2 for comparison...

image.png.72e575cc3a10a68892f438cccb555edb.png

 

in Windows 11 22H2, it shows neither.

Expand  

Do you have Hypervisor Platform installed? I’m going off memory; I’m not at my computer yet.  

So... what you're trying to get back, is what I have pictured?

 

Possible that you, like the others ran into an interesting bug as it were.. where every app you use to check shows you're running all the necessary requirements and Windows just isn't cooperating with it. Wouldn't be the first time. 

 

Funny enough.. when I recently upgraded my video card, or any time I upgrade hardware... I run Hardware-Info or HWInfo64 to double check specs and features. It showed me, that somehow.. AMD-V and Secure Boot was in the "red", in other words.. they are there but not enabled. Apparently got turned off when I updated the BIOS... and Windows never even blinked. Nothing reminded me that the security features for 11 were turned off. Made zero sense.

 

So... I go by third party apps to double check system protection items as well as making sure, like you did.. to double check with other machines that run similar hardware.

 

 

Untitled.jpg

all u have to do is have 1 unsuported feature and it will say that

 

Standard hardware security not supported

This means that your device does not meet at least one of the requirements of standard hardware security.

 

my pc is also windows 11 compat and that also says the same thing

  On 27/05/2022 at 15:11, DKAngel said:

all u have to do is have 1 unsuported feature and it will say that

 

Standard hardware security not supported

This means that your device does not meet at least one of the requirements of standard hardware security.

 

my pc is also windows 11 compat and that also says the same thing

Expand  

 

it was fine in 21H2. all 5 PCs that I upgraded where fine in 21H2.

 

Now all 5 in 22H2 are not.

 

 

according to Microsoft https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/device-protection-in-windows-security-afa11526-de57-b1c5-599f-3a4c6a61c5e2#hardwarescore

 

Your device meets the requirements for standard hardware security

This means your device supports memory integrity and core isolation and also has:

TPM 2.0 (also referred to as your security processor)        CHECK

Secure boot enabled                                                                CHECK

DEP                                                                                              CHECK

UEFI MAT                                                                                     CHECK

 

I rolled back to 22000, and everything is restored, same PC, not only do I meet the standard hardware security, I meet the enhanced hardware security

 

image.thumb.png.4d49b7619262c4e58528169fb58b9812.png

 

There is definitely  a bug in 22621 (final) 22H2 build.

 

 

  On 27/05/2022 at 16:15, slaughterhus said:

there is a bug report about this on feedback hub

Expand  

I saw it... but that bug report was from 10+ months ago for 22000 build in early days...

Microsoft responded that it should be fixed in 22000.100, I guess they broke the same thing again.

 

Now few people added comments that same is happening on 22621

  • Like 2

Sounds like a bug related to something in your hardware set up.. seeing as others, like myself, aren't having that issue with 22621.

 

Fire up that report, add it to the MS list... let's see if they fix it here soon enough. I mean, we still have what, five months before it's released to the public?

  • 2 weeks later...
  On 08/06/2022 at 02:09, ahmedshujah123 said:

Same problem bro. Will it get fixed or should I rollback too and can I roll back without any data loss? Thank you for bringing this up couldn't find anything about it anywhere.

Expand  

If you roll back, you won't loose any files but any programs that you installed or upgraded since the install of 22621 will probably be gone.

  On 10/06/2022 at 12:53, itomirai said:

It seemed that there are two problems with Windows Security on 22621 for anyone "upgrading", device security not supported and the mising of App and Browser Control section, hope this will be fixed soon tbh

Expand  

just the windows security section of settings got screwed up, according to msinfo all the security options were still running, you just lost info and control of it.

Hello, I am new here, I have come to this post looking for information about this problem, my laptop meets all the requirements, including enhanced security, and I also have this problem after installing 22h2, I have already sent a report to Microsoft, I It happens exactly the same as nekrosoft13, greetings from Spain.

