Which 5 movies do you wish they'd never made sequels for?


Recommended Posts

On 14/09/2022 at 19:25, Nick H. said:

Heresy! 😅

 

That's got to be one of the better sequels for a film. surely?

I did sequels to sequels. So, Terminator 3 would be the odd one out.

 

Terminator 2 might be one of the best films ever made, imo.

  • Like 2
On 14/09/2022 at 14:04, Brandon H said:

I agree with you on most of these except for Predator. The new Pray really redeemed the series for me.

 

forgot Independence Day and Robocop even had sequels lol

 

On 14/09/2022 at 20:06, adrynalyne said:

Prey was amazing.

 

I haven't watched it because I was skeptical of the plot as I understand it. How in the world did a native American woman from 300 years ago last longer than 30 seconds against a Predator?

Edited by Good Bot, Bad Bot
On 15/09/2022 at 15:07, timster said:

I did sequels to sequels. So, Terminator 3 would be the odd one out.

 

Terminator 2 might be one of the best films ever made, imo.

Oh, right! Yeah, that was pretty bad. I mean, the whole series is in decline after 2. I think Kristanna Loken was the only thing that kept me watching - I was probably only 14/15 when it came out though, so cut me some slack. :laugh:

 

On 15/09/2022 at 15:16, Good Bot, Bad Bot said:

I haven't watched it because I was skeptical of the plot as I understand it. How in the world did a native American woman from 300 years ago last longer than 30 seconds against a Predator?

In fairness, Arnie ended up going old school in order to take the Predator down in the first film...

On 15/09/2022 at 10:41, Nick H. said:

Oh, right! Yeah, that was pretty bad. I mean, the whole series is in decline after 2. I think Kristanna Loken was the only thing that kept me watching - I was probably only 14/15 when it came out though, so cut me some slack. :laugh:

 

In fairness, Arnie ended up going old school in order to take the Predator down in the first film...

True but he was at least built like a tank and was able to take some damage.

On 15/09/2022 at 17:02, Good Bot, Bad Bot said:

True but he was at least built like a tank and was able to take some damage.

Hmm, good point. I need to watch Prey again and take another look. I can't say that it was particularly memorable for me - it was like a coming-of-age story, but rather than growing up it was about proving that women can do what men can. Unlike Predators, which I thought was a decent action sequel because of the mashup of killers thrown into the Predators' game.

On 15/09/2022 at 14:16, Good Bot, Bad Bot said:

I haven't watched it because I was skeptical of the plot as I understand it. How in the world did a native American woman from 300 years ago last longer than 30 seconds against a Predator?

She doesn't.  In the first movie we had a squad of special forces soldiers, heavily armed, and only ONE survived through sheer luck more than anything.  My suspension of disbelief doesn't go far enough to let me think a primitive human woman with stone weapons could even scratch a race as advanced and physically imposing as the Predators.  Not even the tribes fiercest of warriors would have lasted more than a minute or two against it.

 

I've tried to watch it twice now, and so far haven't gotten more than 30 minutes in before I just can't take the dumb any more and shut it off...

 

 

On 15/09/2022 at 09:29, FloatingFatMan said:

She doesn't.  In the first movie we had a squad of special forces soldiers, heavily armed, and only ONE survived through sheer luck more than anything.  My suspension of disbelief doesn't go far enough to let me think a primitive human woman with stone weapons could even scratch a race as advanced and physically imposing as the Predators.  Not even the tribes fiercest of warriors would have lasted more than a minute or two against it.

 

I've tried to watch it twice now, and so far haven't gotten more than 30 minutes in before I just can't take the dumb any more and shut it off...

 

 

Keep in mind the predator is also less sophisticated. 

On 15/09/2022 at 21:21, adrynalyne said:

Keep in mind the predator is also less sophisticated. 

Approx 100 years for a race that has interstellar travel REALLY isn't going to make a great deal of difference to primitive humans that still use stone tools or at best, muskets...

 

Ant meet boot.

 

Anyway, I'm perfectly happy some folks enjoy it.  There's just some things I find too... silly to enjoy.