Captura de pantalla 2022-06-12 000234.png

  On 10/06/2022 at 15:21, nekrosoft13 said:

If you roll back, you won't loose any files but any programs that you installed or upgraded since the install of 22621 will probably be gone.

just the windows security section of settings got screwed up, according to msinfo all the security options were still running, you just lost info and control of it

Expand  

Thank you so much bro. I'll just let it run they'll probably fix it when the stable version drops.

  On 11/06/2022 at 22:05, RHP said:

Hello, I am new here, I have come to this post looking for information about this problem, my laptop meets all the requirements, including enhanced security, and I also have this problem after installing 22h2, I have already sent a report to Microsoft, I It happens exactly the same as nekrosoft13, greetings from Spain.

Captura de pantalla 2022-06-12 000234.png

Expand  

We have posted the news so Microsoft should be aware of the issue by now. I believe they will re-fix the issue soon. 🙂

so it seems no update for 22621 today?

 

nvm, they did release one https://msbuilds.rg-adguard.net/GetInfo?id=1203f71f-b8a9-4bf2-a4ee-390f5cb8b207

 

Any idea if this fixes this misreporting?

Edited by nekrosoft13
  On 15/06/2022 at 00:04, itomirai said:

I'm on 22621.160 (Beta) and the problem is still there for sure. There is also 22621.105 for Release Preview so it would be nice if someone check that version.

unknown.png

Expand  

I'm on the release preview. The problem persists for now. It's not fixed yet anywhere that means bummer.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • >Interestingly, the rings came off without any physical damage to the device. With a HUGE amount of effort. The video OP makes it clear he doesn't think they'd ever come off in normal use.
    • Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 may not come with Galaxy S25 Ultra's camera rings by Sagar Naresh Bhavsar When Samsung launched the Galaxy S25 Ultra earlier this year, it remained in the news for its top-of-the-line premium features, but also for a couple of drawbacks. Firstly, it made headlines because Samsung removed the Bluetooth functionality from the S-Pen on the Galaxy S25 Ultra, removing one of the key features: taking remote pictures and videos. But then a jarring issue came to light. The Galaxy S25 Ultra drew attention for its camera rings falling off. Yes, the $1,300 phone featured thick camera rings that were simply glued on top of the cameras. Interestingly, the rings came off without any physical damage to the device. Now, some interesting details about the camera rings on the upcoming Galaxy Z Fold7 have popped up. According to reliable leaker IceUniverse, Samsung was quite keen on keeping the Galaxy S25 Ultra-like camera rings on the upcoming premium Galaxy Z Fold7. However, after facing a strong backlash, the company has supposedly decided to scrap them. In fact, the leaker added that the cheap-looking Saturn rings design was urgently removed from the Galaxy Z Fold7, and instead, the company is bringing back the cleaner look of the Galaxy Z Fold5. Recently, multiple images of the Galaxy Z Fold7 were leaked, which seemingly suggest the same. The foldable is expected to come in three colors: blue, silver, and black. This year's Galaxy Z Fold7 is expected to be much thinner and lighter as compared to last year's foldable. We are just a few days away from the official unveiling. The pre-reserve window is already open, and if you are interested, you can get $50 credit and up to $1,150 additional savings.
    • Loved my LG G6, the build quality was up there with the most expensive flagships. The fingerprint reader on the back made it very comfortable to use.
    • games should be $250 each, they should only be for rich people....... keep stuff from the poor and middle class!!!!!!!!
    • Completely agree, I loved the placement of the power button on the back. I didn’t accidentally press it like I do with them on the side. Many years of enjoyment with that phone.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      Gromvar earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Dedicated
      BreakingBenjamin earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Hartej earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      TsunadeMama earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      shaheen earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      544
    2. 2
      +FloatingFatMan
      181
    3. 3
      ATLien_0
      164
    4. 4
      Skyfrog
      108
    5. 5
      Som
      103
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!