On 15/09/2022 at 23:19, FloatingFatMan said:

Approx 100 years for a race that has interstellar travel REALLY isn't going to make a great deal of difference to primitive humans that still use stone tools or at best, muskets...

 

Ant meet boot.

 

Anyway, I'm perfectly happy some folks enjoy it.  There's just some things I find too... silly to enjoy.

Dunno, that bear drew quite a bit of blood on that boot. 

On 14/09/2022 at 12:12, Nick H. said:

I think Jurassic Park is the one for me that hasn't been mentioned. The Lost World was unnecessary, or maybe it was just poorly done.

 

Other than that, I agree that Independence Day didn't need the sequel, nor did Jaws or Men in Black - although I will concede that MiB3 was good fun.

 

Part of me wants to say that Blade Runner didn't need a sequel, but I think that what they did ended up being pretty decent. The only issue is that it removed the ambiguity from the original.

I'D argue ID itself did not need to exist period.

On 15/09/2022 at 10:41, Nick H. said:

Oh, right! Yeah, that was pretty bad. I mean, the whole series is in decline after 2. I think Kristanna Loken was the only thing that kept me watching - I was probably only 14/15 when it came out though, so cut me some slack. :laugh:

 

In fairness, Arnie ended up going old school in order to take the Predator down in the first film...

Arnold took the predator down because he "outsmarted" him ... or more realistically he was smarter than the Predator thought he was and the Predator being a superior race was overconfident in his ability to win. Overconfidence leads to mistakes. Arnold would have got his ass kicked and died had the Predator really wanted to.

 

People often talk lately about how realistic the first movie was because there was a bunch of muscular men in it. But in reality it doesn't make a difference. The Predator is of a superior race, far more advanced and intelligent and also physically superior. Your only chance is a bit of luck and being smart and hope the Predator will do some mistakes. The new movie doesn't "suck" because it's a small primitive woman it sucks because it's stupid like 90% of movies those days. The worst is it's still far better than the previous movie in the series lol

  • Like 1

Yesterday I heard that Disney are doing a re-make of The Neverending Story. Why they do these things is beyond me. Some stuff just needs leaving the hell alone!

On 21/09/2022 at 02:07, spikey_richie said:

Yesterday I heard that Disney are doing a re-make of The Neverending Story. Why they do these things is beyond me. Some stuff just needs leaving the hell alone!

Because it's a neverending story

The Matrix - Should have left those alone after the 3rd.

Superman (original 1978) - They should have left that one alone after Superman II.

Halloween (original). After Halloween II, they should have left it alone.

Rambo - After 2009's Rambo, where he finally comes home. That should have been the end of it. Perfect ending, ruined by Rambo: Last Blood.

The Fast & The Furious. Sequels getting pretty stupid.

 

 

Star Trek: Nemesis should never have been made, as it was just a crap film overall. Director Stuart Baird obviously had no clue what the ST franchise was about, nor who/what the TNG franchise main characters were, for that matter. Along with the "help" of writer John Logan, the franchise was killed for a time. Then, it was resurrected some years later in another new-ish format, only to be destroyed once again by another filmmaker who didn't "get it" after two films, namely JJ Abrams. 

  • Like 1
On 22/09/2022 at 22:14, nerim said:

Star Trek: Nemesis should never have been made, as it was just a crap film overall. Director Stuart Baird obviously had no clue what the ST franchise was about, nor who/what the TNG franchise main characters were, for that matter. Along with the "help" of writer John Logan, the franchise was killed for a time. Then, it was resurrected some years later in another new-ish format, only to be destroyed once again by another filmmaker who didn't "get it" after two films, namely JJ Abrams. 

So, you want to wipe your brain of Star Trek: Nemesis so you can watch, that which you hate, for the first time again?

On 23/09/2022 at 06:44, nerim said:

Star Trek: Nemesis should never have been made, as it was just a crap film overall. Director Stuart Baird obviously had no clue what the ST franchise was about, nor who/what the TNG franchise main characters were, for that matter. Along with the "help" of writer John Logan, the franchise was killed for a time. Then, it was resurrected some years later in another new-ish format, only to be destroyed once again by another filmmaker who didn't "get it" after two films, namely JJ Abrams. 

This reminds me that I must have added another item to my list: Pirates of the Caribbeans 4 & 5. Like Stuart Baird, director Joachim Rønning had absolutely no idea what Jack Sparrow was all about, mistakenly thinking that in the first film, Jack Sparrow was not the lead. Apparently, nobody told him that in the first film, which Joachim Rønning says was his favorite, Jack shot and killed the primary antagonist.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I imagine that was a review or something? My reviews mostly contain a lot of images and galleries, but these are all webp too, but yeah it all adds up on the page load. Would help if you were more helpful with your critique instead of bitching and moaning like a Karen 😂 Because then we might be able to fix it for you.
    • If Valve refused to let them make the case, I wonder if they've already partnered with someone else to do it? The fact that they didn't seek permission/licence before diving straight in is incredible though
    • OpenClaw now has native mobile apps on iOS and Android by Karthik Mudaliar OpenClaw, the viral open-source personal AI agent, now has its own mobile app, available on both Android and iOS. Users can pair the app with an existing OpenClaw gateway and can start using new mobile-native features that are now available on the app. The app supports all the existing features you'd already have seen on OpenClaw's TUI, as well as some more, such as real-time and background Talk mode, action approvals, sharing from iOS, and optional access to device capabilities such as camera, screen, location, photos, contacts, calendar, and reminders. These features are available on both the Android and iOS versions of the app. What's important with these apps is that they don't run OpenClaw on your phone, but are actually just companion apps that require a running OpenClaw Gateway on an existing device, on macOS, Linux, or Windows via WSL2. To pair the app with your existing OpenClaw gateway, users need to run the command "/pair qr" on the TUI or existing chat interface, which brings up a QR code. Users can then scan this QR code to pair it up with the mobile app. There's also an option to manually pair the app by entering the host and a port. Previously, OpenClaw had been available on phones via WhatsApp, Telegram, Slack, Discord, Microsoft Teams, Matrix, and others. Now, with a native mobile app, the interface is much cleaner and more focused on just the OpenClaw, of course, with the added support for camera, screen, location, and more. It's important to note that OpenClaw comes with its own security warnings. There's always a chance of prompt injection with these tools, so users are recommended to double-check authentication, tool policy, sandboxing, and execution approvals rather than prompts alone. For users well-versed with the AI harness, a native mobile app makes it easier to approve an automation, share a link, use voice, or let an agent react to phone-side context.
    • Google pitches Spanner as one database for all AI agents with these new featues by Karthik Mudaliar Google Cloud is introducing new features within Spanner, its distributed database, as a place where enterprises should keep their data, using which AI agents could make smarter and better decisions. In a detailed blog post, Google highlighted quite a few features coming to Spanner, including relational data, graph relationships, vector search, key-value access, full-text search, and operational analytics together in one database architecture. Google says that today's systems aren't well-made for AI agents. There could be data that is present in one system, search indexes in another, embeddings in a vector database, and relationship data in a graph database. This fragmentation isn't great for AI agents to do their jobs because they don't have access to all of this data in one place. This is where Google is positioning Spanner as a solution. Spanner is already a globally distributed relational database with strong consistency, and Google wants its customers to see it as a broader data layer for AI applications. The company introduced something called Spanner Graph, along with integrated vector search, full-text search, a Cassandra-compatible key-value endpoint, and a columnar engine for analytical queries on operational data. Google also added that its ScaNN-powered vector search can support indexes with more than 10 billion vectors, while the columnar engine can make some analytical scans up to 200 times faster. All of this isn't just exclusive to the Google Cloud Platform, and there's support for multi-cloud as well. This comes via Spanner Omni, which Google says is a downloadable, containerized version of Spanner that can run on Kubernetes and in environments outside Google Cloud, including Microsoft Azure and AWS, and even on-premises infrastructure as well as edge deployments. Google says that customers who are interested in the full-featured edition should contact the company, and there's no word on commercial availability or separate pricing. Those interested can read the full blog by Google Cloud, which details these features individually.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      Juan Dela earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Collagen Project earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      Wakeen1966 earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Rookie
      Almohandis went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      515
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      273
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      143
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      99
    5. 5
      macoman
      54
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!